Re: Singular soname bump and a review swap

right now, and it is only in a somewhat hackish mode, it just builds :) > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:42 AM Paulo César Pereira de Andrade > wrote: > > If nobody takes it, I can review. > > Ankur took it already. On the other hand, he doesn't seem to have > actually start

Re: Singular soname bump and a review swap

Em seg., 7 de mar. de 2022 às 18:22, Jerry James escreveu: > > As you all know by now, I'm trying to retire as steward of the > sagemath and Macaulay2 stacks. Nevertheless, after some impassioned Many thanks for your work maintaining sagemath! > pleas from a couple of sagemath users, I have

Re: Suggestion for Fedora change proposal: -Bsymbolic-functions default in LDFLAGS

Em qua., 4 de dez. de 2019 às 10:16, Tom Hughes escreveu: > > On 04/12/2019 12:58, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > > >Idea about @subject started with ongoing customer support case that > > originated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778236 > >

Re: Suggestion for Fedora change proposal: -Bsymbolic-functions default in LDFLAGS

(at least in the customer environment). > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 2:09 PM Paulo César Pereira de Andrade > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Idea about @subject started with ongoing customer support case that > > originated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17

Suggestion for Fedora change proposal: -Bsymbolic-functions default in LDFLAGS

Hi, Idea about @subject started with ongoing customer support case that originated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778236 [Problems linking to zlib corrected if zlib is linked with -Bsymbolic-functions] when doing some research, it appears Ubuntu has it by default for some time.

Re: Could not execute import_srpm

Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 10:09, Antonio Trande escreveu: > > Hi all. Hi, Just a guess that it was the same issue as for me a few days ago. But it might be something else, like an offline server for some reason. I did not do much work on Fedora for some time, then, when uploading a new

Re: What to do about sagemath

%buEm ter, 16 de out de 2018 às 15:05, Miro Hrončok escreveu: > > On 16.10.2018 19:17, Jerry James wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:51 AM Jerry James wrote: > >> Sadly, no. > > > > Here is the challenge, Python aficionados. The attached file, > > test.pyx, can be processed like this on

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

2017-11-16 16:49 GMT-05:00 Tom Callaway : > On 11/16/2017 11:03 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> I'm not sure what more we can do... > > While not solving this immediate problem, I am working on redoing the > texlive package to make it less evil, in my spare cycles. Maybe now

Re: Need help from someone with experience with %pom_ macros

2017-11-14 11:30 GMT-05:00 Mikolaj Izdebski <mizde...@redhat.com>: > On 11/14/2017 02:58 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If you have a spare time, and can do a quick test I would really >> appreciate. >> >> I only kno

Need help from someone with experience with %pom_ macros

Hi, If you have a spare time, and can do a quick test I would really appreciate. I only know some basic heuristics based on build errors... Test should be: $ fedpkg co jacop; cd jacop; fedpkg local I thought it could be related to scala, but it fails with either current scala, or a

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

2017-11-13 10:53 GMT-05:00 Kevin Fenzi : > On 11/13/2017 01:02 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> It looks as if the texlive saga continues! >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23085154 >> >> Started yesterday evening and still going 15 hours later. >> It has

review-swap: python-cypari2

python-cypari2 - A Python interface to the number theory library pari https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511554 This package is basically previous sagemath pari interfaces, no as a standalone package. It is required to update to sagemath 8.0 Thanks, Paulo

Review swaps

Hi, I have two packages that need review for a sagemath 7.6 update: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445411 [Review Request: python-cysignals - Interrupt and signal handling for Cython] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445412 [Review Request: python-fpylll - A Python

Review swaps

I have two packages for review. These should be very simple reviews. python-pathlib2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406962 python-ipykernel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406958 Thanks, Paulo ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Someone needs to stop texlive madness!!!

