On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:06:06 +0200, Unknown W. Brackets
wrote:
Walter,
Well, having authored web forum software, I suppose I'll make a few
remarks here. I seem to have gotten hit by a stray "forum software
writers (that's me) just don't get it."
1. Well, I get threads, I really do. I
On 2011-11-29 08:40, Caligo wrote:
BTW, something is wrong with the class section of the language
reference: http://d-programming-language.org/new/class.html
It's been like that for months.
There's a pull request available but it hasn't been merged.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2011-11-29 07:37, Gour wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:55:10 +0100
Anders F Björklund wrote:
I'm no fan of either, and prefer plain import modules and libs over
function pointers and complex tools.
Well, my belief is that tools can help when maintaining bindings, iow.
when one has to keep t
On 2011-11-29 07:37, Gour wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:55:10 +0100
Anders F Björklund wrote:
I'm no fan of either, and prefer plain import modules and libs over
function pointers and complex tools.
Well, my belief is that tools can help when maintaining bindings, iow.
when one has to keep t
BTW, something is wrong with the class section of the language reference:
http://d-programming-language.org/new/class.html
It's been like that for months.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:31:33 -0800, bls wrote:
> Picking up ODBC in order to figure out how an generic database Interface
> may look like is a very bad idea.
>
> Creating an ODBC Interface at all is pretty useless. NOBODY is using
> ODBC at all.
Just a point of clarification. It is not my intenti
On 2011-11-29 05:21, Steve Teale wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:48:37 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-11-28 15:34, Steve Teale wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:31:32 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-11-27 07:13, Steve Teale wrote:
You may detest ODBC, but it is very soon going to be th
On 2011-11-28 23:22, Mike Wey wrote:
On 11/28/2011 09:38 PM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable. Here are some early
results:
http://bot.neostrada.pl/dpl.org/std.datetime.html
Do you know some free icons of class, enum, function, etc? I'm thinking
of somethi
Am 29.11.2011, 08:08 Uhr, schrieb Unknown W. Brackets
:
In contrast, I haven't a clue how to use NNTP on my iPhone. Go figure.
The first iPhone didn't even support copy&paste iirc.
On the other hand, this app may work for you:
http://www.caledonia.net/blog/?p=173
On 2011-11-28 22:18, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:38:49 -0500, Piotr Szturmaj
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable. Here are some early
results:
http://bot.neostrada.pl/dpl.org/std.datetime.html
Do you know some free icons of class, enum, function, et
On 2011-11-28 21:38, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable. Here are some early
results:
http://bot.neostrada.pl/dpl.org/std.datetime.html
Do you know some free icons of class, enum, function, etc? I'm thinking
of something like this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/e
On 2011-11-28 21:38, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable. Here are some early
results:
http://bot.neostrada.pl/dpl.org/std.datetime.html
That starts to look like CandyDoc.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2011-11-28 20:43, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/28/2011 5:33 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I know that most of the forums look like this. But what says that they
have to?
I'm just trying to say that a forum doesn't have to look like these
examples.
You also complained how the forum sites doesn't wo
That's just designers who don't get it. They're starting to nowadays.
I remember the WAP, I-mode, and etc. interfaces in SMF worked just fine
on small screens. Nowadays there are specialized iPhone interfaces.
And of course skins that scale fine.
In contrast, I haven't a clue how to use NNT
Walter,
Well, having authored web forum software, I suppose I'll make a few
remarks here. I seem to have gotten hit by a stray "forum software
writers (that's me) just don't get it."
1. Well, I get threads, I really do. I understand their usefulness, and
how sometimes it's beneficial to co
Am 29.11.2011, 06:51 Uhr, schrieb Mike Parker :
Consider this. I've been using web-based mail for years, so had no
mail/newsgroup client installed. Why would I want to install one just
for one little project? With a forum, I don't have to install anything.
I've been using them for years, am
Gerrit Wichert wrote:
So, is wxD going to continue like now, or do you envision some change
how to proceed for wx-2.9/3.=?
I don't plan to do anything with it, I put it up on github so that it
could be forked and maintained if there are any bugfixes etc needed...
