this list is archived

2003-01-13 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: this list is archived you can read this list on http://mail-archive.com, starting now.

RE: ATI card addition to xf86PciInfo.h

2003-01-14 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: RE: ATI card addition to xf86PciInfo.h > One thing I don't understand about this is that this is an integrated > graphics chipset, right ? I.e. it uses part of system RAM for > video RAM. > There is no code in radeon driver to deal with this yet. > >  best

RE: Debugging in RH8?

2003-01-15 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: RE: Debugging in RH8? > ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris/gdb-xfree86 > > Let me know if there are any problems. Can you please adjust user permissions there? Thanks. -Alex.

RE: Debugging in RH8?

2003-01-15 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: RE: Debugging in RH8? on 2nd try i got the listing now - the read error has vanished. > -Original Message- > From: Mike A. Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 01:39 > To: Alexander Stohr > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: s3virge & bigendian

2003-01-20 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: RE: s3virge & bigendian > >Hmm, I have a pdf, but I think I got it from the xfree86 ftp > devel area, > >so I'm not sure about the status right now. > > If you got it from there, then you can't redistribute it.  If you get > it from another (non-NDA) source, then that's a different ma

RE: s3virge & bigendian

2003-01-20 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: RE: s3virge & bigendian > + > +#if X_BYTE_ORDER==X_BIG_ENDIAN > +  pScrn->fbOffset = 32*1024*1024; /* bigendian aperture is at 32M */ > +#else > +  pScrn->fbOffset = 0; > +#endif > +  pScrn->memPhysBase = ps3v->PciInfo->memBase[0] + pScrn->fbOffset; > + >               

RE: vbe and driver vesa

2003-01-23 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: RE: vbe and driver vesa if you dont get any further feedback then i would suggest you to send that patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which gets you a "ticket" for mainline integration. i had a look into the patch and do think its quite simple in effect. even reverting it temporarily could

glapi_x86.S glx86asm.py

2003-01-30 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: glapi_x86.S glx86asm.py according to its headline glapi_x86.S was generated by the script glx86asm.py - its just that i cannot find that script in the XFree86 sources. Any hints? -Alex.

RE: glapi_x86.S glx86asm.py

2003-01-30 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: RE: glapi_x86.S glx86asm.py > From CVS/XFree86/xc/extras/Mesa/bin/Attic/glx86asm.py,v > > revision 1.2 > date: 2000/12/07 16:12:47;  author: dawes;  state: dead;  lines: +0 -0 > Remove from the trunk the Mesa files that aren't needed. > > Latest entry in cvs log of c/extras/Mesa/src/X

RE: glapi_x86.S glx86asm.py

2003-01-30 Thread Alexander Stohr
> You'd have to ask Brian to be sure, but I believe the > intention is that > if the interface ever changes, a new .S file be generated in the Mesa > tree and imported to the XFree86 & DRI trees. There should > never be a > case where the .S file would change in XFree86 and not change in Mesa

RE: controlling refresh rate of the graphics card

2003-01-30 Thread Alexander Stohr
what about syncing to the vertical blank? some cards do provide you an interrupt handler for this. i mean if you want to do it with OpenGL in fullscreen anyways then you just have to use double buffered mode and call glSwap() anytimes you are done with rendering. if you want to do something more

RE: DRM module compile problem under FreeBSD 5.0

2003-01-30 Thread Alexander Stohr
PCI-gart is a still developing component that is maintained in the "XFree86 3D instable" tree, which is better known as "dri-devel" project. you might have better chances when asking there. anyways, that far i do know about PCI-gart, it was under some rather vague development. there were more pat

RE: controlling refresh rate of the graphics card

2003-01-31 Thread Alexander Stohr
> Alexander Stohr wrote: > > >what about syncing to the vertical blank? > >some cards do provide you an interrupt handler for this. > > what is the vertical blank ? . do you know somewhere > where I can > get more information on this? www.opengl.org is o

RE: Radeon clones need support

2003-02-13 Thread Alexander Stohr
All below subscribes to my poor(!) knowledge in order to get you a better view of your state: VendorID 0x1002 means an original ATI chip design DeviceID 0x4136 "A6" is the A3 chip, which might be better known as Radeon IGP 320 M (M=Mobility=Laptop/Notebook) 0x4336 "C6" is the U1 chip, wh

RE: Unsupported Card

2003-02-14 Thread Alexander Stohr
> Please forward 'scanpci -v' output to XFree86 support team. > > When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send > the full server output, not just the last messages. > This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.8.log". i have not seen your XFree86.*.log file. > Please

RE: kernel paging problem

2003-02-14 Thread Alexander Stohr
> It looks like you need to begin with Linux kernel FAQ: > http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s4-3 why not point him out to "Writing Linux Device Drivers, 2nd edition" from Rubini/Corbet? Its even availabel for download. > /Matti Aarnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >

