Sean Kelly wrote:
Robert Jacques wrote:
I'm perfectly happy with 32 windows linux, but have some minor
interest in:
Solaris x86
Oh good point. SPARC Solaris would be nice as well. Though that's only
if I plan to use D at work.
Sean
Same for me. I also have solaris at work though I very
LLVM!!!
Only LLVM!!!
Nothing more!!
It will be cross-platform out of the box!!!
Walter Bright пишет:
What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
.net
jvm
mac osx 32 bit intel
mac osx 64 bit intel
linux 64 bit
windows 64 bit
freebsd 32 bit
netbsd 32 bit
other?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Walter Bright wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Or, better yet:
Cross-platform C code.
Get me that and I have a lot less reason to even care about the others.
The problem with generating C code is: exception handling
Can't you do it with setjmp and
Yo, Walter, do you want to beat GCC or LLVM?
Why don't you want to work on those front-ends?
What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
.net
jvm
mac osx 32 bit intel
mac osx 64 bit intel
linux 64 bit
windows 64 bit
freebsd 32 bit
netbsd 32 bit
other?
Walter Bright Wrote:
What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
.net
jvm
mac osx 32 bit intel
mac osx 64 bit intel
linux 64 bit
windows 64 bit
freebsd 32 bit
netbsd 32 bit
other?
No doubt, linux 64 bit.
In fact, the D is not contain a mechanism for compile-time
initialization of objects. Maybe add?
For example, that would be very usable for any objects which have
mathematical primitives.
Example:
struct S
{
float[10] array;
this( float f )
{
array[0] = f;
}
}
void
Hello,
I have searched on the D2 documentation pages and on this forum, but I did not
really found any documentation about pure member functions, so please excuse me
if a make you repeat.
I was very surprised to see this code compile (dmd 2.022):
class A{
private:
int x;
Walter Bright Wrote:
What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
.net
jvm
mac osx 32 bit intel
mac osx 64 bit intel
linux 64 bit
windows 64 bit
freebsd 32 bit
netbsd 32 bit
other?
linux 64 bit
Recently we have discussed a lot about the balance of putting things inside the
language or outside of it. It's a subtle balance and it's dynamic too, with
time it can change (for example the removal of complex numbers from D2?).
Surely it will need more discussions in the future too.
In the
bearophile пишет:
Recently we have discussed a lot about the balance of putting things
inside the language or outside of it. It's a subtle balance and it's
dynamic too, with time it can change (for example the removal of
complex numbers from D2?). Surely it will need more discussions in
the
Nick Sabalausky пишет:
Chad J gamerc...@__spam.is.bad__gmail.com wrote in message
news:gj1uou$1ct...@digitalmars.com...
Walter Bright wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Or, better yet:
Cross-platform C code.
Get me that and I have a lot less reason to even care about the others.
The problem with
Weed:
It is not enough to make Bigint the object?
I think I have already answered your question (and at the moment BigInt is a
struct, I think).
Bye,
bearophile
Victor Tyurin wrote:
LLVM!!!
Only LLVM!!!
Nothing more!!
It will be cross-platform out of the box!!!
But it doesn't even do win32 yet!
Walter Bright пишет:
What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
.net
jvm
mac osx 32 bit intel
mac osx 64 bit intel
linux 64 bit
windows
bearophile пишет:
Weed:
It is not enough to make Bigint the object?
I think I have already answered your question (and at the moment BigInt is a
struct, I think).
I did not understand the problem.
You can make an object Bigint. You can add, deduct the value BigInt. You
can declare them
Walter Bright wrote:
What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
.net
jvm
mac osx 32 bit intel
mac osx 64 bit intel
linux 64 bit
windows 64 bit
freebsd 32 bit
netbsd 32 bit
other?
Mac OS X x86.
ARMv7, (UNIX-based).
Linux x64.
JVM.
Probably a D-to-C++/Python translator?
mac osx 32 bit intel
mac osx 64 bit intel
linux 64 bit
windows 64 bit
Weed:
where else can I use that thing?
I was talking about a built-in syntax for multi-precision integral numbers. I
presume you can use it only when you want to use multi-precision integral
number :-)
Do you feel the need to use it in other situations too?
Bye,
bearophile
dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:gj34uf$9f...@digitalmars.com...
== Quote from Weed (resume...@mail.ru)'s article
I am still worried about 16bit :)
would like to D has been a universal language
Pardon my ignorance, but who still uses 16-bit? I thought even most
embedded
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 05:40:31PM +, dsimcha wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but who still uses 16-bit? I thought even most embedded
systems in this day and age are at least 32-bit.
