ms (even apache 2 to
a reasonable degree) can serve static content ridiculously fast, that's not
true of dynamic content.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally sign
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> AFAICS no. I'm not saying we should go with a static only host, I'm saying we
> shouldn't
> make dynamic that which doesn't need to be, on grounds of CPU cost (which
> determines
> responsiveness in practice). Modern systems (even apache
altogether and switching to another bug
tracker (possibly hosted by someone else).
NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/27cc01a0/attachment.pgp>
: not dynamic page generation.
>
Okay so there is a cheap solution as long as we have access to the server
config. Great.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/e8bfcf45/attachment.pgp>
his is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/c3802a32/attachment.pgp>
hat our entire website must be static is an arbitrary,
> pointless, and very limiting restriction.
>
> I'm not aware of a single other website anywhere that has opted to
> limit itself to static page generation, either on the grounds of
> security or cost. This is because its a crazy argument.
>
Agreed.
NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/13ea31a4/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> AFAICS no. I'm not saying we should go with a static only host, I'm saying we
> shouldn't
> make dynamic that which doesn't need to be, on grounds of CPU cost (which
> determines
> responsiveness in practice). Modern systems (even apache
signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/662c5db6/attachment.pgp>
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> On Saturday 25 July 2009 21:09:14 Zero3 wrote:
>> [freenet.ini]
>> fproxy.port=
>> fcp.port=
>> pluginmanager.loadplugin=JSTUN;KeyExplorer;ThawIndexBrowser;UPnP;XMLLibrarian
>>
>>
>> node.updater.autoupdate=true
>
> No, node.updater.enabled=true, but autoupdate OFF by d
Evan Daniel skrev:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Florent
> Daignière wrote:
>> * Matthew Toseland [2009-07-28 20:03:42]:
>>> So we need to deal with the bug tracker. But it will take several days work
>>> (= approximately the cost to both FPI and Ian of emu for 1.5 months). Is
>>> this real
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Florent
Daigni?re wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland [2009-07-28 20:03:42]:
>> So we need to deal with the bug tracker. But it will take several days work
>> (= approximately the cost to both FPI and Ian of emu for 1.5 months). Is
>> this really a high priority? IMHO lo
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:32:45 you wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
> >> To do what is proposed (change the download button/text depending on the
> >> user-agent/OS), you need redirects: not dynamic page generation.
> >>
> > Okay so there is a cheap solution as
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
>> To do what is proposed (change the download button/text depending on the
>> user-agent/OS), you need redirects: not dynamic page generation.
>>
> Okay so there is a cheap solution as long as we have access to the server
> config. Great.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Florent
Daignière wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland [2009-07-28 20:03:42]:
>> So we need to deal with the bug tracker. But it will take several days work
>> (= approximately the cost to both FPI and Ian of emu for 1.5 months). Is
>> this really a high priority? IMHO lo
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
>> To do what is proposed (change the download button/text depending on the
>> user-agent/OS), you need redirects: not dynamic page generation.
>>
> Okay so there is a cheap solution as long as we have access to the server
> config. Great.
* Matthew Toseland [2009-07-28 20:03:42]:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 16:08:55 Ian Clarke wrote:
[snip.]
> > What is the status of the website migration?
>
> Nothing has happened. Nothing will happen because it is pointless to move the
> website when we can't move the bug tracker,
Hrmmm. Witho
On Monday 27 July 2009 18:42:11 Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
> >> > I disagree, php or java reduces performance and increases costs, for all
> >> > hosting options.
> >>
> >> Are you serious? I can imagine someone making that kind of argument
> >>
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 16:08:55 Ian Clarke wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> Can you give me a status report, including:
>
> What is the ETA for 0.8?
I have been working on various closely related things related to 1) making
Freenet more usable in hostile regimes, 2) preparing for Bloom filter sharing
an
* Ian Clarke [2009-07-27 12:42:11]:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
> >> > I disagree, php or java reduces performance and increases costs, for all
> >> > hosting options.
> >>
> >> Are you serious? I can imagine someone making that kind of argument
> >> against dyn
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 08:48:04 Luke771 wrote:
> attached
> updated to 1123 rbuild1223-real
> includes new strings, minor rewordings, fixed some typos
> please commit
> L.
>
Applied, thanks.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
tps://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/37079309/attachment.ksh>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
>> Are you doing more testing?
>>
>> On Saturday 13 June 2009 19:05:36 Evan Daniel wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matthew
>>> Toseland wrote:
>>> > Now that 0.7.5 has shippe
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
>> Are you doing more testing?
>>
>> On Saturday 13 June 2009 19:05:36 Evan Daniel wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matthew
>>> Toseland wrote:
>>> > Now that 0.7.5 has shippe
attached
updated to 1123 rbuild1223-real
includes new strings, minor rewordings, fixed some typos
please commit
L.
BookmarkEditorToadlet.myBookmarksExplanation=Link a website pubblicati su
Freenet, con notifica degli aggionamenti
BookmarkEditorToadlet.publicDescLabel=Descrizione visibile agli am
24 matches
Mail list logo
