The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
712
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
59
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
54
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
712
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
167
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
47
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 11:14 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Does it really use TLS with openpgp certificates? If yes, I doubt you
could make 2.8.5 interoperate with gnutls 3.1.20. GnuTLS was modified in
3.1.x to adhere with RFC6091 which was incompatible the previous attempt
to have
Am 04.04.2014 04:44, schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
On Apr 3, 2014 7:18 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
besides that it is the wrong list:
What's the right list?
the users list, not the developers list
grub2-install
$ grub2-install
/usr/sbin/grub2-probe: error: cannot
On 04/03/2014 04:54 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 04/02/2014 07:47 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
* Support for weak dependencies
Does this mean that rpm-build will be able to create packages with weak
dependencies?
Yes.
Will Fedora packages be allowed to declare weak
dependencies?
That's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064271
--- Comment #34 from Andreas Krebbel krebb...@de.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #29)
Thanks, Andreas, your explanation makes sense. I'm going to dig into the
perl itself first.
To my understanding the problem is that a
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 04.04.2014 04:44, schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
On Apr 3, 2014 7:18 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
besides that it is the wrong list:
What's the right list?
the users list, not the developers
Agenda:
- Discuss
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/197074.html
as task for Base
- Discuss http://tinyurl.com/fedora-pkg-reviews as task for Base
- Open Floor
Thanks regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services
On 04/04/2014 12:42 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
- Discuss
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/197074.html
as task for Base
This is just needs a feature owner and an individual to do the work and
push it through
- Discuss http://tinyurl.com/fedora-pkg-reviews as task
The lightweight tag 'perl-Exporter-Tiny-0.038-1.el7' was created pointing to:
3ebb26a... Update to 0.038
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 12:45:17PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
- Discuss http://tinyurl.com/fedora-pkg-reviews as task for Base
Why should this be a task for base, what's the relationship with base?
I had suggested prioritizing the reviews of the packages covered by base.
--
Matthew
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 07:32:38 -0700, quickbooks office wrote:
This change will not affect logging into the console using the local
account and then doing su to get root privileges.
Is there a problem with logging into the local user account and then
typing su and the root password?
Maybe if
As I promised, I prepared a benchmark of lbzip2 and bzip2.
I also added pbzip2 for comparison.
Basic information
=
Test date: 2014-04-04
Tester:Mikolaj Izdebski
Test subjects: lbzip2 2.5
bzip2 1.0.6
pbzip2 1.1.6
Test purpose: compare
On 04/02/2014 08:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
A quick check shows lbzip2 doesn't provide a library interface, much less
one compatible with libbz2. Is that ever intended?
If it's not, saying lbzip2 is the default bzip2 *implementation* may be a
bit of a stretch. Perhaps
On 04/04/2014 04:15 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Compression of payload.tar
--
command| real | user | sys | memory | compr. size
---+++--++
lbzip2 | 3.36 | 170.07 | 6.38 | 380448 | 424676188
lbzip2 -u |
On 04/04/2014 05:16 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 04/04/2014 04:15 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Compression of payload.tar
--
command| real | user | sys | memory | compr. size
---+++--++
lbzip2 | 3.36 |
A number of rpms currently ship .orig files, which are presumably from
patching the files in the spec. Would it make sense to have rpm complain
about this?
# repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatprovides '/*.orig' |
sort -u
alliance-doc-0:5.0-35.20090901snap.fc18.x86_64
On 04/04/2014 05:26 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 04/04/2014 05:16 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 04/04/2014 04:15 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Compression of payload.tar
--
command| real | user | sys | memory | compr. size
Matthias Clasen píše v Čt 03. 04. 2014 v 10:20 -0400:
Hey,
so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
already received fairly wide testing.
But we should be careful, so I want to ask for
fredagen den 4 april 2014 09.32.06 skrev Orion Poplawski:
A number of rpms currently ship .orig files, which are presumably from
patching the files in the spec. Would it make sense to have rpm complain
about this?
No, if -b is used there won't be a .orig file, unless it's named so.
--
On 04/04/2014 05:40 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
First after the upgrade I didn't even boot to GDM. Too bad I didn't
debug it because I had already been considering a clean install, so I
did it right away. My setup was not typical, I had been upgrading since
F15. But apparently I was not the only
On 04/03/2014 11:27 PM, William Brown wrote:
What is the software that is used to make images like :
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/images/IPA_arch.png
Or
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:15:59PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
lbzip2 was the fastest compressor and decompressor in all tests.
