> > In any case we are NOT protected from the compromise of emu nor by the
> > compromise of the key used to sign the installer.
>
> Exactly. Right now we build both the installers and the jars on emu. If emu
> is
> compromised, it can supply bogus installers and bogus jars. If we move the
>
* Matthew Toseland [2008-12-13 12:21:01]:
> Issues for the installer. Both Zero3 and nextgens seem to have decided to
> sulk, so I'll arbitrarily decide these issues where there is deadlock and if
> anyone objects he can reply to this thread with a reasoned argument.
>
> 1. Whether we should
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-13 12:21:01]:
Issues for the installer. Both Zero3 and nextgens seem to have decided to
sulk, so I'll arbitrarily decide these issues where there is deadlock and if
anyone objects he can reply to this thread with a reasoned argument.
In any case we are NOT protected from the compromise of emu nor by the
compromise of the key used to sign the installer.
Exactly. Right now we build both the installers and the jars on emu. If emu
is
compromised, it can supply bogus installers and bogus jars. If we move the
building
* Ian Clarke ian.cla...@gmail.com [2008-12-12 17:56:59]:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
I don't care what you'd say. You are pushing for infrastructure changes
to be made: you are the one making demands here. The policy is what
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-13 18:01:03]:
On Saturday 13 December 2008 17:22, Florent Daignière wrote:
In any case we are NOT protected from the compromise of emu nor by the
compromise of the key used to sign the installer.
Exactly. Right now we build
> I'm not really trying to discuss how the builds should be signed
> (another discussion really),
No, it's not. THEY SHOULD NOT BE SIGNED ON EMU EITHER! and it's not
because we are doing it wrong at the moment that we should extend the
"bad" behaviour.
> but trying to figure out why you can
* Zero3 [2008-12-12 02:37:21]:
> Florent Daigni?re skrev:
> >> How do you suggest it would?
> >>
> >
> > Start the node as a user, shut it down, login as admin, start the node
> > up... it creates new files, shut it down... then the user doesn't have
> > access to the newly created files.
* Zero3 [2008-12-12 02:06:54]:
> Florent Daigni?re skrev:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-12-12 00:06:31]:
> >
> >
> >> On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:46, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> >>
> >>> * Zero3 [2008-12-11 19:18:30]:
> >>>
> >>>
> > Disadvantages:
> > - Have to do
* Zero3 [2008-12-12 01:56:49]:
> Matthew Toseland skrev:
> > On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:36, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >
> >> Nextgens has pointed out that we can't run it from All Users, because
> >>
> > running
> >
> >> it as one user (especially admin) will change the
* Zero3 [2008-12-12 01:54:26]:
> Florent Daigni?re skrev:
> > * Zero3 [2008-12-11 19:06:26]:
> >
> >> Matthew Toseland skrev:
> >>
> >>> Zero3 is very keen that we should run from the start menu from the
> >>> installing
> >>> user, rather than installing a service. This has a number
* Zero3 [2008-12-12 01:48:40]:
> Florent Daigni?re skrev:
> > * Zero3 [2008-12-11 19:18:30]:
> >
> >>> Disadvantages:
> >>> - Have to do some work on emu.
> >>>
> >
> > That alone is a good reason why *not* to do it. I don't see why
> > installers should be auto-built nor built from
* Matthew Toseland [2008-12-12 00:06:31]:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:46, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Zero3 [2008-12-11 19:18:30]:
> >
> > > > Disadvantages:
> > > > - Have to do some work on emu.
> >
> > That alone is a good reason why *not* to do it. I don't see why
> > installers
* Zero3 [2008-12-11 19:06:26]:
> Matthew Toseland skrev:
> > Zero3 is very keen that we should run from the start menu from the
> > installing
> > user, rather than installing a service. This has a number of advantages:
> > - It will be possible to kill Freenet from Task Manager. Not being
I'm not really trying to discuss how the builds should be signed
(another discussion really),
No, it's not. THEY SHOULD NOT BE SIGNED ON EMU EITHER! and it's not
because we are doing it wrong at the moment that we should extend the
bad behaviour.
but trying to figure out why you can sign
* Zero3 [2008-12-11 19:18:30]:
> > Disadvantages:
> > - Have to do some work on emu.