2016-10-15 14:39 GMT-03:00 Kevin Fenzi : > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:33:00 +0100 >> If it is true .. maybe can someone help me to understand intention >> packaging texlive like it is now? > > I can try and provide history here. ;) > Disclaimer: This is just what I remember, it could

Re: review-swap: brial

2016-08-16 12:49 GMT-04:00 Jerry James : > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:30 AM, gil wrote: >> can you provides the bug's url? >> thanks in advance >> regards >> .g > > Oh, sorry gil. I didn't mean to steal that from you. Can you post > your list of

review-swap: brial

This package is required for an update to sagemath 7.3. Brial is a replacement to PolyBori, and needs a bundled significantly different Cudd, so, cannot use the system one. It has only one conflict, brial-devel conflicts with polybori-devel. Newer sagemath will use it, so polybori is

Review swaps

Hi, Two easy reviews. These are required to update to sagemath-6.8. [I will work to update to sagemath-6.9...] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278081 rw - Program that calculates rank-width and rank-decompositions rw is a program that calculates rank-width and

Re: About making noarch package arch specific, when contents differ.

2015-07-28 5:03 GMT-03:00 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: %ifarch x86_64 %package doc BuildArch: noarch ... %endif This looks like a very wise way of handling it. Actually, while debugging It's not, it breaks all secondary architectures. it, I found that the translated

Re: About making noarch package arch specific, when contents differ.

2015-07-28 5:58 GMT-03:00 Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com: On 07/26/2015 04:05 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: Should I make the doc packages arch specific? No, this is not a reason to make them arch-specific. A lot of packages give different results when built twice in a row

Re: About making noarch package arch specific, when contents differ.

2015-07-27 22:34 GMT-03:00 Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com: Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05 +10:00: Should I make the doc packages arch specific? Rather than trying to make Sphinx spit out bitwise-identical output on every arch (which sounds like

About making noarch package arch specific, when contents differ.

I had this build failure: Package:sagemath-6.5-7.fc22 Status: failed Built by: pcpa ID: 672175 Started:Sat, 25 Jul 2015 22:52:10 UTC Finished: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 07:57:28 UTC Closed tasks: - Task 10480570 on arm04-builder10.arm.fedoraproject.org Task Type: build

Re: About making noarch package arch specific, when contents differ.

2015-07-26 12:20 GMT-03:00 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com: On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 11:05 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: I had this build failure: Package:sagemath-6.5-7.fc22 Status: failed Built by: pcpa ID: 672175 Started:Sat, 25 Jul 2015 22:52:10 UTC

Re: Self Introduction: Athos Ribeiro

2015-07-11 15:11 GMT-03:00 Athos Ribeiro athoscribe...@gmail.com: Hi, Hi, My name is Athos Ribeiro, I have been using Fedora for a while now and just submitted my first package (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242056). Welcome Athos! I am a Brazilian Software

Re: Reviving Fedora MIPS

2015-06-02 7:19 GMT-03:00 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com: On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:10:17PM +0200, Michal Toman wrote: Apart from mips64el, we have lately started working on 32-bit mipsel, to be ran on the Creator CI20 Borad [4]. This is basically 3 months behind mips64el so there are

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-07 9:53 GMT-03:00 Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com: [...] I think you might have misunderstood what's happening. We don't want to offer Hopefully I did not :) dnf as an alternative to yum. Dnf is its successor. Yum is deprecated by dnf in F22 and is very likely going to be removed in

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-03 11:24 GMT-03:00 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com: On 04/03/2015 03:41 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: DEBUG util.py:388: No such command: builddep. Please use /usr/bin/dnf --help DEBUG util.py:388: It could be a DNF plugin command. I will review using a release other

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-03 12:04 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com: 2015-04-03 11:24 GMT-03:00 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com: On 04/03/2015 03:41 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: DEBUG util.py:388: No such command: builddep. Please use /usr/bin/dnf

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-03 16:18 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org: As msuchy said, the best thing to do when you encounter something that has been affected by the transition is to file a bug and get it fixed, not just use an older release. I opened two bug reports: [mock with default dnf

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-03 16:18 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org: Hmm, let me see if I understand :) mock should be adapted to dnf or changed to call yum-deprecated on F22 and F23. the 'resolvedep' command was already marked as deprecated *in yum*: * resolvedep dep1 [dep2]

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-01 16:40 GMT-03:00 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com: There's some confusion around this, so I thought I would post to try and clear up things. In the event I am wrong on any of the below, please do feel free to correct me. ;) In the past the proposal was to have a yum-dnf package that

Quick C++ question for C++ experts :)

