Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

07.09.2017, 10:45, "Martin Koller" : >> It also seems that it requires a too new ICU devel package (at least >> for CentOS 7.3), that is I need to deactivate INTL by using >> -DENABLE_INTL=OFF >> >> Can you tell us what I actually disable with that switch, e.g.: what >> does no longer work ? Konst

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

07.09.2017, 10:45, "Martin Koller" : > On Donnerstag, 27. Juli 2017 16:13:05 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  27.07.2017, 16:41, "Martin Koller" : >>  > On Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017 14:20:28 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  > >>  >> >> You can compile with GCC 4.8 if IndexedDB and FTL JIT are d

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On Donnerstag, 27. Juli 2017 16:13:05 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > 27.07.2017, 16:41, "Martin Koller" : > > On Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017 14:20:28 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > >> >> You can compile with GCC 4.8 if IndexedDB and FTL JIT are disabled. > >> However this brings a > >> >>

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

17.08.2017, 18:17, "Thiago Macieira" : > On Thursday, 17 August 2017 08:12:23 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  Altrernatively, you can drop qtwebkit sources on the same level with other >>  Qt modules, however it will break if you customize installation paths, e.g. >>  use custom libdir. Also, c

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On Thursday, 17 August 2017 08:12:23 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > Altrernatively, you can drop qtwebkit sources on the same level with other > Qt modules, however it will break if you customize installation paths, e.g. > use custom libdir. Also, cross-compilation is not supported in this way Th

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

17.08.2017, 18:06, "Thiago Macieira" : > On Thursday, 17 August 2017 07:24:05 PDT Martin Koller wrote: >>  Hi, >> >>  is the 5.212 branch now as integrated in Qt as it was before in Qt 5.5 in >>  the way that I can build Qt with webkit support so that the help system and >>  assistant also use it

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On Thursday, 17 August 2017 07:24:05 PDT Martin Koller wrote: > Hi, > > is the 5.212 branch now as integrated in Qt as it was before in Qt 5.5 in > the way that I can build Qt with webkit support so that the help system and > assistant also use it ? No. You need to use the split-build mechanism,

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Hi, is the 5.212 branch now as integrated in Qt as it was before in Qt 5.5 in the way that I can build Qt with webkit support so that the help system and assistant also use it ? What is the recommended way to build Qt and assistant to have webkit support ? -- Best regards/Schöne Grüße Martin

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

27.07.2017, 16:41, "Martin Koller" : > On Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017 14:20:28 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >>  >> You can compile with GCC 4.8 if IndexedDB and FTL JIT are disabled. >> However this brings a >>  >> degradation of user experience, especially in case of IndexedDB which >> was sup

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017 14:20:28 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >> You can compile with GCC 4.8 if IndexedDB and FTL JIT are disabled. > >> However this brings a > >> degradation of user experience, especially in case of IndexedDB which was > >> supported > >> in previous versions. There

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

24.07.2017, 08:33, "Martin Koller" : > On Sonntag, 23. Juli 2017 23:45:30 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  23.07.2017, 23:49, "Martin Koller" : >>  > On Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 17:03:50 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  > >>  >> I'm not sure it would be acceptable, because updated QtWebKit requi

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On Sonntag, 23. Juli 2017 23:45:30 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > 23.07.2017, 23:49, "Martin Koller" : > > On Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 17:03:50 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > >> I'm not sure it would be acceptable, because updated QtWebKit requires > >> full > >> C++11 support in the com

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

23.07.2017, 23:49, "Martin Koller" : > On Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 17:03:50 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >>  I'm not sure it would be acceptable, because updated QtWebKit requires full >>  C++11 support in the compiler (gcc >= 4.9, 4.8 possible with disabling some >>  features, or with code chan

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On Sunday, 23 July 2017 13:49:18 PDT Martin Koller wrote: > It would be really nice if the current release branch would compile at least > on these major distros Sorry, it's out of our hands. The source code upstream has moved on and is using C++ features not available in GCC 4.8. -- Thiago Mac

