On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:39:14 +0100
Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Embracing the toolkit (GTK) and adopting GNOME application style are
two different things. Yes, we can make more use of GTK. But we do not
have to GNOME it up for it. And whether or not we use a
I want to say, that it would be nice, if a DocumentMap/MiniMap would be added
to Geany. Please add it to the Wishlist on your side.
Notepad++ have something called Document Map:
http://notepad-plus-plus.org/assets/images/docMap.png
Sublime Text have something called MiniMap:
I +1 a mini map like sublime :-) gedit has a buggy plugin that does the same
which we could look at for a gtk implementation. I like the idea of it being
in a scroll bar to use less space.
I suggest this should be a plugin though.
Thanks,
Steve
Hi,
An additional point I want to mention, is a bug in your
Webside-software. As I wanted to add this wish to the wishlist, I
clicked at the bottom of the page on edit this page of the line (If
you have another idea/wish which should be listed here, edit this
page). Then it asks for a username
On 13-11-11 11:48 PM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
That sounds pretty good. Is that a lot like python and gtk? I get the
impression its better since I don't think python compiles to equivolent c code?
If by better you mean faster, leaner, and more compatible with
existing C code, yep. It
I'm thinking vala sounds like a good idea the more I hear about it... :-)
On 11/12/2013 02:36 AM, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-11-11 11:48 PM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
That sounds pretty good. Is that a lot like python and gtk? I get
the impression its better since I don't think python compiles
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 01:31:35 -0800
Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
1. An architecture that allows multi-threading to be used for non-GUI
tasks.
Another (perhaps more obvious) candidate here is file loading/saving,
which is *way* easier than the parsing stuff since [...] and
Hi folks,
Sorry for that Geany-OT posting... but please be so kind and take some
second to check whether your mail client is respecting the threading
when answering a post. I've got a lot of spitted up threads here and
it's really annoying and time consuming to put them together again.
In
Am 11.11.2013 23:38, schrieb Yosef Or Boczko:
What about redesign the GUI?
I like the current one. Only I can iamgine that another sidebar or mayby
more flexible sidebars would help some. Personally I wouldn't change
anything bigger at UI.
Cheers,
Frank
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Am 12.11.2013 00:11, schrieb Yosef Or Boczko:
As a GNOME 3 user, I realy like the recent design of
the applications in GNOME, specify the GtkHeaderBar[1].
And yes, I know have some people not like the new design of
GNOME.
As Matthew say, we can to go use the modern GTK+ API,
for
Am 11.11.2013 10:31, schrieb Matthew Brush:
The other way we could go is to just strive to be a proper, modern GTK+
application. By this I mean using stuff like GtkApplication,
GtkApplicationWindow, GSettings, etc. The GTK+ stack has lots of cool
stuff to make doing applications easier/better
Am 11.11.2013 10:31, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Another (perhaps more obvious) candidate here is file loading/saving,
which is *way* easier than the parsing stuff since we don't have to
contend with TM/CTags that uses global state like mad, and because
Scintilla and GIO make this quite easy
Am 11.11.2013 08:18, schrieb Lex Trotman:
1. An architecture that allows multi-threading to be used for non-GUI
tasks. The most obvious of course is parsing. At the moment none of
the parsers support symbols in anything other than the global scope, and
adding them would significantly
I cannot add much to the vala yes/no question, as the only part of ala
I've seen by know are Matthews's plugin in g-p. Two or maybe three
things are important to me, in case of:
- Geany needs to keep its small memory footprint
- Created code needs to run on all plattforms Geany currently is
Maybe you could send a personal email to the person/persons that aren't
doing this correctly? I just checked the headers in one of my
responses, and I think I'm okay.
On 11/12/2013 08:33 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Hi folks,
Sorry for that Geany-OT posting... but please be so kind and take some
On 13-11-12 07:50 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
I cannot add much to the vala yes/no question, as the only part of ala
I've seen by know are Matthews's plugin in g-p. Two or maybe three
things are important to me, in case of:
- Geany needs to keep its small memory footprint
Yes, I don't think
On 13 November 2013 10:06, Steven Blatnick steve8tr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm being a bit off topic, but one problem I have with having both Gtk2
and Gtk3 apps is that there have been settings and theme discrepancies.
For example, I use Linux Mint MATE, and there have been some problems with
I hope I don't have to rewrite my plugins again for this editor ;-) I
will admit though, seg faulting all of geany in a plugin gets annoying :-)
Maybe I'm spoiling the party, but like with gnome 2, sometimes sticking
with what you have is better than seemingly needless upgrades. I'm
running
On 13 November 2013 10:24, Steven Blatnick steve8tr...@yahoo.com wrote:
My bad. It appears the bookmark discrepancy isn't between versions, but
between caja and the file open dialog:
Thats something inside GTK2/3 that provide the open dialog, nothing we can
control AFAIK.
[...]
As for
Why to switch to other toolkits?!
I not understand what don't good in GTK+.
And also - why to keep GTK+ 2?
GTK+ 3 avilable in all distro, also in older distro,
it also work in Windows and also in Mac. this
because GTK+ 3 released before almost three years.
Because many distros are more
I not understand, you mean have some old version of
some distro isn't support GTK+ 3 and them always with
older version of all package - so why Geany need to be
the last in them distro?
Geany need to go forward, and older distro will keep
the old version of Geany same them keep the old
version
[...]
I'm afraid too. Most likely dependencies will increase as well as memory
footprint. But this is something we get regular asked on our boothes:
More intelligent auto completion stuff. Unfortunately this is one of the
things making the huge IDE so huge.
Yes, more capabilities or using
On 13-11-12 03:48 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
Why to switch to other toolkits?!
I not understand what don't good in GTK+.
And also - why to keep GTK+ 2?
GTK+ 3 avilable in all distro, also in older distro,
it also work in Windows and also in Mac. this
because GTK+ 3 released before almost three
On 13 November 2013 10:53, Yosef Or Boczko yosef...@gmail.com wrote:
I not understand, you mean have some old version of
some distro isn't support GTK+ 3 and them always with
older version of all package - so why Geany need to be
the last in them distro?
Several reasons:
1. we don't have
On 13-11-12 04:23 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 13 November 2013 10:53, Yosef Or Boczko yosef...@gmail.com wrote:
I not understand, you mean have some old version of
some distro isn't support GTK+ 3 and them always with
older version of all package - so why Geany need to be
the last in them
25 matches
Mail list logo
