http://code.dlang.org/packages/unit-threaded
https://github.com/atilaneves/unit-threaded
What's new? Bug fixes and the dtest util.
dtest lets you point it at a list of directories, preferably just
one called tests (that way there's less command-line options to
type) and voilá, all tests in
DCD 0.2.0 is released.
Github Project: https://github.com/Hackerpilot/DCD
Release Tag: https://github.com/Hackerpilot/DCD/tree/0.2.0
The D Completion Daemon is an auto-complete system for the D
programming language that is not tied to any specific text editor
or IDE. Modules exist for
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 19:40:08 UTC, Brian Schott
wrote:
* Only the Textadept module has support for go-to-declaration
at the moment.
FYI, the dcd_lookup.py Python script found on this page:
http://www.zeusedit.com/zforum/viewtopic.php?t=7020
implements the *go-to-declaration*
On 2013-11-13 20:40, Brian Schott wrote:
DCD 0.2.0 is released.
Github Project: https://github.com/Hackerpilot/DCD
Release Tag: https://github.com/Hackerpilot/DCD/tree/0.2.0
The D Completion Daemon is an auto-complete system for the D programming
language that is not tied to any specific text
This project imports stdx.d.(lexer/parser/ast). Where can I find these modules?
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-11-13 20:40, Brian Schott wrote:
DCD 0.2.0 is released.
Github Project: https://github.com/Hackerpilot/DCD
Release Tag:
Go is a boring language, kind of like Dart, I guess Google just
sucks at language design? The do use an awful lot of Java,
perhaps it has caused irreparable damage
On 2013-11-12 10:20, Walter Bright wrote:
I confess I have some serious reservations about AST macros in general:
1. I've seen very heavy use of such macros in macro assemblers. What
happens is people use it to invent their own (very baroque) language on
top of the existing assembler one.
On 2013-11-12 11:03, Walter Bright wrote:
Here's a project to add Linq support to C++:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/17844/CLinq-LINQ-support-for-the-C-CLI-language
There's also:
http://pfultz2.github.io/Linq/
https://github.com/hjiang/linqxx/wiki
Again, operator overloading in D
On 13.11.2013 08:16, KlausO wrote:
Am 13.11.2013 02:21, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 11/12/13 5:10 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
* Pointers and class references: size_t.max - 65_535, i.e. 64K below
the upper memory limit. On all systems I know it can be safely assumed
that that area will
On 2013-11-12 19:01, Rob T wrote:
My personal main need for macros at this point, is to make up for a lack
of better reflection, but as has been pointed out, it's not clear how
macros would help anyway without access to the sort of reflection that
I'm currently lacking.
Macros would need a
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 06:16:07 UTC, Rob T wrote:
I need my Gtkd application to maintain a (possibly big)
archive database of financial records downloaded daily from
the server application. In my case JSON seems to be the most
convenient format. Please let me know if, according to
On 2013-11-12 21:03, Joseph Cassman wrote:
After using string mixins for a while I have come to feel much like your
statement in (1). I like the power and flexibility of string mixins.
Text and strings are understandable and straightforward to manipulate.
This is a clear win in my opinion.
On 10.11.2013. 22:20, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I've been thinking quite long of how AST macros could look like in D.
I've been posting my vision of AST macros here in the newsgroup a couple
of times already. I've now been asked to create a DIP out of it, so here
it is:
On 2013-11-13 00:26, Walter Bright wrote:
It is limiting, but I don't know about extremely limiting. Eric
Anderton's regex engine didn't need them. And, if you really do need
them, you can always define the templates as regular names:
lessThan(a,b)
equals(a,b)
etc. Not the greatest,
On 2013-11-12 16:20, Dicebot wrote:
I don't know much about linq but in macro context I'd expect it to
generate an actual SQL query to database (and execute it) based on
in-language filter statement (via reflection)
Exactly, spot on. The interesting thing there, in the context of macros,
is
On 2013-11-12 15:38, John Colvin wrote:
for those of us entirely unfamiliar with linq, what is this supposed to
do? Select people with name John from a collection of people, like in
sql? It seems trivial to do this using filter, or am I missing
something...?
