I was just posting where the geniuses frequent most.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
-Original Message-
Remember folks, this is not a technical help list, the boards exist for
that purpose - Jay has already asked the question there.
If we want this to be a productive forum, then we need t
Remember folks, this is not a technical help list, the boards exist for
that purpose - Jay has already asked the question there.
If we want this to be a productive forum, then we need to stay on-topic -
which is helping each other to produce or improve software packages.
If we wish to contribu
Many companies have their ISP's smtp server setup to forward all their
e-mail, which would fail the proposed test.
With a distinct lack of RR IPs, this would include anyone who isn't big
enough to have their own block of Ips.
Regards,
Craig F.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Carroll [ma
"Jay (E-Smith List)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have two E-Smith machines at different locations. Both boxes are
> running SME v5.5 and I used the latest and greatest FreeS/WAN from
> www.myezserver.com I installed the rpm at both locations following the
> instructions in the HOW-TO that was
I tried this, on one of the Windows computer. I changed the subnet to
255.255.0.0 which would include both of the private subnets on both
networks. (the class B network subnet was just for a test, not a
permanent setting). However, this didn't solve the issue. I know that
NetBEUI/NetBIOS isn't
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:49:03PM -0700, "Jay (E-Smith List)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was thinking along these lines too. In the IPSEC VPN section of the
> Server-Manager is offers a section where you can make the remote server
> the WINS server for the network. On the "client" server I
I was thinking along these lines too. In the IPSEC VPN section of the
Server-Manager is offers a section where you can make the remote server
the WINS server for the network. On the "client" server I set the WINS
server to the internal IP of the "server" server. Would this be a good
solution or
Windows networking of the "network neighbourhood" kind depends on
broadcast traffic from the master browser on the network.
I'm guessing this system isnt broadcasting traffic across the VPN.
I'm not 100% sure, but modifying the subnet mask on the windows machine
might work. The easy way is to edi
Greetings.
This group has been so helpful to me in the past, I was hoping that you
all could bail me out of another issue.
I have two E-Smith machines at different locations. Both boxes are
running SME v5.5 and I used the latest and greatest FreeS/WAN from
www.myezserver.com I installed the rpm
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Tom Carroll wrote:
> What I am wondering/wishing is if code can be added to the SMTP server
> software to make it compare the actual valid DNS upon reverse lookup to
> the domain being claimed by the connection. If the claimed domain is not
> found anywhere within the string r
Hi,
Just a quick off-topic remark:
Regarding the latest thread concerning 'meaningfull and wanted' efforts,
the following:
Nice! To see that _all_ dev-info people (and I mean _everybody_) are
trying to give their best!
I'm learning a lot and I appreciate it very much. I hope to contribute
at th
Folks, I have seen some varied discussion here and other places about
stopping spammers. Most folks use filters, like spam assassin and other
spam filtering software. As far as I can tell, this does not stop the
use of the bandwidth. Please correct me if I am wrong.
I see that most inexperienced p
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Greg J. Zartman wrote:
> workgroup or a windows domain. Given these two fact (and a bit of
> personal experience), it seems safe to assume that Win 9x and Me simply
> ignore ACL mappings.
Thanks. BTW, thanks for being our "CNN reporter" on the goings on of
the samba maili
You're saying that it would be logical for Win9x & ME machines to ignore
ACL mappings. But what is logical and what actually happens are
occasionally different with Uncle Bill's programs.
Very true Charlie. Sometimes the folks up in Redmond seem to defy logic.
However, neither Win9x nor ME ha
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Greg Zartman wrote:
> If I understand this parameter correctly, it tells samba to attempt to map
> unix permissions to NT ACLs. Seems to me this should be set to yes for all
> shares regardless of the windows version. Wouldn't Win9x & Me machines
> simply ignore the ACL mappi
15 matches
Mail list logo
