[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r26333 - trunk/plugins/XMLSpider

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:38 PM, wrote: > Author: toad > Date: 2009-04-02 11:38:00 + (Thu, 02 Apr 2009) > New Revision: 26333 > > Modified: > ? trunk/plugins/XMLSpider/XMLSpider.java > Log: > Fix XMLSpider [...] > + ? ? ? public void removeFrom(ObjectContainer container) { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

[freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now!

> -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht- > Von: "Matthew Toseland" > Gesendet: 31.03.09 21:19:29 > An: devl at freenetproject.org > Betreff: [freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now! > Which DSCM should we switch to? Last time we discussed this, we decided on > mercurial (hg). We need a decision

[freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now!

On Wednesday 01 April 2009 11:05:43 Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Daniel Cheng > wrote: > [...] > > > > I vote for git. > > May I change my vote? > I change to "abstain". > > * I am biased, because my work in jgit / git. > > * This

[freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now!

> > MfG > saces I'm for hg too; It has a better w32 support and native netbeans integration. NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090402/5ac2e6e1/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now!

change it right up to the deadline. i vote for git. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 315 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090402/45032844/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Ian Clarke [2009-04-02 13:09:14]: > Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource > the repository hosting. For example, if its git, we should use github. > > Reasons: > > - At least in the case of github, it will be free > - We don't have to worry about setting

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

tps://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090402/3f5f55e5/attachment.html>

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r26249 - branches/db4o/freenet/src/freenet/client/async

; > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > > > > ___ > DSL zum Nulltarif + 20 Euro Extrapr?mie bei Online-Bestellung ?ber die > DSL Freundschaftswerbung! http://dsl.web.de/?ac=OM.AD.AD008K15279B7069a > > ___ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090402/b1b35498/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Summer of Code deadline rapidly approaching!

://socghop.appspot.com/ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090402/602d5

[freenet-dev] Project Proposal for Google Summer of Code 2009

> 5) One of the BT advantage is the tracker and queuing, which is > > > impossible to implement (efficiently) without changing the routing > > > details. > > > > > > So, does your proposal take care of the above facts? > > > > In general I agree with sdiz here: your proposal is a little unclear, are > > you > > expecting to have a central (or distributed) bittorrent tracker or are you > > simply implementing multi-source download *within freenet* (which we > > already > > have) ? > > > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090402/d2d89a21/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Proposal for Google Summer of Code 2009

l for organizing information in a system > > that > > > is democratic in nature. Since discovering the Freenet project several > > > months ago I have become extremely interested in contributing to the > > > improvement of performance and "user-friendliness" of freenet. The > > > development of these features I believe are essential to seducing a > > larger > > > population of Freenet users. My simple wish is to make Freenet an > > > attractive, viable solution for the general public! > > > > > > Thank you for your consideration. > > > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090402/403baed2/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

3588 Fax: +1 512 276 6674 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090402/1e6a3ec6/attachment.html>

[freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now!

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Daniel Cheng wrote: [...] > > I vote for git. May I change my vote? I change to "abstain". * I am biased, because my work in jgit / git. * This should make some developer feel better. > ?* I am maintaining a jgit (java port of

Re: [freenet-dev] Proposal for Google Summer of Code 2009

The deadline is tomorrow, please send applications through the SoC web app: http://socghop.appspot.com/ On Wednesday 01 April 2009 01:04:36 you wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Tuesday 31 March 2009 18:49:58 Michael Grube wrote:

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Proposal for Google Summer of Code 2009

On Thursday 02 April 2009 01:46:08 Jai Sharma wrote: Dear Developers, Please excuse me for my ignorance in the routing matters in my earlier proposal. It's a busy time at the college and I didn't have time to go through all the Freenet papers, but that's totally my problem. But after

[freenet-dev] Summer of Code deadline rapidly approaching!

The deadline for Summer of Code applications is tomorrow! If you are considering applying, DO IT NOW! Your proposals do not have to be perfect, we have some time to get them right before we decide which ones to accept. File something reasonable and we can edit it afterwards.

