Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:11 AM Sahana Prasad wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to > avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0. > We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs. > Hi all, FTBFS bugs have been reported for all those

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hi everyone, Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0. We will try a rebuild of previously shared failed packages on 15th, and report FTBFS bugs. Thank you, Regards, Sahana Prasad On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 4:31 PM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > >

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:26 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:00 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 29. 09. 21 9:11, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to > > > avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0. >

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:00 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 29. 09. 21 9:11, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to > > avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0. > > We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs. > >

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 29. 09. 21 9:11, Sahana Prasad wrote: Hi everyone, Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0. We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs. I also see that we have openssl1.1 in the default build root, likely to (at

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hi everyone, Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0. We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs. Thank you, Regards, Sahana Prasad On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:45 AM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 09. 21 11:07, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide > now. > > You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. > > > > The following packages

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 17. 09. 21 11:07, Sahana Prasad wrote: Hello all, The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide now. You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them. I have switched the following

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 12:26 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > Hello Sahana and Jakub, > > openssl-pkcs11 module failed during rebuild. It has no separate bug yet, > but missing pkcs11 engine for OpenSSL 3.0 bind build makes freeipa server > fail to even start. > > Filled bug #2005832 [1]. CentOS Stream

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hello Sahana and Jakub, openssl-pkcs11 module failed during rebuild. It has no separate bug yet, but missing pkcs11 engine for OpenSSL 3.0 bind build makes freeipa server fail to even start. Filled bug #2005832 [1]. CentOS Stream 9 build of openssl-pkcs11 were successful, I think there are

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 20.09.21 11:40, Florian Weimer wrote: * Sandro Mani: Anyone encountered this one? Google just gives a single hit for ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED, which is a rhbz bug [1]. This is kinda fatal for nodejs/webpack development :S MD4 has been deprecated since about 1995. It should be possible to

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

* Sandro Mani: > Anyone encountered this one? Google just gives a single hit for > ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED, which is a rhbz bug [1]. This is kinda fatal for > nodejs/webpack development :S MD4 has been deprecated since about 1995. It should be possible to re-activate these old algorithms:

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 08.09.21 09:59, Sahana Prasad wrote: Hi all, An update that I will directly bring in the OpenSSL 3.0.0 final RC (released upstream yesterday) into rawhide in the next few days. (Compared to beta2, this version has one moderate CVE-2021-3712 fix in addition to other fixes.) Looks like

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide > now. > > You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. > > > > The

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > Hello all, > > The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide now. > You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. > > The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them. > I haven't

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On pe, 17 syys 2021, Sahana Prasad wrote: Hello all, The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide now. You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them. I haven't reported FTBFS bugs

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hello all, The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide now. You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them. I haven't reported FTBFS bugs right away. As I know many packages have the

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:20:06AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:13:08AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:13:08AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > > > > > Hi Sahana, > > > > > > it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Sahana Prasad wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > > > Hi Sahana, > > > > it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to > > watch the progress. Or any other link to some tracker. bind package has a > >

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:26 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 9:40 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > Thanks, that did the trick. > > But of course somebody built stuff during the side-tag window and now > > it can't be pushed. *le big sigh* > > This seems to happen every time

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 9:40 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Thanks, that did the trick. > But of course somebody built stuff during the side-tag window and now > it can't be pushed. *le big sigh* This seems to happen every time there is a large(ish) side-tag. I do wish that (probably using a

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 11:06 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:28:44PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > However, it looks like one build (collectd-5.12.0-9.fc36) is stuck > > without getting signed: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1831700 > > > >

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:28:44PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > However, it looks like one build (collectd-5.12.0-9.fc36) is stuck > without getting signed: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1831700 > > Maybe somebody needs to poke koji / robosignatory / sigul /

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 7:56 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 7:54 PM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > >> > >> Hi Sahana, > >> > >> it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to > >> watch

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 11:54 AM Sahana Prasad wrote: > I will send a list of the failed packages shortly. I have been in contact with pl's upstream about its build failure: https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/packages-ssl/issues/160 I have a workaround ready to go as soon as the merge into Rawhide

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 7:54 PM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote: >> >> Hi Sahana, >> >> it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to watch >> the progress. Or any other link to some tracker. bind package has a new >>

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > Hi Sahana, > > it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to > watch the progress. Or any other link to some tracker. bind package has a > new release, I am preparing update for it, but I am not sure where should I >

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 9/15/21 1:54 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 15. 09. 21 13:00, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Dne 15. 09. 21 v 12:57 Petr Menšík napsal(a): >>> >>> Hi Sahana, >>> >>> it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use >>> to watch the progress. >>> >> >> The commit message should contain

