https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to be the
best available system for the diverse group of people who work on it.
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Phobos - Downloads: phobos-2.046
DMD - Downloads: dmd-2.046
I think the actural latest version of D should be
David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Phobos - Downloads: phobos-2.046
DMD - Downloads: dmd-2.046
I think the actural latest version
On Sunday 23 January 2011 21:00:21 David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Phobos - Downloads: phobos-2.046
DMD - Downloads:
For any one that might be interested, here's a Phobos 2.051 help file in
Windows CHM format:
http://www.zeusedit.com/z300/phobos.2.051.zip
spir wrote:
On 01/23/2011 12:03 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Sounds similar to
using whitespace for visual grouping like in
a*b + c*d
or
[ [1,2,3] , [4,5,6] ]
But may be a bit too complicated for a public, free-willing, style,
don't you think? Rather for an enforced project or
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 15:54 -0500, Jean Crystof wrote:
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
I've been under the impression that, as a rule, the USPTO doesn't check for
prior art and deliberately leaves invalid due to prior art up to the
courts.
That's how it works. The patent threat is always
Sean Eskapp eatingstap...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ih9rhr$2c1k$1...@digitalmars.com...
Is there a reason for this, or is it a bug?
Sounds like it could be http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3797
All sorts of implicit conversions are currently allowed between function
On 01/23/2011 09:13 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Agreed, but I will keep using an underscore after is. Another reason why I do
so is, when used with camelcase, that little is capitalizes the next word
just to be consistent with the camelcase part of the naming conventions. When
we have an attribute of
On 01/23/2011 06:21 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/22/11 10:59 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
This will be a _fantastic_ function to have. I think that I probably even have
an enhancement request somewhere that includes such a function. It's far too
common that you have to find something and
Hi,
I want to specialize a template function - call it print() - for three
cases: classes, structs and arrays. Ideally I'd like something that
looks 'functional' like a proper specialization, but perhaps I need to
use static if. I'm still at the beginning of my journey with D so I'd
be grateful
On 01/11/2011 07:17 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Renaming a function and having a deprecated alias to the old name for a few
releases eases the transition would definitely be good practice. aliasing a
function just to have another name for the same thing wouldn't be good
practice.
There
Luke J. West l...@west.me.uk wrote:
Hi,
I want to specialize a template function - call it print() - for three
cases: classes, structs and arrays. Ideally I'd like something that
looks 'functional' like a proper specialization, but perhaps I need to
use static if. I'm still at the beginning of
Luke J. West:
Hi,
I want to specialize a template function - call it print() - for three
cases: classes, structs and arrays. Ideally I'd like something that
looks 'functional' like a proper specialization, but perhaps I need to
use static if. I'm still at the beginning of my journey with D
Thanks for that bearophile - I'll get myself subscribed right away.
Bye for now,
Luke
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:17:05 -0500, bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com said:
Luke J. West:
Hi,
I want to specialize a template function - call it print() - for three
cases: classes, structs and
After hitting some troubles with optlink in the past (though my problems
got solved others may be not)
I was in constant search for alternatives.
The good news:
there *do* happen to be very versatile linker for windows able to
produce 32/64bit PE, that supports OMF format and so on. Another
I get errors when working with nested functions and structs or scoped classes,
because closures can't be used with anything with scoped destruction. This
makes complete sense, but I don't even want the closure functionality of these
nested functions. Personally, I would like to be able to opt-out
On Sunday 23 January 2011 06:36:27 Sean Eskapp wrote:
I get errors when working with nested functions and structs or scoped
classes, because closures can't be used with anything with scoped
destruction. This makes complete sense, but I don't even want the closure
functionality of these nested
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmx.com)'s article
On Sunday 23 January 2011 06:36:27 Sean Eskapp wrote:
I get errors when working with nested functions and structs or scoped
classes, because closures can't be used with anything with scoped
destruction. This makes complete
== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article
Sean Eskapp:
I want to be able to access the enclosing scope, but NOT after the function
has
exited; I should have the option of accessing the enclosing scope, but at
the cost
of making my delegate not a closure.
It seems
Sean Eskapp:
I want to be able to access the enclosing scope, but NOT after the function
has
exited; I should have the option of accessing the enclosing scope, but at the
cost
of making my delegate not a closure.