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 17:03:50 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > I'm not sure it would be acceptable, because updated QtWebKit requires full > C++11 support in the compiler (gcc >= 4.9, 4.8 possible with disabling some > features, or with code changes, which were not done yet). I'm trying to co

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

11.05.2017, 16:10, "Oswald Buddenhagen" : > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 09:53:26AM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote: >> Oswald Buddenhagen (4 May 2017 18:35) >> > i'll say outright that you can't be part of the qt supermodule and yet >> > have independent releases. while that was the plan on

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 09:53:26AM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote: >Oswald Buddenhagen (4 May 2017 18:35) >> i'll say outright that you can't be part of the qt supermodule and yet >> have independent releases. while that was the plan once upon a time, the >> whole release infrastruct

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Oswald Buddenhagen (4 May 2017 18:35) > i'll say outright that you can't be part of the qt supermodule and yet > have independent releases. while that was the plan once upon a time, the > whole release infrastructure simply doesn't deliver, and even just > diverging branch names are a pita (proved

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

  08.05.2017, 15:11, "Lars Knoll" : On 5 May 2017, at 13:15, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: 05.05.2017, 10:04, "Tuukka Turunen" :Hi,There has also been some interest also for getting Qt WebEngine to be released much faster cycle than Qt – exactly due to the secu

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

i.heikkinen=qt.io@qt- >>> project.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Tokarev >>> Sent: maanantaina 8. toukokuuta 2017 12.56 >>> To: Tuukka Turunen ; Oswald Buddenhagen >>> ; development@qt-project.org >>> Subject: Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming b

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Konstantin Tokarev Sent: maanantaina 8. toukokuuta 2017 12.56 To: Tuukka Turunen mailto:tuukka.turu...@qt.io>>; Oswald Buddenhagen mailto:oswald.buddenha...@qt.io>>; development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org> Subject: Re: [Development] QtWebKit is comin

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On 5 May 2017, at 13:15, Konstantin Tokarev mailto:annu...@yandex.ru>> wrote: 05.05.2017, 10:04, "Tuukka Turunen" mailto:tuukka.turu...@qt.io>>: Hi, There has also been some interest also for getting Qt WebEngine to be released much faster cycle than Qt – exactly due to the security update

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

; ; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2) > > > > 05.05.2017, 14:15, "Konstantin Tokarev" : > > 05.05.2017, 10:04, "Tuukka Turunen" : > >>  Hi, > >> > >>  There has also been some inter

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

05.05.2017, 14:15, "Konstantin Tokarev" : > 05.05.2017, 10:04, "Tuukka Turunen" : >>  Hi, >> >>  There has also been some interest also for getting Qt WebEngine to be >> released much faster cycle than Qt – exactly due to the security update >> need. Even if we succeed in making substantially m

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

05.05.2017, 10:04, "Tuukka Turunen" : > Hi, > > There has also been some interest also for getting Qt WebEngine to be > released much faster cycle than Qt – exactly due to the security update need. > Even if we succeed in making substantially more frequent Qt patch releases > than before, it m

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

05.05.2017, 10:04, "Tuukka Turunen" : > Hi, > > There has also been some interest also for getting Qt WebEngine to be > released much faster cycle than Qt – exactly due to the security update need. > Even if we succeed in making substantially more frequent Qt patch releases > than before, it m

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Hi, There has also been some interest also for getting Qt WebEngine to be released much faster cycle than Qt – exactly due to the security update need. Even if we succeed in making substantially more frequent Qt patch releases than before, it may still be better if user would have the option t

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

04.05.2017, 19:35, "Oswald Buddenhagen" : > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:51:45PM +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  03.05.2017, 17:27, "Sergio Martins" : >>  > On 2017-05-03 15:02, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  >>  Remaining question is versioning. While it's fine to dub current >>  >>  release "