So if i understand you righ
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:53:20 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Honestly I can't even get a simple SWIG project working (the demo from
> klickverbot's announcement on his blog). Apparently there's some
> const-related issues.
Hmm...have you reported the issue to klickverbot?
> Building the examples
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:55:10 +0100
Anders F Björklund wrote:
> I'm no fan of either, and prefer plain import modules and libs over
> function pointers and complex tools.
Well, my belief is that tools can help when maintaining bindings, iow.
when one has to keep the API up-to-date.
Of course, m
On 11/29/2011 8:36 AM, Johannes Totz wrote:
PHP forum? Noo!1
If D had a web-based forum only I would not bother reading it or ever
coming back to it. I would not have bothered trying to learn any D. I
like how these "ancient" newsgroups sort and organise individual
messages.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:48:37 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-11-28 15:34, Steve Teale wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:31:32 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>
>>> On 2011-11-27 07:13, Steve Teale wrote:
You may detest ODBC, but it is very soon going to be the only way to
communicate
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:54:48 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
> That is an overly restrictive interface because the element type is
> fixed.
>
> The interface should be usable like this:
> void foo(R : Range)(R input) { /* ... * / }
void foo(T, R : Range!T)(R input) {} // ?
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:18:50 +, Regan Heath wrote:
> The source for Minecraft (written primarily in
> Java) was going to be released
Hasn't been yet, but it wasn't going to be released as OSS and only
intended for modding. So I don't know what the licensing rules would
entail, but there is
Am 28.11.2011, 14:42 Uhr, schrieb Maxim Fomin :
2011/11/28 Marco Leise :
Am 28.11.2011, 11:02 Uhr, schrieb Jude <10equa...@gmail.com>:
I tried to write a lib and a project, which used that lib
separately, but came to conclusion that the best choice it to pull
lib code to project one. And it i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/28/2011 12:37 PM, Kagamin wrote:
> so Wrote:
>
>> http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/11/having-it-all-pythy-syntax/
>
> o.O
>
> overload a lambda?
And now I see what all the hype is about with D's template system.
Good lord. I've never rea
Honestly I can't even get a simple SWIG project working (the demo from
klickverbot's announcement on his blog). Apparently there's some
const-related issues.
Building the examples that come with swig windows binary doesn't work,
tried it via mingw32-make and via MSYS. Apparently there's a missing
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Debdatta wrote:
> >>1. Your variables are thread local. This guarantees some nice
> >>properties, like code that was intended to run in a single-threaded
> >>environment when it was written will behave nicely in a multi-threaded
> >>environment too, because every thread gets a
On 27/11/2011 17:41, alex wrote:
Hi folks,
I just wondered why there still is this uncomfortable and obviously
outdated newsgroup software in use.
Perhaps it'd be more contemporary to have a 'real' browser-based
forum to which everyone can register and post D-related
questions&answers.
So, my
On 11/28/2011 09:27 PM, Kagamin wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
On 11/27/2011 11:55 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-11-27 23:30, Walter Bright wrote:
Those are all desirable properties. But the forum software I've seen
throws out what's good about NNTP news forums:
1. Threaded view
2. Being ab
On Monday, November 28, 2011 22:17:02 Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Monday, November 28, 2011 22:45:17 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> >> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:38:49 +0200, Piotr
> >> Szturmaj
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable
So, is wxD going to continue like now, or do you envision some change
how to proceed for wx-2.9/3.=?
I don't plan to do anything with it, I put it up on github so that it
could be forked and maintained if there are any bugfixes etc needed...
So if i understand you right, the way to keep wxD a
On 11/28/11 2:39 AM, Marco Leise wrote:
Sounds familiar :D
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/static_interface_for_structs_146478.html
Not to mention
http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/2009-April/053098.html.
Andrei
On 11/28/2011 09:38 PM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable. Here are some early
results:
http://bot.neostrada.pl/dpl.org/std.datetime.html
Do you know some free icons of class, enum, function, etc? I'm thinking
of something like this: http://msdn.microsoft.co
Gour wrote:
Just that I won't have much time to actually maintain it, myself.
