On 2011-04-07 21:38, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 05/04/2011 14:06, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-04-05 13:08, Matthias Pleh wrote:
So I think for short or middle term such solution like gtkD, QtD, DWT
are good, but for the long term the D community needs a D GUI library
completly written in D.
Ju
"Bruno Medeiros" wrote in message
news:inla56$2uoq$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 03/04/2011 19:22, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Lutger Blijdestijn" wrote in message
>> news:in9t6a$21jb$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> I don't understand why it is hackish if it's a pure library approach.
>>> (it
>>>
On 4/7/2011 5:54 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Thanks David for rising to the challenge! You have been accepted.
Congratulations!
Congrats from me, too!
On 4/7/2011 5:33 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jonas Drewsen has been accepted as a mentor for the Google Summer of Code 2011
program for Digital Mars. He is particularly interested in topics related to
networking.
Please join me in congratulating and wishing the best to Jonas.
Congrats, Jona
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:20:53 -0400, %u wrote:
I was trying to write a "Dynamic" class for D, which uses opDispatch
to allow for late binding, but I ran into a problem:
While my class works well for regular methods inside a class, it
fails to work for:
(1) Template methods inside a class
(2) Me
Congratulations, Jonas!
Torarin
On 4/7/11 7:47 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/7/2011 8:33 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jonas Drewsen has been accepted as a mentor for the Google Summer of
Code 2011 program for Digital Mars. He is particularly interested in
topics related to networking.
Please join me in congratulating and wishing
On 4/7/2011 8:33 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jonas Drewsen has been accepted as a mentor for the Google Summer of
Code 2011 program for Digital Mars. He is particularly interested in
topics related to networking.
Please join me in congratulating and wishing the best to Jonas.
We have 18 stud
Jonas Drewsen has been accepted as a mentor for the Google Summer of
Code 2011 program for Digital Mars. He is particularly interested in
topics related to networking.
Please join me in congratulating and wishing the best to Jonas.
We have 18 student applications and only 6 mentors. Probably w
Am 01.04.2011 02:50, schrieb bearophile:
inventing new language features for D3
Why do you always mention D3.
I always hated the M$ strategy to release every 2 years a new C#/.Net
version.
I'm satisfied with D2, and let's improve it in quality not in quantity
of features.
just my 2 cents
°
Am 08.04.2011 00:27, schrieb Andrej Mitrovic:
DWT is 3x the codebase size of SWT? 0o
Maybe the old portet versions in the branches directory?
DWT is 3x the codebase size of SWT? 0o
Am 08.04.2011 00:08, schrieb Matthias Pleh:
Am 07.04.2011 21:38, schrieb Bruno Medeiros:
On 05/04/2011 14:06, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-04-05 13:08, Matthias Pleh wrote:
So I think for short or middle term such solution like gtkD, QtD, DWT
are good, but for the long term the D community ne
Am 07.04.2011 21:38, schrieb Bruno Medeiros:
On 05/04/2011 14:06, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-04-05 13:08, Matthias Pleh wrote:
So I think for short or middle term such solution like gtkD, QtD, DWT
are good, but for the long term the D community needs a D GUI library
completly written in D.
On 2011-04-07 04:38, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:57:18 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > And on some file systems, even / is valid! Though it's not worth it to
> > try and get std.path to work with files with / in the name. It's
> > generally a very bad idea to create a fil
On 03/04/2011 19:22, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Lutger Blijdestijn" wrote in message
news:in9t6a$21jb$1...@digitalmars.com...
I don't understand why it is hackish if it's a pure library approach. (it
is
right?) I find it actually rather nice that D can do this. This is not a
syntax change, octals
Am 07.04.2011, 18:03 Uhr, schrieb Simen kjaeraas :
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:42:35 +0200, Trass3r wrote:
Am 06.04.2011, 20:40 Uhr, schrieb Simen kjaeraas
:
Yup. In theory, any immutable Foo declared at module scope (and likely
also those at static class/struct scope) could be elided by the lin
On 01/04/2011 01:50, bearophile wrote:
On the other hand it's all voluntary service, most people don't get paid to
help D development, so they_can't_ be managed as employed people, especially
in a public forum designed for generic discussions about a language.
Some people are more interested
On 31/03/2011 16:11, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:39:29 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 03/31/2011 09:27 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:16:58 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 03/31/2011 03:52 AM, bearophile wrote:
KennyTM~:
I think
I hope, we agree on !in and !is, as the current lexing introduces the
shown parsing problems. But !is needs to be added to the IsExpression
rules then.
