Roman Ivanov wrote:
> == Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
>> On 2011-04-14 18:48, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 4/14/11 9:03 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Sometimes, I worry that my unit tests or asserts aren't running. Every
once in a while, I have to change one to
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:22:04 -0400, dsimcha wrote:
I'm trying to debug an extremely strange bug whose symptoms appear in a
std.parallelism example, though I'm not at all sure the root cause is in
std.parallelism. The bug report is at
https://github.com/dsimcha/std.parallelism/issues/1#iss
> == Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
>
> > On 2011-04-14 18:48, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > > On 4/14/11 9:03 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> > >> Sometimes, I worry that my unit tests or asserts aren't running. Every
> > >> once in a while, I have to change one to fail to m
On 4/15/11 9:05 AM, Ishan Thilina wrote:
Are you still going to interview every applicant or only the applicants from the
project that you think have high priority and success rate?
Thank you...!
Due to the few slots we received, we got we must be very conservative.
We'll interview the applic
dsimcha wrote:
On 4/15/2011 5:01 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Apr 15, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Don wrote:
Create a pure heap for each thread. This is a heap which can only be
used by pure functions. I present some simplistic code, with the
simplest possible implementation: just a big block of memory with
Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Don napisał:
LEAKY FUNCTIONS
Define a 'leaky' pure function as a pure function which can return
heap-allocated memory to the caller, ie, where the return value or a
parameter passed by reference has at least one pointer or reference
type. This can be determined simply by
On 4/15/11 10:22 PM, dsimcha wrote:
I'm trying to debug an extremely strange bug whose symptoms appear in a
std.parallelism example, though I'm not at all sure the root cause is in
std.parallelism. The bug report is at
https://github.com/dsimcha/std.parallelism/issues/1#issuecomment-1011717 .
D
I'm trying to debug an extremely strange bug whose symptoms appear in a
std.parallelism example, though I'm not at all sure the root cause is in
std.parallelism. The bug report is at
https://github.com/dsimcha/std.parallelism/issues/1#issuecomment-1011717 .
Basically, the example in question
On 4/15/2011 7:06 PM, bearophile wrote:
There is something I don't understand. If your last change allows code like
this, isn't it breaking the safety of pure functions in debug mode? Do you
think this loss of safety is not important?
Yes, it allows one to break the purity of the function. The
Walter:
> On the contrary, I think it is the right solution. After all, the reason
> people
> want to put impure code in a pure function is for debugging. By putting it
> under
> the debug conditional, any logging or printing code can be there without
> needing
> the compiler to be aware of wha
On 4/15/2011 5:01 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Apr 15, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Don wrote:
Create a pure heap for each thread. This is a heap which can only be
used by pure functions. I present some simplistic code, with the
simplest possible implementation: just a big block of memory with a thread
local
On 4/15/2011 3:00 PM, bearophile wrote:
I presume this front end change is not following my suggestion (of adding a
switch to disable purity), but adds a dirty hack that allows impure debug
code inside pure functions. If this is true, then let's now find the bad side
effects of this change.
On
Tomek Sowiñski:
> I'm far from being a GC expert but I think Java having identified such cases
> with escape analysis just puts locally allocated objects on the stack.
Escape analysis will be useful for D compilers too (I think LDC-LLVM is not
doing this much yet), but if the amount of non-esca
Recent slides by Stroustrup on C++0x:
http://www.arcos.inf.uc3m.es/~jdaniel/sem-cpp-11/Madrid-bs.pdf
The Reddit thread:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/gqwei/
The graph at page 20 (about list Vs vector) seems a bit too much good to be
true. There is no link to the benchmarking code.
Don napisał:
> LEAKY FUNCTIONS
>
> Define a 'leaky' pure function as a pure function which can return
> heap-allocated memory to the caller, ie, where the return value or a
> parameter passed by reference has at least one pointer or reference
> type. This can be determined simply by inspecting th
> > Related news:
> > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/ed8068f5036f88fff1603d98ebe96bb6659bceed
I have forgotten to add something: thank you Walter. Sorry for criticizing
before actually trying out the change.