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:51:45PM +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 03.05.2017, 17:27, "Sergio Martins" : > > On 2017-05-03 15:02, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >>  Remaining question is versioning. While it's fine to dub current > >>  release "5.9" (but not 5.0, because we will have another WebKit

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 07:21:03 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: > Yes. But using 5.$large_number seems wrong too, because there is no hard > upper limit for Qt 5.x series No, but it's highly unlikely we'll get to 5.20 or 5.100. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.c

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On 2017-05-04 14:51, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: 03.05.2017, 17:27, "Sergio Martins" : On 2017-05-03 15:02, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:  Remaining question is versioning. While it's fine to dub current  release "5.9" (but not 5.0, because we will have another WebKit update  in 5.10 time frame), u

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

04.05.2017, 17:17, "Thiago Macieira" : > Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 06:51:45 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev > escreveu: >>  I'm leaning towards "6.0.0" number, because it's larger than any 5.x and >>  makes it clear that versioning is different now. Bug fixes will increment >>  patch version

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 06:51:45 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: > I'm leaning towards "6.0.0" number, because it's larger than any 5.x and > makes it clear that versioning is different now. Bug fixes will increment > patch version (6.0.x), WebKit updates minor version (6.1.x etc)

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

04.05.2017, 16:52, "Thiago Macieira" : > Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 00:17:30 PDT, Jani Heikkinen escreveu: >>  > I hope for this (if possible, in 5.9 with Technology preview status >> >>  I don't think adding new TP in 5.9 at this point isn't that wise anymore. We >>  have agreed to g

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 00:17:30 PDT, Jani Heikkinen escreveu: > > I hope for this (if possible, in 5.9 with Technology preview status > > I don't think adding new TP in 5.9 at this point isn't that wise anymore. We > have agreed to get all these new submodules (also TP ones) in be

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

03.05.2017, 17:27, "Sergio Martins" : > On 2017-05-03 15:02, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  Remaining question is versioning. While it's fine to dub current >>  release "5.9" (but not 5.0, because we will have another WebKit update >>  in 5.10 time frame), using Qt versions in QtWebKit has downsid

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+jani.heikkinen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Tokarev > Sent: keskiviikkona 3. toukokuuta 2017 18.14 > To: Adalid Claure > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Developmen

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

03.05.2017, 21:25, "Thiago Macieira" : > Em quarta-feira, 3 de maio de 2017, às 10:55:49 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev > escreveu: >>  So, do you think we should update 5.6 branch of QtWebKit with wip/next >>  contents, fix qmake wrapper project to work with Qt 5.6, and raise >>  requirements to whatev

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Em quarta-feira, 3 de maio de 2017, às 10:55:49 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: > So, do you think we should update 5.6 branch of QtWebKit with wip/next > contents, fix qmake wrapper project to work with Qt 5.6, and raise > requirements to whatever it can require with Qt 5.9? That's fine with me

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

03.05.2017, 20:44, "Thiago Macieira" : > Em quarta-feira, 3 de maio de 2017, às 08:03:50 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev > escreveu: >>  I'm not sure it would be acceptable, because updated QtWebKit requires full >>  C++11 support in the compiler (gcc >= 4.9, 4.8 possible with disabling some >>  features

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Em quarta-feira, 3 de maio de 2017, às 08:03:50 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: > I'm not sure it would be acceptable, because updated QtWebKit requires full > C++11 support in the compiler (gcc >= 4.9, 4.8 possible with disabling some > features, or with code changes, which were not done yet).

