Re: nv driver with FX5200 4.4rc2

2004-01-06 Thread Mark Vojkovich
I don't know what to tell you. I assume the int10 module gets used to post the card every time the server starts? Perhaps checking if there is a video bios upgrade is in order? If you can find out where it's crashing that would be useful. But without hints as to where or why it's crashing

xfs -daemon dumping core

2004-01-06 Thread David Dawes
There is a report in the XFree86 bugzilla (#1060) about 'xfs -daemon' dumping core on platforms where the detaching is done with daemon(3). Looking into it I have found that the same thing happens on other platforms too (Solaris, for example). I'm committing the attached patch to clean this up, an

Re: nv driver with FX5200 4.4rc2

2004-01-06 Thread mel kravitz
No framebuffer device, modified ../os-support/bsd/alpha_video.c which allows compile of xc_4.4rc2 in NetBSD alpha port. First instance or second of 'startx' is fine then crash. Any diagnostics i can provide? /var/log/XFree86.0.log? ..On this box(164LX), TNT2 and MX440 work fine, along with Matro

Re: memory leak

2004-01-06 Thread Jim Gettys
There is a new utility called "xrestop" available in the freedesktop.org CVS that is very useful in identifying clients that hog server memory. This utility is patterned somewhat after the "top" utility; written by Mathew Allum, using Mark's fine Xres extension.

Radeon 9600se Doesnt Work

2004-01-06 Thread toxicfeet
Hi   I just installed Mandrake 9.2 but was unable to get XFree86 4.3.0 to support my Radeon 9600se except in 2d mode. Is 3d supported and if not will it be supported in the next version?   Thanks Dan

Re: memory leak

2004-01-06 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Mark Vojkovich] > > When I see these sort of requests I usually feel pretty comfortable > > dismissing them as application resource leaks. > > Is it possible for dead applications to "use" resources in the X > server? I mean, if a web browser all

Re: nv driver with FX5200 4.4rc2

2004-01-06 Thread Mark Vojkovich
I've never run on Alpha, but if it works on MX440, I don't know why it wouldn't work on FX 5200. You're not running some sort of kernel framebuffer device are you? I could imagine there'd be problems with one of those. Linux + X86 seems to work fine with this card. M

XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure

2004-01-06 Thread lindsay . haigh
The inclusion of Xos.h in xf86cfg/config.h causes a conflict with the inclusion of strings.h on Solaris 2.5.1 x86: making all in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/xf86cfg... rm -f accessx.o gcc -c -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -DNO_ASM -Wall -Wpointer-arith -ansi -pedantic -I../common -I../scanpci -I../lo

Re: Xv Bug in 4.3.99.903 (CVS) ?

2004-01-06 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Linuxconsole wrote: When compiling (make World on Mdk 9.1, Intel Celeron 2Ghz), I had to add "#endif" in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/sis/sis.h Where exactly please? At line 39, I don't know if it is correct ... 37 #ifndef _SIS_H > 3

Re: memory leak

2004-01-06 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Mark Vojkovich] > When I see these sort of requests I usually feel pretty comfortable > dismissing them as application resource leaks. Is it possible for dead applications to "use" resources in the X server? I mean, if a web browser allocate several resources in the X server (shared memory, pixm

nv driver with FX5200 4.4rc2

2004-01-06 Thread mel kravitz
Hi, Having a little problem returning to xsession the 2nd or third time after exit from Xsession:($xinit->exit(ctrl-bkspace-alt)->$xinit) $xinit -> ?? screen is locked up hard. crash occurs quite regularly this is NetBSD-current 1.6ZG and on 164LX alpha, 4.4rc2 built 12/31. With TNT2 or GeForce

Re: Xv Bug in 4.3.99.903 (CVS) ?

2004-01-06 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > Mark Vojkovich wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Yann Le Doar? wrote: > > > > > >>Hi ! > >> > >>I updated last Xfree CVS ( XFree86 Version 4.3.99.902 (4.4.0 RC 2), > >>Release Date: 18 December 2003) > >>and I found 2 bugs. > >> > >>Whe

Re: Xv Bug in 4.3.99.903 (CVS) ?

