help in tracking down 1481 memory leak (with reproduction steps)

Hi, The past weeks I’ve been stumped trying to track down a severe memory leak which prevents releasing 1481. I have a hard time tracking down where and why exactly it happens, therefore I’d be very grateful for your help. The following shows how to reproduce the problem on GNU/Linux: Getting

Frequent crashes with next

Hi, I’ve been testing what is intended to be 1481 for a few days now, and I experience frequent crashes. They both happen in a new install of 1480 which I let update with a testing update key and in my regular node. I now have a full release setup working again, so I can release a new version

Re: 1481 release preparation back on track

Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > You can now find a test release at > https://github.com/freenet/fred/releases > > I plan to insert a test update to the update key the next few days. > > testing for 1481: > USK@82nyT~XJlSSX6pK0MBfJ8Qg4VB8BftFkUi

Re: 1481 release preparation back on track

You can now find a test release at https://github.com/freenet/fred/releases I plan to insert a test update to the update key the next few days. testing for 1481: USK@82nyT~XJlSSX6pK0MBfJ8Qg4VB8BftFkUiE6KdA77GE,B3PZFyjq90O~zpzS8Dx0DC8KlTmAlWqr9Bzx3tiQlsE,AQACAAE/jar/1481 To try it, change the

1481 release preparation back on track

Hi, I finally got the SunEC breakage in Java 7u181 fixed,[1] so the release is moving forward again. I also added some of the recent small but significant bug-fixes. To ease review, I created a tracking pull-request: https://github.com/freenet/fred/pull/637 Best wishes, Arne [1]:

Re: Freenet World Domination Plan

DC* writes: > Really exciting times for Freenet and lot of work to do (that's a good > thing!). Yes :-) > What's the Winterfacey's status? Can't seem to find a way to see what > needs to be done on Mantis. Winterfacey is available as theme in the testing release (just look into config web

Re: Freenet World Domination Plan

Ian Clarke writes: > Some good suggestions. Thank you! These are not suggestions, though, but things I see as good paths forward. They are where I consider my own time well spent. > On the UI, this would require a rewrite I disagree. To explain that, I’m making an exception from the "not a

Re: Freenet World Domination Plan

PS: Things I missed: - Provide and polish and describe basic communication tools: - Private communication, i.e. a Freemail which just works via webmail. Mine is broken right now. I don’t know why (cannot receive emails, not even my own). - Casual low latency communication (i.e. turn

Freenet World Domination Plan

Hi, This is a high-level roadmap. We had several roadmaps in the past. They focussed on releases and on "when are we done". This one is different. It focusses on visions to find a stronger audience. It does not shun controversial topics and it is not a request for input. These are the powerful

quoting presidents about freedom of the press

Hi, I just collected some quotes about freedom of the press to address an unfinished task from an article I wrote a year ago and I want to pass them on to you for times when you need them at hand: »The liberty of the press is

Re: releasing next

Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> writes: > From my side, it’s finally time to create a release from next. The steps > I see are: > > - ship jna.jar as new dependency and add it to wrapper.conf > - ship freenet.jar as built from gradle > > Did I miss someth

Re: releasing next

Florent Daigniere writes: > I am complaining that Arne is fine with releasing code that doesn't > even pass the CI tests. I feel that this needs an answer. I’m fine with releasing it, because I do not want to add yet one more hurdle before we can finally release

releasing next

Hi, >From my side, it’s finally time to create a release from next. The steps I see are: - ship jna.jar as new dependency and add it to wrapper.conf - ship freenet.jar as built from gradle Did I miss something? Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken

Re: Freenet 0.7.5 build 1480 is now available.

x...@freenetproject.org writes: > On Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:02:15 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> I fear that the new installer and tray might not have been shipped >> successfully. If that is the case, please say so as fast as possible. > > Please clarify what

Freenet 0.7.5 build 1480 is now available.

