On Sunday 02 December 2001 07:54 pm, you wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 03:46:26PM -0500, Scott Young wrote:
> > It would be good if we could transfer the javadocs into the Wiki page.
>
> I don't think this is a good idea. The Wiki pages should give an
> overview of what the components (packages
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 12:10:41PM -0500, Scott Young wrote:
> I think it would be better for freenet if the documentation is improved
> before version 5.0.
I agree. Let's make that a goal, good documentation will be available
around the same time as the Freenet 5.0.
<>
> P.S. @see directive
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Will Glynn wrote:
> Feedback at this stage is very welcome -- on any level
> (anything from "make sure you use CHKs in your install file" to "make it
> look cool")
Make sure there's plenty of informative feedback during the retrieval
process. I'm assuming that this installer is
/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011202/2e97e325/attachment.pgp>
On Sunday 02 December 2001 01:20 pm, you wrote:
> Similarily, there is a Wiki page intended to provide a resource for
> those hoping to understand Freenet's internals, it can be found at:
>
> http://freenetproject.org/wiki/index.php?Internals
>
> Again, it is far from complete, but adding to it
Jay Oliveri:
> Regardless, someone with a clue should outline a clear & concise
> table of contents, with special attention paid to who the audience
> is. I'd take part in working on the "Idiot's Reference" version
Nobody should need to read a manual just to run a node or get a
client working. Th
I fixed a nasty bug in the CP code yesterday.
My node is getting inundated with requests, which I think means
that the fix is a significant improvement. It would be good to get more
nodes updated to the new code.
--gj
--
Freesites
(0.3) freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/hom
On Sunday 02 December 2001 02:07 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 11:11:32AM -0800, tom longson wrote:
> > Ian, have you considered paying someone to write documentation on
> > the project? I think this could really help out new developers.
>
> It is a possibility, however I would ra
As many of you probably know, I am writing a Freenet client application for
Windows. I plan to release an installer that contacts the node via FCP,
downloads the "installation instruction" file, grabs the necessary files,
and does the normal installer-related stuff. Does anyone have any thoughts
re
I think it would be better for freenet if the documentation is improved
before version 5.0. When the version is put on slashdot and freshmeat, there
will be a surge of interest, but that interest will probably die quickly if
people don't know how to use freenet or where to find out how to use i
I'm really here, sent you an email about this Ian. All your goals seem
attainable in my opinion, and I will get this moving after this
wednesday (school finals).
Ian, have you considered paying someone to write documentation on the
project? I think this could really help out new developers.
*
gy Officer, Uprizer Inc. http://www.uprizer.com/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/2001
ype: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011202/14648950/attachment.pgp>
> Freenet Gateway will Brows the data store while offline!!
NEAT!!!1
One of the great things about Freenet is that anything that's in
your datastore is 'locally cached' so you don't have to download
it (from the outside Freenet) again.
-- Emil
___
14 matches
Mail list logo