Bye,
bearophile
David Nadlinger:
> Related news:
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/ed8068f5036f88fff1603d98ebe96bb6659bceed
It's a bit disconcerting to see how important things I'm asking and arguing for
for three years or more gets ignored, while this that I have barely noted gets
worked
Sean Kelly wrote:
On Apr 15, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Don wrote:
Create a pure heap for each thread. This is a heap which can only be
used by pure functions. I present some simplistic code, with the
simplest possible implementation: just a big block of memory with a thread
local 'stack pointer' which
On 4/11/11 11:27 PM, bearophile wrote:
From what I am seeing, in a D2 program if I have many (tens or more) pure functions that
call to each other, and I want to add (or activate) a printf/writeln inside one (or few)
of those functions to debug it, I may need to temporarily comment out the
"p
Don:
> But it seems to me that a dedicated GC for pure functions has enormous
> unexplored potential, and might be relatively easy to implement.
- In D we have not even started to exploit the full potential of purity and
pure functions.
- In D reducing the work of the normal GC is a very good t
We could also rewrite tango.core.Thread so that it extends core.thread.
But keep the old interface/API. Some of the tango special feature might
be wrapped in this case.
In my mind it's more important that tango.core.Atomic gets deprecated,
because it doesn't work well on my maschine. I have ou
On Apr 15, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Don wrote:
>
> Create a pure heap for each thread. This is a heap which can only be
> used by pure functions. I present some simplistic code, with the
> simplest possible implementation: just a big block of memory with a thread
> local 'stack pointer' which points to
== Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
> On 2011-04-14 18:48, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > On 4/14/11 9:03 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> >> Sometimes, I worry that my unit tests or asserts aren't running. Every
> >> once in a while, I have to change one to fail to make sure that
On 4/15/2011 1:12 PM, Don wrote:
In reality, things are going to be a bit more complicated than this. But
it seems to me that conceptually, something like this could still stay fairly
simple and be very, very fast. With no changes required to the language, and not
even any changes required to exi
I noticed a lively discussion in Bugzilla about the GC, with speculation
about the impact of a precise GC on speed.
But it seems to me that a dedicated GC for pure functions has enormous
unexplored potential, and might be relatively easy to implement.
LEAKY FUNCTIONS
Define a 'leaky' pure func
On 15.04.2011 22:24, KennyTM~ wrote:
On Apr 16, 11 00:29, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I've also tried to create a some sort of 'bind' function which could
let you bind arguments to specific parameters of a function. If I had
it working it would really help (me) out in coding for e.g. the
Windows API
On Apr 16, 11 00:29, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I've also tried to create a some sort of 'bind' function which could
let you bind arguments to specific parameters of a function. If I had
it working it would really help (me) out in coding for e.g. the
Windows API. For example you might have a WinAPI
Oh and the reason I used a struct and opCall inside the template is
because this somehow allowed me to use foreach for some things. I
dunno, CTFE overall seems like a buggy thing where I have to guess
whether something will work or not. It's very stress-inducing.
On 04/15/2011 01:10 PM, Spacen Jasset wrote:
As other posters have pointed out, it seems to me, at least, that having a way
to express your model/idea or view of a problem directly is the most useful
thing a language can give you.
This is my definition of a good language :-)
Denis
--
_
Here's a hardcoded example:
http://codepad.org/klr8S1hi
I've tried numerous ways of automatically creating the appropriate
call to fun in the bind template, but I've been unsuccessful. Maybe
using some form of string mixin would work.. My biggest issue is that
I can't modify variables at compile
Andrej Mitrovic:
> alias bind!CreateWindow(void, void, width, height, null, null, null,
> void) myWindow;
How do you give a void argument to a function, in D2? This doesn't work,
despite having templated void arguments seems potentially useful:
void foo(T)(T x) {}
void bar() {}
void main() {
On 4/15/2011 7:20 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Just for the record, it's in development and now supports D2.
That's most excellent!
I've recently made an attempt to make a curry alternative which can
take any number of parameters (currently the curry implementation only
works with 1 parameter). I've put my implementation in bugzilla, it is
extremely simple (and maybe buggy :p)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5829.