- Arne Babenhauserheide --- wintray Stephen Oliver (31): Update NuGet packages to newest .NET 4.0 versions Allow VS to update the version listed in designer files Add logging class to facilitate debug logging separate from NLog Add a common base class for browsers

Re: Gradle et al

Matthew Toseland writes: > On 10/01/18 21:15, Florent Daigniere wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 21:10 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: >>> 1. Gradle, >>> >>> 2. Deployment/updating of JARs etc. … >>> So what is going on, and why? >> What's happening is that Arne is

Re: a test release for 1480

Matthew Toseland writes: >> can. I see this as suboptimal, but compared to not releasing at all it’s >> the lesser of two evils. Sorry for that :/ > > Use some of the vast unspent funds to pay for a Windows 10 license, and > run it in a VM. Sadly that can’t buy me the

a test release for 1480

Hi, I uploaded an archive with the files for 1480: jar, installer, …. CHK@MvoTOkbcT--mONuKwklk7CtunQcta1vIxLd9Abr~6Ck,rXO7Nj2L0-Bytn8WorayXo9EvERPz0SS169YdIolndA,AAMC--8/freenet-1480.tbz mkdir freenet-1480 mv freenet-1480.tbz freenet-1480 cd freenet-1480 tar xf freenet-1480.tbz The main change

Re: We need a fix for update.cmd

Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: > On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 19:24 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: >> > Months later he is asking for help supporting the windows version of >> &

Re: We need a fix for update.cmd

Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: > On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 12:33 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On 08/12/17 21:04, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > The new windows installer is prepared, I can release any day,

We need a fix for update.cmd

Hi, The new windows installer is prepared, I can release any day, but there's still one critical piece missing: we need update.cmd fixed to at least download freenet-stable-latest.jar from github instead of trying to use the defunct downloads.freenetproject.org. This is the file:

Re: Fwd: DuckDuckGo privacy donations plan for 2018

Hi Ian, I don’t know whether I can take the lead (I’m starting into a new job next month), but going by our list of tasks, we should take this chance. For our list of successes since last year (alphabetically): - WoT 19 released - Sone released - new website works - Having a structure in

Freenet build 1479 released

source available at CHK@ZOfWMdsxhS1Lg6QKWK4CJZvVt9RYkkjFnU6-PCizHbg,zfTEQX6DexdUm9-eGyDSP5vKvp76b38SCBS7W9zkoGE,AAMC--8/Freemail-v0.2.7.3-source.tar.bz2 ---!Fred changes Arne Babenhauserheide (freenet releases) (18): l10n: pull translations from transifex update NEWS.md U

my plan for november

Hi, This is my plan for november: - 1479: release master with an update.sh as failover which can update to a newer release over clearnet - 1480: release master with the new windows tray. Hopefully with working failover update. - 1481: figure out releasing next with gradle, having a test

Re: [STUDY] Anonymity Networks

Hi Nicolas, Thank you for sharing! I didn’t yet investigate it in depth, but I glanced stored it in my paper folder. "Convincing somebody who ‘has nothing to hide’ of moving his communications to an anonymity network is easier with the knowledge that it helps protect those who depend on it." ←

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

Matthew John Toseland <matt...@toselandcs.co.uk> writes: > On 16/09/17 08:31, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> >> Matthew John Toseland <matt...@toselandcs.co.uk> writes: >>> The above is slightly inaccurate. For a genuine user, the third step >>&g

Re: Test release for 1479

Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> writes: > x...@freenetproject.org writes: >> Beyond that: Thanks for trying to get things done :) > > Thank you! I just need (a) review of the 1479 pull-request and (b) test > reports for the jars (on Windows, OSX, GNU/Linux an

Re: Website update: call for help

Florent Daigniere writes: > I have done some work on the infrastructure behind the website recently; That’s great! I now tested deploying with a tag and it worked nicely! See https://travis-ci.org/freenet/website/builds/295878576 I like tagging to do a release of

Re: Test release for 1479

x...@freenetproject.org writes: > On Saturday, October 14, 2017 02:16:12 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> - plugins: WebOfTrust build0019 > > I spent hours on writing the changelog for that, it would be nice if you > could > link it in the final release: > https://g

Re: Test release for 1479

Matthew John Toseland <matt...@toselandcs.co.uk> writes: > On 15/10/17 10:02, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Yes, it does. But we have to rebuild that capability because what we had >> got lost with downloads.freenetproject.org. > > So this is a temporary klud

Re: Test release for 1479

Matthew John Toseland <matt...@toselandcs.co.uk> writes: > On 14/10/17 19:42, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Matthew John Toseland <matt...@toselandcs.co.uk> writes: >> >>> On 14/10/17 13:16, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>>> Hi, >>&

Re: Test release for 1479

Matthew John Toseland <matt...@toselandcs.co.uk> writes: > On 14/10/17 13:16, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I’m slowly moving towards being able to release somewhat risky changes >> on the new infra again. As first concrete step, >> freenet-201