I'm also not capable to lead such project and would have to take that
into consideration when deciding which GUI toolkit to use with D.
In any case, for now, I plan to learn more D, master some CMake and
start playin
bearophile Wrote:
> And this is positive because?
You say it as if it's negative.
Walter:
> On 11/28/2011 4:00 AM, Alexey Veselovsky wrote:
> > Compiler doesn't know anything about "specification" files. So, he
> > did't check specification&implementation conformance.
>
> Yes, that's correct.
And this is positive because?
See also Timon answer:
http://www.digitalmars.com/web
so Wrote:
> As i was thinking it can't get any worse, you proved me wrong.
For linear chronological view it's a natural thing.
Also:
1. Messy software screws your threads for real. In a forum a post ends up right
where it belongs to: messy clients are not a problem for chronological order.
2. "
On 11/28/2011 05:08 PM, Gour wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:58:00 +0100
Mike Wey wrote:
Yes, I'll probably update GtkD to the latest 2.x release before
looking at GTK+ 3.
Have you considered using SWIG to provide GtkD bindings?
I'll have to check it out, currently updating the lookup files
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:38:49 -0500, Piotr Szturmaj
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable. Here are some early
results:
http://bot.neostrada.pl/dpl.org/std.datetime.html
Do you know some free icons of class, enum, function, etc? I'm thinking
of something like this: http://m
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2011 22:45:17 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:38:49 +0200, Piotr Szturmaj
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable. Here are some early
results:
http://bot.neostrada.pl/dpl.org/std.datetime.html
I think that for
so Wrote:
> Except it has noting remotely resembles a novel, where the author plots to
> a final common goal,
> which happens to be written/thought long before the actual writing.
There's no visible difference if the novel runs for decades.
> > Chronological order also helps to understand peop
On Monday, November 28, 2011 22:45:17 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:38:49 +0200, Piotr Szturmaj
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable. Here are some early
> > results:
> >
> > http://bot.neostrada.pl/dpl.org/std.datetime.html
>
> I think th
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:44:51 +0200, Kagamin wrote:
Some forums even have plugins that merge consecutive posts from the same
author.
As i was thinking it can't get any worse, you proved me wrong.
In Soviet Russia... errm... I mean with linear chronological view you
do. Think of it as a nov
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:38:49 +0200, Piotr Szturmaj
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable. Here are some early
results:
http://bot.neostrada.pl/dpl.org/std.datetime.html
I think that for something like this to have full benefit, DDoc would
need to
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:38:49 +0200, Piotr Szturmaj
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable. Here are some early
results:
http://bot.neostrada.pl/dpl.org/std.datetime.html
I think that for something like this to have full benefit, DDoc would need
to be fixed so that genera
Walter Bright Wrote:
> On 11/27/2011 5:40 PM, Jude wrote:
> > //quote cause I'm lazy
> > Those are all desirable properties. But the forum software I've seen
> > throws out what's good about NNTP news forums:
> >
> > 1. Threaded view
> > 2. Being able to mark messages as "read"
> > 3. Being able t
Hi,
I'm trying to make ddoc index more readable. Here are some early
results:
http://bot.neostrada.pl/dpl.org/std.datetime.html
Do you know some free icons of class, enum, function, etc? I'm thinking
of something like this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library
/y47ychfe%28v=vs.80%29.aspx
Th
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:01:38 +0100
Anders F Björklund wrote:
> Of course, you don't *have* to wrap all the classes or methods ?
> One could start with the ones that are likely to be used from D.
Well, it is still big project and not so easy to say what needed.
In any case, substantial part has
Walter Bright Wrote:
> On 11/27/2011 11:55 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> > On 2011-11-27 23:30, Walter Bright wrote:
> >> Those are all desirable properties. But the forum software I've seen
> >> throws out what's good about NNTP news forums:
> >>
> >> 1. Threaded view
> >> 2. Being able to mark mes
so Wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:12:32 +0200, Kagamin wrote:
>
> > In Java separation is done with interfaces. I think it is right.
>
> For Java, yes.
Java, D or C++, classes and structs are not a separation. Want a real
separation? See COM: it doesn't even have notion of a field.
