"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:jgij59$hc2$1...@digitalmars.com...
> "Zachary Lund" wrote in message
> news:jghpk4$26uk$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>
>> 2. Milestones and Organization
>
> This is non-corporate-backed OSS. People are free to work on what they
> choose. We're not Bill Lumbe
>> However, there's no documentation
>
>We should have this, but like everything else, it requires somebody take the
>time to do it.
So true, I spent literally 5 hours writing documentation for a project
I was releasing. It wasn't even that big. And I didn't write any
reference documentation. I ma
"Zachary Lund" wrote in message
news:jghpk4$26uk$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> 2. Milestones and Organization
This is non-corporate-backed OSS. People are free to work on what they
choose. We're not Bill Lumberg Waterfall Nazis here.
> I cannot stand Windows. If Microsoft suddenly went bankrupt,
"bearophile" wrote in message
news:jght4f$2co0$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> I don't know why Walter likes to use ".c" as suffix for those files, I
> don't remember his answers on this topic,
>
In the most recent discussion he just dodged the question and joked about
the "platform nobody uses" b
Greetings! I am a rather new programmer and while this is my first post
I wanted to say that I did some work on the ddmd project at dsource.org,
which was kind of a big hairy mess. My fork of this project is at:
https://github.com/zachthemystic/ddmd-clean
The point is, I cleaned out the crappi
Am 04.02.2012, 02:54 Uhr, schrieb Martin Nowak :
If override were mandatory in implementation classes we could easily
allow implementations
in interfaces.
Do you have a good example? Mine are currently all solvable with final
methods in interfaces, like
interface ... {
Am 03.02.2012, 20:28 Uhr, schrieb Trass3r :
The same has to happen with druntime and Phobos2 or otherwise our
programs will break with every new release that deprecates or changes
non-template functions. That would probably be *every* release at the
moment, so it could look like this:
/usr
"H. S. Teoh" wrote in message
news:mailman.347.1328315188.25230.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> I'd like to help. My D coding skills are still not up to snuff for
> fixing the hard stuff, since I only just started learning D. But doc
> comments I can do. However, there's no documentation that I
Ah ok, I just guessed. It sounds like you've hit
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4953
"Artur Skawina" wrote in message
news:mailman.343.1328308873.25230.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> On 02/03/12 17:39, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>> void set_from_4ub(dummy = int)(ubyte red, ubyte gre
dennis luehring wrote:
> that means i can't hide an interface inside a module?
I cannot find the definition of members of modules. Therefore this
conclusion might or might not be true.
The docs say something about "Member Templates" thow:
http://www.d-programming-language.org/template-comparis
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:53:38 -0500, bearophile
wrote:
Ali:
I think foreach_reverse and the associated opApplyReverse member
function.
I use it now and then. A possible replacement:
foreach (i; 10 .. 0 : -1) {}
foreach_reverse is fine to keep for builtins and range specifiers, but I'd
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:30:31 +0100, dennis luehring
wrote:
like:
public interface test
{
public static void blub();
}
static class test_static: test
{
private static void blub()
{
int i = 10;
}
}
int main()
{
test_static.blub();
return 0;
}
any idea why static cou
On 02/04/12 01:28, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> I agree with this. Based on current documentation, I didn't even know
> the GC can be replaced at compile-time until someone mentioned it. And
> up to now I still don't know how exactly to do this, since I couldn't
> find any docs for it.
There's nothing spec
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:23:13 -0500, Ali Çehreli wrote:
strings provide opportunities for optimization. For example,
std.string.leftJustify() returns
- either a slice of the entire input string when the field is shorter
than the string (this is an optimization)
- or a new string when the
Documentation is much more important than feature implementation.
Contribution highly welcome at:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 05:12:08PM -0600, Zachary Lund wrote:
> Here are some things I'm unhappy with currently.
>
> 1. Documentation
>
> I find certain things, of which I will start writing down and
> writing patches for, in the documentation that are unsatisfactory.
> Two in particular is the c
Zachary Lund:
> The .c extensions on C++ files... need I say more? That itself is a joke
> and seems to have been ignored when complaints about it came up. I've
> just recently been told that DMD was mostly implemented in C which is
> false. This situation is needlessly frustrating.