The idea of that example is, as
Am 13.11.2013 08:31, schrieb Rainer Schuetze:
- The DIP should state what happens to template instances. Assuming the
definition is marked export, I guess instances will be dllexport if
they are compiled together with the module that contains the definition.
What will happen if it is
On 2013-11-12 17:14, John Colvin wrote:
oh, I see. Would AST macros really be enough to make this work in D?
Arbitrary code is a huge feature space in D, including much that
doesn't map well to anything outside of a relatively low-level language,
let alone SQL.
I can see it quickly becoming a
On 13.11.2013. 9:26, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-12 17:14, John Colvin wrote:
oh, I see. Would AST macros really be enough to make this work in D?
Arbitrary code is a huge feature space in D, including much that
doesn't map well to anything outside of a relatively low-level language,
On 2013-11-12 21:25, Dicebot wrote:
I had an impression it was exactly the context in which linq was
originally mentioned, no idea why discussion has moved from that to
expressing DSL's (which is not really a problem in D) :)
My example is a DSL:
Person.where(e = e.name == John);
--
/Jacob
On 2013-11-12 21:36, deadalnix wrote:
The thing I'd like to be able to do it to create a async/await/yield
like mechanism, purely as library.
Please add this as an example to the DIP.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 07:55:59 UTC, Froglegs wrote:
Go is a boring language, kind of like Dart, I guess Google
just sucks at language design? The do use an awful lot of Java,
perhaps it has caused irreparable damage
If you were working in an Enterprise (TM) with coworkers who
On 11/13/2013 12:17 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-13 00:26, Walter Bright wrote:
It is limiting, but I don't know about extremely limiting. Eric
Anderton's regex engine didn't need them. And, if you really do need
them, you can always define the templates as regular names:
Am Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:35:39 +0100
schrieb Steve Teale steve.te...@britseyeview.com:
I'd like to publicly thank and commend Mike Wey for his hard work
and perseverance on Gtkd.
It is now fully up-to-date with GTK3, and with it and D, writing
GUI programs has rarely if ever been easier.
On 2013-11-12 22:55, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Which you still have to mixin, btw. Which means any tree manipulation
you do must be done at compile-time.
Unless, of course, you then put the resulting code into another file,
to be compiled and loaded afterwards.
It would be at compile time with
On 2013-11-12 21:55, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Actually I couldn't shake off the feeling that macros are just CTFE
functions on Ast objects. How objects are created and converted back to
source code is a separate question.
Yes, and reflection.
If we just had:
//this would invoke compiler's
On 2013-11-13 01:36, deadalnix wrote:
The serialization is a good example. You'll have to note that if the
code has been able to serialize the data, it can generate at compile
time the necessary scafolding to deserialize it.
No, not necessarily. If you serialize an object through a base class
On 11/13/2013 12:03 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Again, operator overloading in D is too limiting to implement something Linq
like.
Ok, let's set aside the opEquals and opCmp issue for the moment.
Can AST macros do anything that expression templates cannot?
On 2013-11-12 23:45, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's not quite trivial - somewhere there has to be a map and
registration and lookup and whatnot. I don't see it why it's unbecoming
for such functionality to be part of the standard library. I would
agree, however, that it's a judgment call
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 08:41:27 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:35:39 +0100
schrieb Steve Teale steve.te...@britseyeview.com:
I'd like to publicly thank and commend Mike Wey for his hard
work and perseverance on Gtkd.
It is now fully up-to-date with GTK3, and with
Steve Teale steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote in message
news:sbthddptgdozwiivi...@forum.dlang.org...
I'd like to publicly thank and commend Mike Wey for his hard work and
perseverance on Gtkd.