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

03.05.2017, 18:05, "Adalid Claure" : > Does this mean that at some point this new QtWebKit would be packaged with Qt > (like in the old days)? I hope for this (if possible, in 5.9 with Technology preview status ;) Also note that you can already get binaries compatible with Qt 5.8.0 from https

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Does this mean that at some point this new QtWebKit would be packaged with Qt (like in the old days)? On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Sergio Martins wrote: > On 2017-05-03 15:02, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >> Remaining question is versioning. While it's fine to dub current >> release "5.9" (bu

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

03.05.2017, 17:27, "Sergio Martins" : > On 2017-05-03 15:02, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  Remaining question is versioning. While it's fine to dub current >>  release "5.9" (but not 5.0, because we will have another WebKit update >>  in 5.10 time frame), using Qt versions in QtWebKit has downsid

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

On 2017-05-03 15:02, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: Remaining question is versioning. While it's fine to dub current release "5.9" (but not 5.0, because we will have another WebKit update in 5.10 time frame), using Qt versions in QtWebKit has downsides: 1. It is not clear if 5.N+1 ships with the same

[Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Hi all, A lot of time has passed since original thread [1]. Lots of work was done since then, and it took much more time than what I've originally planned, however I think now we can use updated QtWebKit as a full replacement of our previous branch that didn't have updates of WebKit engine sinc

Re: [Development] qtwebkit

Em sexta-feira, 16 de dezembro de 2016, às 15:05:57 PST, Harald Vistnes escreveu: > Hi Konstantin, > > precompiled binaries for VS2015 and Qt 5.8 would be perfect! That would > save me a lot of time. Compiling qtwebkit failed, I haven't had the time to > dig into it yet. I'll try your binaries in

Re: [Development] qtwebkit

bkit-im-back.html > > > > Harald > > > > 2016-12-16 10:14 GMT+01:00 Kai Koehne : > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: Harald Vistnes [mailto:harald.vist...@gmail.com] > >>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 10

Re: [Development] qtwebkit

016-12-16 10:14 GMT+01:00 Kai Koehne : >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Harald Vistnes [mailto:harald.vist...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 10:01 AM >>> To: Kai Koehne >>> Cc: development@qt-project

Re: [Development] qtwebkit

> > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 10:01 AM > > To: Kai Koehne > > Cc: development@qt-project.org > > Subject: Re: [Development] qtwebkit > > > > Yes, nothing happens. > > So there's no output from qmake? Have you checked that the webkit sources > are a

Re: [Development] qtwebkit

> -Original Message- > From: Harald Vistnes [mailto:harald.vist...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 10:01 AM > To: Kai Koehne > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] qtwebkit > > Yes, nothing happens. So there's no output

Re: [Development] qtwebkit

ai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > > project.org] On Behalf Of Harald Vistnes > > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 9:55 AM > > To: development@qt-project.org > > Subject: [Development] qtwebkit > > > > Hi, > > > > is it still possible to build the qtwebkit module man

Re: [Development] qtwebkit

6, 2016 9:55 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] qtwebkit > > Hi, > > is it still possible to build the qtwebkit module manually in 5.8.0? I've > tried > fetching the sources from git, but qtwebkit is not built. I guess I have to > change some build

[Development] qtwebkit

Hi, is it still possible to build the qtwebkit module manually in 5.8.0? I've tried fetching the sources from git, but qtwebkit is not built. I guess I have to change some build scripts since it is obsolete, but I am not sure what needs to be done. Here is what I did git clone git://code.qt.io/q

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

07.06.2016, 19:01, "Stephen Chu" : > I don’t see Mac mentioned in either links provided. Is Mac supported? You can build qtwebkit-stable branch on OS X now, see instructions at [1]. Binaries will be available for TP2. [1] https://github.com/annulen/webkit/wiki/Building-QtWebKit-on-OS-X > > Ste

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

Allan, Thanks for write-up, I'd like to add just a few side notes 08.06.2016, 22:49, "Allan Sandfeld Jensen" : >  I was asked how we used to structure and develop QtWebKit, and how it would >  relate to the new project. So here some background and my thoughts: > >  The way QtWebKit used to be dev

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

I was asked how we used to structure and develop QtWebKit, and how it would relate to the new project. So here some background and my thoughts: The way QtWebKit used to be developed was upstream in WebKit, at some point a release was branched and squashed into the qt respository in one big commi