That alone is a good reason why *not* to do it. I don't see why
installers should be auto-built nor built from emu for that matter.
> > - Very few of the developers run Windows, or are familiar with AHK, so if
* Matthew Toseland [2008-12-11 16:47:23]:
> Zero3 has been working on a simple, fast windows-specific installer using
> AutoHotKey.
Good for him
> AHK is GPL, runs well under Wine according to winehq, and has a
> command-line compiler. Wine can be built without the X libraries and does not
* Matthew Toseland [2008-12-11 16:26:37]:
> IMHO we should ship a full bundle-installer by default, i.e. one including
> the
> latest main jar, the latest extra jar, the latest plugins.
> ADVANTAGES:
> - Security: Once you have obtained the installer, somehow (over Tor, from a
> friend, etc
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-11 16:26:37]:
IMHO we should ship a full bundle-installer by default, i.e. one including
the
latest main jar, the latest extra jar, the latest plugins.
ADVANTAGES:
- Security: Once you have obtained the installer, somehow (over Tor,
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-11 16:47:23]:
Zero3 has been working on a simple, fast windows-specific installer using
AutoHotKey.
Good for him
AHK is GPL, runs well under Wine according to winehq, and has a
command-line compiler. Wine can be built without the X
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-11 19:18:30]:
Disadvantages:
- Have to do some work on emu.
That alone is a good reason why *not* to do it. I don't see why
installers should be auto-built nor built from emu for that matter.
- Very few of the developers run Windows, or are
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-11 19:06:26]:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
Zero3 is very keen that we should run from the start menu from the
installing
user, rather than installing a service. This has a number of advantages:
- It will be possible to kill Freenet from Task
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-12 00:06:31]:
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:46, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-11 19:18:30]:
Disadvantages:
- Have to do some work on emu.
That alone is a good reason why *not* to do
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-12 01:48:40]:
Florent Daignière skrev:
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-11 19:18:30]:
Disadvantages:
- Have to do some work on emu.
That alone is a good reason why *not* to do it. I don't see why
installers should
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-12 01:54:26]:
Florent Daignière skrev:
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-11 19:06:26]:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
Zero3 is very keen that we should run from the start menu from the
installing
user, rather than installing
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-12 01:56:49]:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:36, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Nextgens has pointed out that we can't run it from All Users, because
running
it as one user (especially admin) will change the
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-12 02:06:54]:
Florent Daignière skrev:
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2008-12-12 00:06:31]:
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:46, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-11 19:18:30
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-12 02:28:18]:
Florent Daignière skrev:
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-12 01:48:40]:
Florent Daignière skrev:
* Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk [2008-12-11 19:18:30]:
Disadvantages:
- Have to do some work
* Matthew Toseland [2008-11-26 23:55:25]:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2008 00:26, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Zero3 [2008-11-26 00:08:17]:
> >
> > > Matthew Toseland skrev:
> > > >> An
> > > >> installer that works on all three platforms has many advantages, but
> > > >> will never be as
* Matthew Toseland [2008-11-28 20:36:36]:
> On Thursday 27 November 2008 23:35, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-11-27 23:35:49 + (Thu, 27 Nov 2008)
> > New Revision: 23933
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/build.xml
> > Log:
> > build.xml: add
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-28 20:36:36]:
On Thursday 27 November 2008 23:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-11-27 23:35:49 + (Thu, 27 Nov 2008)
New Revision: 23933
Modified:
trunk/freenet/build.xml
Log:
build.xml: add a new
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 23:55:25]:
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 00:26, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 00:08:17]:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
An
installer that works on all three platforms has many advantages
* Zero3 [2008-11-27 01:07:03]:
> Matthew Toseland skrev:
> I do understand that whether the default should be on or off is a tough
> decision, but shouldn't we at least warn the user about it, and provide
> an easy way to disable it (if enabled by default)?