RE: RELNOTES for 4.3.0

2003-02-19 Thread Alexander Stohr
RandR integration with partial enable of features? > -Original Message- > From: Alan Hourihane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RELNOTES for 4.3.0 > > > Here's a list of items for the RELNOTES for 4.3.0, if anyone >

RE: RELNOTES for 4.3.0

2003-02-19 Thread Alexander Stohr
> > A quick question regarding the 9500 and 9700 series Radeons > - is support for > > 3D acceleration planned? > > Eventually, someday, if ATI releases the relavent documentation and > enough developers have the time to do the work. In the meantime, if > you're on x86 Linux (or perhaps some B

RE: RELNOTES for 4.3.0

2003-02-19 Thread Alexander Stohr
Gatos is focussing on video and TV playback, TV/video-in functionality and video capture. But they are _not_ focussed on 3D to my understanding. thanks for the link to the AIW Radeon 9700 comments. the text outlines that even gatos has not timeframe how their development will proceed. for my und

RE: FW: [Xpert]2 mice -> 2 pointer ?!?

2003-02-19 Thread Alexander Stohr
> Anyhow, thanks for the solution! Its a shame that X isn't > going to be able > to cope with multiple focus trees, but I agree the issues are > many, and the > need little... > > Rob what if it is not at all a software cursor but something like the x-eyes application? i mean a free from windo

RE: patch to make 4.3.0 build on FreeBSD 5.0-Current alpha

2003-03-11 Thread Alexander Stohr
[snipped the patch] > Is there a better way to submit patches like this? I've just > subscribed > to the devel list in the last 10 minutes :). > > Fred Clift sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] queues your patch for integration. maybe unified diffs are the prefered style (diff -u src dst). it improv

RE: (no subject)

2003-03-13 Thread Alexander Stohr
sorry this is the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list, dealing with the X11 grafical window environment for the Linux, Unix, BSD and other operating systems. this specific list handles mainly internal programming topicis on the mentioned project. i think you should ask your question somewhere else. -

RE: embedded

2003-03-13 Thread Alexander Stohr
please visit e.g. http://midori.transmeta.com thats what you possibly do want. XF86 this is really not the emedded Linux helpdesk, thanks. pgui (PicoGUI) is a grafics centric project, so you are wrong with posting them as well. i mean you are currently in process of fiddeling out which OS and f

notes on SonicBlue (S3) and S3TC

2003-03-26 Thread Alexander Stohr
Hmm, SonicBlue (aka known as S3) has claimed bankrupcy (Chapter 11) recently, so its a changing situation with S3TC compression right now - who will ever buy that patent and charge the world for the next 70 years? Of course the prefered solution would be that some interested circles buy it as a

RE: radeon 9200 (rv280) support

2003-06-06 Thread Alexander Stohr
(all expressed below is my personal opinion) there is a sound in the below text which i dont like for misc reasons. but ignoring my impressions, there might be some basic clarifications needed. the xfree86 developers drove the policy to only incoroporate highly "important fixes" for releases th

RE: Diamond, Orchid, S3, Supra support/files

2003-05-29 Thread Alexander Stohr
Diamond/S3 had a series of driver CDs that were meant for the vendor and service level. Those were called "ServiceCD" and contained a current driver collection of all products. I have to assume that the last release is at least two years old and might be in stock for misc people since they were fo

portability of function prototypes?

2003-04-12 Thread Alexander Stohr
i am seeing constructs like this at several locations of the XFree86 sources: *.h: extern char *Xpermalloc( #if NeedFunctionPrototypes unsingend int /* size */ #endif ); *.c: char *Xpermalloc(unsigned int length) { ... } #if NeedFunctionPrototypes XrmQuark XrmStringToQuark(

RE: Getting Dual Independent Heads to work on Debian(sid) on iBook

2003-06-12 Thread Alexander Stohr
I dont really know driver or chipset in detail, but its the way that it needs programming so that the timing for the LCD does match. black or striped or whatever effects do indcate wront timing for the flat pane display. If the device is capable of dual head in other OS condtions then it can do it

RE: RH9 Display Settings Card List

2003-07-06 Thread Alexander Stohr
> From: Mike A. Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I plan on replacing the Cards database in Red Hat Linux with a > new mechanism sometime in the future which will be much more > flexible, allow per architecture overrides, allow the config tool > to know what hardware supports DRI and on what speci

RE: Rant (was Re: ATI Drivers.)

2003-07-19 Thread Alexander Stohr
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > > > For consumer desktop that's true. There is one potential business > > case in the professional desktop market. SGI's, HP's and Sun's old > > workstation customers have been moving over to Linux. Thats no market secret to anyone at all. You

RE: Rant (was Re: ATI Drivers.)

