[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Juiceman
and phpBB (forum for user > > support; imho one of the most deployed). > > Re data import on mantis, not likely afaics, they don't support data import > now and when we asked they said ask for an enhancement. > > Apart from that, you may have a point. > Surely there are ways of importing a csv text file at least? We could get that out of Mantis, no? -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20091030/5f5aafd3/attachment.html>

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread xor
: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20091030/ee82bb45/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Florent Daignière
y backing up over and over the same useless data. NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20091030/6fc2509f/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
Suggestions? > > It would make sense to find a tracker that both users and devs can use. > Saves the overhead of moving things from e.g. a forums system to a bug > tracker. Is it possible? Is Trac something that end users can use? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20091030/9d37dcd7/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
aid ask for an enhancement. Apart from that, you may have a point. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20091030/a7612fe6/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Florent Daignière
- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20091030/9ac20751/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Zero3
Matthew Toseland wrote: > We need to migrate the Wikka wiki to MediaWiki, because the latter is > standard and we will be able to host it externally. E.g. sourceforge Hosted > Apps allows for data import for MediaWiki. The wiki isn't really kept enough up-to-date, is it? I personally think the

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
L: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20091030/eecca6b3/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Depency on emu

2009-10-30 Thread Zero3
Speaking of servers, how is our depency on emu looking? There was some discussion a while ago to move things off emu to save the monthly expense? - Zero3 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 20 October 2009 04:46:10 Ian Clarke wrote: >> I reported this bug a few days ago: >> >>

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Evan Daniel
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: >> We need to migrate the Wikka wiki to MediaWiki, because the latter is >> standard and we will be able to host it externally. E.g. sourceforge Hosted >> Apps allows for data import for MediaWiki. > > The wiki isn't really

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Ian Clarke
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > A disk seems to be failing. Fortunately we have two in RAID1. I have taken a > recent > backup and should contact bytemark if we decide to keep it... We should tell them anyway. Doesn't cost us anything if they fix it, and they'd

[freenet-dev] is anyone else experiencing problems with the JNLP installer?

2009-10-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 04:46:10 Ian Clarke wrote: > I reported this bug a few days ago: > > https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=3604 > > Read it for the details, but basically I'm seeing an intermittent > problem where Webstart can't download the installer. Is anyone else > seeing

[freenet-dev] Errors on first start of Freenet after fresh re-install

2009-10-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 22 October 2009 16:42:18 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 17 October 2009 18:16:20 Ian Clarke wrote: > > Just did a fresh re-install, and I'm seeing these errors as soon as > > I've finished the first-time wizard, not a good first impression! > > > > Could not load plugin! > >

[freenet-dev] Depency on emu

2009-10-30 Thread Zero3
Speaking of servers, how is our depency on emu looking? There was some discussion a while ago to move things off emu to save the monthly expense? - Zero3 Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tuesday 20 October 2009 04:46:10 Ian Clarke wrote: I reported this bug a few days ago:

[freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
Emu: A disk seems to be failing. Fortunately we have two in RAID1. I have taken a recent backup and should contact bytemark if we decide to keep it... Emu costs us approx £80/month. Ian has been generously paying half of this, as it was used for his other projects (but isn't really atm), but I

Re: [freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Ian Clarke
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: A disk seems to be failing. Fortunately we have two in RAID1. I have taken a recent backup and should contact bytemark if we decide to keep it... We should tell them anyway. Doesn't cost us anything if they

Re: [freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Evan Daniel
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote: Matthew Toseland wrote: We need to migrate the Wikka wiki to MediaWiki, because the latter is standard and we will be able to host it externally. E.g. sourceforge Hosted Apps allows for data import for MediaWiki. The

Re: [freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Florent Daignière
* Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-10-30 10:57:41]: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: A disk seems to be failing. Fortunately we have two in RAID1. I have taken a recent backup and should contact bytemark if we decide to keep it... We

Re: [freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 30 October 2009 19:13:18 Florent Daignière wrote: * Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-10-30 10:57:41]: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: A disk seems to be failing. Fortunately we have two in RAID1. I have taken a recent

Re: [freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 30 October 2009 17:10:02 Zero3 wrote: Matthew Toseland wrote: We need to migrate the Wikka wiki to MediaWiki, because the latter is standard and we will be able to host it externally. E.g. sourceforge Hosted Apps allows for data import for MediaWiki. The wiki isn't really

Re: [freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread xor
On Friday 30 October 2009 16:29:57 Matthew Toseland wrote: If we don't keep the bug tracker: - We will need to do a spring clean: Keep the current bug tracker up for a while but read-only, *manually* migrate any important bugs and issues to the new tracker. - This will be significant work.

Re: [freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Juiceman
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Friday 30 October 2009 19:13:18 Florent Daignière wrote: * Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-10-30 10:57:41]: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: A

[freenet-dev] Current security measures may be harming performance; better measures may help

2009-10-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
Currently, requests are always routed the same way, but at high HTL we do not cache either replies to requests or incoming inserts. Specifically, at HTL 18 and 17 we do not cache returned data from requests (though we do check the datastore), and at HTL 18, 17 and 16 we do not cache data from

Re: [freenet-dev] Update on getting rid of emu

2009-10-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 30 October 2009 19:21:51 xor wrote: On Friday 30 October 2009 16:29:57 Matthew Toseland wrote: If we don't keep the bug tracker: - We will need to do a spring clean: Keep the current bug tracker up for a while but read-only, *manually* migrate any important bugs and issues to