ghoul at hushmail.com skrev:
> Using the current wininstaller (FreenetInstaller-1210), I installed
> into Windows 7 x64 Build 7100. Installed java as prompted (x32).
> Install went very well. The uninstaller leaves user 'Freenet' and I
> updated my open ticket(bug) with these results.
Your bug at
gh...@hushmail.com skrev:
Using the current wininstaller (FreenetInstaller-1210), I installed
into Windows 7 x64 Build 7100. Installed java as prompted (x32).
Install went very well. The uninstaller leaves user 'Freenet' and I
updated my open ticket(bug) with these results.
Your bug at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Using the current wininstaller (FreenetInstaller-1210), I installed
into Windows 7 x64 Build 7100. Installed java as prompted (x32).
Install went very well. The uninstaller leaves user 'Freenet' and I
updated my open ticket(bug) with these results.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Using the current wininstaller (FreenetInstaller-1210), I installed
into Windows 7 x64 Build 7100. Installed java as prompted (x32).
Install went very well. The uninstaller leaves user 'Freenet' and I
updated my open ticket(bug) with these results.
ghoul at hushmail.com skrev:
> One other thing, When the uninstaller runs, it does not remove the
> freenet user it created. I had multiple users named freenet,
> freenet.001, freenet.002 etc.
Which installer? The new (single GUI screen) or old (several pages) one?
The new one should
gh...@hushmail.com skrev:
One other thing, When the uninstaller runs, it does not remove the
freenet user it created. I had multiple users named freenet,
freenet.001, freenet.002 etc.
Which installer? The new (single GUI screen) or old (several pages) one?
The new one should definitely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:45:49 -0600 Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk
wrote:
2nd Install, with java pre-installed (32/64 bit)
1. Freenet installer as Administrator
2. Java detected, taking default install options
Did the installer correctly detect
ghoul at hushmail.com skrev:
> 4. Only sees IE as I use portable FF.
Makes sense. I doubt the portable FF adds any kind of indication that it
is available? (Registry key or the like, which we could look for in the
browser search done in the launcher)
>
> 2nd Install, with java pre-installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 11 May 2009 17:07:14 -0600 Matthew Toseland
wrote:
>We have removed the memory limit option in git ...
Ignoring the memory issue/non-issue, here is my install testing
today:
Installed version of Java:
java version "1.6.0_13"
Java(TM) SE
On Friday 08 May 2009 19:15:46 ghoul at hushmail.com wrote:
>
> On Fri, 08 May 2009 05:51:58 -0600 Zero3
> wrote:
> >Hey
> >
> >You seem to have tested the *old* Windows installer, which
> >unfortunately
> >doesn't work on Vista. If you can, please test the new one from
> >the link
> >from
On Sunday 10 May 2009 00:54:48 Luke771 wrote:
> Zero3 wrote:
> > ghoul at hushmail.com skrev:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, 08 May 2009 05:51:58 -0600 Zero3
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey
> >>>
> >>> You seem to have tested the *old*
On Friday 08 May 2009 15:12:33 ghoul at hushmail.com wrote:
> Both installers were from toad's links yesterday. One earlier in
> the day and the second around four hours later (with a slightly
> different file size). Here is the MD5 generated on both files.
> a8f88c158cc3927cdc786b67150b86f9 and
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 11 May 2009 17:07:14 -0600 Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
We have removed the memory limit option in git ...
Ignoring the memory issue/non-issue, here is my install testing
today:
Installed version of Java:
java version
gh...@hushmail.com skrev:
4. Only sees IE as I use portable FF.
Makes sense. I doubt the portable FF adds any kind of indication that it
is available? (Registry key or the like, which we could look for in the
browser search done in the launcher)
2nd Install, with java pre-installed (32/64
On Friday 08 May 2009 15:12:33 gh...@hushmail.com wrote:
Both installers were from toad's links yesterday. One earlier in
the day and the second around four hours later (with a slightly
different file size). Here is the MD5 generated on both files.
a8f88c158cc3927cdc786b67150b86f9 and
On Sunday 10 May 2009 00:54:48 Luke771 wrote:
Zero3 wrote:
gh...@hushmail.com skrev:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 08 May 2009 05:51:58 -0600 Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk
wrote:
Hey
You seem to have tested the *old* Windows installer,
On Friday 08 May 2009 19:15:46 gh...@hushmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2009 05:51:58 -0600 Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk
wrote:
Hey
You seem to have tested the *old* Windows installer, which
unfortunately
doesn't work on Vista. If you can, please test the new one from
the link
from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>Joe Cynical suggests: the average user probably wouldnt be
>bothered by
>having both a 32-bit and a 64-bit JRE's, especially if told that
>he's
>supposed to.