Test release for 1479

Hi, I’m slowly moving towards being able to release somewhat risky changes on the new infra again. As first concrete step, freenet-20171010-r1-snapshot.jar updates update.sh to be able to pull new fred releases directly from github. It only covers freenet-stable-latest.jar, but that should be

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

Matthew John Toseland writes: > The above is slightly inaccurate. For a genuine user, the third step > starts off as a bundle, then later becomes a broadcast. We enforce the > scarcity and popularity requirements in both stages. Doesn’t enforcing scarcity at the bundle

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

Matthew John Toseland writes: > Specifically, the process for a scarce *insert* will be: > 1) Is the key popular?? We can tell this from how many peers are > subscribed to it in the ULPR table. If not, kill the request; we only > provide protection for popular

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

Matthew John Toseland <matt...@toselandcs.co.uk> writes: > On 14/09/17 17:33, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> I think the core problem is that I don’t quite understand what you’re >> proposing. Bundles I understand, but I don’t understand how the scarce >> SSKs change r

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

Matthew John Toseland <matt...@toselandcs.co.uk> writes: > On 13/09/17 21:23, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Matthew John Toseland <matt...@toselandcs.co.uk> writes: >>> Proposal 0: Bundles >>> --- >> Do I understand it correctly tha

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

Matthew John Toseland <matt...@toselandcs.co.uk> writes: > On 12/09/17 22:34, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> >> Matthew John Toseland <matt...@toselandcs.co.uk> writes: >>> But we need *something* in this approximate area. >> >> I ful

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

Matthew John Toseland writes: > But we need *something* in this approximate area. I fully agree with that. I think however that we need to be careful not to require user interaction for that. Users already added the friend, we can’t require more than maintaining the

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

Matthew John Toseland writes: > Applied to spam, for example, we could justify banning somebody by > showing some of his messages. > > Does it still allow for spam amplification? Probably, if we immediately > propagate inserts to everywhere. But maybe we can resolve the

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

Hi toad, Matthew John Toseland writes: > Thoughts? I'm not a dev any more, but thinking about Bitcoin and other > stuff maybe there are some ways forward that we've missed... > > Dispute resolution, spam and distributed data structures >

Re: Freenet on Embedded Systems

Hi, I think such a device would be awesome! If combined with the icicles app, it could make using darknet very convenient. This could also serve as darknet peer to a node which runs on another computer. Steve Dougherty writes: > To run Freenet it'd need robust storage and

Re: Testing release - 64-bit Windows support

Hi Stephen, Stephen Oliver writes: > I'm happy to announce that testing releases of our installer and tray app > for Windows, with support for 64-bit Java and some other general > improvements are now available :) That’s awesome! Thank you, and congrats! If the testing goes

Re: DDG Tasks Bug Bounty Proposal

Steve Dougherty writes: > I don't think anyone is proposing that new developers get push access > or bypass review by existing developers. We're all in agreement that > it would not be acceptable. Matthew's question of how to avoid long > review delays doesn't have a great

Re: manifest files and forwarding

Stefanie Roos writes: > Thanks. > > Sorry, bit late in answering I documented an easier to implement version of your idea as note in https://freenet.mantishub.io/view.php?id=3640#c12321 (0003640: Bundles (unencrypted tunnels)) The difference is that it

Re: manifest files and forwarding

Hi Stef, I’m sorry for only answering now (this got stuck in my TODO list). Stefanie Roos writes: >> I have a question regarding the anonymity of downloaded a file that is >> split in a reasonable large number of blocks. Are the requests for all >> blocks forwarded

Re: [freenet-dev] DDG Donation Roadblocks

Ping. Ian Clarke writes: > On Saturday, February 25, 2017 08:23:00 PM Freenet wrote: >> What is stopping the funding from DuckDuckGo (received over a year ago) >> from being disbursed? > Finding someone qualified to hire. To get that going, we only need your comment

HSTS and expired cert: our site is down for now

Hi, The certificate expired and we use HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS). That means: Our old site is down until the DNS can be switched over to the AWS site. Let’s treat this as a test of what would happen if an attacker were to take down our clearnet infrastructure. Best wishes, Arne --

1478 released: add pins to new CAs

Hi, I released 1478 shortly before our certs expired. It just adds pins to our new CA certs for the failover download if no Freenet connection can be established (via Amazon Web Services). This should allow us to switch to the new infrastructure, but it will not avoid short-term breakage. I did

infra changes: please test ./update.sh testing

Hi, Tomorrow evening our certs run out. I uploaded a new update.sh which includes the new AWS certs. I’ll make a release with the new certs in Freenet. We will have to get stuff working again after the certs run out, but there will be a chain of trust with the new certs having initially been