It seems a worth thing to ask for. A possible syntax (not currently
On 01/14/2011 09:34 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Is it common to have multiple modifiers on a single character? The
problem I see with using decomposed canonical form for strings is that
we would have to return a dchar[] for each 'element', which severely
complicates code that, for
On 1/23/11 1:22 AM, Jim wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
I suspect there might be a simple and intuitive way to define a family
of functions that give you whatever portions of the find you're
interested in (before, match, after, before and match, match and after).
That could be either a naming
On 2011-01-21, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
tr? The name means nothing to me. I haven't a clue where the name comes from,
so
I can't really give a better version of the same name. As it is, tr seems
fine to
me, particularly since tR just seems stupid. It should probably get a
On Sunday 23 January 2011 07:12:34 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/23/11 1:22 AM, Jim wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
I suspect there might be a simple and intuitive way to define a family
of functions that give you whatever portions of the find you're
interested in (before, match,
On Sunday 23 January 2011 07:12:16 Brad wrote:
On 2011-01-21, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
tr? The name means nothing to me. I haven't a clue where the name comes
from, so I can't really give a better version of the same name. As it
is, tr seems fine to me, particularly since
Yeah I can reproduce the same thing as you have.
I did manage to convert an OMF to COFF file format, and link it with
GCC (MinGW). See my thread here:
http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/read.php?server=news.digitalmars.comgroup=digitalmars.Dartnum=127079
I have yet to try it on more complex
Perhaps this page would be helpful for the linker guys:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/abi.html
== Quote from Brad Roberts (bra...@puremagic.com)'s article
On 1/22/2011 4:32 PM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 22/01/11 23:58, bioinfornatics wrote:
They are something wrong with druntime management!!!
Why druntime do not support gdc or ldc2?
Its is very crap thing i hope druntime will add
Andrew Wiley:
I don't like being too negative, but if we're removing scope as a storage
class because it can leave unsafe dangling pointers, how likely is it that
we'll get delegates that can have dangling pointers?
I have written that without too much thinking, so I'm sure that's not a
On 23.01.2011 20:43, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Yeah I can reproduce the same thing as you have.
I did manage to convert an OMF to COFF file format, and link it with
GCC (MinGW). See my thread here:
alias DataObjectFromSqlCreateTable!(import(db.sql), users) User;
// sql source code , table to fetch
void main() {
auto obj = new User(null); // that null should actually be a db handle if
you want to be able to commit changes
// read/write access to the
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
alias DataObjectFromSqlCreateTable!(import(db.sql), users) User;
// sql source code , table to fetch
void main() {
auto obj = new User(null); // that null should actually be a db
handle if
you want to be
Yeah, we're kind of stuck with Optlink for now.
2011/1/23 Sean Eskapp eatingstap...@gmail.com:
I want to be able to access the enclosing scope, but NOT after the function
has
exited; I should have the option of accessing the enclosing scope, but at the
cost
of making my delegate not a closure.
Until we have a dedicated syntax for it, I
On 1/23/2011 9:56 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
== Quote from Brad Roberts (bra...@puremagic.com)'s article
On 1/22/2011 4:32 PM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 22/01/11 23:58, bioinfornatics wrote:
They are something wrong with druntime management!!!
Why druntime do not support gdc or ldc2?
Its is very
On 2011-01-23 18:56, Iain Buclaw wrote:
== Quote from Brad Roberts (bra...@puremagic.com)'s article
On 1/22/2011 4:32 PM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 22/01/11 23:58, bioinfornatics wrote:
They are something wrong with druntime management!!!
Why druntime do not support gdc or ldc2?
Its is very
On 2011-01-23 16:08, bearophile wrote:
Sean Eskapp:
I want to be able to access the enclosing scope, but NOT after the function has
exited; I should have the option of accessing the enclosing scope, but at the
cost
of making my delegate not a closure.
It seems a worth thing to ask for. A
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ihhsv0$1fgf$1...@digitalmars.com...
alias DataObjectFromSqlCreateTable!(import(db.sql), users) User;
// sql source code , table to fetch
void main() {
auto obj = new User(null); // that null
Simen kjaeraas wrote:
I've known that D could do it, and I've occasionally
poked at it myself, but always felt it was too much work for
something that isn't all that hard to do by hand.