Is this expected to not compile with -fno-implicit-templates? ---%--- $ cat test.cc #include string std::string test(int i) { std::string t; std::string s = (; t = ; for (int r = i; r; r=1) { if (r 1) t = 1 + t; else t = 0 + t; } s

Re: Quick C++ question for C++ experts :)

2015-03-28 16:06 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com: Is this expected to not compile with -fno-implicit-templates? ---%--- $ cat test.cc #include string std::string test(int i) { std::string t; std::string s = (; t

Re: Texlive packaging

2015-03-28 16:40 GMT-03:00 Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de: * Matthew Miller: On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 08:28:21PM +0100, drago01 wrote: Actually machine generated isn't per se bad ... it saves a lot of effort and should be done more (for other packages too where possible). Why waste man

Re: Texlive packaging

2015-03-27 16:58 GMT-03:00 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org: On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 08:28:21PM +0100, drago01 wrote: Actually machine generated isn't per se bad ... it saves a lot of effort and should be done more (for other packages too where possible). Why waste man power for

Re: Texlive packaging

2015-03-28 13:26 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com: On 28 March 2015 at 15:07, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote: I maintained a slowly evolving approach in Mandriva for some years, (but now it is quickly approaching one

Update to 0ad-0.18

Hi, In case you would like to see it faster in Fedora :) 0ad-0.18 needs mozjs31, so I need this package reviewed and approved: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202131 For rawhide I also need gloox rebuilt for the new c++ string and list abi:

Re: Update to 0ad-0.18

2015-03-15 18:32 GMT-03:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl: On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 04:16:50PM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: Hi, In case you would like to see it faster in Fedora :) 0ad-0.18 needs mozjs31, so I need this package reviewed and approved

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Sandro Bonazzola

2015-03-02 3:34 GMT-03:00 Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com: Il 27/02/2015 18:26, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade ha scritto: 2015-02-27 13:02 GMT-03:00 Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com: Hi, Hello and Welcome Sandro! following [1] I'm writing for introducing myself. My name

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Sandro Bonazzola

2015-02-27 13:02 GMT-03:00 Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com: Hi, Hello and Welcome Sandro! following [1] I'm writing for introducing myself. My name is Sandro Bonazzola and I'm a Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat. I'm leading RHEV integration team and I'm oVirt[2] project release

Re: what is, regarding to std::string and std::list, plan to rebuild packages and better procedures?

2015-02-14 17:11 GMT-02:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com: In my case, I was updating coin-or packages when one of then started failing at link time, only on i686, like this: undefined reference to `CoinMessageHandler::operator(std::__cxx11

what is, regarding to std::string and std::list, plan to rebuild packages and better procedures?

In my case, I was updating coin-or packages when one of then started failing at link time, only on i686, like this: undefined reference to `CoinMessageHandler::operator(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' I tried to, temporarily fix it by, only on

taskotron failure to see dependencies (...has inferior architecture )

... Automatic push to stable based on karma has been disabled for this update due to failure of an AutoQA test ... But I cannot see the error: ---8--- not ok - depcheck for Bodhi update sagemath-6.1.1-6.fc20 # FAIL --- arch: x86_64 details: output: |- Build sagemath-6.1.1-6.fc20

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - jomara

2014-11-12 21:01 GMT-02:00 Jason Rist jr...@redhat.com: On 11/12/2014 03:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:59:16 +0100 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de wrote: Oh yes! Accidentally, we didn't solve this earlier. The plan, discussed with jomara was, Jason Rist

dnf vs yum

I am sorry I did not fully follow the discussions earlier. I only recall it was supposed to exist some compatibility layer at some point. But I keep all the time needing to $ sudo rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db* because I forget and use yum instead of dnf in rawhide. I am not really needing

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 11:08 GMT-03:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: First think of me of as just an slightly above average user :) I am sorry I did not fully follow the discussions earlier. I only recall it was supposed to exist some compatibility layer at some point. But I keep all the

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 13:32 GMT-03:00 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org: On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 11:02:23AM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: I only recall it was supposed to exist some compatibility layer at some point. But I keep all the time needing to $ sudo rm -f /var/lib/rpm