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

07.06.2016, 19:01, "Stephen Chu" : > I don’t see Mac mentioned in either links provided. Is Mac supported? Not yet, though a couple of changes needed to compile on OS X were already integrated. If you want to try building it, I can give you a few instructions. > > Stephen Chu > > On 6/4/16, 3:

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

I don’t see Mac mentioned in either links provided. Is Mac supported? Stephen Chu On 6/4/16, 3:20 PM, "Development on behalf of Konstantin Tokarev" wrote: >Hi all, > >As some of you may already know, there is an ongoing effort to revive QtWebKit >by updating its WebKit engine to the cur

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

On 07/06/16 16:03, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" wrote: >Em terça-feira, 7 de junho de 2016, às 08:47:12 PDT, Florian Bruhin escreveu: >> FWIW the unofficial name it just happened to get in various related >> IRC channels is "QtWebKit-NG" ;) > >I like that. Sounds good to me as wel

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

Em terça-feira, 7 de junho de 2016, às 08:47:12 PDT, Florian Bruhin escreveu: > FWIW the unofficial name it just happened to get in various related > IRC channels is "QtWebKit-NG" ;) I like that. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technol

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

07.06.2016, 09:47, "Florian Bruhin" : > * Lars Knoll [2016-06-07 06:38:35 +]: >>  Ok, in this case a separate repo is maybe a better strategy. >>  WebKitQt (as Allan proposed) might be a good name in this case :) > > I don't want to start any bike-shedding here, but if there's a > QtWebKit a

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

* Lars Knoll [2016-06-07 06:38:35 +]: > Ok, in this case a separate repo is maybe a better strategy. > WebKitQt (as Allan proposed) might be a good name in this case :) I don't want to start any bike-shedding here, but if there's a QtWebKit and a WebKitQt and those are *basically* different v

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

On 06/06/16 17:40, "Konstantin Tokarev" wrote: > > >06.06.2016, 16:54, "Lars Knoll" : >> Hi Konstantin, >> >> I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes >> of course both source code and bug tracking) :) > >Thank you! > >> >> I don’t think it is a problem that

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

06.06.2016, 16:54, "Lars Knoll" : > Hi Konstantin, > > I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes > of course both source code and bug tracking) :) > > I don’t think it is a problem that the set of supported platforms is > different from Qt WebKit in 5.6, this w

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

06.06.2016, 16:54, "Lars Knoll" : > Hi Konstantin, > > I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes > of course both source code and bug tracking) :) Thank you! > > I don’t think it is a problem that the set of supported platforms is > different from Qt WebKit i

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

Hi Konstantin, I’d be happy to host this project here on qt-project.org (and that includes of course both source code and bug tracking) :) I don’t think it is a problem that the set of supported platforms is different from Qt WebKit in 5.6, this would have evolved in any way due to changes in

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

On Saturday 04 June 2016, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em sábado, 4 de junho de 2016, às 22:20:14 BRT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: > > 2. Is it OK to use "QtWebKit" name for this project, and if yes, how > > should it be versioned? > > > > Pros: > > * It is a drop-in replacement for QtWebKit, > > Pl

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

Em sábado, 4 de junho de 2016, às 22:20:14 BRT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: > 2. Is it OK to use "QtWebKit" name for this project, and if yes, how should > it be versioned? > > Pros: > * It is a drop-in replacement for QtWebKit, Please don't. You can use the same soname if you are binary compati

[Development] QtWebKit is coming back

Hi all, As some of you may already know, there is an ongoing effort to revive QtWebKit by updating its WebKit engine to the current state of upstream at webkit.org [1]. While it still haven't reached feature parity with QtWebkit module hosted by Qt Project, its Widgets API is already in a goo

