On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Florent Daigni?re
<nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote:
> * svenerichoffmann at gmx.de <svenerichoffmann at gmx.de> [2009-01-18
> 00:50:17]:
>
>> I think the only "real" solution to guarantee safety
>> is a dedicated freenet browser.
>>
>> Trying to control the behaviour and safety of standard browsers
>> is serious problematic. As Webmaster i know how much information
>> can be gained from visitors.
>>
>> A dedicated browser would also give full control about timings
>> and how much connections to fproxy are made.
>>
>
> Agreed, toad is going on the wrong path here... Just tell the user that
> he *needs* to use a separate browser, if he doesn't do so, it's *his*
> problem.
>
> You've already spent hours^wdays implementing the useless history
> cloacking thingy (which can be easily bypassed anyway), you've
> added one step in the wizard (previously we had an argument
> because you wanted me to keep down to a minimum the number
> of steps) and no one is happy with the current solution!
>
> Not even you!
Agree.
This is the kind of code i consider ugly:
- invasive
cross across many layers and class,
when you are "fix"ing the link twice, you know there are some
fundamental design problem.
this kind of magic discourage casual code/patch contributor
- not fixing the real problem ( there are other ways to know if you
are running freenet.
for example, just include a <img src="http://127.0.0.1:8888";
onLoad="freenetLoaded();" />
then the website can 99.999% sure you have freenet installed ).
Freenet is illegal in many
place and *will be* illegal everywhere soon.
- reduce usability (copy uri from frost / im )
Maybe we should try the another way round: detect if the user use the
same browser
for other web sites and issue a big fat warning for this.
>
>> I think having a taskbar icon siganalizing that freenet service is runing
>> and giving some options to configure freenet while runing and offering
>> to start the "freenet" browser would be fine and convinient thing.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Matthew Toseland" <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org>
>> To: <devl at freenetproject.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 12:34 AM
>> Subject: [freenet-dev] History cloaking sucks
>>
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Devl mailing list
>> > Devl at freenetproject.org
>> > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>>
>> --
>> Ich verwende die kostenlose Version von SPAMfighter f?r private Anwender,
>> die bei mir bis jetzt 6089 Spammails entfernt hat.
>> Rund 5,8 Millionen Leute nutzen SPAMfighter schon.
>> Laden Sie SPAMfighter kostenlos herunter: http://www.spamfighter.com/lde
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devl mailing list
>> Devl at freenetproject.org
>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEAREIAAYFAklzAMIACgkQU/Z/dHFfxte/2wCeOGw3QWbPHAMqe0A/CcDCMTxG
> WY8AoK0fWX7A/hQYIYQCGmuKkzdbWqHc
> =Uaky
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