Aren't les
Timon Gehr:
> I like it and I think it would be a valuable addition to Phobos,
Marco Leise has asked for some benchmarks first, and I think he's right.
> as well as a nice showcase for Ds templates and string mixins.
Phobos is meant to be first of all _useful_ :-)
> You didn't
> specify wha
On 02/03/2012 04:10 PM, Artur Skawina wrote:
void set_from_4ub_f(ubyte red, ubyte green, ubyte blue, ubyte alpha) { }
void set_from_4ub()(ubyte red, ubyte green, ubyte blue, ubyte alpha) { }
void f() {
set_from_4ub_f(0x
On 02/03/2012 11:40 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
From OO design it does not make any sense. I was even't aware that this
is possible in D.
Static methods are intented to be used as what is commonly known as
class methods in Smalltalk. Methods
that are attached to the class class, usually known as met
On 02/03/2012 01:21 AM, bearophile wrote:
Through Reddit I've found this good and long slides pack, it's about using Java
data structures to increase memory efficiency of programs:
http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_people.nsf/pages/sevitsky.pubs.html/$FILE/oopsla08%20memory-efficient
Here are some things I'm unhappy with currently.
1. Documentation
I find certain things, of which I will start writing down and writing
patches for, in the documentation that are unsatisfactory. Two in
particular is the current situation with memory management and CTFE.
"delete" is planned fo
On 3 February 2012 23:15, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:13:04 +0100, Iain Buclaw
> wrote:
>
> On 3 February 2012 08:47, Andrea Fontana wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible to compile for avr (atmel) platform using gdc? It would be
>>> interesting for arduino development...
>>>
>> It's u
On 02/03/12 17:39, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> void set_from_4ub(dummy = int)(ubyte red, ubyte green, ubyte blue, ubyte
> alpha) { }
> ??
>
> (not tested)
That doesn't change anything; the issue is: the "int" literals wont
implicitly convert to ubyte, even when there is no better match and
an assign
Am Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:54:32 +0100
schrieb Jacob Carlborg :
> On 2012-02-02 22:26, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > std.uuid is ready to be reviewed. As far as I know there's nothing
> > being reviewed right now, so we could start the review as soon as
> > a review manager has been found.
> >
Am Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:46:49 +0100
schrieb Trass3r :
> > But things like shared libraries that will become necessary once it
> > becomes mainstream. Lack of shared library support is one of the
> > barriers to it becoming mainstream (among many other things).
>
> Support for that is almost ready
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:32:42 +0100, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On 2/3/12 1:49 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I think it would be useful to have Ruby bindings in Deimos. I don't see
how it can be negative at all, to have in Deimos.
If the library in question is reasonably well known, I don't think t
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:13:04 +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 3 February 2012 08:47, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Is it possible to compile for avr (atmel) platform using gdc? It would
be
interesting for arduino development...
It's unlikely that D will run on systems without a MMU.
gdc actually as
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:27:34 +0100, dennis luehring
wrote:
repost from d.learn
is it a bug? protection attributes on interfaces/abstracts have no
effect outside modules?
module types;
private interface itest
{
public void blub2();
private void blub3();
}
private class test
{
But things like shared libraries that will become necessary once it
becomes mainstream. Lack of shared library support is one of the
barriers to it becoming mainstream (among many other things).
Support for that is almost ready even in dmd.
You were talking about making phobos shared and that's
On 3 February 2012 19:32, Manu wrote:
> On 3 February 2012 16:45, Paulo Pinto wrote:
>>
>> The only language without runtime is pure assembly.
>
>
> And C.. there's no requirement to link the CRT in a C app. In fact, in many
> of my projects, I don't.
> I frequently find that the ONLY function I
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:28:04PM +0100, Trass3r wrote:
[...]
> Why do people always treat D like a mainstream language? It isn't.
But things like shared libraries that will become necessary once it
becomes mainstream. Lack of shared library support is one of the
barriers to it becoming mainstrea
On 3 February 2012 16:45, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> The only language without runtime is pure assembly.
>
And C.. there's no requirement to link the CRT in a C app. In fact, in many
of my projects, I don't.