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 5:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 14. 09. 21 22:52, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:57 PM Sahana Prasad > > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > The builds of packages that depend on OpenSSL are being rebuilt in

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 15. 09. 21 13:00, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 15. 09. 21 v 12:57 Petr Menšík napsal(a): Hi Sahana, it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to watch the progress. The commit message should contain reference to the change proposal IMO I've never referenced the

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Dne 15. 09. 21 v 12:57 Petr Menšík napsal(a): Hi Sahana, it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to watch the progress. The commit message should contain reference to the change proposal IMO Vít Or any other link to some tracker. bind package has a new

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hi Sahana, it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to watch the progress. Or any other link to some tracker. bind package has a new release, I am preparing update for it, but I am not sure where should I watch for a progress. Even build of openssl itself does not

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 14. 09. 21 22:52, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:57 PM Sahana Prasad > wrote: Hi all, The builds of packages that depend on OpenSSL are being rebuilt in the side tag f36-build-side-44794 [1] now. Note to package maintainers: 

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:57 PM Sahana Prasad wrote: > Hi all, > > The builds of packages that depend on OpenSSL are being rebuilt in the > side tag f36-build-side-44794 [1] now. > > Note to package maintainers: If you see a "Rebuilt with OpenSSL 3.0.0" > commit in your package, do not build

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hi all, The builds of packages that depend on OpenSSL are being rebuilt in the side tag f36-build-side-44794 [1] now. Note to package maintainers: If you see a "Rebuilt with OpenSSL 3.0.0" commit in your package, do not build it in regular rawhide unless the side tag is merged [1]

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:35 PM Omair Majid wrote: > Hi, > > Sahana Prasad writes: > > > An update that I will directly bring in the OpenSSL 3.0.0 final RC > > (released upstream yesterday) > > Thanks for doing this! > > I read the upstream announcement and it certainly reads like it's the >

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hi, Sahana Prasad writes: > An update that I will directly bring in the OpenSSL 3.0.0 final RC > (released upstream yesterday) Thanks for doing this! I read the upstream announcement and it certainly reads like it's the final/GA release, not an RC:

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hi all, An update that I will directly bring in the OpenSSL 3.0.0 final RC (released upstream yesterday) into rawhide in the next few days. (Compared to beta2, this version has one moderate CVE-2021-3712 fix in addition to other fixes.) Thank you, Regards, Sahana Prasad On Tue, Aug 31, 2021

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 08. 21 11:17, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > dnf builds well after building all OpenSSL dependent packages (in > batches) > > with the compat package and OpenSSL 3.0.0 beta2 version. > > You can have a look at [1] with

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 31. 08. 21 11:17, Sahana Prasad wrote: Hi everyone, dnf builds well after building all OpenSSL dependent packages (in batches) with the compat package and OpenSSL 3.0.0 beta2 version. You can have a look at [1] with the side-tag f36-build-side-44794 Hello Sahana, I am afraid the side tag

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hi everyone, dnf builds well after building all OpenSSL dependent packages (in batches) with the compat package and OpenSSL 3.0.0 beta2 version. You can have a look at [1] with the side-tag f36-build-side-44794 I think we are in a good state to merge OpenSSL 3.0.0 and compat packages into

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:11 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:55 PM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > No major progress on this task yet. > > I found out that the compat package needs some more fixing. > > I have more time in the coming days, so I should > >

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:55 PM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > No major progress on this task yet. > I found out that the compat package needs some more fixing. > I have more time in the coming days, so I should > have an update soon hopefully. Let us know if you need help with

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hi everyone, No major progress on this task yet. I found out that the compat package needs some more fixing. I have more time in the coming days, so I should have an update soon hopefully. Thank you, Regards, Sahana Prasad On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:57 PM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 11:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 08. 21 11:03, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > As per the F36 schedule [1], rawhide starts F36 development on > 2021-08-10. > > I would like to bring in OpenSSL 3.0.0 [2] and the compat package [3] > (along > > with

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 11:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 08. 21 11:03, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > As per the F36 schedule [1], rawhide starts F36 development on > 2021-08-10. > > I would like to bring in OpenSSL 3.0.0 [2] and the compat package [3] > (along > > with

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 05. 08. 21 11:03, Sahana Prasad wrote: Hello everyone, As per the F36 schedule [1], rawhide starts F36 development on 2021-08-10. I would like to bring in OpenSSL 3.0.0 [2] and the compat package [3] (along with devel subpackage) into rawhide. I would like your opinion/suggestion on: 1.

[Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hello everyone, As per the F36 schedule [1], rawhide starts F36 development on 2021-08-10. I would like to bring in OpenSSL 3.0.0 [2] and the compat package [3] (along with devel subpackage) into rawhide. I would like your opinion/suggestion on: 1. Merging it and building it directly in rawhide.