Re: [Development] QtWebkit to vcxproj

Em sexta-feira, 27 de maio de 2016, às 08:47:01 BRT, raven-worx Software escreveu: > QtWebkit conversion also looks good so far. Only WTF, JavaScriptCore > and WebCore modules are missing. In other words, most of WebKit. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect

Re: [Development] QtWebkit to vcxproj

27.05.2016, 09:47, "raven-worx Software" : > Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > >>  note that vcxproj support for the build of qt as a whole has been >>  dropped a while ago, which is reflected by incomplete projects being >>  generated. you may be able to use them successfully for debugging, but >>  t

Re: [Development] QtWebkit to vcxproj

Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: note that vcxproj support for the build of qt as a whole has been dropped a while ago, which is reflected by incomplete projects being generated. you may be able to use them successfully for debugging, but there is no way to use them for actually building qt reliably.

Re: [Development] QtWebkit to vcxproj

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 04:11:00PM +0200, raven-worx Software wrote: > i am trying to create a vcxproj-Project of the QtWebKit module. > there is no hope whatsoever to get that working. note that vcxproj support for the build of qt as a whole has been dropped a while ago, which is reflected by inc

Re: [Development] QtWebkit to vcxproj

Which begs the question: Why? I'm not claiming it's not possible. But building Qt itself within Visual Studio Is not common, let alone Qt WebKit. Kai to integrate it into our "development ecosystem" and use the advantages of Visual Studio environment (visual debugging, central propert

Re: [Development] QtWebkit to vcxproj

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of raven-worx Software > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:11 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] QtWebkit to vcxproj > >

[Development] QtWebkit to vcxproj

Hi, i am trying to create a vcxproj-Project of the QtWebKit module. For that i call "qmake -tp vc -r" This results in error "Project ERROR: Strict subdir dependencies can only be used with subdirs template" (https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-50099) I can get rid of this error by commentin

Re: [Development] qtwebkit fails to build

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Koehne Kai wrote: > > -Original Message- > > [...] > > Failed to open file: > > Z:/src/kde/qt5/qtwebkit/Source/WebCore/mathml/mathtags.in > > at > > Z:/src/kde/qt5/qtwebkit/Source/WebCore/dom/make_names.pl > >

Re: [Development] qtwebkit fails to build

> -Original Message- > [...] > Failed to open file: > Z:/src/kde/qt5/qtwebkit/Source/WebCore/mathml/mathtags.in > at > Z:/src/kde/qt5/qtwebkit/Source/WebCore/dom/make_names.pl > line 306. > Makefile.WebCore.DerivedSources:786: recipe

Re: [Development] qtwebkit fails to build

[image: Mic Drop] No suggestions at all? :( I am stuck here and without Webkit, I cannot build digikam. On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Partha Bagchi wrote: > I seem to have hit another snag. Hoping someone can point to a solution. > In my build process, I am getting the following error: > >

[Development] qtwebkit fails to build

I seem to have hit another snag. Hoping someone can point to a solution. In my build process, I am getting the following error: mingw32-make[2]: Entering directory 'Z:/src/kde/qt5/qtwebkit/Source/WebCore' ( test -e Makefile.WebCore.DerivedSources || Z:/src/kde/qt5/qtbase/bin/qmake.exe Z:/src/kde/q

[Development] QtWebKit: Turning off NPAPI plugin

Hello! Recently I was wondering how to unload specific NPAPI-based plugin (e.g. flash player) via QtWebKit and haven't succeed so far. Do you guys have any ideas on is it possible or not? Ideally, I'd like to propogate a method to QWebView, which will unload() npapi module there, but I am not sur

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

; > > Regards, > Liang > > > > From: > development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org[development-bounces+liang.qi= > digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Yang Fan [missd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 7:24 AM > To: development@qt-project

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

h your configuration could verify it works or not. > > > > > > Have you created bug report? > > > > > > Regards, > > Liang > > > > > > > > From: development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org > > [deve

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

reated bug report? > > > Regards, > Liang > > > > From: development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org > [development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Yang Fan > [missd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 7:24 AM > To: devel