It is now fully up-to-date with GTK3, and with it and D, writing GUI
programs has rarely if ever
On 2013-11-13 03:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Wait, doesn't Object.factory call the default constructor of the created
object?
Yes, but you use ClassInfo.find and _d_newclass, which is exactly the
same thing, except it won't call the constructor. Object.factory uses
these functions
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 08:39:06 UTC, logicchains wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 07:55:59 UTC, Froglegs wrote:
Go is a boring language, kind of like Dart, I guess Google
just sucks at language design? The do use an awful lot of
Java, perhaps it has caused irreparable damage
Am 13.11.2013 09:34, schrieb luka8088:
What about something like this?
class Person {
macro where (Context context, Statement statement) {
// ...
}
it is not generic - and that is the biggest goal to reach
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 05:26:54 UTC, jean christophe
wrote:
Hello
would you guys say that std.json is a good or bad choice dor a
desktop application ? I've read many threads about it on the
forum and finally I don't realy know what to do Oo`
I need my Gtkd application to
On 2013-11-13 05:07, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Then how do you figure doing this:
class Streamable { ... }
class Foo : Streamable { ... }
class Bar : Streamable { ... }
string className = stream.readln();
Streamable obj = ...;
How do you create obj from className, when className could be
+1
I'm very happy with Gtkd.
My config:
Debian 7
dmd v2.064
GtkD 2.3.0
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 07:35:41 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
I'd like to publicly thank and commend Mike Wey for his hard
work and perseverance on Gtkd.
It is now fully up-to-date with GTK3, and with it and D,
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 00:33:17 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
* Arrays: some weird length (like 17), and also starting at
size_t.max minus the memory occupied by the array.
This question probably reflects the fact that I do not know how
arrays are implemented by the D runtime.
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 08:45:13 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/13/2013 12:03 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Again, operator overloading in D is too limiting to implement
something Linq like.
Ok, let's set aside the opEquals and opCmp issue for the moment.
Can AST macros do anything
On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 09:51:33 Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 08:39:06 UTC, logicchains wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 07:55:59 UTC, Froglegs wrote:
Go is a boring language, kind of like Dart, I guess Google
just sucks at language design? The do use
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 08:45:13 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/13/2013 12:03 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Again, operator overloading in D is too limiting to implement
something Linq like.
Ok, let's set aside the opEquals and opCmp issue for the moment.
Can AST macros do anything
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 08:39:06 UTC, logicchains wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 07:55:59 UTC, Froglegs wrote:
If you were working in an Enterprise (TM) with coworkers who
were potentially competence-challenged, would you want them
having access to the power of D's
On 11/13/13 12:55 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-13 05:07, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Then how do you figure doing this:
class Streamable { ... }
class Foo : Streamable { ... }
class Bar : Streamable { ... }
string className = stream.readln();
Streamable obj = ...;
How do you create
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 09:12:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 09:51:33 Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 08:39:06 UTC, logicchains
wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 07:55:59 UTC, Froglegs
wrote:
Go is a boring language,
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 00:33:17 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
I will soon get to work on typed allocators; I figured there
will be some issues percolating to untyped allocators that will
require design changes (hopefully minor).
For starters, I want to define a function
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:38:43 -, John Colvin
john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 13:50:49 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
auto person = Person.where(e = e.name == John);
Translates to:
select * from person where name = 'John'
for those of us entirely
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 09:12:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Personally, I have no interest in it and think that its
designers made some
very poor choices, but that doesn't mean that we should be
making fun of it or
make fun of Google for being the place where the engineers who
Am 13.11.2013 10:58, schrieb Regan Heath:
Linq is often confused with LinqToSQL, the above was a description of what
happens in the latter. If Person was an object representing a table from
a SQL database, then calling 'where' on it would translate into an
IQueryablePerson object which when
On 12.11.2013 18:53, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Place.objects.filter(name=Bob's Cafe)
[snip]
C. it would look like even worse crap in D (no named parameters!)
It's perfectly possible in D to make this work:
Place.objects.filter(args.name = Bob, args.state = unemployed);
Proof of
Am 13.11.2013 11:41, schrieb dennis luehring:
Am 13.11.2013 10:58, schrieb Regan Heath:
Linq is often confused with LinqToSQL, the above was a description of what
happens in the latter. If Person was an object representing a table from
a SQL database, then calling 'where' on it would translate
On 2013-11-13 10:27, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
With Object.factory that's taken care of already.
