On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> Anyone got any better ideas?
An extension similar to Torbutton?
--Joel
gt; Shipping firefox portable would work for only one platform, no?
Possibly.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/41f82113/attachment.pgp>
dn't expect it to so badly harm me.
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/82a860ad/attachment.pgp>
> 2. Ship a copy of Portable Firefox (~ 6MB), or some other self contained
> browser. Find some way to auto-update it.
>
> ...
>
> Anyone got any better ideas?
What about Prism?
http://labs.mozilla.com/featured-projects/#prism
As far as I know, you can create Shortcuts and run
d...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/ef96d135/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do you think that the following plugin for FF could be tweaked for
Freenet's use?
Torbutton (https://torbutton.torproject.org/dev/)
snip*
Torbutton is a 1-click way for Firefox users to enable or disable
the browser's use of Tor. It adds a panel to
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 24 March 2008 18:06, Michael Rogers wrote:
>
>> Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>
> [snip]
>>> all space savings from CHK-based splitfiles. This proposal is feasible
>>> immediately.
>>>
>> Two questions:
>> 1) How important is saving space compared to
Am Freitag, 21. M?rz 2008 14:53:50 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Friday 21 March 2008 03:32, guido wrote:
> > I noticed that in this build, the "friends" page reports "Other
> > output: -8841846 B (-3%)". That can't be right.
>
> 0% here. Let me know if it increases beyond 3%.
Right now I've
On approach, at least to avoid the stats page not returning after
starting the loading of 10 freesites on separate tabs, might be to
separate the node control/stats parts of FProxy from the key fetching
parts by placing one of the two on a separate TCP port.
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Okay,
ot;Other
> input" from it?
There is some doublecounting somewhere. Most of it has been fixed in trunk.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/d0add381/attachment.pgp>
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 11:55:36 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> IMHO there is a need for some serious debugging for Freemail. It works very
> poorly for me, at least for sending messages. Also there should be optional
> support for CAPTCHAs the first time a channel is set up.
I think this actually
ing.
--
Robert Hailey
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/c20eeb84/attachment.html>
--- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/9c8e78f0/attachment.html>
next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/2b415bf2/attachment.pgp>
freespace
nextgens
toad
tommy
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/a0278be5/attachment.pgp>
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/c3ea707b/attachment.html>
ough my Junior Enterprise[2].
>
> [1]
>
<http://ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr/servlet/com.univ.utils.LectureFichierJoint?CODE=1194595034529=0>
> [2] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junior_enterprise>
>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/e79dd27e/attachment.pgp>
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-sign
crubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/d6c81e25/attachment.pgp>
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/1cd57cb9/attachment.pgp>
tproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs
>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080325/8e28806b/attachment.pgp>
Hi devs,
Here is a draft of my proposal for Freenet. A PDF version is available at :
http://www.milliways.fr/tmp/freenet.pdf
Greetings
Obey Arthur Liu
Application for Summer of Code 2008 : Linux packaging for Freenet
Obey Arthur Liu
March 2008
*Abstract*
I will extend the current
Hi all,
(Firstly, sorry this isn't a reply to the original message - I'm not in
front of my normal email client and hence having silly webmail issues.)
However, I just thought I'd send a quick mail to say 'hello' as I'd most
likley be mentoring for the Freemail web interface project. I did most
IMHO there is a need for some serious debugging for Freemail. It works very
poorly for me, at least for sending messages. Also there should be optional
support for CAPTCHAs the first time a channel is set up.
On Friday 21 March 2008 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
(Firstly, sorry
On Thursday 20 March 2008 23:55, Arthur Randolph wrote:
Hi devs,
Here is a draft of my proposal for Freenet. A PDF version is available at :
http://www.milliways.fr/tmp/freenet.pdf
Greetings
Obey Arthur Liu
Application for Summer of Code 2008 : Linux packaging for Freenet
Freenet 0.7 build 1127 is now available. It will be mandatory on Thursday.
Please upgrade ASAP. This build includes a wide range of bugfixes and one or
two new features:
- Transport layer fixes related to losing key trackers, resulting in hanging
packet throttle - we were no longer able to send
1128 fixes a couple of serious bugs in 1127. Please upgrade. Sorry folks.
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 14:15, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7 build 1127 is now available. It will be mandatory on Thursday.
Please upgrade ASAP. This build includes a wide range of bugfixes and one or
two new
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 11:55:36 Matthew Toseland wrote:
IMHO there is a need for some serious debugging for Freemail. It works very
poorly for me, at least for sending messages. Also there should be optional
support for CAPTCHAs the first time a channel is set up.
