Re: [Development] Threads and the SQL Module

Hi, Just recently needed to fix threading issues with SQLite on non-Qt-context. Here here is obsolete information that helped me:). http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=MultiThreading. From that doc: "By "threadsafe" we mean that you can use different SQLite database connections in different

Re: [Development] Bug (and fix) in QGItem::itemChange() (?)

Please find attached a simple demo: If you try to move the big green rect by dragging the small red rect, the big rect will goes "wild", using my proposed fixed, the big rect follows the mouse as you drag the small rect. Chris On 16 February 2017 at 17:52, Ch'Gans wrote: > Hi

[Development] Bug (and fix) in QGItem::itemChange() (?)

Hi there, Here is my use-case: An item has "handles" child items, when the user moves around an handles, the parent item update it's geometry and position accordingly. Simple concept to let the user change an item geometry by dragging handles. Imagine, you're using a drawing application, you

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 09:00:09 PST Tuukka Turunen wrote: > First I want to say that I am also very sorry that we need to skip 5.8.1. > Unfortunately I do not see any other approach that would allow us to: 1) > catch the delay caused by 5.8 being late (and 5.7 being late, and 5.6

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 09:14:30 PST Marc Mutz wrote: > > Until yesterday, there wasn't much a disagreement, so the release team > > took > > it as consensus decision from the community. > > Sure there was no disagreement. It was _w_e_e_k_e_n_d_. There was no > agreement, either.

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 15:11:49 PST Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > That's a somewhat limited point of view. Yes, xz archives are slightly > smaller, but to be honest: In the days of 4K video streaming saving > 100MiB of download size doesn't seem as important as it was. There are

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 16:14:30 PST Kevin Kofler wrote: > Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > > If distros care about size they can re-compress. > > Well, and to my experience they do. > > I cannot speak for other distributions, but it is Fedora policy to never > modify an upstream

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > If distros care about size they can re-compress. > Well, and to my experience they do. I cannot speak for other distributions, but it is Fedora policy to never modify an upstream tarball unless it is required to remove files that cannot be legally redistributed for

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

Am 15.02.2017 um 18:08 schrieb Konstantin Tokarev: 15.02.2017, 20:07, "Thiago Macieira" : On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 09:04:12 PST Konstantin Podsvirov wrote: This can be not quite on this topic, but I have a suggestion and MVP implementation for

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

Am 15.02.2017 um 13:05 schrieb Dmitry Shachnev: On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: I would kindly request you to at least use tar.xz (rather than tar.gz) for the tarballs. (What you use as the Windows format is something you need to sort out with the Windows

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 08:54:40AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017, às 15:05:06 PST, Dmitry Shachnev > escreveu: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > I would kindly request you to at least use tar.xz (rather than tar.gz)

Re: [Development] Threads and the SQL Module

Hi, AFAIS it does not matter if sqlite is thread safe or not. The problem is that QSQLiteDriver itself is not thread safe. For example if two threads call beginTransaction() on the same driver and the "COMMIT" fails, both threads will call QSqlDriver::setLastError() which does "d->error =

Re: [Development] QtWebChannel: Upstreaming of Python client

On Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2017 11:15:13 CET Jonathan Liu wrote: > >> I agree, this sounds pretty useful, especially given that we’re also > >> working again on pyside since this spring. > >> > >> ...especially an implementation in Python and C++ both from the Qt > >> Project could be a really

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

15.02.2017, 20:10, "Alexandru Croitor" : > I think it's minimal viable product. Yes! It'w work for me now. You can try QtIFW (with --repository option) from my experimental installer for Windows:

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

On Wednesday 15 February 2017 17:50:47 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017, às 13:39:36 PST, Marc Mutz escreveu: > > On Friday 10 February 2017 11:59:56 Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > > Short summary: The Qt Company has decided to focus development effort > > > to 5.9 > >

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

I think it's minimal viable product. > On 15 Feb 2017, at 18:08, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > > 15.02.2017, 20:07, "Thiago Macieira" : >> On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 09:04:12 PST Konstantin Podsvirov >> wrote: >>> This can be not

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

15.02.2017, 20:07, "Thiago Macieira" : > On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 09:04:12 PST Konstantin Podsvirov > wrote: >>  This can be not quite on this topic, but I have a suggestion and MVP >>  implementation for QtIFW. >> >>  This may affect the development

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 09:04:12 PST Konstantin Podsvirov wrote: > This can be not quite on this topic, but I have a suggestion and MVP > implementation for QtIFW. > > > This may affect the development process, testing and create offline > installers. Most Valuable Player? --

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

Hello all!This can be not quite on this topic, but I have a suggestion and MVP implementation for QtIFW.This may affect the development process, testing and create offline installers.19:55, 15 February 2017 г., Thiago Macieira :Em quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017,

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

Hi Sean et al, First I want to say that I am also very sorry that we need to skip 5.8.1. Unfortunately I do not see any other approach that would allow us to: 1) catch the delay caused by 5.8 being late (and 5.7 being late, and 5.6 being late) and 2) enable implementation the much needed CI