No, you need to register the subclasses as well. The static type
information is lost for the subclasses.
Again there is a confusion here. The idea was to create an object with
the dynamic
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 22:17:10 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 21:15:39 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
We can make that work if we insert the tests at the end of a
run of equivalent values.
I've thought about this as well, but then there are cases
I'm using ddoc to generate a lot of documentation and i've
noticed in the new 2.064.2 version the type is now included with
the identifier in parameter lists. Can this be made optional or
able to be controlled by a macro?
The current parameter identifier macro is this:
DDOC_PARAM_ID = $(TD
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 10:19:34 UTC, logicchains wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 09:12:40 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis wrote:
struct, then I have to write (*pt).X to access field X of that
It is in our guidelines too. I almost never write -.
From my point of view this whole idea is great as it makes it
easier
what is already possible. For example, with current behavior if
I wanted
to write.
foo {
writeln(foo);
writeln(foo again);
}
Currently this would be sent as a string. I have suggested
previously (given a lexer
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 11:30:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 10:19:34 UTC, logicchains
wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 09:12:40 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis wrote:
struct, then I have to write (*pt).X to access field X of that
It is in our guidelines too.
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 02:54:05 UTC, eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 17:59:50 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 12.11.2013 17:10, schrieb eles:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 15:35:48 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 15:27:36 UTC, bearophile
wrote:
Ali
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 11:09:24 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
I think you will be pleased with the argument, given D's
philosophy:
https://yinwang0.wordpress.com/2013/11/09/oop-fp/
Yep, 100% agree. We should use both, and think ahead whether to
take first or the second approach to
alas, no, I posted on exactly this some times ago:
glob is non-recursive in D:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.2367.1382320537.1719.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com
Furthermore, it would be very inefficient to filter out results given by
recursive dirEntries that match a glob pattern in
On 2013-11-13 09:38, Walter Bright wrote:
What's special about it was its use of expression templates. It made for
a nice demo of how to do such.
Is there an actual point in doing that, except a nice exercise in
expression templates?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-11-13 09:45, Walter Bright wrote:
Ok, let's set aside the opEquals and opCmp issue for the moment.
Can AST macros do anything that expression templates cannot?
I need to read up on what expression templates can do.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all distributions.
and this is further compounded by
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11501 : dirEntries fails with
Failed to stat file when encountering broken symlinks which i posted
couple days ago
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Timothee Cour thelastmamm...@gmail.comwrote:
alas, no, I posted on
On 2013-11-13 09:34, luka8088 wrote:
What about something like this?
class Person {
macro where (Context context, Statement statement) {
// ...
}
}
auto foo = John;
auto result = Person.where(e = e.name == foo);
// is replaced by
auto foo = John;
auto result =
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 07:35:41 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
I'd like to publicly thank and commend Mike Wey for his hard
work and perseverance on Gtkd.
It is now fully up-to-date with GTK3, and with it and D,
writing GUI programs has rarely if ever been easier.
If you have not been
On 2013-11-13 10:58, Regan Heath wrote:
The motivation is the same as for foreach, it is a general syntax for
accessing a wide range of containers including databases with a common
syntax. We could, equally, go the other way, use the IMO nicer
composition syntax X.where(..).foo(...).etc and
On 2013-11-13 09:15, luka8088 wrote:
I took a look at it as here is my conclusion for now:
Statement and attribute macro examples look great. But I don't like Linq
example. I don't think code like the following should be allowed.
