Walter Bright Wrote:
> dsimcha wrote:
> > == Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> >> I love the news interface, too, and see no reason to give it up. But the
> >> web forums have their advantages, too. That's why I'd like to have a
> >> system that is accessible from b
I would like to divide one array by another using the slice syntax so that I can
benefit from the vectorized operation, but I am running into a problem. Some of
the numbers is my denominator array are 0, producing NaNs and Infs in the result.
My question is: Is there a way to force 0/0 and x/0
Trass3r wrote:
The problem is with the bugzilla keywords. We need something like a
'partial-patch' keyword. In fact the current set of keywords is *far*
from ideal, and the version selection is really terrible.
I know it's probably infeasible but just imagine an automatic system
that tests st
On 2/5/2010 8:55 PM, Joel Anderson wrote:
On 2/4/2010 4:41 PM, Trip Volpe wrote:
Joel Anderson Wrote:
That's one of the reasons I've wished D had a nicer syntax for the
string mixin format. This one kinda scares people away :p
What kind of syntax do you have in mind?
Making mixins less obt
On 2/4/2010 4:41 PM, Trip Volpe wrote:
Joel Anderson Wrote:
That's one of the reasons I've wished D had a nicer syntax for the
string mixin format. This one kinda scares people away :p
What kind of syntax do you have in mind?
Making mixins less obtrusive might ease aggravation when they're
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
I love the news interface, too, and see no reason to give it up. But the
web forums have their advantages, too. That's why I'd like to have a
system that is accessible from both. Post on the web forum, and it is
al
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> I love the news interface, too, and see no reason to give it up. But the
> web forums have their advantages, too. That's why I'd like to have a
> system that is accessible from both. Post on the web forum, and it is
> also posted
retard wrote:
It's interesting to see that even though modern web page/app developers
have spent enormous effort on usability issues, techies still don't like
it. The sad fact is that web forums are more or less a poor copy of the
good old usenet newsgroups. The new format requires more bandwid
BCS wrote:
If D were to quit providing a NNTP interface, I'd loose interest in
participating in these discussions. Heck, (HINT, HINT, HINT) the fact
that Tango has a forum rather than a news group is half or more of the
reason I don't use it.
I love the news interface, too, and see no reason
retard wrote:
// compiles and runs just fine
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3774
Ali Çehreli wrote:
It would be different from C++ if everything were in the same module,
right?
Right.
If I understand it correctly, private is not honored for the code in the
same module. Is that for all uses of private?
Yes.
"Chad J" wrote in message
news:hkic29$ug...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> ...
>
> I for one really want something like that. I think I posted a
> suggestion like this as well:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/read.php?server=news.digitalmars.com&group=digitalmars.D&artnum=9557
== Quote from strtr (st...@spam.com)'s article
> Walter Bright Wrote:
> > Every function in Phobos needs to be reviewed and tagged as safe,
> > trusted or system as appropriate.
> I am sorry if this is totally stupid, but shouldn't it be possible for the
compiler to do this? addition to -profile ma
Walter Bright wrote:
> retard wrote:
>> module m1;
>>
>> class Foo {
>> public void bar() {}
>> }
>>
>> class Bar : private foo {
>> }
>>
>> module m2;
>> import m1;
>>
>> void main() {
>> Foo a = new Bar();
>> a.bar();
>> }
>>
>> // compiles and runs just fine
>
> That's a bug in dmd. It sh
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:43:27 +0100, strtr wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Every function in Phobos needs to be reviewed and tagged as safe,
trusted or system as appropriate.
I am sorry if this is totally stupid, but shouldn't it be possible for
the compiler to do this? addition to -profile may
Hello Bernard,
On 29/01/10 20:16, BCS wrote:
Should we submit an add to this?
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/01/open-source-ad-stats/
What would we advertise? DMD? Phobos?
Tango? LDC? GDC? All or any of the above?
--
<
retard wrote:
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:03:22 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
retard wrote:
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:24:44 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
retard wrote:
{protection-attr} == perhaps one of these
{public|protected|package|
private} - I have no effing clue what this does
It actually does th
Walter Bright Wrote:
> retard wrote:
> > {protection-attr} == perhaps one of these {public|protected|package|
> > private} - I have no effing clue what this does
>
> It actually does the same thing as it does in C++ (with the addition of
> package).
I didn't know I could protect a superclass
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Every function in Phobos needs to be reviewed and tagged as safe,
> trusted or system as appropriate.
I am sorry if this is totally stupid, but shouldn't it be possible for the
compiler to do this? addition to -profile maybe
It might also be interesting if the compiler we
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:03:22 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> retard wrote:
>> Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:24:44 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> retard wrote:
{protection-attr} == perhaps one of these
{public|protected|package|
private} - I have no effing clue what this does
>>> It actual
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> ...