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"spir" wrote in message
news:mailman.3527.1302824019.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 04/15/2011 12:51 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Is anyone aware of any (formal or informal)
theory/information/research/articles/etc. that's already been done on the
idea of reparsin
On 2011-04-14 20:59, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/14/2011 7:31 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Walter has dropped the idea of endorsing a GUI/any library. There was
once a
statement that DWT was the official library for D, development promptly
stopped afterwards. Not trying to claim there was causation h
On 2011-04-14 18:48, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/14/11 9:03 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Sometimes, I worry that my unit tests or asserts aren't running. Every
once in a while, I have to change one to fail to make sure that code is
compiling (this is especially true when I'm doing version
On 2011-04-15 15:13, David Wang wrote:
== Forward by Jesse Phillips (jessekphillip...@gmail.com)
== Posted at 2011/04/14 10:31 to digitalmars.D
David Wang Wrote:
Dear Walter Bright,
I would like to know that what GUI library you wou
On 04/15/2011 03:23 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I'm not certain either, but I *think* partial application is just like
currying except there's some sort of arbitrary limitaion on what
combination(s) of paramaters you can choose to specify or not specify. And
that limitation is based purely on what
>> Digital Mars has received 3 slots for GSoC 2011. That means we need
>> to choose three student projects to go with.
>>
>> We have enjoyed many strong applications and we have a great lineup
>> of mentors, but Google is reluctant to allocate a lot of slots to
>> first-time participants because hi
Am 15.04.2011 15:13, schrieb David Wang:
>
> == Forward by Jesse Phillips (jessekphillip...@gmail.com)
> == Posted at 2011/04/14 10:31 to digitalmars.D
>
> David Wang Wrote:
>
>> Dear Walter Bright,
>>
>> I would like to know that what
On 4/15/11 2:24 PM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
This looks very good. I'd suggest calling them std.units and std.units.si, if
possible.
Thanks for your comments. Unfortunately, having a package of the same
name as a module is not possible in D – any other ideas? What about
std.measure(ment).*?
D
On 4/15/11 3:06 PM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
Oh, and it would appear I have found a bug:
enum foo = metre / 2;
std\units.d(165): Error: cannot raise int to a negative integer power. Did you m
ean (cast(real)rhs)^^-1 ?
Oh, thanks, I just pushed a fix (which uses (rhs ^^ 0) / rhs to work
around th
== Forward by Jesse Phillips (jessekphillip...@gmail.com)
== Posted at 2011/04/14 10:31 to digitalmars.D
David Wang Wrote:
> Dear Walter Bright,
>
> I would like to know that what GUI library you would like to use for D
> Language ?
>
Oh, and it would appear I have found a bug:
enum foo = metre / 2;
std\units.d(165): Error: cannot raise int to a negative integer power. Did you m
ean (cast(real)rhs)^^-1 ?
This looks very good. I'd suggest calling them std.units and std.units.si, if
possible.
It seems to support all the features I wanted when I started writing such a
module, though I never finished mine.
The documentation is very nice if, as you said, somewhat duplicated. Could
perhaps use a bette
On 2011-04-14 16:03, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:04:25 -0400, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On the other hand, having output there might be more interesting
to look at than "yay the asserts all passed!".
I think this is a good point. Someone playing with a language might type
i
On 12/04/2011 11:21, Mafi wrote:
Am 12.04.2011 00:31, schrieb Spacen Jasset:
std::getline(is, line);
while (line.size() != 0)
{
...some things...
std::getline(is, line);
}
What's wrong with
while( std::getline(is, line), (line.size() != 0) ) {
//... some things
}
I mean, that's what the comma
spir Wrote:
> I press '"' '""' is written out (a feature I hate anyway for code edition). I
> would like to know how & how well other editors deal with all of that
> (especially but not only emacs and vim).
Visual studio rehighlights instantly and has a timeout of 2 sec for refold.
> Compare w
On 04/15/2011 02:40 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"spir" wrote in message
news:mailman.3527.1302824019.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 04/15/2011 12:51 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Is anyone aware of any (formal or informal)
theory/information/research/articles/etc. that's already been done
49 matches
Mail list logo