Gour wrote:
Here's a more complete example of what it would look like in the end:
http://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxPython/trunk/src/
http://wxruby.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/wxruby/swig/classes/
Thank you.
Of course, you don't *have* to wrap all the classes or methods ?
One could start with th
On 11/28/2011 4:00 AM, Alexey Veselovsky wrote:
ok. I just removed from test.di all non public entities.
// D import file generated from 'test.d'
module test;
public
{
void foo();
struct Boo
{
public
{
void boo();
}
}
}
Now, let's bui
On 11/28/2011 5:33 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I know that most of the forums look like this. But what says that they have to?
I'm just trying to say that a forum doesn't have to look like these examples.
You also complained how the forum sites doesn't work on a small screen. Have a
look at this s
On 11/28/2011 3:41 AM, Alexey Veselovsky wrote:
ok. What about:
struct Foo {
int a;
int b;
// 100 more fields
...
void foo();
}
Did I must write in implementation all this 100+ fields in implementation?
Yes. (Unless you decide to use the PIMPL idiom.)
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:12:32 +0200, Kagamin wrote:
In Java separation is done with interfaces. I think it is right.
For Java, yes.
On 11/28/2011 07:41 PM, Debdatta wrote:
1. Your variables are thread local. This guarantees some nice
properties, like code that was intended to run in a single-threaded
environment when it was written will behave nicely in a multi-threaded
environment too, because every thread gets a copy of all
Alexey Veselovsky Wrote:
> ok. What about:
>
> struct Foo {
> int a;
> int b;
> // 100 more fields
> ...
> void foo();
> }
>
> Did I must write in implementation all this 100+ fields in implementation?
>
> In Ada and Modula there is 2 languages: one for implementation and
>
On Monday, November 28, 2011 18:41:46 Debdatta wrote:
> >>There is one to one feature correspondence.
>
> Of course. That is obvious.:D It just seemed counter intuitive to have every
> variable I declare to be thread local. Will experiment with it some more
> and see if I can get used to the conce
On 2011-11-28 15:34, Steve Teale wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:31:32 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-11-27 07:13, Steve Teale wrote:
You may detest ODBC, but it is very soon going to be the only way to
communicate with SQL Server short of writing another wire protocol
effort. There was t
>>1. Your variables are thread local. This guarantees some nice
>>properties, like code that was intended to run in a single-threaded
>>environment when it was written will behave nicely in a multi-threaded
>>environment too, because every thread gets a copy of all global data.
>>This is a sane def
so Wrote:
> http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/11/having-it-all-pythy-syntax/
o.O
overload a lambda?
On 11/28/2011 06:41 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
2011/11/28 Timon Gehr:
On 11/28/2011 09:01 AM, so wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:44:23 +0200, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/27/2011 4:44 PM, Alexey Veselovsky wrote:
"D has a true module system that supports separate compilation and
generates and us
On 28/11/11 1:56 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 28/11/2011 03:29, Alexey Veselovsky a écrit :
D's private is different than some other languages (e.g. C++).
'private' provides access to the entire module.
public: no access limitation
private: access by the module
package: access by the modul
On 11/28/2011 05:07 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
2011/11/28 Max Samukha:
On 11/28/2011 02:29 PM, so wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:58:25 +0200, Max Samukha
wrote:
How would you write libraries?
The way they do, for example, in C# - interface definitions are stored
in the library, no need for sepa
On 11/28/2011 05:41 PM, Alexey Veselovsky wrote:
Separate hand written specification is rulez for human. It is best
short module description (with some useful manually written comments).
I like it more then autogenerated docs (by doxygen and so on).
Autogenerated specifications (headers and so o
2011/11/28 Timon Gehr :
> On 11/28/2011 09:01 AM, so wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:44:23 +0200, Walter Bright
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/27/2011 4:44 PM, Alexey Veselovsky wrote:
"D has a true module system that supports separate compilation and
generates and uses module summaries
Am 28.11.2011, 18:21 Uhr, schrieb Benjamin Thaut :
I don't think porting any game to D is a good idea right now. I've did
some major game developement on D. Half my code uses manual memory
management and still the D garbage collector is a major performance
issue. Unless you want to do all of
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:26:23 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote:
Nobody stops you from hand crafting *.di files.