Hmm what if you have something like Templ!is(T:int)
Is http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5785 fixable with grammar
changes oth
On 4/7/11, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 04:13, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>> Wait, I'm a dumbass!
>>
>> Actually QtD needs to have Qt's MinGW in PATH, not the regular MinGW.
>> Hold on a second, let me see what you need to do..
>
> Qt has its own MinGW? o_o'
I'm not sure what's special about
"Bruno Medeiros" wrote in message
news:inl5cp$2gkf$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 05/04/2011 21:54, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:49:00 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>>> "Daniel Gibson" wrote in message
>>> news:infu1q$6bn$1...@digitalmars.com...
Am 05.04.2011 22:2
On 05/04/2011 10:04, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-04-05 01:16, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-04-04 15:41, Matthias Pleh wrote:
Am 05.04.2011 00:14, schrieb Daniel Gibson:
Maybe your company could help the DWT or QtD guys?
Getting something stable out of that would most probably not take as
On 05/04/2011 21:54, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:49:00 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Daniel Gibson" wrote in message
news:infu1q$6bn$1...@digitalmars.com...
Am 05.04.2011 22:20, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
I'm referring to Firefox 4. What's the "AwfulBar" ?
Probably
On 2011-04-07 22:32:42 +0300, Fawzi Mohamed said:
During a google summer of code project you are supposed to produce your
own code.
I also wasn't sure about the exact licensing needs, but as this is
relevant for a project I tried to clarify the situation.
As far as I understood if your code
Hi there!
Now I read Ishan's idea of a expansion of the scope and I think it's a
good one! We can split a greater topic in smaller ones and can
complement each other! There are a lot of cool containers and so the
library would get even mightier.
Now we are prepared (I ordered some books on that t
On 04/07/2011 09:32 PM, Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
During a google summer of code project you are supposed to produce your own
code.
I also wasn't sure about the exact licensing needs, but as this is relevant for
a project I tried to clarify the situation.
As far as I understood if your code has to
On 05/04/2011 04:13, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Wait, I'm a dumbass!
Actually QtD needs to have Qt's MinGW in PATH, not the regular MinGW.
Hold on a second, let me see what you need to do..
Qt has its own MinGW? o_o'
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
On 05/04/2011 14:06, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-04-05 13:08, Matthias Pleh wrote:
So I think for short or middle term such solution like gtkD, QtD, DWT
are good, but for the long term the D community needs a D GUI library
completly written in D.
Just my thoughts
°Matthias
You do know that
During a google summer of code project you are supposed to produce
your own code.
I also wasn't sure about the exact licensing needs, but as this is
relevant for a project I tried to clarify the situation.
As far as I understood if your code has to become part of phobos then
it should be
Justin Whear Wrote:
> Actually GTK+3.0 is the current stable release and the 2.2* series is
> in maintenance mode. I'd love to see GtkD update to the 3 series soon--
> currently using the 2.6 version.
Indeed, lol, I was confused by the windows section which knows nothing about
3.0 version.
> What's UCFS?
Whoops, typo. xD Uniform Function Call Syntax. :)
What's UCFS?
> I tried a "wrapper" type using opDispatch in dcollections, but what
I ran into is, opDispatch uses its called parameter types to decide
the function parameter types, you have very little control over that.
I basically ended up abandoning the use of opDispatch and implemented
each covered function
On 2011-04-07 16:17:43 +0300, Torarin said:
2011/4/7 Jonas Drewsen :
On 07/04/11 00.32, Max Klyga wrote:
snip
Seems good to me. Some comments:
You mention that a reactor will probably be used for implementing the
proactor. On windows it really doesn't make sense to do this it think.
Instead
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:20:53 -0400, %u wrote:
I was trying to write a "Dynamic" class for D, which uses opDispatch
to allow for late binding, but I ran into a problem:
While my class works well for regular methods inside a class, it
fails to work for:
(1) Template methods inside a class
(2) Me
I was trying to write a "Dynamic" class for D, which uses opDispatch
to allow for late binding, but I ran into a problem:
While my class works well for regular methods inside a class, it
fails to work for:
(1) Template methods inside a class
(2) Methods with overloads
(3) Global methods that have
Actually GTK+3.0 is the current stable release and the 2.2* series is
in maintenance mode. I'd love to see GtkD update to the 3 series soon--
currently using the 2.6 version.
Trass3r wrote:
Am 02.04.2011, 10:11 Uhr, schrieb Rainer Schuetze :
Do we want to allow spaces and comments between these tokens?
- extern ( C ++ )
Well we would have to introduce C++ as a keyword just for that purpose.
