Hi devs,
I’ve recomputed the global Clover TPC by excluding all tests from the result
and found the following results:
* 2012-07-02: 62.21%
* 2016-12-20: 65.29% => +3.08%
* 2017-11-09: 68.59% => +3.3%
* 2018-04-03: 68.34% => -0.25%
* 2018-05-11: 68.77% => +0.43%
So:
* From mid 2012 to end of 2
Hi Ktc,
The unexpected behavior is the event sent by the
XWikiServerXwikiDocumentInitializer. Upon starting a new node, there is no
reason that the main wiki descriptor gets updated, and therefore no reason for
an DocumentUpdatedEvent to be triggered. I hardly suggest trying to understand
why
Hey everyone,
I’m working on improving dokuwiki importer this GSoC and have designed a
proposal defining goals according to the current issues and some proposed
ideas, for this summer.
I’ll be glad if developers can share their views and let me know if you feel
something more can be added to it
> On 14 May 2018, at 15:30, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 14 May 2018, at 14:13, Eduard Moraru wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>>
FYI we dropped the installer because it was a pa
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
>> On 14 May 2018, at 14:13, Eduard Moraru wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>
>>> FYI we dropped the installer because it was a pain to maintain and causing
>>> too much trouble (FTR izpack allowed to
> On 14 May 2018, at 14:13, Eduard Moraru wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>> FYI we dropped the installer because it was a pain to maintain and causing
>> too much trouble (FTR izpack allowed to bundled the JRE too).
>>
>> I’m not sure a this stage we sho
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
> FYI we dropped the installer because it was a pain to maintain and causing
> too much trouble (FTR izpack allowed to bundled the JRE too).
>
> I’m not sure a this stage we should go back to that.
>
FTR, I never suggested adding an install
> On 14 May 2018, at 13:48, Marius Dumitru Florea
> wrote:
[snip]
>
>> ** Find new packages introduced that have a TPC < the average computed
TPC
>>
>
> What is the average computed TPC currently?
It’s about 70%, see for example:
http://maven.xwiki.o
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
> > On 14 May 2018, at 13:30, Marius Dumitru Florea <
> mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Vincent Massol
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 14 May 2018, at 12:28, Marius Dumitru Florea <
> >> ma
> On 14 May 2018, at 13:30, Marius Dumitru Florea
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On 14 May 2018, at 12:28, Marius Dumitru Florea <
>> mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Vincent Massol
>> wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
> > On 14 May 2018, at 12:28, Marius Dumitru Florea <
> mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Vincent Massol
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi devs,
> >>
> >> Our current Test coverage strategy is to fail th
> On 14 May 2018, at 12:28, Marius Dumitru Florea
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Our current Test coverage strategy is to fail the build when new code
>> added results in a coverage lower than the threshold for the module, using
>> j
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Our current Test coverage strategy is to fail the build when new code
> added results in a coverage lower than the threshold for the module, using
> jacoco.
>
> This has 2 limitations causing our global TPC to go down from tim
Issue fixed in https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-15252 and will be
available starting with 10.4-rc-1.
Documentation at
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/DevGuide/ExtensionPoint/AfterContentHeaderUIX
Thanks Stéphane,
Caty
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Stéphane Laurière <
stephane.lauri...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose a new UI extension point: content header (or before
> content). My current motivation for it relates to the page-relations
> application that will display t
FYI we dropped the installer because it was a pain to maintain and causing too
much trouble (FTR izpack allowed to bundled the JRE too).
I’m not sure a this stage we should go back to that.
Here’s an idea:
* Merge Try and Download on xwiki.org into a single entry point
* Have a wizard in that en
There seem to be some resources on the topic:
https://github.com/libgdx/libgdx/wiki/Bundling-a-JRE
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7071133/how-to-bundle-a-jre-with-launch4j
https://codeiseasy.wordpress.com/2012/07/31/including-a-jre-in-a-tycho-build/
...so it's not such an uncommon practice.
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Eduard Moraru wrote:
> AFAIR, Eclipse also does this (i.e. bundle their own JRE), we could look
> into how they do it.
Eclipse JDT comes with its own Java compiler but you are supposed to
install Java to run Eclipse itself.
>
> On a quick check, OpenJDK's JRE is
Correction to the correction: They are OpenJDK, got confused by the Oracle
logo. :)
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Eduard Moraru
wrote:
> Correction, the above are Oracle builds, not OpenJDK :)
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Eduard Moraru
> wrote:
>
>> AFAIR, Eclipse also does this (i
Correction, the above are Oracle builds, not OpenJDK :)
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Eduard Moraru
wrote:
> AFAIR, Eclipse also does this (i.e. bundle their own JRE), we could look
> into how they do it.
>
> On a quick check, OpenJDK's JRE is only 38.4 MB (
> http://jdk.java.net/java-se-ri/
AFAIR, Eclipse also does this (i.e. bundle their own JRE), we could look
into how they do it.
On a quick check, OpenJDK's JRE is only 38.4 MB (
http://jdk.java.net/java-se-ri/8) ... I find that acceptable.
FTR, the JDK is 164 MB.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Thomas Mortagne
One issue with embedded Java (OpenJDK I guess) is that it would make
the zip quite huge.
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Eduard Moraru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On the palliative side (i.e. not actually fixing, but at least making life
> a bit easier), we might consider a naming scheme for the downloada
Hi,
On the palliative side (i.e. not actually fixing, but at least making life
a bit easier), we might consider a naming scheme for the downloadable that
includes that supported java version, e.g. xwiki-10.3-java8.zip (though
this might also lead users to thinking that the java 8 runtime is
includ
Hi,
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:21 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
> > On 11 May 2018, at 14:22, Thomas Mortagne
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Vincent Massol
> wrote:
> >> Hi Edy,
> >>
> >>> On 8 May 2018, at 12:38, Eduard Moraru wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> IMO, it's j
Hi devs, here’s a feedback we received, FYI.
Ideas?
Thanks
-Vincent
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Vincent Massol
> Subject: Re: Get started with XWiki
> Date: 14 May 2018 at 09:10:06 CEST
> To: XXX
> Cc: XXX
>
> Hi Christian,
>
>> On 12 May 2018, at 14:25, Christian XXX wrote:
>>
>> I
25 matches
Mail list logo