My point exactly.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:18:33 +0100
Anders F Björklund wrote:
> At this point in time it doesn't matter, the generated files are
> different even if the scripts to generate them are somewhat similar.
> The API is also different, from the different languages used and
> from this recent push to rena
On 11/28/2011 09:01 AM, so wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:44:23 +0200, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/27/2011 4:44 PM, Alexey Veselovsky wrote:
"D has a true module system that supports separate compilation and
generates and uses module summaries (highbrowspeak for "header files")
automatically fr
Am 23.11.2011 17:16, schrieb deadalnix:
Hi,
I want to suggest a project to the community. Doom3 source code has just
been released, and I think we may want to do a port in D. Here are the
reasons :
1/ I think D is suitable and pertinent for video games.
2/ This would make a solid code base to pr
On 11/28/2011 01:57 PM, Debdatta wrote:
@Michael,
Thanks for clearing that up. Your post was very informative. :)
Actually, the private data of your thread object could be used by other
threads if the MyThread object is accessible from another thread and
someone calls a method on it.
Absolut
Do you think it'd be a good thing to put the .di file in the
generated compiled lib?
That'd be somewhat similar to the c# example.
dmd myprog.d something.dll
searches something.dll for a .di reference, and adds it to the
compile command line if it's there.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:41:30 +0200, Alexey Veselovsky
wrote:
Separate hand written specification is rulez for human. It is best
short module description (with some useful manually written comments).
I like it more then autogenerated docs (by doxygen and so on).
I agree for C/C++ and even fo
On 11/28/2011 06:07 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
In conclusion, I find D module support the worst one.
Sad but true.
Separate hand written specification is rulez for human. It is best
short module description (with some useful manually written comments).
I like it more then autogenerated docs (by doxygen and so on).
Autogenerated specifications (headers and so on) are worst and ugly.
But in language like java an
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:21:03 +0200, Max Samukha wrote:
Could you clarify what is the most important part?
As i tried in the above post, header files are specs, a contract between
library writer and the user.
A dll itself is not a spec, it is the implementation.
If you want to use a libra
On 11/28/2011 04:05 PM, so wrote:
For the second part if library writer changes anything with
"implementation", that would not affect the user.
In your case it does, because there is no distinction between
specification and implementation
There is, but the specification is bundled with the impl
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Gour wrote:
> btw, do you have any influence @dsource forums?
>
> I registered 8 days ago and still neither received confirmation email
> that my account was activated nor I can login.
>
"To register as a dsource user, head over to Forums and use the Register
li
On 11/28/2011 03:52 PM, so wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:34:19 +0200, Max Samukha wrote:
No, it has nothing to do with the IDE. The article describes a visual
tool for viewing meta-data stored in a .NET binary. You don't have to
use it.
Specially for you, die-hard IDE haters, this is how to u
2011/11/28 Max Samukha :
> On 11/28/2011 02:29 PM, so wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:58:25 +0200, Max Samukha
>> wrote:
>>
How would you write libraries?
>>>
>>> The way they do, for example, in C# - interface definitions are stored
>>> in the library, no need for separate headers.
>>
>>
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:58:00 +0100
Mike Wey wrote:
> Yes, I'll probably update GtkD to the latest 2.x release before
> looking at GTK+ 3.
Have you considered using SWIG to provide GtkD bindings?
btw, do you have any influence @dsource forums?
I registered 8 days ago and still neither received
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 21:04:28 -, Paulo Pinto
wrote:
Am 25.11.2011 00:33, schrieb Somedude:
Le 25/11/2011 00:14, Andrej Mitrovic a écrit :
I remember reading this ages ago:
http://fabiensanglard.net/quakeSource/index.php
Besides there has already been a FPS written in D, and that hasn't
Andrea Fontana:
> writeln("int.max: ", int.max);
> writeln("int.min: ", int.min);
> writeln("float.max: ", float.max);
> writeln("float.min: ", float.min);
> }
>
> it prints:
> int.max: 2147483647 <-- no int > int.max
> int.min: -2147483648 <-- no int < int.min
> float.max: 3.
