On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 00:50:57 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:42:04 +0100
alex i...@alexanderbothe.com wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 22:33:38 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:46:43 +0100
alex i...@alexanderbothe.com wrote:
Nope. You can
Am 14.03.2013 03:03, schrieb Ellery Newcomer:
On 03/13/2013 11:30 AM, D-ratiseur wrote:
uppon everything to bypass the garbage
collector.
In that case, I call foul.
FAddr.length = FAddr.length + 1;
types.d#L281
Wait, what? You're using classes everywhere and.. ohhh. you're
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 10:23:05 UTC, David wrote:
Afaik it is deprecated which really sucks imo.
I don't know why the new operator is so important to some people.
If templates had been in C++ before classes, this operator would
probably never have existed.
object.destroy()(UFCS) and
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:11:13 +0100
Jakob Ovrum jakobov...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 10:23:05 UTC, David wrote:
Afaik it is deprecated which really sucks imo.
I don't know why the new operator is so important to some people.
If templates had been in C++ before classes,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:38:45 +0100
alex i...@alexanderbothe.com wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 00:50:57 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:42:04 +0100
alex i...@alexanderbothe.com wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 22:33:38 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On Thu,
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 14:33:06 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Even ignoring the disregard my system settings overdose of
white, the UI is still just generally very difficult to read
due to what
appears to be a (more or less) buggy theme. Note in particular:
1. Invisible menu items.
2.
On Monday, 11 March 2013 at 06:58:35 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Somtimes I really wonder what's up with DMDs error messages.
This code
has been there since ages and never triggered an error here,
even on DMD
2.062 (and it rightfully should have triggered one). Anyway,
It's fixed
now on master.
Am 15.03.2013 17:37, schrieb Kagamin:
On Monday, 11 March 2013 at 06:58:35 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Somtimes I really wonder what's up with DMDs error messages. This code
has been there since ages and never triggered an error here, even on DMD
2.062 (and it rightfully should have triggered
Hi, I would like to announce llvm-d, which provides LLVM bindings
for D.
It loads LLVM from a dynamic library (so/dylib/dll) and has
support
for LLVM versions 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 (current svn trunk).
It has as of now been tested on 64bit versions of Archlinux, OS X
Mountain Lion and Windows 7.
Destroy (but upvote):
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1adf94/three_optimization_tips_for_c/
Andrei
This website is a mess. The home still shows v3, following the
download, you'll reach v4.0 (windows)... which is so ugly and buggy.
The latest for windows, which I found in their forum, is:
http://download.xamarin.com/studio/Windows/XamarinStudio-4.0.1.msi
On 14.03.2013 22:43, alex wrote:
On
Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Hi, I would like to announce llvm-d, which provides LLVM bindings
for D.
It loads LLVM from a dynamic library (so/dylib/dll) and has support
for LLVM versions 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 (current svn trunk).
It has as of now been tested on 64bit versions of Archlinux, OS X
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 21:18:09 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote:
Nice.
Can you make it compatible with Deimos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos/?
Jens
If by compatible you mean can be used with:
I don't see anything that would prevent you from using llvm-d
together
with deimos bindings
On 3/14/2013 10:25 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 17:53:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Template constraints are D's solution to that issue. I agree it's not perfect,
but I think dollar for dollar it's better than concepts.
No they aren't, because it would only skip
15-Mar-2013 01:58, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 3/14/13 4:37 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Point taken. That doesn't detract us from:
a) fixing issues with -cov
Yes please (are there bugzilla entries etc)?
template powerup(T) //usable as template mixin too
{
//imagine more
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 00:36:59 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:51:36 +0100
schrieb Lars T. Kyllingstad pub...@kyllingen.net:
Now that the big pieces are seemingly falling into place, it
is probably time for bikeshedding. I was thinking clearEnv or
newEnv, but
On 3/14/2013 11:36 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
15-Mar-2013 01:58, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 3/14/13 4:37 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Point taken. That doesn't detract us from:
a) fixing issues with -cov
Yes please (are there bugzilla entries etc)?
template powerup(T) //usable as
15-Mar-2013 10:47, Walter Bright пишет:
On 3/14/2013 11:36 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
15-Mar-2013 01:58, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 3/14/13 4:37 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Point taken. That doesn't detract us from:
a) fixing issues with -cov
Yes please (are there bugzilla entries etc)?