I frequently find that the ONLY function I use from the CRT is sprintf...
which I really sho
The same has to happen with druntime and Phobos2 or otherwise our
programs will break with every new release that deprecates or changes
non-template functions. That would probably be *every* release at the
moment, so it could look like this:
/usr/lib64/libphobos2.so (link to /usr/lib64/l
Marco Leise wrote:
> As time goes by the D runtime will have it's place on Unix systems next
> to the C runtime. The upcoming support for PIC is the next step. Now I
> just want to quickly raise awareness for "sonames". For any library,
> there may be several incompatible versions installed, since
Am 03.02.2012 18:44, schrieb Manfred Nowak:
dennis luehring wrote:
why can i see a private interface in different module?
The docs online define protections for member sof the module.
-manfred
that means i can't hide an interface inside a module?
dennis luehring wrote:
> why can i see a private interface in different module?
The docs online define protections for member sof the module.
-manfred
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7430
Please vote on this, so it would get some attention.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> Bug!
>
> "Ali Çehreli" wrote in message
> news:jgh2nb$rtv$1...@digitalmars.com...
>> On 02/03/2012 06:44 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>> >
How do I overload the unordered comparison operators? do I overload
them one by one? If I do what happens if I also define the opCmp?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 02/03/2012 06:44 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>> Good day.
>>
>> There's a problem in how opCmp works.
>>
>>
Bug!
"Ali Çehreli" wrote in message
news:jgh2nb$rtv$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 02/03/2012 06:44 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
> > Good day.
> >
> > There's a problem in how opCmp works.
> >
> > I have a structure, that represents an element of a range. Let's say a
> > character. That character ca
On 02/03/2012 06:44 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
> Good day.
>
> There's a problem in how opCmp works.
>
> I have a structure, that represents an element of a range. Let's say a
> character. That character can be invalid.
> I need all comparison operators to return false of at least one of the
> ope
void set_from_4ub(dummy = int)(ubyte red, ubyte green, ubyte blue, ubyte
alpha) { }
??
(not tested)
Assuming that DMD and DigitalMars make are on your PATH, just »cd src;
make -f win32.mak dmd«, resp. »make -f win32.mak« in the root directory
for druntime/Phobos.
David
On 2/3/12 5:33 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 03.02.2012 16:54, schrieb Daniel Murphy:
"dennis luehring" wrote in message
On 2/3/12 1:49 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I think it would be useful to have Ruby bindings in Deimos. I don't see
how it can be negative at all, to have in Deimos.
If the library in question is reasonably well known, I don't think there
should be any doubt at all as to whether we want headers i
Am 03.02.2012 16:54, schrieb Daniel Murphy:
"dennis luehring" wrote in message
news:jggue2$ksn$1...@digitalmars.com...
Am 03.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Daniel Murphy:
is there something like an github build or do i need to build from source?
From source I'm afraid. And because they all ge
On 3 February 2012 12:49, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-02-03 13:36, Jakob Øvrum wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, 3 February 2012 at 09:38:38 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>>
>>> Ruby:
>>> http://www.ruby-lang.org
>>> "A dynamic, open source programming language with a focus on
>>> simplicity and productiv
If I'm not mistaken, your wrapper already uses the pure Lua C
bindings, the modules in the luad.c package. If that's the case,
you could divide your project into 2 sub-projects:
- Pure Lua C bindings (deimos.lua instead of luad.c)
- High-level D wrapper (luad)
On Friday, 3 February 2012 at 12:
On 3 February 2012 08:47, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> Is it possible to compile for avr (atmel) platform using gdc? It would be
> interesting for arduino development...
gdc actually asserts that the target it is building for is either
32bit or 64bit, anything greater or less than will fail to compile
On 3 February 2012 10:36, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 03-02-2012 11:33, Andrea Fontana wrote:
>>
>> How much work is needed to support atmel in your opinion?
>>
>> Il giorno ven, 03/02/2012 alle 10.40 +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen ha
>> scritto:
>>>
>>> On 03-02-2012 09:47, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:30:36AM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[...]
> The GC is already swappable during linking.
[...]
Is there documentation for this?
T
--
No! I'm not in denial!
"dennis luehring" wrote in message
news:jggue2$ksn$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Am 03.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Daniel Murphy:
>>
>
> is there something like an github build or do i need to build from source?
