Hi,
The way I interpret the GPL is that e-smith must make the source
available (on written request for their cost of distribution and
within a reasonable period of time) but does not have to make the iso
available online and does not have to provide it free.
MITEL is required to
Hi Laurent,
I saw a message in the General discussion forum saying that mitel has
released 5.6 to their clients.
Mitel has done this with other releases, they first give it to pay
customers and partners and later on, they make it available for
downloading. Expect like a month or two for
Clarkconnect just released a new version you might want to check out.
Bob
On Saturday 14 December 2002 10:26 am, Jaime Nebrera Herrera wrote:
Hi Laurent,
I saw a message in the General discussion forum saying that mitel has
released 5.6 to their clients.
Mitel has done this with
Laurent Roudier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have a simple question : does SME 5.6 still a GPL licence software
or Mitel has decided to keep the source for them ?
A very good question Laurent.
A positive answer from Mitel stating, No worries, GPL release is coming
would certainly end this
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 08:02:06PM -, Darrell May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laurent Roudier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have a simple question : does SME 5.6 still a GPL licence software
or Mitel has decided to keep the source for them ?
A very good question Laurent.
A positive
the final iso, but
am rather curious if that is legal under terms of GPL.
Ryan Duffner
OnTarget Tech.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Darrell May
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] release 5.6
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 04:41:44PM -0600, Ryan Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
And before I get some flame response,
I am not criticizing e-smith's decision to withhold the final iso, but
am rather curious if that is legal under terms of GPL.
[...]
It's not a matter of us withholding
Hi Ryan,
I am no expert on GPL either but I have a different interpretation.
I have a question about the When (and even whether) we release a
final GPL image is Mitel's choice. That is not really true. If you
have shipped a commercial package using GPL software, you are required
to provide
samela [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
resist 'shots across the bows' in Mitel's direction (eg the
jibe for release date with you well know is against their stated
policy): it is an unworthy use of your intellect.
That really was not my intent. If it came across that way, my apologies
everyone. I
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 16:20, Paul Miller wrote:
Hi Ryan,
I am no expert on GPL either but I have a different interpretation.
I have a question about the When (and even whether) we release a
final GPL image is Mitel's choice. That is not really true. If you
have shipped a commercial
10 matches
Mail list logo