On 03/15/2013 12:18 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 20:57:57 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
...
Challenge accepted. Clearly the Phobos developers do not instantiate
their templates before shipping them. :o)
The following breaks most of std.range, and most of std.algorithm
could
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 06:51:15 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
15-Mar-2013 10:47, Walter Bright пишет:
On 3/14/2013 11:36 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
15-Mar-2013 01:58, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 3/14/13 4:37 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Point taken. That doesn't detract us from:
a)
15-Mar-2013 06:43, deadalnix пишет:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 23:52:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:54:52 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
[snip]
That implicitly does the equivalent of .save on a mere InputRange
*twice*. The result, of
15-Mar-2013 15:27, Dmitry Olshansky пишет:
15-Mar-2013 06:43, deadalnix пишет:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 23:52:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:54:52 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
[snip]
That implicitly does the equivalent of .save
There could be other possibilities as well, like a function without @foo
attribute not being able to call a function with the attribute in its body.
I mean, a function without @foo should not be able to call a function with
@foo attribute.
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:51:36 -0400, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.net wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 20:34:11 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:20:24 -0400, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.net wrote:
The more I think about this, the more it seems
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:11:00 -0400, kraybit st...@kraybit.com wrote:
Cheers!
Oh, and destroy and all that!
It looks good. I think it would be cool to have two moons instead (I'm
assuming from the red terrain, we are on mars, right?), and also to have
some sort of template instantiation
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 21:29:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
int foo(int delegate() dg){ return dg(); }
void main(){
foo(delegate()=2); // error, int delegate()pure immutable
// does not convert to int delegate()
}
OK, is it possible to consider naked delegate as
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 13:57:10 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:51:36 -0400, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.net wrote:
Speaking of negative flags, do you have better suggestions for
the Config.noCloseStd... ones?
retainStdout
Nice!
On 3/15/13 15:01 , Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
It looks good. I think it would be cool to have two moons instead (I'm
assuming from the red terrain, we are on mars, right?), and also to have
some sort of template instantiation there :) Perhaps menlo!park();
-Steve
Good points! Mars, yes :)
On 3/14/2013 1:27 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
We can do a lot, lot better before we need something better than -cov.
A proposal to improve the use of -cov:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9726
On 3/14/13 7:11 PM, kraybit wrote:
On 3/6/13 21:58 , Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hi everyone,
Time to design the DConf 2013 T-shirts! Please reply to this with any
ideas you may have.
I have some ideas, but I'm sure they're not the best one. Destroy!
Thanks,
Andrei
Hello Earthlings!
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 02:09:13PM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/14/13 7:11 PM, kraybit wrote:
[...]
Hello Earthlings!
Tshirt mockup
https://www.dropbox.com/s/tqbezl4wyk9llar/tshirt.png
***
Decal PNG-file (hires)
On 3/15/13 19:09 , Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Would love if the moon would be actually a small
Earth, is that possible?
Andrei
Two versions with the 'ol home planet in them coming up!
One small Earth instead of the second moon (would need more work for
fair comparison though), and one tiny
On 3/15/2013 11:12 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Another neat thing to do is to put Pathfinder in the background
somewhere. :)
It would be neat, but I'd worry about somebody thinking we are claiming
Pathfinder has D code in it.
Also, simpler is better.
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:44:47 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:12 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Another neat thing to do is to put Pathfinder in the background
somewhere. :)
It would be neat, but I'd worry about somebody thinking we are claiming
Pathfinder
On Friday, 8 March 2013 at 21:47:11 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 7 March 2013 07:55, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Mar 7, 2013 12:56 AM, Joshua Niehus jm.nie...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 March 2013 at 20:58:35 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Hi everyone,
Time to
On 3/15/2013 1:46 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Why not put a thought bubble above the stuck rover (I can't remember the name
of it) saying If Only I'd been programmed with D :)
I suppose that's going too far...
T-shirt designs shouldn't have small print on them. Having people need to peer
On 3/13/2013 7:32 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
news:kibnaskimiqnmzzie...@forum.dlang.org...