I for one really want something like that. I think I posted a
suggestion like this as well:
http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/read.php?server=news.digitalmars.com&group=digitalmars.D&artnum=95579
This also came up in another thread and was warmly received, in the
cont
retard wrote:
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:24:44 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
retard wrote:
{protection-attr} == perhaps one of these {public|protected|package|
private} - I have no effing clue what this does
It actually does the same thing as it does in C++ (with the addition of
package).
I see. I
Michel Fortin wrote:
So what's the plan? Should everything theoretically safe in Phobos be
@trusted to avoid complains about unnecessary checks in programs that
don't bother about safety? Or should we make things @safe and promote
them to @trusted (for performance) only after a careful review?
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:24:44 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> retard wrote:
>> {protection-attr} == perhaps one of these {public|protected|package|
>> private} - I have no effing clue what this does
>
> It actually does the same thing as it does in C++ (with the addition of
> package).
I see. I only
On 2010-02-05 15:22:44 -0500, Walter Bright said:
Michel Fortin wrote:
My only wish in relation to that is that SafeD be more usable.
I know safe D isn't fully implemented, but can you say which missing
part of it you need?
First, I'd like to say that language itself isn't too bad. I thin
On 29/01/10 20:16, BCS wrote:
Should we submit an add to this?
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/01/open-source-ad-stats/
What would we advertise? DMD? Phobos?
retard wrote:
{protection-attr} == perhaps one of these {public|protected|package|
private} - I have no effing clue what this does
It actually does the same thing as it does in C++ (with the addition of
package).
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> - Actual user accounts. Anonymous reading/posting is great, and many web
> forums can still do that anyway, but they can also have real user accounts
> to, for example, prevent posters from pretending to be someone else. I
> rather like user profiles, too (although they'
Proposed:
---
mixin template foo1 {
const char[] foo1 = "int a;";
}
mixin char[] foo2() {
return "int b;";
}
foo1!();
foo2();
---
Well, it's a little bit indistinctive, hard to tell if it's a normal
function call or a mixin without e.g. using a
"Simen kjaeraas" wrote in message
news:op.u7n9c0nnvxi...@biotronic-pc.home...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>>> Actually, this is already in Bugzilla.
>>> ( http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3666 )
>>> And it will probably come as no surprise that I, as creator of that
>>> request, very
"BCS" wrote in message
news:a6268fffef38cc745343a81...@news.digitalmars.com...
> Hello Gareth,
>
>
>> I actually like the newsgroup format (more than modern web forums) now
>> that I've gone to the trouble of setting up Thunderbrid but I guess
>> they did put me off initially.
>>
I had the same
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Actually, this is already in Bugzilla.
( http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3666 )
And it will probably come as no surprise that I, as creator of that
request, very much support this.
Wow, that's kinda crazy, the same exact suggestion, and honestly I swear
"Simen kjaeraas" wrote in message
news:op.u7nl710qvxi...@biotronic-pc.home...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> Point #1: It's often been noted that string mixin syntax is ugly. Which
>> is a
>> bad thing in and of itself, but it also tends to discourage use of string
>> mixins despite their high d
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:35:20 -0800, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> I did need to change my text only a few times, e.g. when constant-sized
> arrays became value types.
You can easily check from the changelogs what happened between dmd 1.00
and 1.056. Quite a lot changed. You could even write a 200 page book
Michel Fortin wrote:
My only wish in relation to that is that SafeD be more
usable.
I know safe D isn't fully implemented, but can you say which missing
part of it you need?
grauzone wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
retard wrote:
I can easily come up with 100 other such features.
Please do so, and submit them to bugzilla.
You know, the problem with Bugzilla is, that most entries simply remain
unreplied. Especially when they inquire about strange language features
Walter Bright wrote:
retard wrote:
I can easily come up with 100 other such features.
Please do so, and submit them to bugzilla.
You know, the problem with Bugzilla is, that most entries simply remain
unreplied. Especially when they inquire about strange language features
or dark corner ca
On 2010-02-05 14:35:20 -0500, Ali Çehreli said:
D2 obviously must stabilize before being useful; but it is great that
it moves fast before that happens.
D2 is already useful for small scale projects. I wrote the system to
manage license codes for my Mac shareware (Magic Launch) with D2. It's
retard wrote:
> The funny thing about D is that if you start writing a book about it,
> there's a high desire to change the core features and add more of
them in
> the community.
