Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Outlook IMAP problems with e-smith 4.1.2

2001-08-28 Thread dfowler
May just have been a coincidence, but, I had similar errors in Lookout!(sorry - Outlook). Since it worked in Webmail and worked with Netscape Messenger, I assumed the problem to be with Outlook. I installed the latest Office service pack and I haven't seen any errors since then. I believe

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Outlook IMAP problems with e-smith 4.1.2

2001-08-27 Thread Graeme Robinson
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Charlie Brady wrote: - sort the mail using procmail, but get qmail to do that message delivery: - create a maildir ~/Mail/folder1 - create ~/.qmail-folder1 containing: ./Mail/folder1/ - configure procmail to forward matching messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Outlook IMAP problems with e-smith 4.1.2

2001-08-27 Thread Charlie Brady
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Graeme Robinson wrote: This is bending my brain a bit - do you mean setup a different ~/Mail/folder1 and a different ~/.qmail-folder1 and a different .procmailrc rule for each of the folders you want mail sorted into? Yes. So the result is a mail comes in, procmail

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Outlook IMAP problems with e-smith 4.1.2

2001-08-27 Thread Darrell May
Michael Doerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: At least it sounds like procmail's latest stable version 3.15.2 might be able to do proper maildir support? For those wanting to test and report on this UID issue, I have 3.21-0.71 available. (Of course this would only work with newly

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Outlook IMAP problems with e-smith 4.1.2

2001-08-27 Thread Stephan Burmeister
-Original Message- From: Michael Doerner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] user password change, which way to go? The way as Windows users in an NT based network are used to do it is for example under

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Outlook IMAP problems with e-smith 4.1.2

2001-08-27 Thread Stephan Burmeister
Sorry guys, that message went to the wrong thread... Stephan -Original Message- From: Michael Doerner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] user password change, which way to go? The way as Windows users

[e-smith-devinfo] windows,samba,unix password sync [was RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Outlook IMAP problems with e-smith 4.1.2]

2001-08-27 Thread Darrell May
Stephan Burmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I found that modifying the passwd chat line in smb.conf to... snip Hi Stephan, it appears to me that the defaults are already there, just remarked out. # The following are needed to allow password changing from Windows to # update the Linux sytsem

[e-smith-devinfo] RE: windows,samba,unix password sync [was RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Outlook IMAP problems with e-smith 4.1.2]

2001-08-27 Thread Stephan Burmeister
Hi Darrel, it appears to me that the defaults are already there, just remarked out. the line I gave for passwd chat is different from the default. If I use the default and then try to change passwords on the server via the Win98 control panel, it changes the SMB password but not the Unix

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Outlook IMAP problems with e-smith 4.1.2

2001-08-26 Thread Michael Doerner
I'm using Outlook 2000 as my email client. I've just installed Darrell's procmail howto, and have setup mail filterering so mail from two mailing lists gets filtered to their folders. However, when I try to access the new messages in these folders, Outlook is giving me these errors: Your

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Outlook IMAP problems with e-smith 4.1.2

2001-08-26 Thread John Powell
--On Sunday, August 26, 2001 4:11 PM -0400 John Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, when I try to access the new messages in these folders, Outlook is giving me these errors: Your server has reported a UID which does not comply with the IMAP standard. This typically indicates a

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Outlook IMAP problems with e-smith 4.1.2

2001-08-26 Thread Michael Doerner
Your server has reported a UID which does not comply with the IMAP standard. This typically indicates a server bug. This is highly likely to be a problem with the way that procmail is storing messages into the INBOX mail folder. I would strongly suggest that procmail not be used to