Yeah, that's the way I feel about it mostly. What finally pushed
me over the edge here was writing yet
== Quote from Torarin (torar...@gmail.com)'s article
2011/1/23 Sean Eskapp eatingstap...@gmail.com:
I want to be able to access the enclosing scope, but NOT after the function
has
exited; I should have the option of accessing the enclosing scope, but at
the cost
of making my delegate
== Quote from Brad Roberts (bra...@puremagic.com)'s article
On 1/23/2011 9:56 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
== Quote from Brad Roberts (bra...@puremagic.com)'s article
On 1/22/2011 4:32 PM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 22/01/11 23:58, bioinfornatics wrote:
They are something wrong with druntime
Note that SSE is less precise than x87.
Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
If the D becomes common used language we can examine its new
features and take in into consideration. But... Maybe is's easier to
contact with D developer and ask for new features in objects.
If the author wants to email me with any specific questions, I'd be happy to
On 23.01.2011 23:55, Walter Bright wrote:
Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
If the D becomes common used language we can examine its new
features and take in into consideration. But... Maybe is's easier to
contact with D developer and ask for new features in objects.
If the author wants to email me
Sadly true.
They intend to replace it with a library based solution, I don't know why.
I don't understand it either. AFAIK they are being removed because
they're unsafe, and are being replaced by an unsafe library solution.
Andrej Mitrovic:
I don't understand it either. AFAIK they are being removed because
they're unsafe, and are being replaced by an unsafe library solution.
I have hated see typedef and scoped classes go (I have even missed delete), but
you need a bit of faith in the future and in Andrei
I don't understand it either. AFAIK they are being removed because
they're unsafe, and are being replaced by an unsafe library solution.
I have the same feeling.
While I do understand why typedef is poorly designed
(http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5467) I can't imagine how a
Hopefully we can get the author to support dmd.
I can't wait years until optlink might support x64.
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:11:48 +0200, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
Sadly true.
They intend to replace it with a library based solution, I don't know
why.
If the library solution is as good as the original, it is a big plus.
If only we could do the same for everything!
Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 23.01.2011 23:55, Walter Bright wrote:
Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
If the D becomes common used language we can examine its new
features and take in into consideration. But... Maybe is's easier to
contact with D developer and ask for new features in objects.
If the
On Friday 21 January 2011 06:10:26 Sean Eskapp wrote:
Someone mentioned to me that scope declarations, e.g.
scope class A{}
or
scope A myNewObject;
are being removed from the language. Is this true? If so, how will
RAII-type classes be implemented?
std.typecons.scoped is the replacement
bioinfornatics Wrote:
They are something wrong with druntime management!!!
Why druntime do not support gdc or ldc2?
Should it? Even if the devlopers of GDC and LDC2 were interested (and neither
have contacted me indicating this), I'm not sure it's an optimal workflow to
have all compiler
We've moved the entire camp to github: dmd compiler, phobos, druntime,
website, installer.
I'm happy to report that we have our first git commit:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/81a4a4034aabe83d41cf2a0a202fedb428da66b6
Andrei
I like the new diff. Although there doesn't seem to be syntax
highlighting (or is that usual for diffs?).
Anyway, congrats!
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
We've moved the entire camp to github: dmd compiler, phobos, druntime,
website, installer.
I'm happy to report that we have our first git commit:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/81a4a4034aabe83d41cf2a0a202fedb428da66b6
Andrei
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
We've moved the entire camp to github: dmd compiler, phobos, druntime,
website, installer.
I'm happy to report that we have our first git commit:
On Sunday 23 January 2011 00:47:13 bearophile wrote:
spir:
How to write a predicate like:
assert( throws(someStatement, ErrorType) );
Are you using Design By Contract a lot? Contracts need to contain asserts
only...
Not necessarily. In fact, in general, the tact that has been taken
On 23.01.2011 2:02, bearophile wrote:
Is this another compiler bug?
The situation is nice:
struct Foo1 {}
struct Foo2 { int x; }
const struct Foo3 { int* p; }
struct Foo4 { int* p; }
void bar1(Foo1 f) {}
void bar2(Foo2 f) {}
void bar3(Foo3 f) {}
void bar4(Foo4 f) {}
void main() {
const f1
On 01/23/2011 09:47 AM, bearophile wrote:
spir:
How to write a predicate like:
assert( throws(someStatement, ErrorType) );
Are you using Design By Contract a lot? Contracts need to contain asserts
only...
Bye,
bearophile
No, not yet. I don't see your point.