It the best command for interactive use.
lbzip2 -u always produced smallest files (even smaller than bzip2)
while consuming the least amount of resources (CPU
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:49:25 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:15:59PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
lbzip2 -u always produced smallest files (even smaller than bzip2)
while consuming the least amount of resources (CPU power and memory).
This
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--mat...@fedoraproject.org
Tepid change for the somewhat better!
--
devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 13:14:30 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
it is very useful to
On 04/04/2014 07:01 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:49:25 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:15:59PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
lbzip2 -u always produced smallest files (even smaller than bzip2)
while consuming the least amount of
Dne 4.4.2014 19:14, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
I'm definitely going through this email every day. Not just to see what
is broken but what is new as well.
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 07:39:18PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'm definitely going through this email every day. Not just to see what
is broken but what is new as well.
Okay, carry on then. Just checking!
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--mat...@fedoraproject.org
I mentioned this a while ago but just recently figured out the
process details and got the permissions I needed to complete the work.
Our hosts are getting pretty old and most of them haven't seen a
firmware update since they were installed 3-4 years ago. This hasn't
been a problem for most of
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:32:57AM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
As far as I am concerned they are very useful. In more detail I am
looking mostly at Broken deps and Summaries, with only an occasional
peek at a changelog information, but on a number of occasions these
messages were crucial
commit 12ec243a1d40126dffa5201d6e5819cb5d22b430
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Apr 4 18:41:23 2014 +0100
Update to 1.978
- New upstream release 1.978
- Added public prefix checking to verification of wildcard certificates,
e.g.
accept *.foo.com but
On 04/04/2014 07:14 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
It is definitely useful, but I wish there was some way of excluding
long-standing problems that no one cares to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2014 11:44 AM, Oden Eriksson wrote:
fredagen den 4 april 2014 09.32.06 skrev Orion Poplawski:
A number of rpms currently ship .orig files, which are presumably
from patching the files in the spec. Would it make sense to have
rpm
On Friday, April 4, 2014, 1:42:49 PM, Matthew Milleru wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:32:57AM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
As far as I am concerned they are very useful. In more detail I am
looking mostly at Broken deps and Summaries, with only an occasional
peek at a changelog
Hi,
There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action.
With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to
address this.
I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone
wants to take over, please let me know. Please do keep in mind
- Original Message -
From: Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, April 4, 2014 2:01:18 PM
Subject: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
Hi,
There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action.
With feature freeze approaching for
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:14:30PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
To add to what others have said, I also find this a useful message.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903608
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083964
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083418
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|unspecified |high
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064271
--- Comment #33 from Andreas Krebbel krebb...@de.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #32)
All of this could have been handled by using the compiler to generate a
.gnu.attribute entry for the new ABI when such a structure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084374
Bug ID: 1084374
Summary: perl-CPAN-Checksums-2.09 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Checksums
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084380
Bug ID: 1084380
Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-81 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PerlIO-via-Timeout:
5d11a404ef25fde310e1798c8702ce61 PerlIO-via-Timeout-0.29.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5f602f7... Initial import (#1080952). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084382
Bug ID: 1084382
Summary: perl-Text-Xslate-3.2.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Text-Xslate
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084383
Bug ID: 1084383
Summary: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0115 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-LibXML
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Summary of changes:
5f602f7... Initial import (#1080952). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084399
Bug ID: 1084399
Summary: t/comp/parser.t loads modules from system instead from
build directory
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084399
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 882662
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=882662action=edit
Proposed fix
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084399
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Exporter-Tiny:
9ab8587a1c95ad7b666fbc43ab76f16e Exporter-Tiny-0.038.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3ebb26af1767201cac81e10e87f0cf518e0bdfcb
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Apr 4 12:55:58 2014 +0100
Update to 0.038
- New upstream release 0.038
- Added: Support Exporter.pm's import negation syntax qw( !foo )
- Added: Support Exporter.pm's regexp
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-BigInt-GMP:
c7c34657e03f9b0bd5de437adb062e23 Math-BigInt-GMP-1.38.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
3ebb26a... Update to 0.038 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-autodie:
6bf7df62326e7e22e2916eb82bc12a40 autodie-2.25.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e3b33d9714ee9793bc09631edc9177813fd86900
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 4 14:43:26 2014 +0200
2.25 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-autodie.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084399