I sometimes still work on old point of sale systems that run MS-DOS.
--
Adam D. Ruppe
http://arsdnet.net
Michael P. baseball@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gj39a7$gb...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Chad J gamerc...@__spam.is.bad__gmail.com wrote in message
news:gj1uou$1ct...@digitalmars.com...
Walter Bright wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Or, better yet:
Cross-platform C code.
Walter Bright wrote:
What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
.net
jvm
mac osx 32 bit intel
mac osx 64 bit intel
linux 64 bit
windows 64 bit
freebsd 32 bit
netbsd 32 bit
other?
linux 64 bit
bearophile wrote:
KlausO, I like limited forms of pattern matching, I have asked for them in D in
the past; they also fit with the growing functional nature of D2.
But I've seen the pattern matching you can see for example in Scala adds lot of
complexity to the compiler (and some to the
aarti_pl wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu pisze:
We're trying to make that work. D is due for an operator overhaul.
Andrei
Is there any chance that we get possibility to overload raw operators,
like in C++? I think that they may coexist with currently defined
operator overloads with simple
freebsd 32 bit - This is the target platform for our live servers as the
networking guy is a freebsd fanatic (drives me up the wall) - dmd should
be a relatively easy port?
Walter Bright wrote:
What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
.net
jvm
mac osx 32 bit intel
mac
Tim Keating wrote:
Yigal Chripun Wrote:
personally I don't see a point in JVM/.NET - One of the best
things about D is that you get the ease of use of Ruby/python/etc
with the benefits of native compiling like in c/c++. Why throw that
away and make yet another version of Java/C# ?
Supporting
Weed wrote:
Yigal Chripun пишет:
Weed wrote:
bearophile пишет:
Weed:
where else can I use that thing?
I was talking about a built-in syntax for multi-precision integral
numbers. I presume you can use it only when you want to use
multi-precision integral number :-)
Do you feel the need to
I'm trying to annotate some code with pure and nothrow (mostly just to test it
out and give feedback at this point), and I've noticed one very irritating
thing. If I use a struct as follows:
struct LameStruct {
uint foo;
uint bar;
void doStuff() {
foo++;
bar++;
}
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I think that argument is rather weak and ought to be revisited. It's weak to
start with as if writing + in a D program hardly evokes anything else but
plus. What the notation effectively achieved was put
Yigal Chripun пишет:
Weed wrote:
Yigal Chripun пишет:
Weed wrote:
bearophile пишет:
Weed:
where else can I use that thing?
I was talking about a built-in syntax for multi-precision integral
numbers. I presume you can use it only when you want to use
multi-precision integral number :-)
Do
Hello Nick,
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:gj1olu$139...@digitalmars.com...
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:gj0qht$2lc...@digitalmars.com...
What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
.net
jvm
mac osx 32 bit intel
mac osx 64
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I think that argument is rather weak and ought to be revisited. It's weak to
start with as if writing + in a D program hardly evokes anything else but
plus. What the notation
Can I at compile time check whether there is a facility method
(toString(), for example)?
Today I wrote:
static if ( __traits(isArithmetic, Element) ) {
ret ~= toString(this[i,j]) ~ \t;
} else {
ret ~= this[i,j].toString ~
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:15:30 +0100, Weed resume...@mail.ru wrote:
Can I at compile time check whether there is a facility method
(toString(), for example)?
Today I wrote:
static if ( __traits(isArithmetic, Element) ) {
ret ~= toString(this[i,j]) ~ \t;
I'm running into a problem installing dmd in the computer labs at my
department. I don't have root access so I'm installing into my home
directory and I had a working dmd 0.150 but I was in need of features
introduced after that so I tried to install 1.038 instead.
Now I'm getting
dmd:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Johan Granberg
lijat.me...@ovegmail.com wrote:
I'm running into a problem installing dmd in the computer labs at my
department. I don't have root access so I'm installing into my home
directory and I had a working dmd 0.150 but I was in need of features
Simen Kjaeraas пишет:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:15:30 +0100, Weed resume...@mail.ru wrote:
Can I at compile time check whether there is a facility method
(toString(), for example)?
Today I wrote:
static if ( __traits(isArithmetic, Element) ) {
ret ~=
subj
Reply to Weed,
subj
is(typeof(*this))?struct:class; // untested
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2542
Summary: array casts behave differently at compile and runtime
Product: D
Version: 1.037
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: spec
Severity: normal
39 matches
Mail list logo