Denis
On 01/23/2011 06:32 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 22 January 2011 20:45:14 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
*There are several of those, like assertExcThrown, etc. Try searching
the newsgroups for std.unittest or std.datetime and there should be a
link to the source if you want it right now.
On 01/23/2011 06:05 AM, %u wrote:
Hmm.. I thought naming enums with capital letters was a standard thing in D
land. I prefer them that way since they're constants, and since I almost always
use a tag for an enum I never mistake it for anything else. YMMV.
Huh, I guess now I see why they are
On 01/23/2011 06:28 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The problem is that constants are used all over the place in D - far more than
you'd use in most other languages (primarily because of CTFE, I belive). If you
use all-caps for stuff like enums, then you're constantly using variables which
are all
On Sunday 23 January 2011 03:14:48 spir wrote:
On 01/23/2011 06:32 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 22 January 2011 20:45:14 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
*There are several of those, like assertExcThrown, etc. Try searching
the newsgroups for std.unittest or std.datetime and there should
On 01/23/2011 12:36 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday 23 January 2011 03:14:48 spir wrote:
On 01/23/2011 06:32 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 22 January 2011 20:45:14 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
*There are several of those, like assertExcThrown, etc. Try searching
the newsgroups for
On 01/23/2011 12:36 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday 23 January 2011 03:14:48 spir wrote:
On 01/23/2011 06:32 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 22 January 2011 20:45:14 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
*There are several of those, like assertExcThrown, etc. Try searching
the newsgroups for
On Sunday 23 January 2011 03:22:36 spir wrote:
On 01/23/2011 06:28 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The problem is that constants are used all over the place in D - far more
than you'd use in most other languages (primarily because of CTFE, I
belive). If you use all-caps for stuff like enums,
On Sunday 23 January 2011 03:55:48 spir wrote:
On 01/23/2011 12:36 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday 23 January 2011 03:14:48 spir wrote:
On 01/23/2011 06:32 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 22 January 2011 20:45:14 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
*There are several of those, like
On 2011-01-23 00:03, Sean Eskapp wrote:
It was recommended to me to use structs for RAII instead of scope classes,
since scope is being removed (?). However, since default-constructors for
structs can't exist, how does one do this?
You can use a static opCall, like this:
struct Foo
{
On 2011-01-23 01:14, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
A workaround:
import std.stdio;
import std.exception;
struct A
{
int x;
this(void* none)
{
if (none !is null)
{
enforce(0, Tried to pass a parameter to A's constructor);
}
writeln(in
Am 23.01.2011 11:00, schrieb Dmitry Olshansky:
On 23.01.2011 2:02, bearophile wrote:
Is this another compiler bug?
The situation is nice:
struct Foo1 {}
struct Foo2 { int x; }
const struct Foo3 { int* p; }
struct Foo4 { int* p; }
void bar1(Foo1 f) {}
void bar2(Foo2 f) {}
void bar3(Foo3 f) {}
On 23.01.2011 19:05, Mafi wrote:
Am 23.01.2011 11:00, schrieb Dmitry Olshansky:
On 23.01.2011 2:02, bearophile wrote:
Is this another compiler bug?
The situation is nice:
struct Foo1 {}
struct Foo2 { int x; }
const struct Foo3 { int* p; }
struct Foo4 { int* p; }
void bar1(Foo1 f) {}
void
On 1/23/11, %u wfunct...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yeah, MMWV. :]
Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus? :D
I don't know what that abbreviation means.
I think some enums are in all caps because they're a workaround for
not being able to use e.g. in in a TypeTuple, so they're kind of
special.
Jonathan M Davis:
Not necessarily. In fact, in general, the tact that has been taken with Phobos
is that you use assertions when you're verifying that Phobos is correct, and
you use enforce (or an if-statement which throws an exception) when verifying
that arguments given by outside code is
Ah, I keep forgetting about opCall. Nice tips there.
I don't know what that abbreviation means.
Haha I kind of made that up... just meant My Mileage *Will* Vary :)
Huh, I never noticed the keyword conflict; that's totally legitimate, although
personally I'd prefer PascalCased. But I don't like the related to the
language
idea; it shouldn't be
Hi,
I don't want to keep typing isNumeric!T | isSomeChar!T. I want to type
isBuiltIn!T instead, but am trying to work out how to implement it.