D fixed a lot of predecessor's mistakes :)
Il giorno lun, 28/11/2011 alle 16.59 +0200, so ha scritto:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:53:11 +0200, Andrea Fontana
> wrote:
>
> > dmd 2.056.
> >
> > void main(string[] args)
> > {
> > writeln("int.max: ", int.max);
> > writeln("int.min: ", int.min);
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 21:39:05 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> That's not a workaround, that ctor never gets called unless you pass an
> argument.
But it lets you pass a Range test.
Gour wrote:
If you were to use SWIG, you would still have the same two libraries ?
Just that files would be: example.d + example_im.d, example_wrap.cxx
(as generated by SWIG from your example.i source file and the headers)
whereas they are currently called: wx/Example.d and wxc/example.cpp
OK;
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:53:11 +0200, Andrea Fontana
wrote:
dmd 2.056.
void main(string[] args)
{
writeln("int.max: ", int.max);
writeln("int.min: ", int.min);
writeln("float.max: ", float.max);
writeln("float.min: ", float.min);
}
it prints:
int.max: 2147483647 <-- no int > int
dmd 2.056.
void main(string[] args)
{
writeln("int.max: ", int.max);
writeln("int.min: ", int.min);
writeln("float.max: ", float.max);
writeln("float.min: ", float.min);
}
it prints:
int.max: 2147483647 <-- no int > int.max
int.min: -2147483648 <-- no int < int.min
float.max:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:32:23 +0200, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Yes, but let's not call this a "range", since it does not work in
functions that use ranges or with foreach (this is Walter's goal).
How bout strange? (Yes, i am bored)
Instead of having to write if(is(typeof(exp))), how about if(try(exp)) ?
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:31:32 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-11-27 07:13, Steve Teale wrote:
>> You may detest ODBC, but it is very soon going to be the only way to
>> communicate with SQL Server short of writing another wire protocol
>> effort. There was the alternative of OLE DB, but MS
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:52:51 +0200, so wrote:
Now how do you know you have a "Lib", and it implements "hello", what
rule enforces that?
If this is all it does, you are overlooking the most important point of
header files.
It was obscure.
A header enforces its contents for both library writ
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:37:38 +0100
Somedude wrote:
> The main drawback of newsgroups is the absence of a search feature.
> Apart from that, I like it.
It's the drawback of your *newsreader* and not of the newsgroups itself.
I use Claws-mail and have powerful search features included.
Sincerel
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:34:19 +0200, Max Samukha wrote:
No, it has nothing to do with the IDE. The article describes a visual
tool for viewing meta-data stored in a .NET binary. You don't have to
use it.
Specially for you, die-hard IDE haters, this is how to use the terminal
to create a m
>
>>>Not having default sharing is about providing guaranties, it's about
>>>making thread-safety checkable by the compiler.
>
> No piece of code can absolutely guarantee threading errors. When you start
Threading errors and thread-safety checks are different things... It is
pretty much possibl
2011/11/28 Marco Leise :
> Am 28.11.2011, 11:02 Uhr, schrieb Jude <10equa...@gmail.com>:
>
>>> I tried to write a lib and a project, which used that lib
>>> separately, but came to conclusion that the best choice it to pull
>>> lib code to project one. And it is not a biggest problem, because
>>> d
Le 27/11/2011 20:31, Gour a écrit :
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 18:25:20 + (UTC)
> alex wrote:
>
>> That's it. To be more beginner-friendly. Not to be that unnecessarily
>> complicated and opaque.
>
> What is not beginner-friendly in this group?
>
> My mailer allows reading news, I selected digit
On 2011-11-28 11:55, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/27/2011 11:55 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Then that's just bad design. If the forum is designed correctly there
won't be
any problem.
Here's a typical example:
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=72850.0
Check out all of the vertic
On 11/28/2011 02:29 PM, so wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:58:25 +0200, Max Samukha wrote:
How would you write libraries?
The way they do, for example, in C# - interface definitions are stored
in the library, no need for separate headers.
Are we talking about the same thing?
Something like
h
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