>
> >>>
* Matthew Toseland [2008-11-26 23:55:48]:
> > > Being hosted at SourceForge, I can't see bandwidth being a problem?
> >
> > We left SourceForge years ago because of their chronical unreliability.
>
> Nonetheless, the bandwidth cost for downloading all the plugins on every
> install is
* Zero3 [2008-11-26 23:33:47]:
> Florent Daigni?re skrev:
> > * Zero3 [2008-11-26 22:39:58]:
> >
> >
> Will there be one available within reasonable time perhaps, or will
> we have to depend on the non-free one later on?
>
> >>> Ensuring that the code works reliably
* Zero3 [2008-11-26 22:49:14]:
> Ian Clarke skrev:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Zero3 wrote:
> >
> >>> The aim was to reduce the number of questions we ask during the
> >>> installation to a minimum: on the basis that advanced users can change
> >>> the settings they need afterwards,
* Zero3 [2008-11-26 22:07:11]:
>>> Next, we must identify anything that can be improved in Freenet that
>>> would make writing these installers easier.
>>>
>> IMHO moving the "wizard" part into the node itself was an
>> important step in the right
* Zero3 [2008-11-26 21:41:02]:
> Florent Daigni?re skrev:
>> * Zero3 [2008-11-25 23:49:24]:
>>
>>
Then it would require the node to have web-access and to make
web-requests after it has been set up. The current node doesn't do
that unless told to.
>>> Web
* Zero3 [2008-11-26 20:51:31]:
> Florent Daigni?re skrev:
>> * Zero3 [2008-11-26 00:08:17]:
>>
>>
>>> Matthew Toseland skrev:
>>>
> An installer that works on all three platforms has many
> advantages, but
> will never be as smooth or intuitive as platform-specific
* Zero3 [2008-11-26 20:51:14]:
> Florent Daigni?re skrev:
>>> I'd argue for a default autorun status of "off" though, and instead
>>> make "on" the default on the relevant wizard page, along with a short
>>> description of advantages/consequences of autorun'ing Freenet.
>>>
>>
>> Here you
* Tommy[D] [2008-11-26 20:47:50]:
> Florent Daigni?re schrieb:
>
> > We can't because of the frequency of required updates... and because
> > our code depends on a non-free jvm.
>
> I do compile and run freenet with icedtea6 :-)
>
Then you and users using your ebuilds are unsupported :)
* Zero3 [2008-11-26 20:35:40]:
> Florent Daigni?re skrev:
>> * Zero3 [2008-11-25 23:55:20]:
>>
>>
>>> Shouldn't we just accept that fact that people are moving towards
>>> mobility, and that most likely won't change anytime soon? :).
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I would really appreciate if you
* Zero3 [2008-11-25 23:49:24]:
> > Then it would require the node to have web-access and to make
> > web-requests after it has been set up. The current node doesn't do that
> > unless told to.
> >
> Web access for what?
>
Downloading plugins.
> >
> >> - Integration directly into the
* Zero3 [2008-11-26 00:08:17]:
> Matthew Toseland skrev:
> >> An
> >> installer that works on all three platforms has many advantages, but
> >> will never be as smooth or intuitive as platform-specific installers
> >> because people have differing expectations of each platform. For
> >>
* Zero3 [2008-11-25 23:20:06]:
> Florent Daigniere skrev:
> > Zero3 wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> IMHO, Freenet should be packaged for Linux distros anyway, compeletely
> >> eliminating the need for a Linux installer (besides whatever scripting
> >> the package installation requires) and terminal
* Zero3 [2008-11-25 23:55:20]:
> Shouldn't we just accept that fact that people are moving towards
> mobility, and that most likely won't change anytime soon? :).
>
I would really appreciate if you could share your insight on the topic:
How exactly would you design a fully decentralized
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 20:35:40]:
Florent Daignière skrev:
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-25 23:55:20]:
Shouldn't we just accept that fact that people are moving towards
mobility, and that most likely won't change anytime soon? :).