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

Liang From: development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org [development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Yang Fan [missd...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 7:24 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't displ

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

t;> Regards, >>> Liang >>> >>> -- >>> *From:* >>> development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org[development-bounces+liang.qi= >>> digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Yang Fan [missd...@gmail.com] &

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

.@qt-project.org[development-bounces+liang.qi= >> digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Yang Fan [missd...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, November 22, 2012 7:24 AM >> *To:* development@qt-project.org >> *Subject:* [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese >&g

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

The example under qt5\qtbase\examples\widgets\richtext\textedit seems OK. It could input Chinese characters, opens a text file contains Chinese characters and displays correctly. On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Konstantin Ritt wrote: > Hi, > > Plz check if the rich text editor example shows t

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

2012 7:24 AM > *To:* development@qt-project.org > *Subject:* [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese > characters correctly on Windows > > > Hi All, > > Maybe it's not so suitable to ask here, since there's no reply in the > Interest maillist. >

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

: development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org [development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Yang Fan [missd...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 7:24 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Ch

Re: [Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

Hi, Plz check if the rich text editor example shows these Chinese characters correctly. Konstantin 2012/11/22 Yang Fan : > > Hi All, > > Maybe it's not so suitable to ask here, since there's no reply in the > Interest maillist. > I built Qt5 from Git with MSVC2010 SP1 by myself, I used ICU5.0 t

[Development] QtWebkit from Qt5 couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows

Hi All, Maybe it's not so suitable to ask here, since there's no reply in the Interest maillist. I built Qt5 from Git with MSVC2010 SP1 by myself, I used ICU5.0 to build QtWebkit. But I found it couldn't display Chinese characters correctly on Windows, the official example under qt5\qtwebkit-examp

Re: [Development] qtwebkit changes to qt/4.8

Hi, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > Hi QtWebKit team, > is QtWebKit 2.3 planned how will this patch end up in Qt? (Is the Correction, I meant 'Since there is no QtWebKit 2.3 planned...' Girish ___ Development mailing list

[Development] qtwebkit changes to qt/4.8

Hi QtWebKit team, What's the best way to deal with patches to QtWebKit1/qt4 (for example, http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,21292) ? Is the strategy still to get it all upstream? Since, I assume, there is QtWebKit 2.3 planned how will this patch end up in Qt? (Is the answer that it won't ev

Re: [Development] qtwebkit-examples-and-demos.patch

Hi, On 11 February 2012 21:15, Philip Ashmore wrote: > Hi there. > Please find attached a patch for qtwebkit-examples-and-demos that allows the > build to complete on Debian Wheezy amd64. > > Please also note that this patch includes a previously submitted patch, not > yet applied. > > Also, exam

Re: [Development] qtwebkit-examples-and-demos.patch

Philip Ashmore said: > Hi there. > Please find attached a patch for qtwebkit-examples-and-demos that allows > the build to complete on Debian Wheezy amd64. > > Please also note that this patch includes a previously submitted patch, > not yet applied. > > Also, examples/webkit/fancybrowser/fancy

[Development] qtwebkit-examples-and-demos.patch

Hi there. Please find attached a patch for qtwebkit-examples-and-demos that allows the build to complete on Debian Wheezy amd64. Please also note that this patch includes a previously submitted patch, not yet applied. Also, examples/webkit/fancybrowser/fancybrowser.pro contains a TARGET.EPO

[Development] qtwebkit-examples-and-demos/examples/browser/cookiejar.cpp is missing "#include "

Hi there. qtwebkit-examples-and-demos/examples/browser/cookiejar.cpp is missing "#include ". Please find the patch attached. Regards, Philip Ashmore diff --git a/examples/browser/cookiejar.cpp b/examples/browser/cookiejar.cpp index d65573d..194f25b 100644 --- a/examples/browser/cookiejar.cpp