Something like
template isBuiltInT(T) {const bool t=isNumeric!T | isSomeChar!T};}
alias isBuiltInT.t isBuiltIn;
But that doesn't compile. How should
Use the eponymous trick:
import std.stdio;
import std.traits;
template isBuiltInT(T)
{
enum isBuiltInT = isNumeric!T || isSomeChar!T;
}
void main()
{
assert(isBuiltInT!(int));
assert(isBuiltInT!(char));
}
Luke J. West l...@west.me.uk wrote:
Hi,
I don't want to keep typing isNumeric!T | isSomeChar!T. I want to type
isBuiltIn!T instead, but am trying to work out how to implement it.
Something like
template isBuiltInT(T) {const bool t=isNumeric!T | isSomeChar!T};}
alias isBuiltInT.t isBuiltIn;
Mandeep Singh Brar mand...@brars.co.in wrote in message
news:ihf3gs$2kve$1...@digitalmars.com...
Hi,
I was just thinking if implementing interfaces as abstract classes could
be a workaround. Since D anyways allows multiple inheritance, so would it
make sense
to just declare interfaces as
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.764.1295584412.4748.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
Speaking of COM.. has anyone successfully used COM interfaces in D2?
I'm asking because a few months ago I gave them a try but I kept
having random access
Sean Eskapp eatingstap...@gmail.com writes:
== Quote from Andrej Mitrovic (andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com)'s article
You can use scoped!() from std.typecons:
snip
You must not escape a reference to the object outside of the foo()
scope. Note that you will get a runtime error if you try to do
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com writes:
Is this another compiler bug?
The situation is nice:
struct Foo1 {}
struct Foo2 { int x; }
const struct Foo3 { int* p; }
struct Foo4 { int* p; }
void bar1(Foo1 f) {}
void bar2(Foo2 f) {}
void bar3(Foo3 f) {}
void bar4(Foo4 f) {}
void main()
D:\dev\svnsvn co http://svn.dsource.org/projects/orange/ orange
svn: OPTIONS of 'http://svn.dsource.org/projects/orange': 200 OK
(http://svn.dsource.org)
D:\dev\svnsvn co http://svn.dsource.org/projects/orange/trunk orange
svn: OPTIONS of 'http://svn.dsource.org/projects/orange/trunk': 200 OK
The problem is it uses a Mercurial repository.
Aw it's in that tiny box on the right, I missed it. Thanks!
On Sunday 23 January 2011 09:24:25 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Not necessarily. In fact, in general, the tact that has been taken with
Phobos is that you use assertions when you're verifying that Phobos is
correct, and you use enforce (or an if-statement which throws an
exception)
Thanks.
I'll wait for now since (gulp!) casting away shared just for the sort works and
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the patching.
Adam
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3934
--- Comment #16 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-01-23 07:18:39 PST ---
This shows something strange, dmd 2.051:
const struct Foo1 { int* p; }
struct Foo2 { int* p; }
void bar1(Foo1 f1) {}
void bar2(Foo2 f2) {}
void main() {
const f1 =
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2810
--- Comment #10 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-01-23 07:17:03 PST ---
Hit by the same bug, the reduced code:
int main() {
return foo();
}
auto foo() {
return 0;
}
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3934
--- Comment #17 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-01-23 09:26:37 PST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
This shows something strange, dmd 2.051:
According to Mafi that code is correct:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5478
Summary: API/ABI differences/issues in d-runtime
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #12 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2011-01-23
13:28:48 PST ---
There are good arguments for going either way wrt the relative priority of
toString and range interface.
Using toString by default is in a way the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #13 from Denis Derman denis.s...@gmail.com 2011-01-23 14:25:33
PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
There are good arguments for going either way wrt the relative priority of
toString and range interface.
Using toString by
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5424
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
The attached code usually hangs (running on OSX, dmd 2.051).
It uses spawn to create a new thread. All the thread does is create a large
array of doubles. In one case it uses the Array!double from std.container. In
the other case it uses the built in dynamic double[]. It declares the array,
On Sunday 23 January 2011 20:34:16 Adam Conner-Sax wrote:
The attached code usually hangs (running on OSX, dmd 2.051).
It uses spawn to create a new thread. All the thread does is create a
large array of doubles. In one case it uses the Array!double from
std.container. In the other case it
98 matches
Mail list logo
