The update frequency is twice a year, the method is fully documented:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
Simply refresh, download, reboot and wait a little while ...
It's hardly a burden, I've got at least 5 machines that have been
upgraded this way since Fedora 13.
Op wo 14
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:26:09PM +0100, Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote:
> Je mer, 2018-11-14 je 12:28 +0100, Miroslav Suchý skribis:
> > This is the core issue. We only have a limited manpower. You have three
> > things to choose from: free of charge
> > distribution, long support, fresh versions
Je mer, 2018-11-14 je 12:28 +0100, Miroslav Suchý skribis:
> This is the core issue. We only have a limited manpower. You have three
> things to choose from: free of charge
> distribution, long support, fresh versions of SW in distribution - but we can
> only choose two of them.
>
> [...]
>
>
Dne 14. 11. 18 v 2:23 steve schooler napsal(a):
> I recognize that since Fedora is FREE, the developers face an enormous
> burden. However, I suspect that many will feel as I do that it is an onerous
> user-burden to have to frequently upgrade/re-install. Further,
> forum-technical-support,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:14 PM steve schooler wrote:
>
>
> I am currently using Fedora 26. When I first heard of your (new) End-Of-Life
> policy, I hoped that the Fedora developer community would be so inundated
> with complaints that the policy would be reversed. Instead however, the
>
steve schooler wrote:
> I am currently using Fedora 26. When I first heard of your (new)
> End-Of-Life policy,
That policy is not new. It has been like that for years, and before that the
lifetime was even shorter.
> If you agree but need to first alleviate current burdens, then I suggest
>
This email is a hail mary pass.
I posted the following message to the Fedora forum:
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/129083/could-fedora-please-reverse-its-policy-re-end-of-life/
Part of the _closing_ response was for me to redirect the message to a
fedora.org mailing list