I would really appreciate
* Tommy[D] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 20:47:50]:
Florent Daignière schrieb:
We can't because of the frequency of required updates... and because
our code depends on a non-free jvm.
I do compile and run freenet with icedtea6 :-)
Then you and users using your ebuilds are unsupported
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 20:51:14]:
Florent Daignière skrev:
I'd argue for a default autorun status of off though, and instead
make on the default on the relevant wizard page, along with a short
description of advantages/consequences of autorun'ing Freenet.
Here you
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 21:41:02]:
Florent Daignière skrev:
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-25 23:49:24]:
Then it would require the node to have web-access and to make
web-requests after it has been set up. The current node doesn't do
that unless told
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 22:07:11]:
Next, we must identify anything that can be improved in Freenet that
would make writing these installers easier.
IMHO moving the wizard part into the node itself was an
important step in the right direction. We could
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 22:49:14]:
Ian Clarke skrev:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The aim was to reduce the number of questions we ask during the
installation to a minimum: on the basis that advanced users can change
the settings they
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 23:33:47]:
Florent Daignière skrev:
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 22:39:58]:
Will there be one available within reasonable time perhaps, or will
we have to depend on the non-free one later on?
Ensuring that the code works
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 23:55:48]:
Being hosted at SourceForge, I can't see bandwidth being a problem?
We left SourceForge years ago because of their chronical unreliability.
Nonetheless, the bandwidth cost for downloading all the plugins on every
install is
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-27 01:07:03]:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
I do understand that whether the default should be on or off is a tough
decision, but shouldn't we at least warn the user about it, and provide
an easy way to disable it (if enabled by default)?
Huh.
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-25 23:55:20]:
Shouldn't we just accept that fact that people are moving towards
mobility, and that most likely won't change anytime soon? :).
I would really appreciate if you could share your insight on the topic:
How exactly would you design a fully
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-25 23:20:06]:
Florent Daigniere skrev:
Zero3 wrote:
IMHO, Freenet should be packaged for Linux distros anyway, compeletely
eliminating the need for a Linux installer (besides whatever scripting
the package installation requires) and terminal
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-26 00:08:17]:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
An
installer that works on all three platforms has many advantages, but
will never be as smooth or intuitive as platform-specific installers
because people have differing expectations of each platform. For
* Zero3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-25 23:49:24]:
Then it would require the node to have web-access and to make
web-requests after it has been set up. The current node doesn't do that
unless told to.
Web access for what?
Downloading plugins.
- Integration directly into the
* Ian Clarke [2008-11-24 13:33:09]:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:59 PM, David 'Bombe' Roden
> wrote:
> > On Monday 24 November 2008 18:25:42 Ian Clarke wrote:
> >> I see no reason why Freenet's installation process couldn't be as elegant
> >> as
> >> littleshoot's.
> >
> > Here's what it says
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-24 13:33:09]:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:59 PM, David 'Bombe' Roden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008 18:25:42 Ian Clarke wrote:
I see no reason why Freenet's installation process couldn't be as elegant
as
littleshoot's.
* Florent Daigni?re [2008-11-17 23:51:51]:
The meeting is now over: logs are available at
http://emu.freenetproject.org/irc/2008-11-18
Here is what has been ruled:
> 1) What future do we want for FMSPlugin (a FMS clone in java
> written by saces) / Freetalk
There is no fundamental
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-17 23:51:51]:
The meeting is now over: logs are available at
http://emu.freenetproject.org/irc/2008-11-18
Here is what has been ruled:
1) What future do we want for FMSPlugin (a FMS clone in java
written by saces) / Freetalk
Hi,
Tonight we discussed a bit about what the future messaging system of
freenet should be. We obviously didn't reach any kind of agreement but
nevertheless agreed on meeting again tomorrow.
