Before #1201, it was always about 50 KiB/s of the 100 KiB/s which Freenet is
allowed to use. Now it has increased:
# Total Input: 1.25 GiB (51.3 KiB/sec)
# Total Output: 1.63 GiB (66.9 KiB/sec)
# Payload Output: 1.20 GiB (49.5 KiB/sec)(74%)
Success rates
Group P(success) Count
All
Daniel Cheng skrev:
> Maybe we should try the another way round: detect if the user use the
> same browser
> for other web sites and issue a big fat warning for this.
>
Oh, the sweet irony in us using the same exploit to test if user has
visited http://www.google.com/, http://www.ebay.com/,
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> 1200:
> - More history cloaking bugfixes.
> - Make activelinks configurable and turn them off by default. Ian thinks they
> are ugly. I'm not sure, any opinions would be welcome. It is however clear
> that they slow down loading the homepage.
>
My opinion is still
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Florent Daigni?re
wrote:
> * svenerichoffmann at gmx.de [2009-01-18
> 00:50:17]:
>
>> I think the only "real" solution to guarantee safety
>> is a dedicated freenet browser.
>>
>> Trying to control the behaviour and safety of standard browsers
>> is serious
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> We decided to get rid of the firefox profile, because it was becoming the
> default profile on a few users' systems, causing severe problems as the user
> didn't know what a browser profile is let alone how to switch back to the
> default
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090118/a1f5b2e6/attachment.pgp>
I think the only "real" solution to guarantee safety
is a dedicated freenet browser.
Trying to control the behaviour and safety of standard browsers
is serious problematic. As Webmaster i know how much information
can be gained from visitors.
A dedicated browser would also give full control
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
We decided to get rid of the firefox profile, because it was becoming the
default profile on a few users' systems, causing severe problems as the user
didn't know what a browser profile is let alone how to switch
* svenerichoffm...@gmx.de svenerichoffm...@gmx.de [2009-01-18 00:50:17]:
I think the only real solution to guarantee safety
is a dedicated freenet browser.
Trying to control the behaviour and safety of standard browsers
is serious problematic. As Webmaster i know how much information
can
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
* svenerichoffm...@gmx.de svenerichoffm...@gmx.de [2009-01-18 00:50:17]:
I think the only real solution to guarantee safety
is a dedicated freenet browser.
Trying to control the behaviour and safety of
Matthew Toseland skrev:
1200:
- More history cloaking bugfixes.
- Make activelinks configurable and turn them off by default. Ian thinks they
are ugly. I'm not sure, any opinions would be welcome. It is however clear
that they slow down loading the homepage.
My opinion is still largely
Daniel Cheng skrev:
Maybe we should try the another way round: detect if the user use the
same browser
for other web sites and issue a big fat warning for this.
Oh, the sweet irony in us using the same exploit to test if user has
visited http://www.google.com/, http://www.ebay.com/,
Before #1201, it was always about 50 KiB/s of the 100 KiB/s which Freenet is
allowed to use. Now it has increased:
# Total Input: 1.25 GiB (51.3 KiB/sec)
# Total Output: 1.63 GiB (66.9 KiB/sec)
# Payload Output: 1.20 GiB (49.5 KiB/sec)(74%)
Success rates
Group P(success) Count
All
Now with 1201, I have 66KB/s input / 72KB/s output : increase of 100%.
On 1/18/09, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
Before #1201, it was always about 50 KiB/s of the 100 KiB/s which Freenet is
allowed to use. Now it has increased:
# Total Input: 1.25 GiB (51.3 KiB/sec)
# Total Output: 1.63 GiB (66.9
14 matches
Mail list logo
