On 01/12/2012 02:46 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 de January de 2012 14.26.41, Samuel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=F8dal?=
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to remove the QTouchEvent::TouchPoint::Primary flag, as per
>> change request http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,12928
>>
>> The
On Friday, 13 de January de 2012 08.14.41, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> > Well, having method createX which creates Y doesn't sound good to me
> > either.
>
> Yes, this is worse than a binary-only bug.
>
> I don't know the policy for API changes for Qt 5.0,
> but when such a thing couldn't be fixed, noth
2012/1/13 Thiago Macieira :
> So, changing the name of this function is:
>
> - of little practical benefit
> - not 100% automatable without a code scanner
> - dangerous, as it creates silent bugs
what about the slightly more garden-variety approach of deprecating
the old one and introducing a n
Am Freitag, den 13.01.2012, 14:10 +0200 schrieb Robin Burchell:
> 2012/1/13 Thiago Macieira :
> > So, changing the name of this function is:
> >
> > - of little practical benefit
> > - not 100% automatable without a code scanner
> > - dangerous, as it creates silent bugs
>
> what about the slig
On 13 January 2012 12:32, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
>> what about the slightly more garden-variety approach of deprecating
>> the old one and introducing a new method?
>
> Maybe we should check the premise of this discussion first.
> Does that method really have the wrong name? It is called
> "cre
On Friday, 13 de January de 2012 13.32.27, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 13.01.2012, 14:10 +0200 schrieb Robin Burchell:
> > 2012/1/13 Thiago Macieira :
> > > So, changing the name of this function is:
> > > - of little practical benefit
> > > - not 100% automatable without a code s
On Friday, 13 de January de 2012 14.10.09, Robin Burchell wrote:
> 2012/1/13 Thiago Macieira :
> > So, changing the name of this function is:
> >
> > - of little practical benefit
> > - not 100% automatable without a code scanner
> > - dangerous, as it creates silent bugs
>
> what about the slig
Am Freitag, den 13.01.2012, 13:00 + schrieb Giuseppe D'Angelo:
> On 13 January 2012 12:32, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> >> what about the slightly more garden-variety approach of deprecating
> >> the old one and introducing a new method?
> >
> > Maybe we should check the premise of this discuss
Hello everybody.
I hereby propose to grant Nicolas Arnaud-Cormos "Approver" status.
Nicolas has contributed to Qt Creator development since 2010.
His contributions include the macro recording plugin, as well as fixes
and enhancements to the analyzer/valgrind plugin, cmake support,
and to variou
On 01/13/2012 02:10 PM, ext Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> (...)
> Surely startRequest() would have been a better name.
> But really not sure it is worth the hassle of changing it.
> Still Robins suggestions shows a practical approach.
I don't really think it is worth changing it, I think for 5.0 so
Hello
We've got a problem with -reduce-relocations. tl;dr: it's a broken concept and
we either add a permanent workaround or we stop using it. The permanent
workaround is to compile all executables in PIC/PIE mode.
Long story:
The -reduce-relocations option in configure checks that the compiler s
On Friday, January 13, 2012 12:33:46 PM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Hello
>
> We've got a problem with -reduce-relocations. tl;dr: it's a broken concept
> and we either add a permanent workaround or we stop using it. The permanent
> workaround is to compile all executables in PIC/PIE mode.
I thi
createReply doesn't make sense to me.
createRequest is perfectly fine in a sense that we query the server, and it
returns a reply out of it.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On 13.01.12 16:25, Sylvain Pointeau wrote:
> createReply doesn't make sense to me.
>
> createRequest is perfectly fine in a sense that we query the server,
> and it returns a reply out of it.
>
Well, it does make sense to me :-)
The request (QNetworkRequest) is already created. What the function
On Friday, 13 de January de 2012 15.55.06, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Friday, January 13, 2012 12:33:46 PM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > We've got a problem with -reduce-relocations. tl;dr: it's a broken concept
> > and we either add a permanent workaround or we stop using it. The
>
On 01/11/2012 08:29 AM, ext Quim Gil wrote:
> The only days that seem to suit a majority in this semester are during
> the week of June 18th. We still need to look at the availability of
> venues in Berlin for those dates.
Daniel & those of you with _Berliner Fachwissen_ : can you help nailing
do
Hi all,
This is just a general email informing Qt developers about a new API in Qt 5 -
QSensorGesture!
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/qt5/qsensorgesture.html
Of course, it also has a QML element - SensorGesture.
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/qt5/qml-qtsensors5-sensorgesture.html
There are a few simple gestur
Hi all,
I've been constructing a proxy model that hides multiple underlying
models. In this process, I have to translate the custom roles for each
model. E.g. the custom role enumeration for the duration of a music
track is not the same as for an album, but when accessed through my
proxy model, it
Just for fun I've been playing with a medium-sized QML app that we had written
for 4.7/Symbian and porting it to Qt5/QML2. Mostly have been working on Linux
but the past few days I finally got around to compiling Qt5 on Windows and
playing around with the project enough so that it would compile
19 matches
Mail list logo