I think this actually
Am Freitag, 21. März 2008 14:53:50 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Friday 21 March 2008 03:32, guido wrote:
I noticed that in this build, the friends page reports Other
output: -8841846 B (-3%). That can't be right.
0% here. Let me know if it increases beyond 3%.
Right now I've got:
Other
I recently decided to try Freenet. Just the act of installing it has
destroyed my internet connectivity. Freenet took over Firefox, wiping out
all of my bookmarks and extensions. I uninstalled Freenet and Firefox will
not start. I have reinstalled Firefox and it still will not start. I
desperatly
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 18:27, guido wrote:
Am Freitag, 21. März 2008 14:53:50 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Friday 21 March 2008 03:32, guido wrote:
I noticed that in this build, the friends page reports Other
output: -8841846 B (-3%). That can't be right.
0% here. Let me know if it
Sorry, I'm the idiot who decided to create a firefox profile. I was simply
trying to avoid some major performance issues we have because the default
settings are not good for Freenet, and asking users to change them globally
also sucks.
Freenet has not destroyed any data, it has simply created
Okay, having investigated this, I'm fairly confident of the current theory:
- If a copy of Firefox is already running with the default profile, and we
launch a copy with our profile (-no-remote -P profile name), everything
works fine (as long as our copy exits before the default one does).
- The
On Mar 25, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
- If the default profile is NOT running when we load our copy of
firefox with
our custom profile, when the link to firefox is clicked on, it
coalesces with
our copy and opens a new window using our profile and not the default
profile.
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 21:00, Robert Hailey wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
- If the default profile is NOT running when we load our copy of
firefox with
our custom profile, when the link to firefox is clicked on, it
coalesces with
our copy and opens
On Mar 25, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Anyone got any better ideas?
If the profile we ship was only unpacked/readable while freenet is
running, then (presumably) the conventional diagnostics (stop freenet/
uninstall freenet) would work around the 'take over' feeling.
--
2. Ship a copy of Portable Firefox (~ 6MB), or some other self contained
browser. Find some way to auto-update it.
...
Anyone got any better ideas?
What about Prism?
http://labs.mozilla.com/featured-projects/#prism
As far as I know, you can create Shortcuts and run webapplications in
a
Robert Hailey wrote:
If the profile we ship was only unpacked/readable while freenet is
running, then (presumably) the conventional diagnostics (stop
freenet/uninstall freenet) would work around the 'take over' feeling.
But if the user started a normal firefox session while freenet's firefox
On approach, at least to avoid the stats page not returning after
starting the loading of 10 freesites on separate tabs, might be to
separate the node control/stats parts of FProxy from the key fetching
parts by placing one of the two on a separate TCP port.
Matthew Toseland wrote:
Okay,
Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2008 18:06, Michael Rogers wrote:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
[snip]
all space savings from CHK-based splitfiles. This proposal is feasible
immediately.
Two questions:
1) How important is saving space compared to anonymity?
A
Matthew Toseland wrote:
However, if the network is large and the attacker's capacity for
connecting to many nodes at once is limited, or if the attacker needs to
trace the originator very quickly, an adaptive search as I have described
will be more feasible / yield results much faster.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do you think that the following plugin for FF could be tweaked for
Freenet's use?
Torbutton (https://torbutton.torproject.org/dev/)
snip*
Torbutton is a 1-click way for Firefox users to enable or disable
the browser's use of Tor. It adds a panel to
* David Sowder (Zothar) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-25 19:13:13]:
On approach, at least to avoid the stats page not returning after
starting the loading of 10 freesites on separate tabs, might be to
separate the node control/stats parts of FProxy from the key fetching
parts by placing one
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-25 19:34:54]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do you think that the following plugin for FF could be tweaked for
Freenet's use?
Torbutton (https://torbutton.torproject.org/dev/)
snip*
Torbutton is a 1-click way for Firefox
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone got any better ideas?
An extension similar to Torbutton?
--Joel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-25 19:41:59]:
Sorry, I'm the idiot who decided to create a firefox profile. I was simply
trying to avoid some major performance issues we have because the default
settings are not good for Freenet, and asking users to change them globally
also
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-25 20:36:43]:
Okay, having investigated this, I'm fairly confident of the current theory:
- If a copy of Firefox is already running with the default profile, and we
launch a copy with our profile (-no-remote -P profile name), everything
works
47 matches
Mail list logo