2004-01-06 Thread Linuxconsole
When compiling (make World on Mdk 9.1, Intel Celeron 2Ghz), I had to add "#endif" in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/sis/sis.h Where exactly please? At line 39, I don't know if it is correct ... 37 #ifndef _SIS_H 38 #define _SIS_H_

Re: memory leak

2004-01-06 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Nils Faerber wrote: > Am Di, den 06.01.2004 schrieb tateopfr um 16:26: > > Hi, > > > > Xfree86 4.3.0 i use more and more memory ... until 200MB and more > > > > my system : > > > > Slackware 9.1 - kernel 2.4.22 - 512MB RAM > > DUAL ATHLON 2200+ - THUNDER 2468 TYAN > > 2 HD

Re: Xv Bug in 4.3.99.903 (CVS) ?

2004-01-06 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Mark Vojkovich wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Yann Le Doar? wrote: Hi ! I updated last Xfree CVS ( XFree86 Version 4.3.99.902 (4.4.0 RC 2), Release Date: 18 December 2003) and I found 2 bugs. When compiling (make World on Mdk 9.1, Intel Celeron 2Ghz), I had to add "#endif" in program

Re: embed the fixed font in the X server binary

2004-01-06 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 19:06, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Michael Taylor wrote: > > > Torgeir Veimo wrote: > > > The dreaded > > > > > > Fatal server error: > > > could not open default font 'fixed' > > > > > > - can happen at the least expected times. > > > > > > To the point:

Re: Xv Bug in 4.3.99.903 (CVS) ?

2004-01-06 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Yann Le Doaré wrote: > Hi ! > > I updated last Xfree CVS ( XFree86 Version 4.3.99.902 (4.4.0 RC 2), > Release Date: 18 December 2003) > and I found 2 bugs. > > When compiling (make World on Mdk 9.1, Intel Celeron 2Ghz), I had to add > "#endif" in programs/Xserv

Re: embed the fixed font in the X server binary

2004-01-06 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Michael Taylor wrote: > Torgeir Veimo wrote: > > The dreaded > > > > Fatal server error: > > could not open default font 'fixed' > > > > - can happen at the least expected times. > > > > To the point: wouldn't it be benecifial to embed the fixed font in the X > > server bin

Xv Bug in 4.3.99.903 (CVS) ?

2004-01-06 Thread Yann Le Doaré
Hi ! I updated last Xfree CVS ( XFree86 Version 4.3.99.902 (4.4.0 RC 2), Release Date: 18 December 2003) and I found 2 bugs. When compiling (make World on Mdk 9.1, Intel Celeron 2Ghz), I had to add "#endif" in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/sis/sis.h And, running mplayer (with glibc-2.3.2

Re: Suggested Fixes for the Rendition Driver - Long Message

2004-01-06 Thread Mario Klebsch
Hi! Am Dienstag, 06.01.04 um 04:50 Uhr schrieb Eric Wittry: On the other hand, it is far less trivial to hardwire the video chip to add 1 to an argument, which the hardware would have to do to reverse what we currently do at Step #2. In Contrast, it often is far more easy for the hardware to wor

Re: building X11 in separate pieces

2004-01-06 Thread Mario Klebsch
Hi! Am Dienstag, 06.01.04 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb Thomas Dickey: some of the directories depend on other parts of the tree - not on their immediate descendents. For example, the programs depend on libraries. In the past, I often pulled out a single program aout of the xc source tree and build it st

Re: embed the fixed font in the X server binary

2004-01-06 Thread David Dawes
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:39:37PM +, Torgeir Veimo wrote: >The dreaded > >Fatal server error: >could not open default font 'fixed' > >- can happen at the least expected times. > >This happened to a collegue when upgrading packages on his fedora >installation, and for some reason the font serv

Re: Solaris build problems with XFree86 4.4.0 RC2

2004-01-06 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I get the following compilation errors when building 4.4.0 RC2 on Solaris > 2.51 x86 because int64_t and int32_t are not defined in any system headers. > glxext.h defines them #ifdef __UNIXOS2__. I guess this condition also > needs to include Solaris