Re: Freenet Infrastructure Migration TODO

Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> writes: > Ian Clarke <i...@freenetproject.org> writes: > >> Thank you for your work on this Arne. >> Regarding the certs, I don't have a strong opinion but doesn't Amazon also do >> this? Since we're migrating to Amazon

Re: Freenet Infrastructure Migration TODO

Ian Clarke writes: > Thank you for your work on this Arne. > Regarding the certs, I don't have a strong opinion but doesn't Amazon also do > this? Since we're migrating to Amazon already and AWS has fairly powerful > multi-user admin capabilities, wouldn't it be better

Freenet Infrastructure Migration TODO

Hi, This lays out the steps needed to migrate to our new infrastructure with the new SSL certs. It is a short-term plan, but it should be compatible with moving to gradle and signed jars for validation of downloads (instead of sha1 files). If you find any problem in this plan, please say so —

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1477

CryptNode writes: > I was able to verify this build. Log file > https://cryptnode.org/temp/verify-1477.log Verify instructions > https://github.com/freenet/scripts Thank you! Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken signature.asc

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1476 is now available

23 Key fingerprint = B30C 3D91 069F 81EC FEFE D0B1 B41A 6047 FD6C 57F9 uid Arne Babenhauserheide (ArneBab) <arne_...@web.de> uid Arne Babenhauserheide (freenet releases) <arne_...@web.de> Best wishes and thank you again for verif

Re: [freenet-dev] portable WoT IDs recoverable with a random password, implemented in pyFreenet

x...@freenetproject.org writes: > On Thursday, December 22, 2016 12:31:47 AM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just finished the basic implementation of a longterm plan I had: >> portable WoT IDs, recoverable with a random password. > But from a us

Re: [freenet-dev] Bug tracker unusable

Pascal writes: > Is the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ intentionally > unusable? It is still linked to from > https://freenetproject.org/contribute.html but requires a username & > password and does not indicate how to obtain credentials.

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1476 is now available

Pascal writes: > FProxy SSL does not work at all in 1476. Downgrading to 1475 brings it > back. 1475 does not work with recent Chrome. Thank you for your report! Could you tell us the actual error your seeing so we can try to track down its origin? Best

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1476 is now available

Dan Roberts writes: > Thanks for all your hard work! > > Thanks also to Steve for managing for so long and supporting this release > as well! A big thank you from me to all of you, too! I am building on all the work by all of you, and that’s awesome! Best wishes, Arne --

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1476 is now available

Steve Dougherty writes: > Congratulations on your first release! Thank you! Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Devl mailing list

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1476 is now available

detached enough that the press release can still get coverage ("Freenet was updated to 1476, deployment of the update went cleanly over Freenet itself with most nodes already running the new version"). Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> writes: > Freenet 0.7.

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1476 is now available

the update automatically over Freenet and either update directly or prompt you for updating (depending on your autoupdate settings). - Arne Babenhauserheide PS: The long release notes in the tag contain one error: "semi-persistent" should be "persistent". Fixed here Developer

Re: [freenet-dev] DDG Donation Roadblocks

Ian Clarke writes: > On Saturday, February 25, 2017 08:23:00 PM Freenet wrote: >> What is stopping the funding from DuckDuckGo (received over a year ago) >> from being disbursed? > > Finding someone qualified to hire. To get that going, we only need your comment whether we

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

Ian Clarke writes: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 9:06 AM, x...@freenetproject.org wrote:Our typical > developer is using a highly sophisticated terminal mail client > > which has received decades of development. > Really? Have you conducted a survey? I can't remember the

Re: [freenet-dev] Website Redesign Pre-pre-alpha

Dan Roberts writes: > Hey Everyone, > I'll be posting the website for feedback tomorrow. Great! > I seem to constantly > find new things to fix, but I could probably nit-pick forever, That’s common problem ☺ > I'd like to also create and/or link to a google plus

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

Florent Daigniere writes: > @devl is the smallest list we still operate. > > freenetproject:/var/backups/mailman# wc -l *members|sort -rg > 4441 total > 2581 announce.members > 452 support.members > 354 devl.members > 309 tech.members > 293 chat.members > 248

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

Florent Daigniere writes: > On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 13:18 +0100, Florent Daigniere wrote: >> Are you seriously suggesting that "having a working fred, working FMS" >> is an acceptable requirement for accessing what will be our future >> support mailing list? > > Oh,