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #882662|0 |1
is obsolete|
The lightweight tag 'perl-Exporter-Tiny-0.038-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
3ebb26a... Update to 0.038
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 616346850804bb592b52843ae6aef43a3ed784db
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 4 13:52:32 2014 +0200
Fix t/comp/parser.t not to load system modules
The fact that perl tests (t/base/*.t, t/comp/*.t, t/run/*.t) are run
without -I is intentional. One has to fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083960
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Checksums:
6e6bc499e4350c10d6513f2d40040180 CPAN-Checksums-2.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 847e6092b6e510ae3af5be2576d97a7cf0321f41
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:10:19 2014 +0200
2.09 bump
.gitignore |1 +
CPAN-Checksums-2.08-New-signature.patch| 61
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Carp:
6b69aaecee7987c6447407d87ca5cc7a Carp-1.3301.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 19b04fce4d2dfa3e6bd10c8fde6d4139bdca4886
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:15:54 2014 +0200
1.3301 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Carp.spec | 13 ++---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083961
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-List-AllUtils:
0becef45aaf3556685ab798a132c014e List-AllUtils-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 0a7cad1f6989ec917ac9cafa46806f1b5b00abd3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:29:35 2014 +0200
0.08 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-List-AllUtils.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084374
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083967
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852503
--- Comment #7 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Ping.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BEuLiiSAL8a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851721
--- Comment #5 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Ping.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RQygsccYHza=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp:
bfddc1083f556a8af270190fd7e2867f Perl-Critic-Pulp-81.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 875bc20d7d8898aa7a3b15b7d1fbf3d18b6f9c8f
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:46:38 2014 +0200
81 version bump
.gitignore |1 +
...Critic-Pulp-80-Pass-string-to-version-new.patch | 48
Summary of changes:
875bc20... 81 version bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084399
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-LibXML:
456cde9d6733792e35bc45df566e82ad XML-LibXML-2.0115.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084380
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084383
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
commit 2250cc19e95cb92675cc661d15d9856da13fd2e7
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 4 16:15:45 2014 +0200
2.0115 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-XML-LibXML.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-GnuPG-Interface has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late)
On i386:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late)
On armhfp:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
72b0efa2b1adde5ca88a069caf7e IO-Socket-SSL-1.978.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.978-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
12ec243... Update to 1.978
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064271
--- Comment #35 from Carlos O'Donell codon...@redhat.com ---
Andreas,
I've written up Packaging Changes notes for this in upstream:
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.19#Packaging_Changes
Could you please checkin a note to the 2.19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064271
--- Comment #36 from Carlos O'Donell codon...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #34)
If all the required perl .so files come from RPMs rebuilding all of them at
once should help. What I don't know is whether perl .so
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Modern:
23e9158b6b7600d86152231e6e6f1207 Test-Modern-0.006.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f76f7f62be3399c688643e9e1de277795dc1ff7c
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sat Apr 5 00:40:15 2014 +0100
Update to 0.006
- New upstream release 0.006
- EXPERIMENTALLY provide Test::Lib-like behavior, and a related -lib
export
tag
- Support an
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Modern-0.006-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
f76f7f6... Update to 0.006
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit dda05f63cb9eadefc20bded121e864cfafca2f1a
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Sat Apr 5 04:58:13 2014 +0200
Modernize spec.
- Rebase eai.patch (Avoid *.orig being packaged).
- Fix bogus %changelog entries.
eai.patch |9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078083
Bug 1078083 depends on bug 1081281, which changed state.
Bug 1081281 Summary: CVE-2014-2525 libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when
parsing URLs [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081281
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078083
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libyaml-0.1.6-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995748
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-IO-Interactive-0.0.6-1.fc20, perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple-0.03-1.fc20,
perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet-0.31-1.fc20, perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.59-2.fc20 has
been pushed to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078083
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libyaml-0.1.6-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
On 03.04.2014 21:13, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Hello,
(I'm switching from 389-users to 389-devel list for people who could be
more interested in...)
Rich Megginson wrote:
On 04/03/2014 07:06 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Hi
It's me again :)
1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though
Hi Timo,
Timo Aaltonen wrote:
1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for release
in Sep'12
You can download the tar ball from here now.
http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2
Cool, thanks. It's a broken tarball though, you forgot '/' after the
version..
On 04.04.2014 19:42, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Hi Timo,
Timo Aaltonen wrote:
1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for release
in Sep'12
You can download the tar ball from here now.
http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2
Cool, thanks. It's a broken
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