>From source I'm afraid. And because they all get changed in tandem you'll
need to build dr
One can use C without an OS on any of the Atmel microcontroller range...
why would D need an OS to support it?
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> The only language without runtime is pure assembly.
>
> All high level languages require a runtime library, even C, despite what
Am 03.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Daniel Murphy:
Another bug. Although there have been some bugfixes in that area since the
last release, it might be fixed in the github version.
"dennis luehring" wrote in message
news:jggp8k$c1n$1...@digitalmars.com...
Am 03.02.2012 14:53, schrieb Daniel Murphy:
void set_from_4ub_f(ubyte red, ubyte green, ubyte blue, ubyte alpha) { }
void set_from_4ub()(ubyte red, ubyte green, ubyte blue, ubyte alpha) { }
void f() {
set_from_4ub_f(0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xff); // Works.
set_from_4ub
Another bug. Although there have been some bugfixes in that area since the
last release, it might be fixed in the github version.
"dennis luehring" wrote in message
news:jggp8k$c1n$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Am 03.02.2012 14:53, schrieb Daniel Murphy:
>> C.blub4 - yes, it looks like a bug
>>
>>
The only language without runtime is pure assembly.
All high level languages require a runtime library, even C, despite what many
people think.
Now in this case what would be nice would be the possibility to generate code
that runs on top of the arduino without any
real OS. This is a common use
Good day.
There's a problem in how opCmp works.
I have a structure, that represents an element of a range. Let's say a
character. That character can be invalid.
I need all comparison operators to return false of at least one of the
operands is invalid.
with opCmp, the expression a @ b is rewritte
Le 03/02/2012 14:12, dennis luehring a écrit :
Am 03.02.2012 13:55, schrieb deadalnix:
Le 03/02/2012 13:02, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Friday, February 03, 2012 09:03:21 dennis luehring wrote:
Am 03.02.2012 08:40, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
On Friday, February 03, 2012 08:30:31 dennis lueh
That's my point! Arduino use c++, dmd syntax will be a really good
alternative. We just need a subset of druntime and we need to port
arduino/wiring library...
Il giorno sab, 04/02/2012 alle 00.48 +1100, Daniel Murphy ha scritto:
> It probably wouldn't be too hard (if you could get the cross comp
"Daniel Murphy" wrote in message
news:jggok5$b5i$1...@digitalmars.com...
> The syntax improvement would alone would make it a great alternative to c.
>
Abolutely. I'd love to see a "Lean D" for such uses.
Am 03.02.2012 14:53, schrieb Daniel Murphy:
C.blub4 - yes, it looks like a bug
A.blub3 - I've seen a bug about this somewhere in bugzilla, and it's
debatable whether it's a bug or not. Private functions are not virtual, so
it doesn't override anything, it just uses the same name as an interface
On 3 February 2012 15:37, Alex_Dovhal wrote:
> **
> >Andrea Fontana" wrote:
> >In this case can we hope for a d frontend?
> That depends if it's MCU or MPU. If it will be MCU(like ARM7TDMI), which
> means Harvard Architecture (where Program code and RAM are physically
> different). Also internal
C.blub4 - yes, it looks like a bug
A.blub3 - I've seen a bug about this somewhere in bugzilla, and it's
debatable whether it's a bug or not. Private functions are not virtual, so
it doesn't override anything, it just uses the same name as an interface
method. Allowing override here is probabl
Heh, I didn't realize that. I actually build an fpga clone of atmega64 last
year and would love to get D compiling on it, but other things tend to take
priority.
It probably wouldn't be too hard (if you could get the cross compiler
working) to stub out most of druntime and get it to compile.
>Andrea Fontana" wrote:
>In this case can we hope for a d frontend?
That depends if it's MCU or MPU. If it will be MCU(like ARM7TDMI), which means
Harvard Architecture (where Program code and RAM are physically different).
Also internal RAM of a few KB and no Linux.
If it'll be MCU then it can h
In this case can we hope for a d frontend?