Everyone is welcome to attend our IRC meeting scheduled at [1] 21:00PM GMT
on #freenet. Sorry for the
Hi,
Tonight we discussed a bit about what the future messaging system of
freenet should be. We obviously didn't reach any kind of agreement but
nevertheless agreed on meeting again tomorrow.
Everyone is welcome to attend our IRC meeting scheduled at [1] 21:00PM GMT
on #freenet. Sorry for the
* Florent Daigni?re [2008-05-12 04:37:15]:
> * Ian Clarke [2008-05-11 18:08:23]:
>
> > Merging in Subversion is a major PITA, but fortunately this is about
> > to change with version 1.5, see this blog entry for details:
> >
> > http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=92
> >
> > Hopefully this
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 04:37:15]:
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-11 18:08:23]:
Merging in Subversion is a major PITA, but fortunately this is about
to change with version 1.5, see this blog entry for details:
http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=92
* Daniel Cheng [2008-11-09 19:54:32]:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 1:24 AM, wrote:
> > fication of r23379 on emu
>
> ^^--- the email header is messed up
It has been already fixed :)
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > toad has
* Matthew Toseland [2008-11-09 00:24:57]:
> After a conversation with someone on #freenet , it looks like new node
> installs are broken.
>
> I had a very odd wget:
>
> browser at servalan:~$ wget
> http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/new_installer.jar
> --2008-11-09
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-09 00:24:57]:
After a conversation with someone on #freenet , it looks like new node
installs are broken.
I had a very odd wget:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wget
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/new_installer.jar
--2008-11-09
* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-09 19:54:32]:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 1:24 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fication of r23379 on emu
^^--- the email header is messed up
It has been already fixed :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
toad has declared that
* Daniel Cheng [2008-11-07 08:24:06]:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:09 AM, wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-10-28 18:09:53 + (Tue, 28 Oct 2008)
> > New Revision: 23155
> >
> > Modified:
> >
* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-07 08:24:06]:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-10-28 18:09:53 + (Tue, 28 Oct 2008)
New Revision: 23155
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/SingleFileInserter.java
* bbackde at googlemail.com [2008-11-05 09:17:37]:
> Will the current store be converted automatically?
>
No but at some point we will display a user alert asking the user to
make the move.
I got the green light from sdiz in a private email and have commited the
change in r23323.
> On Tue,
.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 21:17, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's time for the salted-datastore to be the default option.
Sdiz, do you object to it?
NextGen$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkkQrd0ACgkQU/Z
I think it's time for the salted-datastore to be the default option.
Sdiz, do you object to it?
NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
* Matthew Toseland [2008-11-03 20:12:21]:
> On Monday 03 November 2008 20:04, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
> > toad at freenetproject.org a ?crit :
> > > Author: toad
> > > Date: 2008-11-03 19:28:41 + (Mon, 03 Nov 2008)
> > > New Revision: 23292
> > >
> > > Modified:
> > >
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-03 20:12:21]:
On Monday 03 November 2008 20:04, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: toad
Date: 2008-11-03 19:28:41 + (Mon, 03 Nov 2008)
New Revision: 23292
Modified:
trunk/website/pages/en/news.php
I think it's time for the salted-datastore to be the default option.
Sdiz, do you object to it?
NextGen$
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
* Matthew Toseland [2008-10-30 12:48:19]:
> I'm CCing this to devl, hope you don't mind.
>
> On Thursday 30 October 2008 05:13, you wrote:
> > Bank balance: $4,820.11
> >
> > Paypal: $1,250.11
>
> That's another 2.5 months at current exchange rates ... less if the UK
> economy
> rises / US
* Matthew Toseland [2008-10-30 18:35:22]:
> On Thursday 30 October 2008 15:59, Zero3 wrote:
> > Matthew Toseland skrev:
> > >> We need to start thinking about raising more $$$.
> > >>
> >
> > Random ideas for inspiration:
> >
> > - Did you consider raising the possible donation amounts on
* Matthew Toseland [2008-10-29 23:17:01]:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2008 21:14, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-10-29 13:30:48]:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 29 October 2008 03:50, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-10-29 00:12:24]:
> > > >
> > > > > On
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-30 18:35:22]:
On Thursday 30 October 2008 15:59, Zero3 wrote:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
We need to start thinking about raising more $$$.