Re: dnf vs yum

2014-10-04 18:23 GMT-03:00 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com: Hi On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade I did not remove plain yum so far on purpose, because I was expecting it to be automatically replaced, or kept working, but only now I sent a note about

rpath/runpath in binaries

Hi, I missed the memo about it not being a fatal error now (rpmlint still tells it is an error), but just in case, before attempting to enforce it a package review, I checked what I have right now in my rawhide box... $ for f in /usr/bin/*; do file $f | grep -q ELF chrpath -l $f | grep -v

Re: Looking for a package reviewer

2014-09-14 10:12 GMT-03:00 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr: Hi! I would like to review it, and learn more about julia. I'm looking for a reviewer for my Julia package. It's been 9 months I've started working on it, and now I can't get anybody to do the final formal review. If

Re: Issue during generating header files

Hi all. Hi, I don't understand why same code is not compiled with rpmbuild unlike when I compile in local. This is compiled with rpmbuild: http://fpaste.org/130139/ This is compiled in local: http://fpaste.org/130141/ These commands are not performed so auto-header.h file is not

Re: Two-minute(!)-survey on motivation and free time contribution of open source developers

2014-08-31 11:03 GMT-03:00 Stefan Kullack stefankull...@web.de: Dear all, for a university research project in an Open Source class at the Technical University Berlin (Germany) I would like to gather some original input from open source software developers. I kept the length of the survey to

Re: PkgDB, pending ACL requests

2014-07-24 6:46 GMT-03:00 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr: On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Good Morning

How to make a buildroot override for f21

I am making an update and to speed things up I made overrides for f19 and f20, but for f21 I get Could not determine release for coin-or-Ipopt-3.11.8-1.fc21 with tags ['f21'] Probably this is just a ping to update infrastructure :-) (updated coin-or-Ipopt is required for just approved

Re: Packaging: bin subfolder

2014-05-29 18:27 GMT-03:00 Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com: Hi, Hi, I'm working on packaging Salome (The Open Source Integration Platform for Numerical Simulation) [1], and the cmake scripts there install tons of I packaged and maintained it packaged in Mandriva for a few years. If I

Re: Deprecate setjmp/longjmp? [was Re: Maybe it's time to get rid of tcpwrappers/tcpd?]

2014-04-27 19:02 GMT-03:00 Andrew Price anpr...@redhat.com: On 24/04/14 15:13, Lennart Poettering wrote: We probably should make setjmp()-freeness a requirement for all code included in Fedora. Would it be worth the effort, and how feasible is it anyway? - Do we have any usage statistics?

Re: Self Introduction: Oden Eriksson

2014-04-03 7:50 GMT-03:00 Oden Eriksson o...@nux.se: Hello, Hi Oden, Small Linux world, isn't it ? :-) Been active with packaging, productization and maintaining packages for Mandriva Linux since 1999 and thought I should give it a try at fedora. First cut is this one:

Re: Heads up: Mesa/LLVM rebase and OpenGTL retirement in F20

2014-03-27 17:40 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 16:02 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: We'd like to update to Mesa 10.1 in Fedora 20, since the cycle is so long before F21 and (among other goodies) it enables OpenGL 3.3 on some newer Radeons. This implies

review swap - coin-or-Osi

The package follows the same pattern of other coin-or packages already in Fedora, should be trivial do review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 Thanks, Paulo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

Re: review swap - coin-or-Osi

2013/11/1 Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/01/2013 04:36 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: The package follows the same pattern of other coin-or packages already in Fedora, should be trivial do review. https

Re: rawhide report: 20131006 changes

2013/10/7 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com: On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: sagemath-5.10-2.fc21 * Fri Oct 04 2013 pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com - 5.10-2 - Rebuild with newer rawhide atlas. The

Re: fflas-ffpack needs update for atlas in rawide

2013/10/3 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com: On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote: Does anybody know what progress is being made towards getting a working atlas package on ARM? Thanks, Big thanks to Orion for fixing the atlas build on ARM. Paulo,

Re: DeveloperAssistant and android development under Fedora 19

2013/8/8 Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com: Hi folks, Hi, I would like to ask you what are necessary steps to develop android applications under Fedora. I suppose that Eclipse environment is needed. Any other package(s)? Is there any guide how to do that? When some working guide will be

Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?

2013/8/6 Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com: On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 20:38:27 +0200, Mario Ceresa wrote: -- -- vtk-devel-6.0.0-7.fc20.x86_64 Error: Package: 3:texlive-dvips-bin-svn30088.0-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib =

Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?