>Make "simple install" just install JRE automatically and "expert
>mode"
>let the user
Zero3 wrote:
> ghoul at hushmail.com skrev:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 08 May 2009 05:51:58 -0600 Zero3
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey
>>>
>>> You seem to have tested the *old* Windows installer, which
>>> unfortunately
>>> doesn't work on Vista. If
Zero3 wrote:
gh...@hushmail.com skrev:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 08 May 2009 05:51:58 -0600 Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk
wrote:
Hey
You seem to have tested the *old* Windows installer, which
unfortunately
doesn't work on Vista. If you can,
ghoul at hushmail.com skrev:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>> As previously mentioned: Does anyone know how to handle this 32-
>> bit vs.
>> 64-bit stuff? What to do? (I have no idea, and nothing to test 64-
>> bit
>> stuff on).
>>
>> - Zero3
>>
ghoul at hushmail.com skrev:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On Fri, 08 May 2009 05:51:58 -0600 Zero3
> wrote:
>> Hey
>>
>> You seem to have tested the *old* Windows installer, which
>> unfortunately
>> doesn't work on Vista. If you can, please test the new one from
ghoul at hushmail.com skrev:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Both installers were from toad's links yesterday. One earlier in
> the day and the second around four hours later (with a slightly
> different file size). Here is the MD5 generated on both files.
>
Hey
You seem to have tested the *old* Windows installer, which unfortunately
doesn't work on Vista. If you can, please test the new one from the link
from toad's mail :).
- Zero3
ghoul at hushmail.com skrev:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On Thu, 07 May 2009
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
>As previously mentioned: Does anyone know how to handle this 32-
>bit vs.
>64-bit stuff? What to do? (I have no idea, and nothing to test 64-
>bit
>stuff on).
>
>- Zero3
>___
>Devl mailing list
>Devl at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 08 May 2009 05:51:58 -0600 Zero3
wrote:
>Hey
>
>You seem to have tested the *old* Windows installer, which
>unfortunately
>doesn't work on Vista. If you can, please test the new one from
>the link
>from toad's mail :).
>
>- Zero3
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Both installers were from toad's links yesterday. One earlier in
the day and the second around four hours later (with a slightly
different file size). Here is the MD5 generated on both files.
a8f88c158cc3927cdc786b67150b86f9 and
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009 23:27:44 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 07 May 2009 18:10:06 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>
>>> https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/FreenetInstaller.exe
>>>
>>> This should be Vista-compatible. It is entirely Zero3's work.
On Thursday 07 May 2009 23:27:44 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009 18:10:06 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/FreenetInstaller.exe
> >
> > This should be Vista-compatible. It is entirely Zero3's work. Please test
it
> > before we release it
On Thursday 07 May 2009 18:10:06 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/FreenetInstaller.exe
>
> This should be Vista-compatible. It is entirely Zero3's work. Please test it
> before we release it to all Windows users! In particular, testing on Vista
> and Windows
Hey
You seem to have tested the *old* Windows installer, which unfortunately
doesn't work on Vista. If you can, please test the new one from the link
from toad's mail :).
- Zero3
gh...@hushmail.com skrev:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 07 May 2009 16:29:19
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Both installers were from toad's links yesterday. One earlier in
the day and the second around four hours later (with a slightly
different file size). Here is the MD5 generated on both files.
a8f88c158cc3927cdc786b67150b86f9 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As previously mentioned: Does anyone know how to handle this 32-
bit vs.
64-bit stuff? What to do? (I have no idea, and nothing to test 64-
bit
stuff on).
- Zero3
___
Devl mailing list
https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/FreenetInstaller.exe
This should be Vista-compatible. It is entirely Zero3's work. Please test it
before we release it to all Windows users! In particular, testing on Vista
and Windows 7 would be very helpful (since the existing installer doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 07 May 2009 16:29:19 -0600 Matthew Toseland
wrote:
>On Thursday 07 May 2009 23:27:44 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> On Thursday 07 May 2009 18:10:06 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> >
>https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/FreenetInstaller.exe
https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/FreenetInstaller.exe
This should be Vista-compatible. It is entirely Zero3's work. Please test it
before we release it to all Windows users! In particular, testing on Vista
and Windows 7 would be very helpful (since the existing installer doesn't
On Thursday 07 May 2009 18:10:06 Matthew Toseland wrote:
https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/FreenetInstaller.exe
This should be Vista-compatible. It is entirely Zero3's work. Please test it
before we release it to all Windows users! In particular, testing on Vista
and Windows 7
On Thursday 07 May 2009 23:27:44 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 18:10:06 Matthew Toseland wrote:
https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/FreenetInstaller.exe
This should be Vista-compatible. It is entirely Zero3's work. Please test
it
before we release it to all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 07 May 2009 16:29:19 -0600 Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 23:27:44 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 18:10:06 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 23:27:44 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 18:10:06 Matthew Toseland wrote:
https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/FreenetInstaller.exe
This should be Vista-compatible. It is entirely Zero3's work. Please test
40 matches
Mail list logo