2003-07-19 Thread Alexander Stohr
> From: William Suetholz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mr. Harris, yes I am one of "Those people" who want a device to work > in my chosen operating system, /me wants "Commodore 64 - BASIC BIOS 2.0" support, call it my favorite! Cool machine, boots in 2 seconds to a fully useable prompt. It must

RE: patch procedure ..

2003-07-24 Thread Alexander Stohr
from 24 hours to 7 days depending on complexity and on people having time working on it. -Alex. > -Original Message- > From: Sven Goethel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 19:17 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: patch procedure .. > > > sorry for being lazy and n

RE: Hardware overlays (8+24?) on Intel i830

2003-07-25 Thread Alexander Stohr
mobile devices will always have more limitations, so you wont get rid of any sort of low bpp formats. in multi buffer environments, such as OGL with front, back, depth, stencil, overlay, whatever you will be in need to deal with any sort of pixel depth at the same time as well. for imaging progra

RE: via driver and mtrr problem

2003-08-01 Thread Alexander Stohr
> I'm running XFree 4.3.99.8 with kernel 2.6.0.test2 on a via M1 > motherboard. > I loaded the modules for mtrr, i2c and agpgart for via. > > Into XF86Config I choose via driver > When I start X there's always this warning: > > (WW) via(0): Failed to set up write-combining range (0x > I

RE: radeonfb in 2.6.0-test2 and radeon 320m

2003-08-04 Thread Alexander Stohr
> I have laptop with 320m radeon. radeonfb didn't seem > to work for it on 2.4.21. Has this changed in 2.6.0-test2? this is the XF86 development mailing list for the XF86 windowing system infrastructure. there are other people around that do work on the framebuffer device support. you might

RE: Seeking MergedFB - Xinerama development advice

2003-08-04 Thread Alexander Stohr
just a short comment on the illustrations... > Mode 1: (fixed width font required for viewing) > > +--+ > |++ +-+| > ||| | || > ||| | || > ||

RE: patch to include some kernel info in banner

2003-08-14 Thread Alexander Stohr
> Granted, as the patch stands. However, I don't mind doing the minimal > fixing up for inclusion, as this information would be > extremely useful in > some logs. > > Why the extra symbol, if I may ask, instead merely using > defined(linux)? i suppose that those feature can be done on non-linu

RE: Radeon 9800

2003-08-21 Thread Alexander Stohr
should be supported in 2D by latest XF86 CVS drop. maybe supported X4.3.0 release by the "ChipID" override/fake option of XF86Config file, see man pages. supported by latest ATI 3.3.x beta drivers as from Schneider-digital.de and SuSE ftp. general user questions should possibly not go to the

RE: 2 questions about radeon driver

2003-08-19 Thread Alexander Stohr
CP mode means using an engine on the chip that gets the command data from main memory by itselves, some sort of busmaster DMA stream. MMIO means that the driver does program the chipset directly via its memory mapped registers. DRI means direct rendering and is the most common socket for current

RE: [XFree86] Driver problem for RADEON 9100

2003-08-17 Thread Alexander Stohr
(WW) RADEON(0): monitor1: Using default hsync range of 28.00-33.00kHz (WW) RADEON(0): monitor1: using default vrefresh range of 43.00-72.00Hz (II) RADEON(0): Clock range: 20.00 to 350.00 MHz (II) RADEON(0): Not using default mode "800x600" (hsync out of range) (II) RADEON(0): Not using mode "800

RE: [XFree86] 4.3 setup is dumping

2003-08-26 Thread Alexander Stohr
It looks to me that your grafis hardware is mirrored some 40 times on the PCI bus scan. and therefore the autodetection tries to load a bigger bunch of drivers, thus i assume memory exhaustions happens. Either you do find a way to fix up the PCI bus scan to up to the very first grafics device (a k

RE: ansifying xwininfo.c

2003-09-10 Thread Alexander Stohr
> This is the minimum work to get this program into ansi shape. > This patch is > ready for inclusion. If their are no objections to the patch, > it would be > very nice to get this in ASAP. It will make some other projects I am > working on go smoother. > > Thanks, Warren Turkal i have no reas

RE: ansifying xwininfo.c

2003-09-10 Thread Alexander Stohr
> So who applies these patches then? people that do read "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", if you submitted it there, or people who do read this list with some care. > I don't have CVS write, nor do I want it at this point. unlikely to get such an account that fast. (i dont have one.) anyways patching works

RE: setjmp needs fixing again, here's the issues

2003-09-10 Thread Alexander Stohr
> Since we already have a jmp_buf which is much larger than > necisarry, all > that is needed is to take the first offset into it which is properly > aligned for the given architecture and use that as the system jmp_buf. > when the compiler can guarentee the proper alignment this becomes a > 'nop'

RE: Porting Compaq AVGA driver to 4.x

2003-09-22 Thread Alexander Stohr
is there some x3.3.6 to x4.x.x porting guide around? -Alex. ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

SPLIT_WC_REGIONS - anyone out there?