Re: memory leak

2004-01-06 Thread Nils Faerber
Am Di, den 06.01.2004 schrieb tateopfr um 16:26: > Hi, > > Xfree86 4.3.0 i use more and more memory ... until 200MB and more > > my system : > > Slackware 9.1 - kernel 2.4.22 - 512MB RAM > DUAL ATHLON 2200+ - THUNDER 2468 TYAN > 2 HD SCSI > VIDEO CARD : ATI RAGE XL WITH 8 MB RAM ( ONBOARD ) >

memory leak

2004-01-06 Thread tateopfr
Hi, Xfree86 4.3.0 i use more and more memory ... until 200MB and more my system : Slackware 9.1 - kernel 2.4.22 - 512MB RAM DUAL ATHLON 2200+ - THUNDER 2468 TYAN 2 HD SCSI VIDEO CARD : ATI RAGE XL WITH 8 MB RAM ( ONBOARD ) TOUCH SCREEN ELOTOUCH SERIAL Application developed in perl and perl/t

Re: help on configure the X window System X11R6

2004-01-06 Thread jassi brar
Hi, Use some existing architecture port (say iPaq), as the starting point. Study it and then make parallel changes. thats the best way to do it. -jassi On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote : >Dear Friends, > >We are going to port Xfree86 to new processor platform >which is running l

Re: embed the fixed font in the X server binary

2004-01-06 Thread Michael Taylor
Torgeir Veimo wrote: > The dreaded > > Fatal server error: > could not open default font 'fixed' > > - can happen at the least expected times. > > To the point: wouldn't it be benecifial to embed the fixed font in the X > server binary itself? It would harden the x server tremendously in case >

embed the fixed font in the X server binary

2004-01-06 Thread Torgeir Veimo
The dreaded Fatal server error: could not open default font 'fixed' - can happen at the least expected times. This happened to a collegue when upgrading packages on his fedora installation, and for some reason the font server wasn't starting. I had to help him remotely, relaying commands throug

Re: documentation of the format of files in xkb/symbols?

2004-01-06 Thread Ivan Pascal
Hi, > > You'll find some documentation here: > > i haven't the information i need on that page. i may have overread it or > something, but i still ask myself what certain keywords mean when > reading the files in .../xkb/symbols/pc http://pascal.tsu.ru/en/xkb/g

help on configure the X window System X11R6

2004-01-06 Thread Suresh Chandra Mannava
Dear Friends, We are going to port Xfree86 to new processor platform which is running linux. I am going through "Using Imake to Configure the X windows System Version 11, release 4" by Paul DuBios www.snake.net/software/imake-stuff/config-X11R4.pdf Above document is for X11R4. Does the above do

Re: building X11 in separate pieces

2004-01-06 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [iso-8859-1] Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote: > Dear friends, > > Is it possible to build X11 in pieces? I read that > > "X11 has its own Imake based build system and you > can't > build X11 in separate pieces such as build tools, > server & libraries and applications. Instead aft

Re: Return-activation behaviour

2004-01-06 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a test system of a multi monitor (5) Linux RedHat 9.0/Xfree86 4.3 > X-Terminal system. Programs and MWM window manager (version 1.2-4) are started > from a DEC VMS machine. > > There is unexpected strange behaviour of the activation key: > After

building X11 in separate pieces

2004-01-06 Thread Suresh Chandra Mannava
Dear friends, Is it possible to build X11 in pieces? I read that "X11 has its own Imake based build system and you can't build X11 in separate pieces such as build tools, server & libraries and applications. Instead after a configuration change use “make World” and rebuild the whole 160+MB source

the log file 2nd time enter Xwindow

2004-01-06 Thread harry
attached file is the log file created second time enter Xwindow   Harry XFree86.0.log Description: Binary data

Return-activation behaviour

2004-01-06 Thread Marcel . Stegehuis
I have a test system of a multi monitor (5) Linux RedHat 9.0/Xfree86 4.3 X-Terminal system. Programs and MWM window manager (version 1.2-4) are started from a DEC VMS machine. There is unexpected strange behaviour of the activation key: After editing in an edit box one can press Enter to select th

via_drv documentation

2004-01-06 Thread Uberto Barbini
I've learned from experience that ShadowFB option works differently from documentation, the man says: Option "ShadowFB" but the shadow framebuffer it's disabled by default and the option activate it whether it says "true" or "false". This'd be fixed (either the behavior or the doc) IMHO. _