Il giorno ven, 03/02/2012 alle 22.33 +1000, Danni Coy ha scritto:
> 32bit version will be arm architecture
>
Am 03.02.2012 13:55, schrieb deadalnix:
Le 03/02/2012 13:02, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Friday, February 03, 2012 09:03:21 dennis luehring wrote:
Am 03.02.2012 08:40, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
On Friday, February 03, 2012 08:30:31 dennis luehring wrote:
any idea why static could mak
Am 03.02.2012 13:38, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2012-02-03 13:24, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 03.02.2012 13:10, schrieb dennis luehring:
Am 03.02.2012 13:02, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
C++ doesn't have interfaces, and C# and Java don't allow function
implementations of any kind on interfaces.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 2 February 2012 14:50, J Arrizza wrote:
> >
> > So... Will D and Android GUI libraries be able to replace Java in the
> next
> > two years? Is there a commitment or direction towards that end?
> >
> Not replace, but it is my goal to certain
Le 03/02/2012 13:02, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Friday, February 03, 2012 09:03:21 dennis luehring wrote:
Am 03.02.2012 08:40, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
On Friday, February 03, 2012 08:30:31 dennis luehring wrote:
any idea why static could makes sense in an interface? any example?
The s
On 2012-02-03 13:36, Jakob Øvrum wrote:
On Friday, 3 February 2012 at 09:38:38 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Ruby:
http://www.ruby-lang.org
"A dynamic, open source programming language with a focus on
simplicity and productivity. It has an elegant syntax that is natural
to read and easy to write."
Am 03.02.2012 13:34, schrieb bls:
On 02/03/2012 04:00 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
D interfaces_do_ allow for function implementations under certain
circumstances.
- Jonathan M Davis
A code snippet please.
http://dlang.org/interface.html
interface D
{
void bar() { } // error, implemen
On 2012-02-03 13:24, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 03.02.2012 13:10, schrieb dennis luehring:
Am 03.02.2012 13:02, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
C++ doesn't have interfaces, and C# and Java don't allow function
implementations of any kind on interfaces. The same is not true for D.
but as you can see
On Friday, 3 February 2012 at 09:38:38 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Ruby:
http://www.ruby-lang.org
"A dynamic, open source programming language with a focus on
simplicity and productivity. It has an elegant syntax that is
natural to read and easy to write."
If the Ruby API is suitable for Deimo
On 02/03/2012 04:00 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
D interfaces_do_ allow for function implementations under certain
circumstances.
- Jonathan M Davis
A code snippet please.
32bit version will be arm architecture
repost from d.learn
is it a bug? protection attributes on interfaces/abstracts have no
effect outside modules?
module types;
private interface itest
{
public void blub2();
private void blub3();
}
private class test
{
protected abstract void blub4();
public abstract void blub5();
Am 03.02.2012 13:10, schrieb dennis luehring:
Am 03.02.2012 13:02, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
C++ doesn't have interfaces, and C# and Java don't allow function
implementations of any kind on interfaces. The same is not true for D.
but as you can see in my example - my static function isn't im
"Daniel Murphy" wrote:
>There are 32 bit avrs. Search for 'AVR32'.
Thanks, I know :) But Arduino uses 8-bit.
>"Manu" wrote:
>I think you'll find that most arduino projects are using a much more
>capable avr chip, probably avr32 chips.
Never used Arduino but it's site and wikipedia mentiones only 8-bit AVR's
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arduino
Here http://arduino.cc/en/Main/Hardware also all AVR's are
>"Manu" wrote:
>I think you'll find that most arduino projects are using a much more
>capable avr chip, probably avr32 chips.
Never actually used arduino, but it's site and wikipedia mentiones 8-bit
devices http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arduino .
Here also http://arduino.cc/en/Main/Hardware - all
also do Arm based 32bit microcontrollers...
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Danni Coy wrote:
> Atmel also Arm based 32bit microcontrollers
>
>
Atmel also Arm based 32bit microcontrollers
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> **
> There are 32 bit avrs. Search for 'AVR32'.
>
> "Alex_Dovhal" wrote in message
> news:jgggnk$2vev$1...@digitalmars.com...
> "Andrea Fontana" wrote:
> >Is it possible to compile for avr (atme
Am 03.02.2012 13:02, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
C++ doesn't have interfaces, and C# and Java don't allow function
implementations of any kind on interfaces. The same is not true for D.
but as you can see in my example - my static function isn't implemented
in the interface scope
interface tes
On Friday, February 03, 2012 09:03:21 dennis luehring wrote:
> Am 03.02.2012 08:40, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
> > On Friday, February 03, 2012 08:30:31 dennis luehring wrote:
> >> any idea why static could makes sense in an interface? any example?
