Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-10 Thread Nick Warr
- Original Message - From: Peter Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:13 PM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm Quoting Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gordon Rowell writes Commenting

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-10 Thread Michiel Blotwijk
In Charlie's contrib area you'll find mailfront-0.86-1es2 which allows you to nominate a log user in /var/service/smtpfront-qmail/env/LOG_RECIPIENT Is there any documentation on this? I googled the Internet for LOG_RECIPIENT mailfront but did not get any hits. Grepping the content of

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-10 Thread Peter Samuel
Quoting Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Actually I'm not patching it. It's a simple modification, listed in the FAQs on Djb's site: Set QUEUE_EXTRA to Tlog\0 and QUEUE_EXTRALEN to 5 in extra.h then recompile qmail.. As far as I know, that doesn't qualify as patching.

[e-smith-devinfo] mailfront LOG_RECIPIENT (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm)

2003-10-10 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:11:37PM +0200, Michiel Blotwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In Charlie's contrib area you'll find mailfront-0.86-1es2 which allows you to nominate a log user in /var/service/smtpfront-qmail/env/LOG_RECIPIENT Is there any documentation on this? Use the source,

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-09 Thread Nick Warr
- Original Message - From: Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:42 PM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 10:15:27AM +0200, Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-09 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Sounds interesting, I really just need a way to have a copy of every outgoing mail sent archived for review. If Charlie's contrib does that, I'll give it a look. Yes, it will do that. Much cleaner than patching

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-09 Thread Nick Warr
- Original Message - From: Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:34 PM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-09 Thread Peter Samuel
Quoting Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gordon Rowell writes Commenting out the entire %prep section should be fine. But, I'd still recommend using the updated smtpfront-qmail instead. If smtpfront doesn't cut it, I may end up doing this.. thanks for the

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] The Qmail 1.03 src.rpm

2003-10-07 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 10:15:27AM +0200, Nick Warr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to recompile the e-smith qmail rpm to add archiving functionality, You might like to look at doing this through smtpfront-qmail instead of patching qmail. The only supported way for a user to inject mail is via