On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 07/02/2017 10:52, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> I would prefer to try to keep the open projects separated by their
>> topic areas (using the component field) to maintain some organization
>> of the open projects page.
>
>
> Nice.
>
>> I have made
On 07/02/2017 10:52, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I would prefer to try to keep the open projects separated by their
topic areas (using the component field) to maintain some organization
of the open projects page.
Nice.
I have made a small change to add a
sub-heading to reflect this. Each topic area (
I would prefer to try to keep the open projects separated by their
topic areas (using the component field) to maintain some organization
of the open projects page. I have made a small change to add a
sub-heading to reflect this. Each topic area (component) will need a
separate query to generate.
O
On 06/02/2017 15:11, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote:
I have edited the open projects page to include my workflow for adding
tickets(https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/OpenProjects#HelpConverttoTickets).
Kindly review it and help me edit the required changes.
Thank you for doing this. I have updated
Hello all,
I have edited the open projects page to include my workflow for adding
tickets(https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/OpenProjects#HelpConverttoTickets).
Kindly review it and help me edit the required changes.
Thank you,
Tanu Hari Dixit.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Chris Johns wr
Hi,
This is a great idea.
On 01/02/2017 05:54, Gedare Bloom wrote:
* Use only one keyword. I prefer "SoC" so it is generic to other
'summer of code' style projects.
I have added a new report under "Available Reports" called "SoC
Projects". You can find the "Available Reports" link just under
Hello all,
I added the following tickets for the BSP projects:
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2898#ticket
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2899#ticket
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2900#ticket
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2901#ticket
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2903#ticket
https://devel.rtems.
> If you're logged in then you should see a small link "Modify ↓" just
> above the ticket box.
I clicked on the Modify link but it doesn't give me an option to edit
the description.
Thanks,
Tanu Hari Dixit.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Kuan Hsun Chen
wrote:
> Hi Gedare,
>
> I think we are no
Hi Gedare,
I think we are not able to modify the content of tickets. I have tried the
ticket I initialized before.
I can only change properties summary and action.
Best,
Kuan-Hsun
2017-02-01 17:55 GMT+01:00 Gedare Bloom :
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Tanu Hari Dixit
> wrote:
> > Hello,
>
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm unable to change the content of "Description" field on Trac. I
> read https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/TracTickets and couldn't find any
> luck. I read a thread on Trac's mailing list
> (https://lists.gt.net/trac/users/46376). Pe
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote:
>> * You removed the "Introduction" section. Any reason or just an oversight?
>> * The 'status' field is gone too. But, I think the status is not
>> needed in the ticket format.
>
> I removed the "Introduction" section by mistake. I'll inclu
Hello,
I'm unable to change the content of "Description" field on Trac. I
read https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/TracTickets and couldn't find any
luck. I read a thread on Trac's mailing list
(https://lists.gt.net/trac/users/46376). Perhaps, it has to do
something with TICKET_EDIT_DESCRIPTION permissio
> * You removed the "Introduction" section. Any reason or just an oversight?
> * The 'status' field is gone too. But, I think the status is not
> needed in the ticket format.
I removed the "Introduction" section by mistake. I'll include it.
>
> Did you face any difficulties in making the transiti
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Tanu Hari Dixit
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I created (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2891#ticket) on the lines of
> > Gedare's advice for this open project
> > (https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Projects/
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote:
> Hello,
> I created (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2891#ticket) on the lines of
> Gedare's advice for this open project
> (https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Projects/Open/ImproveBeagleBSP).
Looks nice, a few minor things:
* You remove
Hello,
I created (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2891#ticket) on the lines of
Gedare's advice for this open project
(https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Projects/Open/ImproveBeagleBSP).
The link to buy USB-TTL FTDI Cable 3.3V on the open project page is
probably broken. What should I replace it
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Tanu Hari Dixit
> wrote:
> > I'll be glad to do it. Please guide me as to how to proceed.
> >
> We will need to import each existing Open Project description into a
> new ticket. It would be best to start wi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote:
> I'll be glad to do it. Please guide me as to how to proceed.
>
We will need to import each existing Open Project description into a
new ticket. It would be best to start with one to "try it out". The
project title should be the Summary of
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Kuan Hsun Chen
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Could we invoke a project for https://git.rtems.org/rtems-schedsim/
> again?
> > It could be useful to develop/verify scheduling algorithms.
> >
> > Quote from Joe
I'll be glad to do it. Please guide me as to how to proceed.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Yes that would be much nicer. Maybe we can get potential GSoC Students
> to do the work ;)
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
> > Maybe we should move a
Yes that would be much nicer. Maybe we can get potential GSoC Students
to do the work ;)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Maybe we should move all this open projects wiki stuff into tickets with
> some sort of "GSoC" tag.
>
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
>
Maybe we should move all this open projects wiki stuff into tickets with
some sort of "GSoC" tag.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Kuan Hsun Chen
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could we invoke a project for https://git.rtems.org/rtems-schedsim/ again?
> It could be useful to develop/verify scheduling algorithms.
>
> Quote from Joel:
> "I honestly think the best approach is to build a native gcc/newlib t
Hello,
Could we invoke a project for https://git.rtems.org/rtems-schedsim/ again?
It could be useful to develop/verify scheduling algorithms.
Quote from Joel:
"I honestly think the best approach is to build a native gcc/newlib toolset
and use that so that the C Library differences should be handl
Hello Folks,
We have submitted our application to participate as an Org in GSoC
2017. So it is once again time to "Freshen up" our projects page [1]
with any projects that you might think are of interest and you may be
willing to mentor. If you add a new project please use the Open
Project Templat
25 matches
Mail list logo
