[freenet-dev] Hello Freenet (& design feedback)

2009-07-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
ms (even apache 2 to a reasonable degree) can serve static content ridiculously fast, that's not true of dynamic content. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally sign

[freenet-dev] Hello Freenet (& design feedback)

2009-07-28 Thread Ian Clarke
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > AFAICS no. I'm not saying we should go with a static only host, I'm saying we > shouldn't > make dynamic that which doesn't need to be, on grounds of CPU cost (which > determines > responsiveness in practice). Modern systems (even apache

[freenet-dev] status

2009-07-28 Thread Florent Daignière
altogether and switching to another bug tracker (possibly hosted by someone else). NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/27cc01a0/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Hello Freenet (& design feedback)

2009-07-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
: not dynamic page generation. > Okay so there is a cheap solution as long as we have access to the server config. Great. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/e8bfcf45/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] status

2009-07-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
his is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/c3802a32/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Hello Freenet (& design feedback)

2009-07-28 Thread Florent Daignière
hat our entire website must be static is an arbitrary, > pointless, and very limiting restriction. > > I'm not aware of a single other website anywhere that has opted to > limit itself to static page generation, either on the grounds of > security or cost. This is because its a crazy argument. > Agreed. NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/13ea31a4/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-dev] Hello Freenet (& design feedback)

2009-07-28 Thread Ian Clarke
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > AFAICS no. I'm not saying we should go with a static only host, I'm saying we > shouldn't > make dynamic that which doesn't need to be, on grounds of CPU cost (which > determines > responsiveness in practice). Modern systems (even apache

[freenet-dev] it_IT l10n update 090728

2009-07-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/662c5db6/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-dev] Default plugins, freenet.ini defaults and wrapper.conf defaults

2009-07-28 Thread Zero3
Matthew Toseland skrev: > On Saturday 25 July 2009 21:09:14 Zero3 wrote: >> [freenet.ini] >> fproxy.port= >> fcp.port= >> pluginmanager.loadplugin=JSTUN;KeyExplorer;ThawIndexBrowser;UPnP;XMLLibrarian >> >> >> node.updater.autoupdate=true > > No, node.updater.enabled=true, but autoupdate OFF by d

Re: [freenet-dev] status

2009-07-28 Thread Zero3
Evan Daniel skrev: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Florent > Daignière wrote: >> * Matthew Toseland [2009-07-28 20:03:42]: >>> So we need to deal with the bug tracker. But it will take several days work >>> (= approximately the cost to both FPI and Ian of emu for 1.5 months). Is >>> this real

[freenet-dev] status

2009-07-28 Thread Evan Daniel
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * Matthew Toseland [2009-07-28 20:03:42]: >> So we need to deal with the bug tracker. But it will take several days work >> (= approximately the cost to both FPI and Ian of emu for 1.5 months). Is >> this really a high priority? IMHO lo

Re: [freenet-dev] Hello Freenet (& design feedback)

2009-07-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:32:45 you wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: > >> To do what is proposed (change the download button/text depending on the > >> user-agent/OS), you need redirects: not dynamic page generation. > >> > > Okay so there is a cheap solution as

[freenet-dev] Hello Freenet (& design feedback)

2009-07-28 Thread Ian Clarke
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> To do what is proposed (change the download button/text depending on the >> user-agent/OS), you need redirects: not dynamic page generation. >> > Okay so there is a cheap solution as long as we have access to the server > config. Great.

Re: [freenet-dev] status

2009-07-28 Thread Evan Daniel
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Florent Daignière wrote: > * Matthew Toseland [2009-07-28 20:03:42]: >> So we need to deal with the bug tracker. But it will take several days work >> (= approximately the cost to both FPI and Ian of emu for 1.5 months). Is >> this really a high priority? IMHO lo

Re: [freenet-dev] Hello Freenet (& design feedback)

2009-07-28 Thread Ian Clarke
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> To do what is proposed (change the download button/text depending on the >> user-agent/OS), you need redirects: not dynamic page generation. >> > Okay so there is a cheap solution as long as we have access to the server > config. Great.

Re: [freenet-dev] status

2009-07-28 Thread Florent Daignière
* Matthew Toseland [2009-07-28 20:03:42]: > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 16:08:55 Ian Clarke wrote: [snip.] > > What is the status of the website migration? > > Nothing has happened. Nothing will happen because it is pointless to move the > website when we can't move the bug tracker, Hrmmm. Witho

Re: [freenet-dev] Hello Freenet (& design feedback)

2009-07-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 27 July 2009 18:42:11 Ian Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: > >> > I disagree, php or java reduces performance and increases costs, for all > >> > hosting options. > >> > >> Are you serious?  I can imagine someone making that kind of argument > >>

Re: [freenet-dev] status

2009-07-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 16:08:55 Ian Clarke wrote: > Matthew, > > Can you give me a status report, including: > > What is the ETA for 0.8? I have been working on various closely related things related to 1) making Freenet more usable in hostile regimes, 2) preparing for Bloom filter sharing an

Re: [freenet-dev] Hello Freenet (& design feedback)

2009-07-28 Thread Florent Daignière
* Ian Clarke [2009-07-27 12:42:11]: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: > >> > I disagree, php or java reduces performance and increases costs, for all > >> > hosting options. > >> > >> Are you serious?  I can imagine someone making that kind of argument > >> against dyn

Re: [freenet-dev] it_IT l10n update 090728

2009-07-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 08:48:04 Luke771 wrote: > attached > updated to 1123 rbuild1223-real > includes new strings, minor rewordings, fixed some typos > please commit > L. > Applied, thanks. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___

[freenet-dev] it_IT l10n update 090728

2009-07-28 Thread Luke771
tps://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090728/37079309/attachment.ksh>

[freenet-dev] Variable opennet connections: moving forward

2009-07-28 Thread Evan Daniel
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: >> Are you doing more testing? >> >> On Saturday 13 June 2009 19:05:36 Evan Daniel wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matthew >>> Toseland wrote: >>> > Now that 0.7.5 has shippe

Re: [freenet-dev] Variable opennet connections: moving forward

2009-07-28 Thread Evan Daniel
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: >> Are you doing more testing? >> >> On Saturday 13 June 2009 19:05:36 Evan Daniel wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matthew >>> Toseland wrote: >>> > Now that 0.7.5 has shippe

[freenet-dev] it_IT l10n update 090728

2009-07-28 Thread Luke771
attached updated to 1123 rbuild1223-real includes new strings, minor rewordings, fixed some typos please commit L. BookmarkEditorToadlet.myBookmarksExplanation=Link a website pubblicati su Freenet, con notifica degli aggionamenti BookmarkEditorToadlet.publicDescLabel=Descrizione visibile agli am