e online installer is
straightforward... building the offline one is a bit trickier as you've
to "tell" the installer where the required packs are.
[snip.]
> >
> > I'm not arguing we should invest $ into getting a signed certificate. I
> > am sure we have professional developers here who do have a valid,
> > trusted certificate.
>
> Whom we can trust? Such as?
I don't think it's a matter of trust here; well, I don't know; I do have
one for instance and I'm sure we could find others if we asked.
Would anyone reading this mailing list volunteer to build and sign one
of our installers?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081215/97028344/attachment.pgp>
asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081215/8ecafbcc/attachment.pgp>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Toseland [mailto:toad at amphibian.dyndns.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 7:30 PM
> To: xor
> Subject: Re: I need help with Db4o / Freetalk
>
> On Monday 15 December 2008 13:45, you wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > there is a severe Db4o problem
promise to use
> Microsoft's own signing tools for the Windows installer (again: if we
> actually want to sign the .exe in this way).
Nextgens would certainly object to running Microsoft provided binaries on emu,
and I can see his point.
There is an argument for just providing a gpg signature for the binaries - but
otoh since Microsoft provides a signing/verification system we should
seriously consider using it.
>
> > Also, would we need to buy a separate code signing certificate for signing
> > windows EXEs? Or could we use one derived from the StartCom cert or
derived
> > from a code signing cert bought for signing jars?
>
> A bit out of my league. I'm not that much into all this signing stuff.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081215/3af71f2c/attachment.pgp>
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> On Saturday 13 December 2008 17:40, Zero3 wrote:
>
>> Matthew Toseland skrev:
>>
>>> Issues for the installer. Both Zero3 and nextgens seem to have decided to
>>> sulk, so I'll arbitrarily decide these issues where there is deadlock and
>>>
> if
>
>>>
Hi,
there is a severe Db4o problem in Freetalk:
Instances of class Message can only be created with a non-null member
variable mAuthor. Further, mAuthor is final. So when receiving messages, the
mAuthor field is definitely non-null when the Message objects are stored in
the database.
HOWEVER,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> Nextgens would certainly object to running Microsoft provided binaries on emu,
> and I can see his point.
...which is?
We're the Freenet Project, not the "anti-Microsoft" project. If using
some Microsoft code helps us to offer a better
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Zero3 wrote:
nextgens and Zero3 to equal degrees.
>>> I hope that's just meant as a joke... :-/
>> It was not intended as a joke at the time.
> Great way of making decisions then :-/
Obviously it was a joke, you people really need to get a grip - this
whole
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:46 AM, xor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> users are having the DatabaseClosedException appear with Freetalk/WoT
> randomly. Now I also received it, and I found the log line which caused it
> MAYBE.
> Now the question is, what is the reason for that? A db4o bug probably? Maybe
> we
nts/20081215/5446d577/attachment.ksh>
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-bounces at freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Cheng
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 12:59 AM
> To: Discussion of development issues
> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] DatabaseClosedException
>
> On Mon, Dec
Hi,
there is a severe Db4o problem in Freetalk:
Instances of class Message can only be created with a non-null member
variable mAuthor. Further, mAuthor is final. So when receiving messages, the
mAuthor field is definitely non-null when the Message objects are stored in
the database.
HOWEVER,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Nextgens would certainly object to running Microsoft provided binaries on emu,
and I can see his point.
...which is?
We're the Freenet Project, not the anti-Microsoft project. If using
some Microsoft code helps
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Toseland [mailto:t...@amphibian.dyndns.org]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 7:30 PM
To: xor
Subject: Re: I need help with Db4o / Freetalk
On Monday 15 December 2008 13:45, you wrote:
Hi,
there is a severe Db4o problem in Freetalk:
On Monday 15 December 2008 20:35, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Nextgens would certainly object to running Microsoft provided binaries on
emu,
and I can see his point.
...which is?
We're the Freenet Project, not
On Sunday 14 December 2008 12:48, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote:
That covers mine, toads and nextgens opinions. What do everyone else
think?
Here are my thoughts:
Bundling
--
I don't have a problem with bundling per-se
* Ian Clarke ian.cla...@gmail.com [2008-12-15 14:35:19]:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Nextgens would certainly object to running Microsoft provided binaries on
emu,
and I can see his point.
...which is?
As explained for the
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-13 19:20:21]:
On Saturday 13 December 2008 18:57, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-13 18:01:03]:
On Saturday 13 December 2008 17:22, Florent Daignière wrote:
In any case we are NOT
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-15 23:10:57]:
On Sunday 14 December 2008 12:48, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote:
That covers mine, toads and nextgens opinions. What do everyone else
think?
Here are my
* Ian Clarke ian.cla...@gmail.com [2008-12-14 06:56:22]:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
Don't worry: that's the last reply you will get from me. I have more
important things to spare my free time on.
Okay so you concede. I'll
On Monday 15 December 2008 23:58, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-13 19:20:21]:
On Saturday 13 December 2008 18:57, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-13 18:01:03]:
On Saturday 13 December
* Ian Clarke ian.cla...@gmail.com [2008-12-12 17:56:59]:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
I don't care what you'd say. You are pushing for infrastructure changes
to be made: you are the one making demands here. The policy is what it
is:
* Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org [2008-12-14 06:48:57]:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote:
That covers mine, toads and nextgens opinions. What do everyone else think?
Here are my thoughts:
Bundling
--
I don't have a problem with bundling
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-16 00:14:58]:
On Monday 15 December 2008 23:58, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-13 19:20:21]:
On Saturday 13 December 2008 18:57, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 00:24, Florent Daignière wrote:
I'm not arguing we should invest $ into getting a signed
certificate. I
am sure we have professional developers here who do have a valid,
trusted certificate.
Whom we can trust? Such as?
I don't think
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-16 00:28:54]:
I'm not arguing we should invest $ into getting a signed
certificate. I
am sure we have professional developers here who do have a valid,
trusted certificate.
Whom we can trust? Such as?
I
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:37 PM, x...@freenetproject.org wrote:
Author: xor
Date: 2008-12-15 11:37:52 + (Mon, 15 Dec 2008)
New Revision: 24348
Added:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/pluginmanager/FredPluginWithClassLoader.java
Log:
Add code to allow plugins to know their ClassLoader. Db4o
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:45 PM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
Hi,
there is a severe Db4o problem in Freetalk:
Instances of class Message can only be created with a non-null member
variable mAuthor. Further, mAuthor is final. So when receiving messages, the
Did you try to make it non-final?
Maybe
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
On Saturday 13 December 2008 17:40, Zero3 wrote:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
Issues for the installer. Both Zero3 and nextgens seem to have decided to
sulk, so I'll arbitrarily decide these issues
29 matches
Mail list logo