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: > On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 13:02 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > You are in lalaland if you think that we can do what currently do with > our mailing lists over Freenet. Almost two decades in the making, we've >

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

Florent Daigniere writes: >> We could also move more of our discussions to FMS. It’s code has >> nowadays been checked by at least two established users, and most >> interactive development already happens over IRC. > Or we could just migrate to slack (like Ian

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

x...@freenetproject.org writes: > That is unfortunately something our privacy-focused users will certainly not > accept :| We could also move more of our discussions to FMS. It’s code has nowadays been checked by at least two established users, and most interactive development already happens

Re: [freenet-dev] 5 weeks till our SSL certificate expires

Dan Roberts writes: > The website is fully static and should be fine with s3 + cloudflare. Do we actually need cloudflare for the hosting? Would it be simpler without cloudflare? (according to stackoverflow S3 should support SSL). Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

Florent Daigniere <nextg...@freenetproject.org> writes: > On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 08:54 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Florent just warned again, that the clock on osprey (all our >> non-standard hosting) is ticking. If we don’t act, this means that all >> lin

[freenet-dev] 5 weeks till our SSL certificate expires

Hi, Our SSL certificate expires Wed 05 Apr 2017 22:47:32 CET GMT. … /me makes a dramatic pause … That’s a deadline. Almost literally. From what I see, we need to address that for: - the wiki (see my offer) - the bugtracker - the site (thanks to the work on that to Dave) - loading plugins

[freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

Hi, Florent just warned again, that the clock on osprey (all our non-standard hosting) is ticking. If we don’t act, this means that all links to the wiki stop working. To avoid that, I can provide hosting of a static copy of the wiki with links at the top of each article to the new github based

Re: [freenet-dev] poll: start writing offers hopstolive

Update to the two top tasks. Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > These are the two top tasks (they came out on top in every evaluation): > > > (1) Title: *Darknet invitation bundles* > Description: Adding a single use node reference to an installer > executable. Peo

Re: [freenet-dev] poll: start writing offers

x...@freenetproject.org writes: > On Saturday, January 28, 2017 04:57:58 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> PS: Finishing the first iteration of the WoT would normally be among >> these two (with estimated 2.8 to 4.1 weeks ~ 2800$ to 4100$), but xor >> pulled back hi

Re: [freenet-dev] poll: start writing offers

x...@freenetproject.org writes: > On Saturday, January 28, 2017 04:57:58 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> PS: Finishing the first iteration of the WoT would normally be among >> these two (with estimated 2.8 to 4.1 weeks ~ 2800$ to 4100$), but xor >> pulled back hi

Re: [freenet-dev] Website Redesign Pre-pre-alpha

Ian Clarke <i...@freenetproject.org> writes: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 5:34 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de wrote:A >> More importantly: However they are shown: We are lacking screenshots. > We should only include screenshots if they don't detract from the clean &g

Re: [freenet-dev] Website Redesign Pre-pre-alpha

Steve Dougherty <st...@asksteved.com> writes: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017, 6:39 AM Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> wrote: > >> >> Dan Roberts <ademan...@gmail.com> writes: >> > I've hosted the current state of the redesign here for now: >>

Re: [freenet-dev] Website Redesign Pre-pre-alpha

s.com> wrote: > >> I use FB, and we already have a Freenet page - >> https://www.facebook.com/freenetp2p/ >> It's not well maintained, but it is getting about 15 likes per week or >> so. If >> anyone would like to assist with it let me know. >> >>

Re: [freenet-dev] Website Redesign Pre-pre-alpha

Hi, Dan Roberts writes: > Ian: Are you comfortable with creating social media accounts for Freenet? > Our design assumes their existence. I think a Facebook account is > worthwhile in any case. As far as I know we have a twitter account. Does anyone among us use Facebook

[freenet-dev] poll: start writing offers

Hi, The poll concluded a few weeks back and exceeded its hopstolive.¹ We should adhere to it and spend the money. I think we should start by writing offers in Freenet forums to pay people to do the highest ranking tasks and move to later tasks when the initial tasks are done. These are the two

Re: [freenet-dev] portable WoT IDs recoverable with a random password, implemented in pyFreenet

Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > Florent Daigniere writes: > >> On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 11:22 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>> > > Is it somehow possible to decrypt parts of >>> > > the store at random in the hope of hitting a random uploaded >

Re: [freenet-dev] portable WoT IDs recoverable with a random password, implemented in pyFreenet