2003-11-06 Thread Alexander Stohr
Hello, i stumbled across the above mentioned define and related code in the XFree86 sources (lnx_video.c). comparing X4.1.0 and X4.3.0 i found that the condtitnal coding of "if (base % size)" has vanished at some point in time and the handling is now hardcoded at this code location. to my best k

must builds be done as root?

2003-11-25 Thread Alexander Stohr
i tried a "make World"/make on a current CVS snapshot, using RH Linux 7.3 - and found that the drm kernel module makefiles will need root rights on /lib/modules/. i know that prior versions of xf86 sources did not force me to be "root" for building them. and i think it is a bad habit to force use

RE: (Warning long!) Re: X11 CVS with linux 2.6.0-test9?

2003-12-03 Thread Alexander Stohr
> I tried just leaving the display running without doing anything > interactive with the interface and X ran for several hours before > freezing. All that was running was Xscreensaver. I then tried > again using > X normally but with a different window manager (XFCE 4) and > it worked for > about

RE: (Warning long!) Re: X11 CVS with linux 2.6.0-test9?

2003-12-04 Thread Alexander Stohr
> I suppose I could have a hardware problem, since my PC is a > couple years > old now. However, I can leave the same computer just running a 2.4.x > kernel for days with no problems. Would the redesigned kernel > 2.6.x bang the hardware so much more; going beyond that of > kernel 2.4.x? It ca

RE: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

2003-12-04 Thread Alexander Stohr
> I always get these errormessage when I load agpgart and fglrx > and then startx. > > The weird thing is that X starts up with this gray screen and > the mouse > working. It only crashes the instant when the KDE dialog > should be coming up. > > (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"

RE: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

2003-12-04 Thread Alexander Stohr
> >run ldd on your glxgears or glxinfo executables and see > which libGL it > >is using. > > It is using the ones from the driver. It uses libGL which > points to a link > which is the drvier lib. I made a diff on the file which is > in the driver > directory and the installed libGL.so.1.2 and

RE: State of radeon driver

2003-12-10 Thread Alexander Stohr
you do want to report, 2D is okay, but there are performance issues and some glitches in 3D? if yes, then this roughly matches what is expected state of the art. 2D is solid and maintained by XF86 whilst 3D is hardening in DRI project for almost some time and the last merge back into XF86 CVS sho

RE: State of radeon driver

2003-12-10 Thread Alexander Stohr
the _ is the mailmain default but can be canged. only the fglrx closed source drivers from ATI for the i386/Linux platform do have 3D. Data"books" are no longer state of the art in the information technologies age. > > On Wednesday 10 December 2003 12:48, wim delvaux wrote: > > > Any idea

RE: State of radeon driver

2003-12-10 Thread Alexander Stohr
> I have tried these drivers but refuse to work. > They think I have an (unsupported) OEM card (=powered by ATI) > while according to the identity check programs > run under XP it 'should' be an ATI one (=Built by ATI) There is no general OEM barrier anymore. It only was i

RE: (Warning long!) Re: X11 CVS with linux 2.6.0-test9?

2003-12-13 Thread Alexander Stohr
> Can someone explain why the "<" business is in the > source file? That should not be. It looks to me like a broken file. Either patching or CVS transfer might have failed. -Alex. > static void r200SetBuffer( GLcontext *ctx, >GLframebuffer *colorBuffer, >

Re: radeon 9700 question - need working config

2003-12-31 Thread Alexander Stohr
tryout the closed source drivers from ATI´s website. if you find out about any problem then call either ATI or SuSE support on them. they must have a solution. -Alex. - Original Message - From: "William W. Austin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003

Re: [Dri-users] OT - Help with ATI 3.7 and UT2003

2004-01-19 Thread Alexander Stohr
if you dont have succes on OpenGL support with the 3.7 drivers from ATI then maybe tryout one of the earlier drivers. i cant tell you much about the 3.7 driver caracteristics since i have not had much time in recent 4 weeks and no equipment ready for testing them myselves. i do know that UT2003 wa

Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Manufacturers who fully disclosed specifications for agp cards?

2004-02-03 Thread Alexander Stohr
> Subject: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Manufacturers who fully disclosed > It is possible to gain the specs for a chip by discetion for i.e R300 > chip or NV 30 chips with the right tools like a electon microscope? "full specifications" as the headline does say is more than just the register des

Re: Manufacturers who fully disclosed specifications for agp cards?

2004-02-06 Thread Alexander Stohr
- Original Message - From: "netpython" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 9:38 AM Subject: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Manufacturers who fully disclosed specifications for agp cards? [...] > (reverse engineering) >