Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-10 Thread Nick Warr
- Original Message - From: Peter Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:13 PM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm Quoting Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gordon Rowell writes Commenting

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-10 Thread Michiel Blotwijk
In Charlie's contrib area you'll find mailfront-0.86-1es2 which allows you to nominate a log user in /var/service/smtpfront-qmail/env/LOG_RECIPIENT Is there any documentation on this? I googled the Internet for LOG_RECIPIENT mailfront but did not get any hits. Grepping the content of

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-10 Thread Peter Samuel
Quoting Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Actually I'm not patching it. It's a simple modification, listed in the FAQs on Djb's site: Set QUEUE_EXTRA to Tlog\0 and QUEUE_EXTRALEN to 5 in extra.h then recompile qmail.. As far as I know, that doesn't qualify as patching.

[e-smith-devinfo] mailfront LOG_RECIPIENT (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm)

2003-10-10 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:11:37PM +0200, Michiel Blotwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In Charlie's contrib area you'll find mailfront-0.86-1es2 which allows you to nominate a log user in /var/service/smtpfront-qmail/env/LOG_RECIPIENT Is there any documentation on this? Use the source,

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-09 Thread Nick Warr
- Original Message - From: Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:42 PM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 10:15:27AM +0200, Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-09 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Sounds interesting, I really just need a way to have a copy of every outgoing mail sent archived for review. If Charlie's contrib does that, I'll give it a look. Yes, it will do that. Much cleaner than patching

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-09 Thread Nick Warr
- Original Message - From: Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:34 PM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-09 Thread Peter Samuel
Quoting Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gordon Rowell writes Commenting out the entire %prep section should be fine. But, I'd still recommend using the updated smtpfront-qmail instead. If smtpfront doesn't cut it, I may end up doing this.. thanks for the

[e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-07 Thread Nick Warr
I need to recompile the e-smith qmail rpm to add archiving functionality, but I've noticed that the .spec file contains pre code to look for the qmail UIDs and GIDs on the system where the compilation is taking place, even though it will not be installed there. Why is this there? I compiled the

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-07 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 10:15:27AM +0200, Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to recompile the e-smith qmail rpm to add archiving functionality, You might like to look at doing this through smtpfront-qmail instead of patching qmail. The only supported way for a user to inject mail is via