On July 22, 2003 08:41 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 08:30:16PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> > Please don't let's forget that random first hop is the only thing that
> > makes retrying of any use after we reach HTL=25 and want to keep trying,
> > because of ftable. And I think t
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:05:28AM +0100, Toad wrote:
> The main argument put forward at the time was to prevent the network
> from dividing into islands, or to stitch it back together when they did
> form.
Yes, however there has never been a single known instance of this
happening, either in rea
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 08:30:16PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> Please don't let's forget that random first hop is the only thing that
> makes retrying of any use after we reach HTL=25 and want to keep trying,
> because of ftable. And I think that people will agree with me, that as
> it stands
ly 22, 2003 8:30
PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] NGrouting and
random first step
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash:
SHA1 Ian Clarke wrote:||Bottom line, the whole random
routing thing was a solution to a problem|that nobody ever observed, and
in all liklihood - would never|actually
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:45:59AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:02:46PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:40:18AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > If my memory serves me correctly, we currently select the first step in
> > > routing at random as a security me
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 06:05 pm, Toad wrote:
> The main argument put forward at the time was to prevent the network
> from dividing into islands, or to stitch it back together when they did
> form. However, random routing every request on the origin node is not the
> only way to deal with it - one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Clarke wrote:
|
|Bottom line, the whole random routing thing was a solution to a problem
|that nobody ever observed, and in all liklihood - would never
|actually occur in practice.
Please don't let's forget that random first hop is the only thing t
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:02:46PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:40:18AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > If my memory serves me correctly, we currently select the first step in
> > routing at random as a security measure.
> >
> > Translating this over to NGrouting, I suggest that f
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:40:18AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> If my memory serves me correctly, we currently select the first step in
> routing at random as a security measure.
>
> Translating this over to NGrouting, I suggest that for the first hop in
> a request, instead of using the RTE to es
> On July 3, 2003 03:11 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:46:39PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> > > On Thursday 03 July 2003 01:40 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > > step in routing at random as a security measure.
> > >
> > > Forgive my ignorance, but how does this provide security?
On July 3, 2003 03:11 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:46:39PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 July 2003 01:40 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > If my memory serves me correctly, we currently select the first step in
> > > routing at random as a security measure.
> >
> >
On July 3, 2003 02:40 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> If my memory serves me correctly, we currently select the first step in
> routing at random as a security measure.
>
> Translating this over to NGrouting, I suggest that for the first hop in
> a request, instead of using the RTE to estimate the per-key
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:11:59PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:46:39PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 July 2003 01:40 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > If my memory serves me correctly, we currently select the first step in
> > > routing at random as a security m
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:46:39PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2003 01:40 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > If my memory serves me correctly, we currently select the first step in
> > routing at random as a security measure.
>
> Forgive my ignorance, but how does this provide securit
On Thursday 03 July 2003 01:40 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> If my memory serves me correctly, we currently select the first step in
> routing at random as a security measure.
Forgive my ignorance, but how does this provide security?
___
devl mailing list
[EMA
If my memory serves me correctly, we currently select the first step in
routing at random as a security measure.
Translating this over to NGrouting, I suggest that for the first hop in
a request, instead of using the RTE to estimate the per-key request time
estimate, we use a random number betw
16 matches
Mail list logo