Not worth it.
It does not have to be a keyword, but the parser can just
On 04/07/2011 06:10 PM, Jason E. Aten wrote:
Dr. Dobb's Journal just published a blog entry by Walter that discusses
some of the motivation and design for the std/conv.d library. As a
relative newcomer to D, I found it quite an interesting read.
User Defined Literals in the D Programming Languag
Am 02.04.2011, 10:11 Uhr, schrieb Rainer Schuetze :
Do we want to allow spaces and comments between these tokens?
- extern ( C ++ )
Well we would have to introduce C++ as a keyword just for that purpose.
Not worth it.
- @ Property (safe, trusted, disable, etc)
safe, trusted etc. aren't keywor
Dr. Dobb's Journal just published a blog entry by Walter that discusses
some of the motivation and design for the std/conv.d library. As a
relative newcomer to D, I found it quite an interesting read.
User Defined Literals in the D Programming Language
06 April 2011
http://drdobbs.com/blogs/tool
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:42:35 +0200, Trass3r wrote:
Am 06.04.2011, 20:40 Uhr, schrieb Simen kjaeraas
:
Yup. In theory, any immutable Foo declared at module scope (and likely
also those at static class/struct scope) could be elided by the linker
if it not used anywhere, but Optlink does not do
On 4/3/2011 6:35 PM, Emil Madsen wrote:
This about image processing, got me thinking, hows the shader support
for D currently? - Interfaceable though C?
Because for image processing, thats def. the way to go, at least in my
opinion, that is if you want acceptable processing speeds.
And a more sp
On 7-apr-11, at 09:05, Mihir Patil wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Andrei for the heads up. I read the discussion in the
archives as you said.
I still did not find anyone talking about the garbage collection
part. I have a decent enough knowledge about the theoretical aspects
of it. And I am confident
2011/4/7 Jonas Drewsen :
> On 07/04/11 00.32, Max Klyga wrote:
>>
>> OK, I've absorbed enough informtion to transform my thoughts in the
>> second proposal draft.
>> I'll be posting it direcltly to GSoC website and correct it, if necessary.
>>
>> Proposal is situated here:
>>
>> http://www.google-m
On 25/03/2011 08:45, Don wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:54:56 +0200, Trass3r wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so what about:
Me too - how about an image library? Being able to load/save popular
image formats from/to RG
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 07:35:19 +, David Wang wrote:
>
> > please view:
> >
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/read.php?
> > server=news.digitalmars.com&group=digitalmars.D&artnum=134026
>
> The reason this is not getting a lot of attention is the same reason any
> o
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:57:18 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> And on some file systems, even / is valid! Though it's not worth it to
> try and get std.path to work with files with / in the name. It's
> generally a very bad idea to create a file with a / in the name - too
> many programs would ch
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> And yea, you're right that software rendering sucks performance-wise. But
> the main orginal point was t have a way to just toy around with image
> drawing in an easy classic DOS-style. From there, my thoughts were "ok, how
> to make this approach as close to being effi
On 07/04/11 00.32, Max Klyga wrote:
OK, I've absorbed enough informtion to transform my thoughts in the
second proposal draft.
I'll be posting it direcltly to GSoC website and correct it, if necessary.
Proposal is situated here:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:51:15 +0100, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> > On 03/03/2011 16:29, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> >> As mentioned in the "std.path.getName(): Screwy by design?" thread, I
> >> started working on a rewrite of std.path a long time ago, but I got
> >> sidetracked by other things. The
2011/4/4 Emil Madsen :
> And a more specific question; say one wants to blur a picture
> with Gaussian blur, how would D ranges deal with the 2d array?
foreach (r; image.rows)
convolute1d(r, gaussianKernel);
foreach (c; image.cols)
convolute1d(c, gaussianKernel);
Torarin
i have successfully implemented a function in D.that takes a bmp image and
stores it in a array.but it supports only grayscale images..i.e.8bit 256
levels.fawzi sir proposed a creation of a wrapper for arbitrary
bitdepth/channel but i could not understand that concept well will someone
elaborate o
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:51:15 +0100, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 16:29, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
>> As mentioned in the "std.path.getName(): Screwy by design?" thread, I
>> started working on a rewrite of std.path a long time ago, but I got
>> sidetracked by other things. The recent di
Hi,
Thanks Andrei for the heads up. I read the discussion in the archives as you
said.
I still did not find anyone talking about the garbage collection part. I
have a decent enough knowledge about the theoretical aspects of it. And I am
confident that I can implement it.
I have read the garbage col
56 matches
Mail list logo