2013/8/6 Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com: On 6 August 2013 17:38, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote: Package owner Jindrich Novy is no longer in Red Hat so I am not sure how quickly it may get fixed. I really hope the next mantainer can manage a 14 mb spec file :) In

Re: heads up - Qt qreal difference on ARM

2013/8/2 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com: On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 11:38 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: On 08/02/2013 09:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Judging by a google search for qreal float arm this difference causes endless problems. I even found a Fedora build bug related to it.

Re: Rebuild of Boost dependees

2013/7/30 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com: On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote: polybori5663365 SCONS: internal error in regular expression engine I will try to figure this one out. This should be 32 bit only.

Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines

Hi all. I'm editing .spec file of MUMPS package to conform it to the MPI packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI). I have a modest experience in this particular case so I need some suggestions. This is initial .spec file of MUMPS:

Re: Fedora 19 for IBM System z 64bit official release

2013/7/16 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz: Hello everyone, Hi, Sorry for offtopic, Fedora 19 GA release for the IBM System z is here. This time two weeks later than the primary mainly because me being on vacation. It's hard for me to take time off work when there are always some deadlines in

Re: Who uses abi-compliance-checker?

IBook. 'Kiomjm Em 03/07/2013 19:00, Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org escreveu: On 07/03/2013 10:03 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even versioning for that

Re: Who uses abi-complian. V. I UVce-checker?

/ lo m' Em 03/07/2013 21:16, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com escreveu: On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Qua, 2013-07-03 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my packages does not

Re: libgd breakage

2013/6/28 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: Almost there, but still cannot generate chroot in mock. DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: gnuplot-4.6.2-2.fc20.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libgd.so.2()(64bit) gnuplot appears to be failing on some sort of

Re: libgd breakage

2013/6/28 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at: On 27/06/13 17:31, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 06/26/2013 08:01 AM, Volker Fröhlich wrote: GDAL is currently broken because it needs a rebuild for Poppler, but the Texlive build is broken, as far as I can see. texlive has now been rebuilt.

libgd breakage

Hi, It is taking a bit too long for some dependencies to be rebuilt in rawhide. Could a compat-libgd be provided please? I am receiving daily mails about broken deps, already posted to $pkg-owner@ asking what I could help, but still no response neither problems corrected. Remi Collet told

Re: libgd breakage

2013/6/26 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com: Le 26/06/2013 14:36, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit : Hi, It is taking a bit too long for some dependencies to be rebuilt in rawhide. Could a compat-libgd be provided please? I am receiving daily mails about broken deps, already

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

2013/5/22 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se: Jan Zelený wrote: what are the changes that you would like to see in the foreseeable future (say 2-3 years) and why would you like to see them (what would they help you with)? Dare I say ... (puts on a helmet) ... Recommends and Suggests?

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

2013/5/22 Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com: Dear Fedora community, several months ago, at the Developer conference in Brno, Software Management team received a whole bunch of proposals for new functionality in RPM and related software stack. As a packager, some way to transparently handle an

Re: Pending soname bumps for m4ri, m4rie, and ntl

2013/5/3 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com: Hi, Sorry for the delay responding. I would like to push updates for m4ri 20130416, m4rie 20130416, and ntl 6.0.0 to Rawhide. Each of those updates involves an soname bump. This will require rebuilds of the following packages: eclib flint

Re: Pending soname bumps for m4ri, m4rie, and ntl

2013/5/6 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com: On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote: I started working on updating to sagemath 5.9 that was just released. But if the 5.8 build finished, and most likely did, as most

Re: BuildRequires for texlive stuff for F18 and beyond

2013/1/26 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com: On Sex, 2013-01-25 at 12:56 -0800, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote: [...] With the more fine grained texlive packaging in F18 where tex(latex) is provided by texlive-collection-latex I am finding that this is insufficient to build most documents. I

Re: [rawhide] ideas to improve rawhide

2013/1/23 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com: Greetings. As some of you may know, I switched my laptop over to rawhide and have been posting a series of blogs about the various issues I have run into in the last month. [...] So, I've been collecting ideas on how to improve things in rawhide and

Re: git rebase request on a project

2013/1/21 Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com: Quoting Stephen Gallagher (2013-01-18 15:27:30) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri 18 Jan 2013 06:55:26 AM EST, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I cannot find any

Re: Strange Build problem....

