在 2021-09-09星期四的 02:49 +，Bojan Smojver via devel写道：
> Just being devil's advocate for a second here...
>
> Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the
> builds that slow?
It should not be that slow, if you look at build.log you can see
```
... timed out waiting for
On Friday, 10 September 2021 at 15:32, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 09. 09. 21 v 18:54 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
> > Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines?
>
> I would love to see a benchmark how much it speed up big packages and how it
> slow downs smaller packages.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 2:11 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Small correction. Miroslav didn't say COPR uses ccache. He said COPR
> uses ramdisk for mock.
Oh, whoops. Got it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 14:05, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:33 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > We use this in Copr. AFAIK Koji does not use it. You can join Fedora infra
> > to change it :)
>
> Is there more documentation about how Copr uses ccache? I was grepping
> around
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:33 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> We use this in Copr. AFAIK Koji does not use it. You can join Fedora infra to
> change it :)
Is there more documentation about how Copr uses ccache? I was grepping
around https://pagure.io/copr/copr for "ccache" and I see the
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 09:33, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 09. 09. 21 v 18:54 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
> > Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines?
>
> I would love to see a benchmark how much it speed up big packages and how it
> slow downs smaller packages. Whole
gt;
> > :-)
>
> This is also a security problem: consider a 0day exploit found in the
> wild.
>
> Should the FF builds be given more resources? Does Mozilla provide a
> signed Flatpak that could be used instead?
If you absolutely required a security fix, you could get
Dne 09. 09. 21 v 18:54 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines?
I would love to see a benchmark how much it speed up big packages and how it slow downs smaller packages. Whole rpmbuild
part.
FYI
Mock has CCache plugin, which speeds the
On 9/9/21 14:22, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:06 PM PGNet Dev wrote:
On 9/9/21 13:53, Florian Weimer wrote:
Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines?
I frequently deploy FF from upstream builds, with updates managed from within
the app.
Q: Is there any
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:23 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 07:53:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Neal Gompa:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> > > wrote:
> > >> Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines?
> > >>
> > >
> >
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:06 PM PGNet Dev wrote:
>
> On 9/9/21 13:53, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>> Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines?
>
> I frequently deploy FF from upstream builds, with updates managed from within
> the app.
>
> Q: Is there any historical _measure_ of
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 07:53:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> > wrote:
> >> Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines?
> >>
> >
> > We'd need icecream[1] support enabled in Koji. I am not even sure
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 1:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> We'd need icecream[1] support enabled in Koji. I am not even sure Mock
> (the build engine) supports icecream right now.
This is on my list of things to investigate one day. Ceph has the same
problem - builder machines with 16GB RAM can barely
On 9/9/21 13:53, Florian Weimer wrote:
Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines?
I frequently deploy FF from upstream builds, with updates managed from within
the app.
Q: Is there any historical _measure_ of security issues fixed in @Fedora FF
pkgs, before upstream gets
* Neal Gompa:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>> Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines?
>>
>
> We'd need icecream[1] support enabled in Koji. I am not even sure Mock
> (the build engine) supports icecream right now.
I think for Firefox,
On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 13:01, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
> > Also, could the Fedora project itself perform at least
> > basic QA for critical security patches?
> >
>
> Who do you think is the "Fedora Project"? It's us in the community!
>
>
t; Just being devil's advocate for a second here...
> >>>
> >>> Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the builds
> >>> that slow?
> >>>
> >>> :-)
> >>
> >> This is also a security problem: consider a 0day exploi
oji? Has it gotten that big or are the builds that
>>> slow?
>>>
>>> :-)
>>
>> This is also a security problem: consider a 0day exploit found in the wild.
>>
>> Should the FF builds be given more resources? Does Mozilla provide a signed
>> Flatpak
> >
> > :-)
>
> This is also a security problem: consider a 0day exploit found in the wild.
>
> Should the FF builds be given more resources? Does Mozilla provide a signed
> Flatpak that could be used instead?
>
Security is not worth anything if the application doesn't wo
On 9/8/21 10:49 PM, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> Just being devil's advocate for a second here...
>
> Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the builds that
> slow?
>
> :-)
This is also a security problem: consider a 0day exploit found in the wi
Just being devil's advocate for a second here...
Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the builds that
slow?
:-)
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
21 matches
Mail list logo