Hi all,
A quick quiz: Does the following function compile, and if yes,
what will it return?
---
void* delegateToPtr(void delegate() dg) {
return
On 3/15/13 2:37 PM, kraybit wrote:
On 3/15/13 19:09 , Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Would love if the moon would be actually a small
Earth, is that possible?
Andrei
Two versions with the 'ol home planet in them coming up!
One small Earth instead of the second moon (would need more work for
On 3/15/13 2:12 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Although, as seen from Mars, Earth would just be a tiny speck in the
sky, indistinguishible from a star (unless it's possible to print a
t-shirt with a moving star aka planet). Phobos and Deimos would be more
prominent in the Martian sky. ;-)
Yah, two
On 15 March 2013 21:07, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.orgwrote:
On 3/15/13 2:37 PM, kraybit wrote:
On 3/15/13 19:09 , Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Would love if the moon would be actually a small
Earth, is that possible?
Andrei
Two versions with the 'ol home planet in
I want to second Steven's suggestion that the code have a
template instantiation in it.
auto event = menlo!park(2013); ?
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 21:13:42 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 15 March 2013 21:07, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.orgwrote:
On 3/15/13 2:37 PM, kraybit
If you're looking around for ideas on contributions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?keywords=preapprovedquery_format=advancedkeywords_type=allwordsbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENED
On Friday, March 15, 2013 14:50:21 Walter Bright wrote:
If you're looking around for ideas on contributions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?keywords=preapprovedquery_format=
advancedkeywords_type=allwordsbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_statu
s=REOPENED
Why are there _bugs_
On 3/15/2013 3:02 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 15, 2013 14:50:21 Walter Bright wrote:
If you're looking around for ideas on contributions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?keywords=preapprovedquery_format=
On 03/06/2013 09:58 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hi everyone,
Time to design the DConf 2013 T-shirts! Please reply to this with any
ideas you may have.
I have some ideas, but I'm sure they're not the best one. Destroy!
Thanks,
Andrei
What happened to the lousy!T shirt?
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 21:30:46 UTC, Miles Stoudenmire wrote:
I want to second Steven's suggestion that the code have a
template instantiation in it.
auto event = menlo!park(2013); ?
I like the one suggested in another shirt, but maybe the
duplicate info needs changed
auto event =
On 03/14/2013 09:54 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 04:09:25 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Something like If an rvalue is assigned to a
member in a constructor, do not call opAssign() of the member.
Ali
Yes, in general, first assignment in a constructor should be considered
as
Thanks. I's much more clear now.
So far, my lexer is pure exercise.
But my goal is actually to filter variables and functions, to see
if they are ever used in the code.
So you got rid of array creation. About time ;)
Yes, that was the only way to get closer to your measured time. :D
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 14:51:42 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 14:29:59 UTC, Andrea Fontana
wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 13:58:56 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 13:20:51 UTC, Andrea Fontana
wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 03:44:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/14/2013 04:58 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 21:40:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I had toyed with the idea of making a ForwardRange from an
InputRange
by caching the elements. Without any guarantees, :)
It's having possibilities,I mean polymorphism for struct,and
without a enum declaring thus it can be more scalable if you
should use virtual call in a delegate class,cause it's just what
virtual call is designed for.Since you record the Type all the
time,you get rid of virtual call but lose
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 02:20:01 UTC, estew wrote:
Ok, I did a bit more reading of TDPL and decided to go with the
following pattern:
synchronized class A{
private string[] _values;
void setValue(size_t i, string val) {_values[i] = val;}
string getValue(size_t i) const
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 14:31:43 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear,
By using CTFE I try to get a generic range to read array or a
file as a phobos range. code hosted here:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/1f2bcf39
that works fine for array but for a File instance .eof seem to
not return true a
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 14:40:17 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 14:31:43 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear,
By using CTFE I try to get a generic range to read array or a
file as a phobos range. code hosted here:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/1f2bcf39
that works fine for
But it works already for templates.
So if it's confusing, then, why was it introduced?
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:32:35 -0400, Namespace rswhi...@googlemail.com
wrote:
But it works already for templates.
