On March 27, 2003 11:57 pm, Pascal wrote:
> Adding useDSIndex=false to your config file will significantly reduce
> your CPU load. This will have two side effects however:
This _does_ seem to be helping here. Freenet load is less noticealbe
with this option.
May I suggest that it be modified s
On March 27, 2003 11:57 pm, Pascal wrote:
> Adding useDSIndex=false to your config file will significantly reduce
> your CPU load. This will have two side effects however:
This _does_ seem to be helping here. Freenet load is less noticealbe
with this option.
May I suggest that it be modified s
Adding useDSIndex=false to your config file will significantly reduce
your CPU load. This will have two side effects however:
1. You will no longer loose files completed since the last DS
checkpoint. With the DS index enabled, files are committed to the DS
only at checkpoints. Files received a
Adding useDSIndex=false to your config file will significantly reduce
your CPU load. This will have two side effects however:
1. You will no longer loose files completed since the last DS
checkpoint. With the DS index enabled, files are committed to the DS
only at checkpoints. Files received a
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 05:00:07AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:34:48PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:19AM -0500, Gianni Johansson spake thusly:
> >>
> >>>Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:34:48PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:19AM -0500, Gianni Johansson spake thusly:
>>
>>>Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of the CPU load issue?
>>>
>>>If not, what are the best hypotheses?
>>
>
> Thr
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 05:00:07AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:34:48PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:19AM -0500, Gianni Johansson spake thusly:
> >>
> >>>Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 05:00:07AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:34:48PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:19AM -0500, Gianni Johansson spake thusly:
> >>
> >>>Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 05:00:07AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:34:48PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:19AM -0500, Gianni Johansson spake thusly:
> >>
> >>>Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of
Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:34:48PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:19AM -0500, Gianni Johansson spake thusly:
Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of the CPU load issue?
If not, what are the best hypotheses?
Threads. Threads. Threads.
Actually I've come across an unusual cause of high CPU load (although I
doubt this would be the cause on many other setups).
>From time to time (due to, I believe, dodgy firmware on my 802.11 units) my
wireless connection drops out. This even includes booting from cold -
sometimes my wireless lan
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:34:48PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:19AM -0500, Gianni Johansson spake thusly:
> > Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of the CPU load issue?
> >
> > If not, what are the best hypotheses?
Threads. Threads. Threads. And did I me
Actually I've come across an unusual cause of high CPU load (although I
doubt this would be the cause on many other setups).
>From time to time (due to, I believe, dodgy firmware on my 802.11 units) my
wireless connection drops out. This even includes booting from cold -
sometimes my wireless lan
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:34:48PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:19AM -0500, Gianni Johansson spake thusly:
> > Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of the CPU load issue?
> >
> > If not, what are the best hypotheses?
Threads. Threads. Threads. And did I me
Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of the CPU load issue?
If not, what are the best hypotheses?
--gj
___
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:19AM -0500, Gianni Johansson spake thusly:
> Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of the CPU load issue?
>
> If not, what are the best hypotheses?
I have a sneaking suspicion it's coded in java.
*ducking and running*
--
Tracy Reed http://www.ultrav
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:19AM -0500, Gianni Johansson spake thusly:
> Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of the CPU load issue?
>
> If not, what are the best hypotheses?
I have a sneaking suspicion it's coded in java.
*ducking and running*
--
Tracy Reed http://www.ultrav
Has anyone definitively tracked down the source of the CPU load issue?
If not, what are the best hypotheses?
--gj
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
18 matches
Mail list logo