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r26249 - branches/db4o/freenet/src/freenet/client/async

On Wednesday 01 April 2009 20:41:00 bo...@web.de wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org Gesendet: 01.04.09 21:20:42 An: devl@freenetproject.org Betreff: Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r26249 -

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r26333 - trunk/plugins/XMLSpider

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:38 PM, t...@freenetproject.org wrote: Author: toad Date: 2009-04-02 11:38:00 + (Thu, 02 Apr 2009) New Revision: 26333 Modified:   trunk/plugins/XMLSpider/XMLSpider.java Log: Fix XMLSpider [...] +       public void removeFrom(ObjectContainer container) { +    

Re: [freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now!

Matthew Toseland schrieb: Which DSCM should we switch to? Last time we discussed this, we decided on mercurial (hg). We need a decision in the near future - it has dragged out for 6 months due to technical and communication problems, but nextgens is able and willing to implement a change in

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource the repository hosting. For example, if its git, we should use github. Reasons: - At least in the case of github, it will be free - We don't have to worry about setting up and administering the repository - Services like

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Ian Clarke ian.cla...@gmail.com [2009-04-02 13:09:14]: Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource the repository hosting. For example, if its git, we should use github. Reasons: - At least in the case of github, it will be free - We don't have to worry

Re: [freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now!

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org Gesendet: 31.03.09 21:19:29 An: devl@freenetproject.org Betreff: [freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now! Which DSCM should we switch to? Last time we discussed this, we decided on mercurial (hg). We

Re: [freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now!

* bo...@web.de bo...@web.de [2009-04-02 22:08:04]: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org Gesendet: 31.03.09 21:19:29 An: devl@freenetproject.org Betreff: [freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now! Which DSCM should we switch to? Last

Re: [freenet-dev] Load management / token passing / tit for tat was Re: The Free Network Project Summer Projects 2009

Yes. Simulations of load management would be very welcome. You should investigate the existing simulators (particularly the event-based ones), which are in the SVN repository, I am hopeful that they can be adapted without massive effort. You will need to more or less reproduce the current load

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ nextg...@freenetproject.orgwrote: Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of workflow : all the devs are pushing to the same repository... How does what you have written above integrate in the picture? Now I am confused. Do

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ nextg...@freenetproject.orgwrote: Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of workflow : all the devs are pushing to the same repository... How does what you have written

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Freitag 03 April 2009 00:44:37 schrieb Ian Clarke: If we go with git and github they do support post-receive hooks: http://github.com/guides/post-receive-hooks I think the workflow can and should be very similar to what it is currently, with developers pushing to a single authoritative

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

2009/4/3 Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de: Am Freitag 03 April 2009 00:44:37 schrieb Ian Clarke: If we go with git and github they do support post-receive hooks: http://github.com/guides/post-receive-hooks I think the workflow can and should be very similar to what it is currently,

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

2009/4/3 Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org: * Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ nextg...@freenetproject.orgwrote: Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of workflow : all the devs are pushing to

[freenet-dev] ITA l10n update 090331

updated to latest trunk as of march 31 2009 I thought I sent it last tuesday but now I think I probably haven't freenet.l10n.it.override.properties_luke771_090331 Description: Binary data ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org

Re: [freenet-dev] Git vs hg: we must decide now!

On Wednesday 01 April 2009 11:05:43 Daniel Cheng wrote: On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Daniel Cheng j16sdiz+free...@gmail.com wrote: [...] I vote for git. May I change my vote? I change to abstain. * I am biased, because my work in jgit / git. * This should make some developer

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r26391 - trunk/freenet/test/freenet/client

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:30 AM, nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2009-04-02 22:30:59 + (Thu, 02 Apr 2009) New Revision: 26391 Modified:   trunk/freenet/test/freenet/client/CodeTest.java Log: Add a benchmark to the junit test; launch it with -Dbenchmark=true