So if it's confusing, then, why was it introduced?
The way it works for templates is to generate two separate functions, one
which takes ref and one which takes by value.
The
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 16:11:38 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 14:40:17 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 14:31:43 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear,
By using CTFE I try to get a generic range to read array or a
file as a phobos range. code
And it is planned to change the functionality of 'auto ref' to
the proposed variant of Jonathan? Or was his proposal rejected?
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:15:21 -0400, Namespace rswhi...@googlemail.com
wrote:
And it is planned to change the functionality of 'auto ref' to the
proposed variant of Jonathan? Or was his proposal rejected?
I have no idea. All I know is that Jonathan's proposal is really what
Andrei wanted
On Friday, March 15, 2013 18:15:21 Namespace wrote:
And it is planned to change the functionality of 'auto ref' to
the proposed variant of Jonathan? Or was his proposal rejected?
I don't think that there was any official decision of any kind. IIRC, Kenji was
looking into at one point and
So first of all we have to find a new syntax/name?
AFAIK Kenji made a pull request for a new implementation of
'auto ref' a few months ago. If that was already in the proposed
manner of Jonathan, we need not to discuss with Walter, because
the pull is open for months.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9726
Summary: Add minimum % coverage required for -cov testing
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9727
Summary: Allow splitting documentation is unittets
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #2 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2013-03-15 04:54:07 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Predicates? Did you mean traits or restrictions ?
They are predicates, mappings from types to bool.
Either way, I don't think that's the problem, as
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #3 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-03-15 06:21:39 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
Predicates? Did you mean traits or restrictions ?
They are predicates, mappings from types to bool.
Ah OK, I was
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1528
--- Comment #30 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-03-15 07:27:23 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #29)
(In reply to comment #28)
(In reply to comment #26)
It's not about the polysemous literals.
What's irritating me is that a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9728
Summary: Ddoc anchors non-unique across overloads
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9729
Summary: interface thunk doesn't set EBX to GOT
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9712
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-03-15 09:58:44 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9654
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-03-15 09:58:40 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9730
Summary: Allow ddoc unittests to remotely reference declaration
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9731
Summary: Ddoc should output per-paragraph macro instead of
$(DDOC_BLANKLINE)
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9723
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9719
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9717
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9717
--- Comment #3 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-03-15 10:46:50 PDT ---
That said, nearest half is one scheme among many other. I'm not sure about
default.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9717
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9726
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9489
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9722
--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-03-15
11:01:20 PDT ---
Martin, are you saying this bug should still be open?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9722
--- Comment #5 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-03-15 13:48:10 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Martin, are you saying this bug should still be open?
No, the bug is fixed but it's terribly inefficient when the GOT isn't cached.
What
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9676
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9676
--- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-03-15 13:52:58 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9676
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9723
--- Comment #12 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-03-15
13:57:22 PDT ---
You guyz make a good case. I amend my proposal so this should happen only when
a -main switch is thrown on the command line.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9729
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-03-15 14:01:30 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9722
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9729
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-03-15 14:40:22 PDT ---
Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9722
--- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-03-15 14:40:24 PDT ---
Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9726
--- Comment #2 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-03-15
14:54:21 PDT ---
For example,
dmd test.d -unittest -cov=90 -run
should compile and run the unittests in test.d, and the program should fail if
it doesn't have at least
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9723
jens.k.muel...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jens.k.muel...@gmx.de
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9723
--- Comment #14 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-03-15
15:14:22 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
You guyz make a good case. I amend my proposal so this should happen only when
a -main switch is thrown on the command
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1528
--- Comment #31 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2013-03-15 15:52:59 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #30)
...
Parameter deduction is less specialized than matching to explicitly
specialized type parameter.
...
It's not less specialized than a normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1528
--- Comment #32 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-03-15 16:51:36 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #31)
(In reply to comment #30)
...
Parameter deduction is less specialized than matching to explicitly
specialized type parameter.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9723
--- Comment #15 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-03-15
16:52:19 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #12)
You guyz make a good case. I amend my proposal so this should happen only
when
a -main
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9732
Summary: Do not call opAssign() for the first assignment to
member in the constructor
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