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

Em quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017, às 15:05:06 PST, Dmitry Shachnev escreveu: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I would kindly request you to at least use tar.xz (rather than tar.gz) for > > the tarballs. (What you use as the Windows format is something

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

Em quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017, às 13:39:36 PST, Marc Mutz escreveu: > On Friday 10 February 2017 11:59:56 Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > Short summary: The Qt Company has decided to focus development effort to > > 5.9 > > [...] > > > In case of severe > > security vulnerability we would

Re: [Development] Threads and the SQL Module

I have used SQLite on android to access a SQLite database from Qt's Local Storage API and the Android API. I thought the serialization mode would have worked, but I experienced numerous corruptions, despite closing all the cursors/handles apropriately. I eventually re-wrote everything to use Qt's

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

On Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2017 12:52:50 CET Shawn Rutledge wrote: > users into upgrading to 5.9 sooner than they might otherwise I don't think that's true. I even think it's the opposite. Users of 5.6.2 or 5.7.1, that did not upgrade to 5.8.0 because it is a .0 release will also have to wait

Re: [Development] [meta-qt5] Qt5.8 qdbuscpp2xml broken for kde baloo?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: >> Em terça-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2017, às 10:08:27 PST, Andreas Müller via >> Development escreveu: >>> On Tue, Feb 14,

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

On Wednesday 15 February 2017 11:52:50 Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > On 15 Feb 2017, at 11:11, Marc Mutz wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 15 February 2017 10:36:33 Sean Harmer wrote: > > > >> First of all, apologies for not being able to make the release meeting > >> yesterday. I was

[Development] Threads and the SQL Module

According to http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/threads-modules.html#threads-and-the-sql-module database connection should be used within one thread *only*. I have checked SQLite driver and according to https://www.sqlite.org/threadsafe.html it supports multithreading by default. And it seems that Qt

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

On Wednesday 15 February 2017 12:52:50 Shawn Rutledge wrote: > FWIW the discussion was on #qt-releases, not exactly behind closed doors. Everything that doesn't happen in a QUIP or on this mailing-list, or to a lesser extent, Gerrit, is behind closed doors. All that was posted to this ML was:

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

2017-02-15 12:52 GMT+01:00 Shawn Rutledge : > > > On 15 Feb 2017, at 11:11, Marc Mutz wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 15 February 2017 10:36:33 Sean Harmer wrote: > >> First of all, apologies for not being able to make the release meeting > >> yesterday. I

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I would kindly request you to at least use tar.xz (rather than tar.gz) for > the tarballs. (What you use as the Windows format is something you need to > sort out with the Windows people.) The fact that tar.gz is still the most >

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

> On 15 Feb 2017, at 11:11, Marc Mutz wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 February 2017 10:36:33 Sean Harmer wrote: >> First of all, apologies for not being able to make the release meeting >> yesterday. I was in a workshop all day. >> >> For the record I think skipping 5.8.1 is a

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

Jani Heikkinen wrote: > well, of course this would be possible as well but this would be a change > to existing "behavior" : Currently 7z is with unix line endings. And as > you can see from statistic tar.gz and .zip are most used ones and so on it > would be quite reasonable to continue offering

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

>>Why not use most efficient compression formats instead, i.e. keep 7z and >>tar.xz only? well, of course this would be possible as well but this would be a change to existing "behavior" : Currently 7z is with unix line endings. And as you can see from statistic tar.gz and .zip are most used

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

15.02.2017, 13:39, "Jani Heikkinen" : > Hi all, > > As you know we need to optimize our systems to be able to keep our plans in > the future. In CI side we are handling at least 4 different branches at same > time. Releasing side we should be able to do many

[Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

Hi all, As you know we need to optimize our systems to be able to keep our plans in the future. In CI side we are handling at least 4 different branches at same time. Releasing side we should be able to do many releases/snapshots parallel, test those releases/snapshots parallel etc. And all

Re: [Development] QtWebChannel: Upstreaming of Python client

Hi Arno, On 26 October 2016 at 19:32, Arno Rehn wrote: > On 25.10.2016 13:36, Johannes Lochmann wrote: > >> Hi Arno, >> >> On 24 October 2016 at 00:53, Arno Rehn >>> wrote: >>> Hey everybody, At my company we've developed a

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

On Wednesday 15 February 2017 10:36:33 Sean Harmer wrote: > First of all, apologies for not being able to make the release meeting > yesterday. I was in a workshop all day. > > For the record I think skipping 5.8.1 is a big mistake. I would much rather > delay 5.9 by a few weeks and have a 5.8.1

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

First of all, apologies for not being able to make the release meeting yesterday. I was in a workshop all day. For the record I think skipping 5.8.1 is a big mistake. I would much rather delay 5.9 by a few weeks and have a 5.8.1 release out than skip it and try for a quick 5.9.0. Why would

Re: [Development] [meta-qt5] Qt5.8 qdbuscpp2xml broken for kde baloo?

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em terça-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2017, às 10:08:27 PST, Andreas Müller via > Development escreveu: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Andreas Müller >> >> wrote: >> > I just ran