Florent Daigniere writes: > On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 11:22 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> > > Is it somehow possible to decrypt parts of >> > > the store at random in the hope of hitting a random uploaded >> > > private >> > > k

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet in Whonix

ban...@openmailbox.org writes: > On 2016-12-19 23:36, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> ban...@openmailbox.org writes: >> With multiple nodes running on the gateway, the performance should be >> good enough for tasks which are similar in their requirements to >> regular

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet in Whonix

ban...@openmailbox.org writes: > On 2016-12-18 23:32, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> ban...@openmailbox.org writes: >> >>> In principle the F2F way seems closest to what we need. Though it has >>> the downsides of limited performance and probably complicate

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet in Whonix

ban...@openmailbox.org writes: > In principle the F2F way seems closest to what we need. Though it has > the downsides of limited performance and probably complicated to > automate since a noderef needs to be exchanged out of band first. If that’s what you want to go for and you want to

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet in Whonix

ban...@openmailbox.org writes: > On 2016-12-17 19:01, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> What I forgot to ask: Do you have information about Users for whom the >> Freenet friend-to-friend mode is blocked? This is similar to hidden >> bridges, and the Freenet protocol is not tri

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet in Whonix

ban...@openmailbox.org writes: > * Whonix Gateway is a separate VM that forces all traffic thru any > anonymous network of choice > * Whonix Workstation - The untrusted VM where users run applications > configured with safe defaults that can only access the network via a > virtual isolated NIC

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet in Whonix

ban...@openmailbox.org writes: > On 2016-12-16 22:06, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> ban...@openmailbox.org writes: >> There is a way to route connections over Tor, but it isn’t tested >> regularly and currently only works in friend-to-friend mode. For >> details

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet in Whonix

Arne Babenhauserheide writes: >> We are looking for a censorship-resistant and decentralized way to >> communicate notifications about critical situations [1] to our users and >> host the project metadata and files themselves to resist a Permanent >> Takedown Attack th

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet in Whonix

Hi, ban...@openmailbox.org writes: > Hi. Whonix [0] dev here. Welcome to Freenet! :) > We are looking for a censorship-resistant and decentralized way to > communicate notifications about critical situations [1] to our users and > host the project metadata and files themselves to resist a

Re: [freenet-dev] Alternate evaluations to get a robust top 20; was: Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > Arne Babenhauserheide writes: >> The most robust result of the poll is: we should definitely do these >> five tasks: >> >> - Darknet invitation bundles (requires single use references) >> - Improve FProxy CSS3 support to all

Re: [freenet-dev] Alternate evaluations to get a robust top 20; was: Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > ## Executive Summary > > The most robust result of the poll is: we should definitely do these > five tasks: > > - Darknet invitation bundles (requires single use references) > - Improve FProxy CSS3 support to allow better Freesite UI >

[freenet-dev] Alternate evaluations to get a robust top 20; was: Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

Hi, I did alternate evaluations of the poll to test the robustness of the results. These evaluations build on the work by xor and add several diagnostics, but do not exclude values, except where they investigate a specific group of voters. ## Executive Summary The most robust result of the

Re: [freenet-dev] Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

x...@freenetproject.org writes: > Thanks for your kind words :) > > I don't have time to answer to all of this today, so I will just reply to the > most important stuff. That’s ok :) > On Friday, December 09, 2016 09:01:16 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Why did you

Re: [freenet-dev] Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

x...@freenetproject.org writes: > Ian and Florent have voiced concerns about whether my involvement in the poll > could be influenced by the prospect of me benefiting financially by > potentially being able to resume my job for Freenet. > > I want to provide you with a solid proof that this is

Re: [freenet-dev] Poll results available; Temporary quit as potential employee

Matthew Toseland writes: > The final results seem surprisingly sensible, though clearly there is > overlap and lack of clarity around the darknet enhancements stuff. Yes, it’s pretty solid. Though the only reason that fixing WoT is not at the top is that xor pulled out his vote for that (and

Re: [freenet-dev] Ian et al: Poll conclusions

x...@freenetproject.org writes: > On Tuesday, December 06, 2016 06:49:04 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> It’s been over a week now, could you please post the data with or >> without the evaluation? > > I offered something like that at both the beginning and the end of

Re: [freenet-dev] Ian et al: Poll conclusions

Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > x...@freenetproject.org writes: >> There are some tough administrative decisions remaining to make about stage >> 3, >> namely which voters to exclude from stage 3 because they look like a sybil >> attack. > > I don’t like

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >