Era Scarecrow, el 13 de October a las 21:18 me escribiste:
Does D include an index to bitmaps specifying which offsets in a
given memory block (say a class or a struct) of which fields
actually would point to memory? With the strong possibility of
working with manual pointer management it is
On Saturday, 13 October 2012 at 13:17:52 UTC, alex wrote:
Hi everyone,
Just released a new Mono-D version that features couple of
bigger sort of fixes..
The download:
http://mono-d.alexanderbothe.com/repo/MonoDevelop.D_0.4.1.5_MD3.0.4.7.mpack
The changelog:
Walter Bright:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Be the first kid on your block to build a dmd Win64 app!
The changelog section is not in good state, it misses parts and
newlines.
Bye,
bearophile
On 10/14/12, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Be the first kid on your block to build a dmd Win64 app!
But this is without Phobos support?
D:\DMD\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\algorithm.d(317): Error:
module string is in file 'std\c\string.d' which cannot be read
I can't
On 10/14/2012 3:27 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
D:\DMD\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\algorithm.d(317): Error:
module string is in file 'std\c\string.d' which cannot be read
Fixed.
On 10/15/12, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 10/14/2012 3:27 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
D:\DMD\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\algorithm.d(317): Error:
module string is in file 'std\c\string.d' which cannot be read
Fixed.
Ok so we're only supposed to compile with -c
On 10/14/2012 6:08 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Ok so we're only supposed to compile with -c when using -m64? I don't
suppose DMD could automatically invoke the VC linker?
It does automatically invoke the VC linker.
You'll need to set the VCINSTALLDIR environment variable. I set it with sc.ini
On Saturday, 13 October 2012 at 20:25:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
MyEnum me;
final switch (me) // no init case necessary nor allowed
{
case MyEnum.first: break;
case MyEnum.second: break;
}
}
Think about that for a moment. What happens when that final
On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 09:48:50 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 09:22:17 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
I'd like to see enum syntax for flug enum. So I dislike
function calls like `set_flag`, `checkAll`, etc. (IMHO)
You mean... binary basic syntax? That shouldn't
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 08:20:40 Tommi wrote:
There's a bug in that code, because MyEnum default-initializes to
an invalid value. It's effectively the same as this following
code, where the programmer has failed to initialize MyEnum
variable with a valid value:
Valid or not, MyEnum.init
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 06:51:48 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
And honestly, declaring a specific init value for an enum is a
stupid idea.
I think that declaring a specific *valid* init value for an enum
has no purpose. But declaring a specific *invalid* init value, to
which the enum
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 10:07:22 monarch_dodra wrote:
I'm just wondering what the recommended and most efficient
way to do that is?
front + popFront is suboptimal, because you have to evaluate the
code point length twice.
Some sort of fancy stride or decode scheme?
Or can I just go
Why doesn't code like this work?
chain(repeat(a).take(5), repeat(b).take(5)).splitter(b);
On 10/13/2012 8:58 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Hi,
With precise garbage collection coming up, and most likely compacting
garbage collection in the future, I think it's time we start thinking
about an API to pin garbage collector-managed objects.
A typical approach that people use to 'pin'
Because you are now no longer able to do stuff like this:
void log(...)
{
auto t = _arguments[0];
while(some condition)
{
t = t.next();
}
}
To be actually able to use TypeInfo.next you will now need the ConstRef
(hack) from phobos. Afaik there is no such thing in druntime which
On 2012-10-13 15:45, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
This was already proposed before, but it would break too much code.
Anyway there's nothing wrong in having an alias that makes typing
simpler, e.g. toUTF16z vs toUTF!(const(wchar)*).
Phobos has many helper auto functions which make instantiating
On 2012-10-13 23:11, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Source code does not depend on an import path, that is an environment
issue. Thus you would not specify import paths in source files.
You need to specify it somewhere. Why would I want half of the compiler
flags in one place and the other half in
On Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 08:13:39 UTC, Manu wrote:
DMD doesn't support non-x86 platforms... What DMD offer's is
fine, since it
all needs to be collated anyway; GDC/LDC don't agree on
intrinsics either.
By the way, I just committed a patch to auto-generate GCC-LLVM
intrinsic mappings to
They are doing something similar to D on this:
http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2012/10/12/extending-the-definition-of-purity-in-rust/
Bye,
bearophile
On 10/8/2012 4:52 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
With all due respect to Walter, core.simd isn't really designed much at all,
or at least this isn't visible in its current state – it rather seems like a
quick hack to get some basic SIMD code working with DMD (but beware of ICEs).
That is correct.
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 09:50:20 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
Why doesn't code like this work?
chain(repeat(a).take(5), repeat(b).take(5)).splitter(b);
There's two versions of splitter, the version that splits a range
using an element, and a version that splits a range using another
range.
On 2012-10-11 20:19, Michel Fortin wrote:
Most likely, the object objc_msgSend is called on has been deallocated,
which would mean that windowSendEvent is called with a deallocated
NSWindow object as its first argument.
I found the problem now, it's really embarrassing. I had missed passing
David Nadlinger wrote:
By the way, I just committed a patch to auto-generate GCC-LLVM
intrinsic mappings to LDC – thanks, Jernej! –, which would
mean that you could in theory use the GDC code path for LDC as
well.
Your awesome, David!
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:16:28 +0200
Tommi tommitiss...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 06:51:48 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
And honestly, declaring a specific init value for an enum is a
stupid idea.
I think that declaring a specific *valid* init value for an enum
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 19:40:08 UTC, F i L wrote:
David Nadlinger wrote:
By the way, I just committed a patch to auto-generate
GCC-LLVM intrinsic mappings to LDC – thanks, Jernej! –,
which would mean that you could in theory use the GDC code
path for LDC as well.
Your awesome, David!
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 19:26:37 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 09:50:20 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
Why doesn't code like this work?
chain(repeat(a).take(5), repeat(b).take(5)).splitter(b);
There's two versions of splitter, the version that splits a
range using an
On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 12:24:48 UTC, Manu wrote:
Perfect!
I can get on with my unittests :P
Speaking of test – are they available somewhere? Now that LDC
at least theoretically supports most of the GCC builtins, I'd
like to throw some tests at it to see what happens.
David
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 20:03:52 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 19:26:37 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 09:50:20 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
Why doesn't code like this work?
chain(repeat(a).take(5), repeat(b).take(5)).splitter(b);
chain doesn't
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 20:09:44 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
Well, for example:
splitter(hello world, ' ')
gives
[hello, world]
The splits are slices of the original range.
splitter could allocate new ranges, but if you want that
behaviour then it's better to specify it manually:
On 14 October 2012 21:05, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote:
On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 12:24:48 UTC, Manu wrote:
Perfect!
I can get on with my unittests :P
Speaking of test – are they available somewhere? Now that LDC at least
theoretically supports most of the GCC builtins, I'd
On 2012-10-14 19:38:21 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
On 2012-10-11 20:19, Michel Fortin wrote:
Most likely, the object objc_msgSend is called on has been deallocated,
which would mean that windowSendEvent is called with a deallocated
NSWindow object as its first argument.
I found
On 14 October 2012 21:58, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 14 October 2012 21:05, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote:
On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 12:24:48 UTC, Manu wrote:
Perfect!
I can get on with my unittests :P
Speaking of test – are they available somewhere? Now that
I was trying to check out windbg with a project I am working on.
The program currently consists of two D files (main.d,
Application.d) and three Derelict3 import libs (DerelictUtil,
DerelictSDL2, DerelictGL3). Without debug info, the following
console command runs fine;
---
dmd main.d
On 10/15/12, Matt webwra...@fastmail.fm wrote:
However, no matter where I put either the -g or -gc switches,
Optlink complains with 'Error 118: Filename Expected
Likely related to this: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8791
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 22:13:28 Mehrdad wrote:
Yeah, I think that might not be such a bad idea. It should be
possible to slice infinite ranges too, after all.
There's actually some discussion on making it so that you can't. The main
problem is that a slice can't be the same type as the
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 22:53:11 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/15/12, Matt webwra...@fastmail.fm wrote:
However, no matter where I put either the -g or -gc switches,
Optlink complains with 'Error 118: Filename Expected
Likely related to this:
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 22:09:43 Peter Alexander wrote:
I wonder if a better design for splitter would automatically
allocate an array when the input range doesn't support slicing?
We generally try and avoid any kind of allocation like that in std.algorithm.
We leave it up to the
On 10/15/12, Matt webwra...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 22:53:11 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/15/12, Matt webwra...@fastmail.fm wrote:
However, no matter where I put either the -g or -gc switches,
Optlink complains with 'Error 118: Filename Expected
Likely related
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 22:58:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 22:13:28 Mehrdad wrote:
Yeah, I think that might not be such a bad idea. It should be
possible to slice infinite ranges too, after all.
There's actually some discussion on making it so that you
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 23:01:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 22:09:43 Peter Alexander wrote:
I wonder if a better design for splitter would automatically
allocate an array when the input range doesn't support slicing?
We generally try and avoid any kind of
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 23:11:32 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
How are you supposed to split a range that doesn't support
slicing though?
You can't just call array() because it might be too big to be
reasonable for fitting it into memory...
(Canonical example: splitting a stream by newlines)
On Monday, October 15, 2012 01:11:28 Mehrdad wrote:
How are you supposed to split a range that doesn't support
slicing though?
You can't just call array() because it might be too big to be
reasonable for fitting it into memory...
If you're splitting on an element, slicing isn't necessary.
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 23:06:19 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/15/12, Matt webwra...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 22:53:11 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 10/15/12, Matt webwra...@fastmail.fm wrote:
However, no matter where I put either the -g or -gc switches,
Speaking of test – are they available somewhere? Now that LDC
at least theoretically supports most of the GCC builtins, I'd
like to throw some tests at it to see what happens.
David
I have a fork of std.simd with LDC support at
https://github.com/jerro/phobos/tree/std.simd and some tests
On 14-10-2012 12:19, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Because you are now no longer able to do stuff like this:
void log(...)
{
auto t = _arguments[0];
while(some condition)
{
t = t.next();
}
}
To be actually able to use TypeInfo.next you will now need the ConstRef
(hack) from phobos.
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 06:34:39 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
I've added binary functionality. Looking at these notes I see I
forgot the enum/array part; And checking for binary true isn't
added yet. However I'll get to it sooner or later. Both
opBinary and opOpBinary are supported so far.
Era Scarecrow:
I can't get opOpAssign working properly, and it's worse with
arrays. Removing opOpAssign, everything else (arrays, single
flags, other flags) works properly.
Are such problems known? In bugzilla or here? Are those fixable?
It's likely the last time I'll update it for a
Hello All,
I have been looking at D off and on for several years. Initially
I worked through a very painful experience to get D compiling on
Linux. After that experience, I concluded that I should wait for
it to become more mature. Since then, I do a very simple test. I
install the latest
On Monday, 15 October 2012 at 02:54:38 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Era Scarecrow:
I can't get opOpAssign working properly, and it's worse with
arrays. Removing opOpAssign, everything else (arrays, single
flags, other flags) works properly.
Are such problems known? In bugzilla or here? Are those
On 15-10-2012 05:10, Gerry Weaver wrote:
Hello All,
I have been looking at D off and on for several years. Initially I
worked through a very painful experience to get D compiling on Linux.
After that experience, I concluded that I should wait for it to become
more mature. Since then, I do a
On 15-10-2012 06:31, Gerry Weaver wrote:
On Monday, 15 October 2012 at 04:20:04 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 15-10-2012 05:10, Gerry Weaver wrote:
Hello All,
I have been looking at D off and on for several years. Initially I
worked through a very painful experience to get D compiling on
On Monday, 15 October 2012 at 04:20:04 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 15-10-2012 05:10, Gerry Weaver wrote:
Hello All,
I have been looking at D off and on for several years.
Initially I
worked through a very painful experience to get D compiling on
Linux.
After that experience, I
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 06:20:03AM +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 15-10-2012 05:10, Gerry Weaver wrote:
[...]
dmd hello.d
Here is the output:
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libphobos2.a(dmain2_459_1a5.o): In function
`_D2rt6dmain24mainUiPPaZi7runMainMFZv':
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 21:39:42 H. S. Teoh wrote:
This looks like what happens if you try to use the latest dmd release
with an old version of Phobos, perhaps installed along with gdc.
Whoever's doing the .deb packaging really should add a versioned
Depends: field to debian/control so
On 15-10-2012 06:39, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 06:20:03AM +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 15-10-2012 05:10, Gerry Weaver wrote:
[...]
dmd hello.d
Here is the output:
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libphobos2.a(dmain2_459_1a5.o): In function
On Monday, 15 October 2012 at 04:34:10 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 15-10-2012 06:31, Gerry Weaver wrote:
On Monday, 15 October 2012 at 04:20:04 UTC, Alex Rønne
Petersen wrote:
On 15-10-2012 05:10, Gerry Weaver wrote:
Hello All,
I have been looking at D off and on for several years.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 06:45:16AM +0200, Gerry Weaver wrote:
[...]
Unfortunately, I don't. This is a special dev system I setup for a
customer project. They have several 32bit only apps that force the
32bit requirement. Actually, I would be using D on 64bit anyway. I
just happened to be
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:42:56PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 21:39:42 H. S. Teoh wrote:
This looks like what happens if you try to use the latest dmd
release with an old version of Phobos, perhaps installed along with
gdc.
Whoever's doing the .deb
On Monday, 15 October 2012 at 05:05:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 06:45:16AM +0200, Gerry Weaver wrote:
[...]
Unfortunately, I don't. This is a special dev system I setup
for a
customer project. They have several 32bit only apps that force
the
32bit requirement. Actually, I
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 07:14:42AM +0200, Gerry Weaver wrote:
[...]
Hi,
I checked it out. There is only a dmd.conf. I've included it below.
[...]
Strange, I have exactly the same copy of dmd.conf, and I didn't see a
problem. I copy-n-pasted your code into the same filename, etc..
What
On Monday, 15 October 2012 at 05:27:14 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 07:14:42AM +0200, Gerry Weaver wrote:
[...]
Hi,
I checked it out. There is only a dmd.conf. I've included it
below.
[...]
Strange, I have exactly the same copy of dmd.conf, and I didn't
see a
problem. I
K I have opOpAssign working. I may have to clean up
documentation a little and clean the unittests up a bit, but it
all appears to be working.
Feel free to give it a try.
I have added opSlice, which returns an array of your enum of all
the flags it qualifies for. An empty enum (say, zero)
I recently noticed that the SWT repository contains unit tests. I think
it would be create if these tests could be ported and included into DWT.
The tests are located in the tests directory in the SWT git repository:
On Saturday, 13 October 2012 at 22:34:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
OK, before this thread devolves into a shouting match, I'd like
to
understand what was the rationale behind this restriction. What
were the
reasons behind not allowing a non-member function to overload an
operator? What are the
On Saturday, 13 October 2012 at 17:01:27 UTC, Tommi wrote:
Another way to describe my reasoning...
According to TDPL, if var is a variable of a user-defined type,
then:
++var
gets rewritten as:
var.opUnary!++()
Not always. If user-defined type has an alias this to integer
member, than
The dmd compiler comes with some example code. One of the
examples is for COM.
Does this work for anyone else? The dll registration code is
failing: SetKeyAndValue() failed.
Other output looks good:
OLE 2 initialized
hMod = 268435456
LoadLibraryA() succeeded
pfn = 100033E0, fn =
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 06:22:03 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Saturday, 13 October 2012 at 17:01:27 UTC, Tommi wrote:
Another way to describe my reasoning...
According to TDPL, if var is a variable of a user-defined
type, then:
++var
gets rewritten as:
var.opUnary!++()
Not always. If
On Saturday, 13 October 2012 at 19:50:02 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 10/13/2012 06:02 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
...
Different groups of people have different mind and same things
produce
different sense on them. From my point of view operator
overloading
methods are special functions and not
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 07:01:30 UTC, Tommi wrote:
Actually, it seems that alias this has precedence over UFCS.
So, a free function opUnary wouldn't ever suit better than an
actual method opUnary of the thing referred to by that alias
this.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/d0a4431d
Free function
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 23:05:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
You can have the variable be private and alias a function which
returns by ref
instead of the variable itself. Something like
class C
{
@property ref inout(Impl) get() inout { return _impl; }
alias get this;
private:
Hey everyone, I'm new to D so bare with me please. I've been
trying to figure out what's up with the strange forward refernce
errors the compiler (DMD 2.060) is giving me. Here's a code
snippet that's generating a forward reference error:
public class AliasTestClass(alias func)
{
On 2012-10-14, 14:28, Martin wrote:
Hey everyone, I'm new to D so bare with me please. I've been trying to
figure out what's up with the strange forward refernce errors the
compiler (DMD 2.060) is giving me. Here's a code snippet that's
generating a forward reference error:
public class
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 12:58:24 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2012-10-14, 14:28, Martin wrote:
Hey everyone, I'm new to D so bare with me please. I've been
trying to figure out what's up with the strange forward
refernce errors the compiler (DMD 2.060) is giving me. Here's
a code
On 10/14/12, Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote:
Is there a way to make dmd ignore the default imports and library search
paths inside sc.ini?
See http://dlang.org/dmd-windows.html#sc_ini
On Oct 12, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 20:30 -0700, Charles Hixson wrote:
[…]
I'm not clear on what Fibers are. From Ruby they seem to mean
co-routines, and that doesn't have much advantage. But it also seems as
[…]
I think the
On 14-Oct-12 20:19, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 12, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 20:30 -0700, Charles Hixson wrote:
[…]
I'm not clear on what Fibers are. From Ruby they seem to mean
co-routines, and that doesn't have much advantage. But it
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 09:40:36 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Is there a way to make dmd ignore the default imports and
library search paths inside sc.ini?
Currently I have to keep two versions of dmd around, one with a
modified sc.ini and one with the original one, which is a bit
I haven't tried to run it, but as a random guess, does the user
your running it as have permissions to write to HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT
?
On 10/14/12 08:13, Maxim Fomin wrote:
The only mentioned reason is to allow writing operator overloading methods
outside type scope - just because somebody (currently two people) consider it
logical to broaden UFCS usage.
It's more than two people... Also, it's not about broadening UFCS
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 07:14:25 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
If this request is approved and compiler has opUnary definition
outside type (which suits better then alias
this) such function would hijack alias this.
Free functions cannot and must not ever hijack, i.e. modify
existing
On Sunday, 14 October 2012 at 19:04:22 UTC, Richard Webb wrote:
I haven't tried to run it, but as a random guess, does the user
your running it as have permissions to write to
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT ?
Guess that would be it. Specifically told the program to run as
admin and it works. Should have
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 23:38:48 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
toStringz takes a string (immutable(char)[]), and the GC will not
reclaim immutable data until app exit.
If the GC never collects immutable data which has no references to it until
the app closes, then there's a serious problem.
On Monday, October 15, 2012 00:51:34 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/15/12, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Anything and everything with no references to it any
longer should be up for collection.
I think this is fuzzy territory and it's a good opportunity to
properly document GC
On 10/15/12, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
I'd have to see exactly what TDPL says to comment on that accurately
Maybe I've misread it. On Page 288 it says:
An immutable value is cast in stone: as soon as it's been
initialized, you may as well
consider it has been burned forever
On 10/14/2012 04:36 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/15/12, Jonathan M Davisjmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
I'd have to see exactly what TDPL says to comment on that accurately
Maybe I've misread it. On Page 288 it says:
An immutable value is cast in stone: as soon as it's been
initialized,
On Monday, October 15, 2012 01:36:27 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/15/12, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
I'd have to see exactly what TDPL says to comment on that accurately
Maybe I've misread it. On Page 288 it says:
An immutable value is cast in stone: as soon as it's been
On 10/15/12, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
snip
Hmm ok, this sheds some light on things.
If a C function takes a const pointer and has no documentation about
ownership then maybe it's a good guess to say it won't store that
pointer anywhere and will only use it as a temporary?
On Monday, October 15, 2012 02:04:44 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/15/12, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
snip
Hmm ok, this sheds some light on things.
If a C function takes a const pointer and has no documentation about
ownership then maybe it's a good guess to say it won't
On Oct 14, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14-Oct-12 20:19, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 12, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 20:30 -0700, Charles Hixson wrote:
[…]
I'm not clear on what Fibers are. From Ruby
On 10/15/12 02:14, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Johannes, are you still working on gobject introspection? libgit has
gobject bindings so I remembered you mentioning something about
working on gobject for D.
FWIW gobject bindings are part of my gtk2 bindings too;
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:53:48 -0700
Charles Hixson charleshi...@earthlink.net wrote:
If std.stream is being deprecated, what is the correct way to deal
with file BOMs. This is particularly concerning utf8 files, which I
understand to be a bit problematic, as there isn't, actually, a utf8
I have an array of reals that I want to format with writefln, but the
precision field needs to be passed in a variable. For a single real, it
would be writefln(%.*f, precision, x); but when I try this:
int precision = ...;
real[] array = ...;
writefln(%(%.*f, %),
On 10/14/2012 10:43 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I have an array of reals that I want to format with writefln, but the
precision field needs to be passed in a variable. For a single real, it
would be writefln(%.*f, precision, x); but when I try this:
int precision = ...;
real[] array =
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8816
Summary: It should be illegal for enums to declare members
named init, max, or min
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8817
Summary: Symbols named init should be illegal
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8816
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-10-14 00:05:18
PDT ---
See also issue# 8817.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8816
Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lycus.org
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8817
Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lycus.org
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8817
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-10-14 00:48:24
PDT ---
That comment has been there for eons. What do we do about it?
Create a function with the correct name (whatever that is - initialize?) and
mark the old one
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8809
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