I have started writing a D book in June and have not desired to change
much about the language. I did find the half
The problem is with the bugzilla keywords. We need something like a
'partial-patch' keyword. In fact the current set of keywords is *far*
from ideal, and the version selection is really terrible.
I know it's probably infeasible but just imagine an automatic system that
tests stuff like vers
Steve Teale wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
What would you do? Any ideas are welcome.
Andrei, congratulations on starting the most interesting thread I have seen on
dm.D for as long as I can remember. It has managed to stay really focused, and
has produced a lot of interesting suggestio
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:20:51 +, BCS wrote:
> Hello Gareth,
>
>
>> I actually like the newsgroup format (more than modern web forums) now
>> that I've gone to the trouble of setting up Thunderbrid but I guess
>> they did put me off initially.
>>
>> Well, that's one data point for you.
>>
>>
>
Hello Gareth,
I actually like the newsgroup format (more than modern web forums) now
that I've gone to the trouble of setting up Thunderbrid but I guess
they did put me off initially.
Well, that's one data point for you.
I've said it before, but I might as well say it again; I'm of the same
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
>
> What would you do? Any ideas are welcome.
>
Andrei, congratulations on starting the most interesting thread I have seen on
dm.D for as long as I can remember. It has managed to stay really focused, and
has produced a lot of interesting suggestions.
I don't env
On 2/4/2010 3:55 PM, BCS wrote:
Hello Joel,
PPS: Riot is looking for some strong senior engineers (3years+
experienced) so if your looking for work you may check out
www.riotgames.com.
Well I'm in the market, but I rater suspect that I don't have enough
experience (~3 year, but none in that d
Yes, but look at how many of the patches are marked as 'enhancement'.
Most of the old patches have problems of various kinds: they are
incorrect or incomplete, but still useful.
The problem is with the bugzilla keywords. We need something like a
'partial-patch' keyword. In fact the current set
What about the simper:
x.dot(y)
x.dot(y) and dot(x,y) are already implementable without language
change.
As is std.numeric.dotProduct(x, y) without language _or_ library change
:o).
That's why I wondered if it could be reasonably included (without
introducing a ton of new stuff to th
Mike Parker wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
I've thought about building such a system for these forums many times.
Registration would not be required to post, but registering would
enable
features like voting on posts, establishing a profile, preferences,
etc.
That sounds a
On 02/05/2010 12:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Point #1: It's often been noted that string mixin syntax is ugly. Which is a
bad thing in and of itself, but it also tends to discourage use of string
mixins despite their high degree of usefulness.
Point #2: It seems to me that the vast majority of
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Point #1: It's often been noted that string mixin syntax is ugly. Which
is a
bad thing in and of itself, but it also tends to discourage use of string
mixins despite their high degree of usefulness.
Point #2: It seems to me that the vast majority of templates and
fun
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:41:48 -0700, Rainer Deyke wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> One idea I've had for a while was to have a universal string type:
>>
>> struct UString {
>> union {
>> char[] utf8;
>> wchar[] utf16;
>> dchar[] utf32;
>> }
>> enum Discrim
retard wrote:
I can easily come up with 100 other such features.
Please do so, and submit them to bugzilla.
Some time ago I really
wanted to write a wikibook about D. I also wanted to write a new
compiler. It's just that D is a shitty language to work with because even
the stable version i
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:20:35 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> retard wrote:
>> I can easily come up with 100 other such features.
>
> Please do so, and submit them to bugzilla.
OK
>
>
>> Some time ago I really
>> wanted to write a wikibook about D. I also wanted to write a new
>> compiler. It's just
Point #1: It's often been noted that string mixin syntax is ugly. Which is a
bad thing in and of itself, but it also tends to discourage use of string
mixins despite their high degree of usefulness.
Point #2: It seems to me that the vast majority of templates and functions
are either designed s
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:42:53 +, Stewart Gordon wrote:
> Trass3r wrote:
>> I wonder if an array operation could be reasonably included. It's a
>> quite common case and there are direct SSE instructions for it since
>> SSE 4.1.
>
> This would be achieved by adding array aggregate properties, an id
BCS Wrote:
> Hello Joel,
>
> > PPS: Riot is looking for some strong senior engineers (3years+
> > experienced) so if your looking for work you may check out
> > www.riotgames.com.
>
> Well I'm in the market, but I rater suspect that I don't have enough
> experience
> (~3 year, but none in that
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Trass3r" wrote in message
Some date back to dmd 0.164 and one even is for gdc! Shouldn't those
be closed to keep the system clean?
Just because there's a patch submitted doesn't mean it's been accepted
and incorporated into DMD.
That depend
57 matches
Mail list logo