2013/1/19 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net: Le Mer 16 janvier 2013 20:48, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit : Sorry for that problem. It solved the problems I was having but created at least yours problem. I am having an almost live conversation right now about related

git rebase request on a project

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I cannot find any information. I would like to have git rebase master on f16, f17, and f18 branches of http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/megaglest.git I once messed it a bit by adding a commit only to branches and later merging master, now I cannot

Re: Strange Build problem....

2013/1/16 Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com: On 16/01/13 12:27, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Looking at the F17 version of matplotlib, the default afm font is being set to None there -- so a better fix (but requiring fixing in matplotlib) might be to patch it like this: ---

Review swap: c-graph

This should be a very easy one https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881794 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Megaglest unit moving error workaround

In case you have this issue, I just rediscovered a workaround. Add EnableColorPicking=true to $HOME/.megaglest/glestuser.ini you probably will want to remove it later, once the problem is corrected in mesa. Initial fedora and upstream bug reports:

Re: Dealing with static code analysis in Fedora

2012/12/11 David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com: A while back I ran my static checker on all of the Python extension modules in Fedora 17: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/StaticAnalysisOfPythonRefcounts I wrote various scripts to build the packages in a mock environment that injects my

Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?

2012/12/10 Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz: On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I think, though, that this tool, integrated well and supported, could really help us in Fedora (and in EPEL). So, I'd like to a) enumerate the problems with Software

Re: Where are we going? (Not a rant)

2012/12/9 Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it: On 12/08/2012 07:52 PM, Rahul wrote: On 12/08/2012 01:48 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: (my two cents, as someone using Red Hat / Fedora daily since RH5.1, and never stepping up as Fedora packager because too scared by the bureaucracy) Can you be

Re: Where are we going? (Not a rant)

2012/12/7 Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com: The threat for Fedora is that even in the FOSS, there is competition. Distros are competing for users - users that give back, users that report bugs, or users that are or become maintainers and developers. When the overwhelming response to Fedora is

Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?

2012/12/5 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org: There is a perpetual problem facing all Linux distributions around how fast to move with software updates. In Fedora, of course, our default speed is petal-to-the-metal. This is part of who we are and why we are awesome. However, it also

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012/7/7 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15 coq requires

Re: *countable infinities only

2012/6/5 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at: Tomas Mraz wrote: That's a total nonsense unless the restriction is by-license and not just technical obstacle. If it is just a technical obstacle in the code, you can remove it and run the software on any crippled machine at your will. So no,

Re: *countable infinities only

2012/6/6 drago01 drag...@gmail.com: On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/6/5 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at: Tomas Mraz wrote: That's a total nonsense unless the restriction is by-license and not just

Re: *countable infinities only

2012/6/6 drago01 drag...@gmail.com: On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/6/6 drago01 drag...@gmail.com: On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote

rpmlib(X-CheckUnifiedSystemdir) is needed by filesystem-3-2.fc17.x86_64

I know I got what I deserved by attempting to fix by hand the move from / to /usr, just did need to boot from the fedora16 dvd, mount lvm root and finish my fix; brain fart, and cyclic dep on moving /lib64 to /usr/lib64 and then a symlink, leaving it with all binaries failing due to missing

Re: rpmlib(X-CheckUnifiedSystemdir) is needed by filesystem-3-2.fc17.x86_64

2012/5/15 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 23:47 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: I know I got what I deserved by attempting to fix by hand the move from / to /usr, just did need to boot from the fedora16 dvd, mount lvm root and finish my fix; brain fart

Re: Like C++? Not afraid of quirky build systems? Seeking LLVM co-maintainers

2012/5/6 Michel Alexandre Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org: Hi all, LLVM is becoming an increasingly integral part of our distribution (with mesa now using it to build the LLVMpipe renderer, for example) that I don't really feel comfortable maintaining it mostly by myself. I'd love to have

Re: Review swaps

2012/5/1 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com: I'm interested in swapping reviews.  Here are the ones I need reviewed: vinci: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790560 permlib: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797312 Let me know what I can review for you.  Thanks, Ok. I

  1   2   >