Random ideas for inspiration:
- Did you consider raising the possible donation amounts on
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-30 12:48:19]:
I'm CCing this to devl, hope you don't mind.
On Thursday 30 October 2008 05:13, you wrote:
Bank balance: $4,820.11
Paypal: $1,250.11
That's another 2.5 months at current exchange rates ... less if the UK
economy
rises
* Matthew Toseland [2008-10-29 13:30:48]:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2008 03:50, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-10-29 00:12:24]:
> >
> > > On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:47, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > > > Author: nextgens
> > > > Date: 2008-10-28 19:47:26
* Luke771 [2008-10-29 12:31:54]:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:53:03 +
> Florent Daigni?re wrote:
>
> > * Luke771 [2008-10-28 08:42:02]:
> >
> > >
> > > Updated to 1166 r23150
> > > Includes new strings and some minor changes
> > >
> >
> > Commited in r23159
> >
>
> I'm sorry, I screwed
* Matthew Toseland [2008-10-29 00:12:24]:
> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:47, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-10-28 19:47:26 + (Tue, 28 Oct 2008)
> > New Revision: 23162
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/ArchiveManager.java
>
* Luke771 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-29 12:31:54]:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:53:03 +
Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Luke771 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-28 08:42:02]:
Updated to 1166 r23150
Includes new strings and some minor changes
Commited in r23159
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-29 13:30:48]:
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 03:50, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-29 00:12:24]:
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-10-28 19:47
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-29 23:17:01]:
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 21:14, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-29 13:30:48]:
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 03:50, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008
* Luke771 [2008-10-28 08:42:02]:
>
> Updated to 1166 r23150
> Includes new strings and some minor changes
>
Commited in r23159
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital
* Matthew Toseland [2008-10-28 14:12:47]:
> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 04:14, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As part of the repository refactoring process, I have move the
> > 3rd party code and I am have to release a new -ext.jar file.
> >
> > Current trunk will probably
* Florent Daigni?re [2008-10-28 04:14:11]:
> Hi,
>
> As part of the repository refactoring process, I have move the
> 3rd party code and I am have to release a new -ext.jar file.
>
> Current trunk will probably not build with #22.
>
> *DO NOT TRY TO FIX ANY
Hi,
As part of the repository refactoring process, I have move the
3rd party code and I am have to release a new -ext.jar file.
Current trunk will probably not build with #22.
*DO NOT TRY TO FIX ANY INCLUDE PROBLEM*
Help me out testing #23
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-28 14:12:47]:
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 04:14, Florent Daignière wrote:
Hi,
As part of the repository refactoring process, I have move the
3rd party code and I am have to release a new -ext.jar file.
Current trunk
* Luke771 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-28 08:42:02]:
Updated to 1166 r23150
Includes new strings and some minor changes
Commited in r23159
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-29 00:12:24]:
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-10-28 19:47:26 + (Tue, 28 Oct 2008)
New Revision: 23162
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/ArchiveManager.java
Log:
Hi,
As part of the repository refactoring process, I have move the
3rd party code and I am have to release a new -ext.jar file.
Current trunk will probably not build with #22.
*DO NOT TRY TO FIX ANY INCLUDE PROBLEM*
Help me out testing #23
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-28 04:14:11]:
Hi,
As part of the repository refactoring process, I have move the
3rd party code and I am have to release a new -ext.jar file.
Current trunk will probably not build with #22.
*DO NOT TRY
* xor at freenetproject.org [2008-10-26 10:58:06]:
> Author: xor
> Date: 2008-10-26 10:58:05 + (Sun, 26 Oct 2008)
> New Revision: 23102
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/BandwidthUsageHistory.java
> Log:
> Format only.
>
The regexp doesn't match that!
Instructions have
101 - 200 of 1326 matches
Mail list logo