> >
> > The same reason it makes sense in a class
On Friday, February 03, 2012 11:40:53 Paulo Pinto wrote:
> From OO design it does not make any sense. I was even't aware that this is
> possible in D.
>
> Static methods are intented to be used as what is commonly known as class
> methods in Smalltalk. Methods
> that are attached to the class clas
There are 32 bit avrs. Search for 'AVR32'.
"Alex_Dovhal" wrote in message
news:jgggnk$2vev$1...@digitalmars.com...
"Andrea Fontana" wrote:
>Is it possible to compile for avr (atmel) platform using gdc? It would be
interesting for arduino development...
AVR is 8-bit harward architectu
On 3 February 2012 13:34, Alex_Dovhal wrote:
> **
> "Andrea Fontana" wrote:
> >Is it possible to compile for avr (atmel) platform using gdc? It would be
> interesting for arduino development...
>
> AVR is 8-bit harward architecture while D is designed for at least 32
> bits. Besides that AVR's h
Le 03/02/2012 11:40, Paulo Pinto a écrit :
From OO design it does not make any sense. I was even't aware that this
is possible in D.
Static methods are intented to be used as what is commonly known as
class methods in Smalltalk. Methods
that are attached to the class class, usually known as met
"Andrea Fontana" wrote:
>Is it possible to compile for avr (atmel) platform using gdc? It would be
>interesting for arduino development...
AVR is 8-bit harward architecture while D is designed for at least 32 bits.
Besides that AVR's have from (less then 1) to (a few) kB of RAM so it needs
an
From OO design it does not make any sense. I was even't aware that this is
possible in D.
Static methods are intented to be used as what is commonly known as class
methods in Smalltalk. Methods
that are attached to the class class, usually known as metaclass. These
methods are then transversal
On 03-02-2012 11:33, Andrea Fontana wrote:
How much work is needed to support atmel in your opinion?
Il giorno ven, 03/02/2012 alle 10.40 +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen ha scritto:
On 03-02-2012 09:47, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> Is it possible to compile for avr (atmel) platform using gdc? It would
>
How much work is needed to support atmel in your opinion?
Il giorno ven, 03/02/2012 alle 10.40 +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen ha
scritto:
> On 03-02-2012 09:47, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> > Is it possible to compile for avr (atmel) platform using gdc? It would
> > be interesting for arduino development.
On 03-02-2012 09:47, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Is it possible to compile for avr (atmel) platform using gdc? It would
be interesting for arduino development...
Not currently. We don't even have a standard version identifier for that
platform.
--
- Alex
I would like to open two Deimos projects, one for Clang and one for
Ruby. Actually it would be for libclang and libruby.
Clang:
http://clang.llvm.org/
"A C language family frontend for LLVM"
Ruby:
http://www.ruby-lang.org
"A dynamic, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity
On 2012-02-02 22:26, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Hi,
std.uuid is ready to be reviewed. As far as I know there's nothing
being reviewed right now, so we could start the review as soon as
a review manager has been found.
About std.uuid (copied from the module documentation):
-
This i
On 2012-02-03 02:33, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, February 03, 2012 02:29:20 Marco Leise wrote:
As time goes by the D runtime will have it's place on Unix systems next to
the C runtime. The upcoming support for PIC is the next step. Now I just
want to quickly raise awareness for "sonames".
Is it possible to compile for avr (atmel) platform using gdc? It would
be interesting for arduino development...
On 2012-02-03 05:01, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:48:20PM -0600, Robert Jacques wrote:
[...]
So to answer your question, yes, someone has made one of these types
of GC for D called CDGC. No, it doesn't look like Windows will support
this anytime soon. And cloning GCs, don't solv
Am 03.02.2012 08:40, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
On Friday, February 03, 2012 08:30:31 dennis luehring wrote:
any idea why static could makes sense in an interface? any example?
The same reason it makes sense in a class. I don't see any difference.
that also my first thought - but why do c#,
100 matches
Mail list logo