I'm not a fan of the Linq example either. Or rather if I put
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 11:09:24 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
I think you will be pleased with the argument, given D's
philosophy:
https://yinwang0.wordpress.com/2013/11/09/oop-fp/
“functions are also objects”. Yes, they are.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_theory
On 2013-11-13 13:20, Timothee Cour wrote:
alas, no, I posted on exactly this some times ago:
glob is non-recursive in D:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.2367.1382320537.1719.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com
Hmm, right, my bad.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 11:09:24 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
I think you will be pleased with the argument, given D's
philosophy:
https://yinwang0.wordpress.com/2013/11/09/oop-fp/
The thing I don't like with many such pure paradigm languages
is not actually the fact that they stick
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 04:35:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
I don't see why we need such sub-directories. The language
doesn't seem important to me.
I also place the source under /usr/src since they actually
aren't headers/import files.
Mostly hygiene concerns. One of reasons why
Am Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:23:17 +0100
schrieb Dejan Lekic dejan.le...@gmail.com:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 06:13:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
What's the reason vibe.d's json tools aren't backported to
Phobos?
It is quite a lot of effort to adjust module to match Phobos
guidelines and push it through the review. No one has been
motivated enough to do this for stuff
On 2013-11-13 12:49, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
AST macros currently suggested do not work at the same stage as mixins,
as far as I am aware. They work at a much earlier stage. Mixins have
limits because of there lateness in lexing process.
I think macros would work on the same stage as mixins.
import std.stdio,std.cstream;
void main(string[] args)
{
int first;
int second;
write (First Number : );
readf ( %s, first);
write (Second Number: );
readf ( %s, second);
int result = first + second;
std.json is ok. If you want a prettier api btw, I wrote a module
called jsvar that uses it to provide a D type that is very
similar to a javascript var:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/misc-stuff-including-D-programming-language-web-stuff/blob/master/jsvar.d
void main() {
import
Thanks guys.
Its a great help...
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 14:36:22 UTC, Vincent wrote:
it shows the result it will totally exit and I can't
see the output.
din.getc has something in its buffer already (the newline from
when you hit enter after readf - it uses the number but left the
line), so it doesn't
On 2013-11-13 15:36, Vincent wrote:
Problem: When I run this code why it is automatically exit when it shows
the
result. It allows me to input first numbers and second number
but when
it shows the result it will totally exit and I can't see the
output.
I use D-IDE as my
Changing
readf ( %s, second);
to
readf ( %s , second);
is likely to fix it (untested). There is a \n symbol left in
buffer from last entry (which gets read by `getc`)
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 12:05:51 UTC, logicchains wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 11:30:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 10:19:34 UTC, logicchains
wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 09:12:40 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis wrote:
struct, then I have to
Problem: When I run this code why it is automatically exit when
it shows the
result. It allows me to input first numbers and second
number but when
it shows the result it will totally exit and I can't
see the output.
I use D-IDE as my editor and dmd2 as my compiler.
Add
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 14:36:22 UTC, Vincent wrote:
import std.stdio,std.cstream;
void main(string[] args)
{
int first;
int second;
write (First Number : );
readf ( %s, first);
write (Second Number: );
readf (
On 13.11.2013. 13:26, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-13 09:34, luka8088 wrote:
What about something like this?
class Person {
macro where (Context context, Statement statement) {
// ...
}
}
auto foo = John;
auto result = Person.where(e = e.name == foo);
// is replaced
Am Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:53:10 +0100
schrieb Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 04:35:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
I don't see why we need such sub-directories. The language
doesn't seem important to me.
I also place the source under /usr/src since they
On 13 November 2013 13:53, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 04:35:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I don't see why we need such sub-directories. The language doesn't seem
important to me.
I also place the source under /usr/src since they actually aren't
Sorry sir my post is out of place. But thanks anyway next time I
know now where will I post my topic/questions.
Thanks for the help sirs...
On 2013-11-13 15:47, luka8088 wrote:
May/Should I add such example to wiki?
Yes, should. Sure, add it to the DIP.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 11/13/13 2:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-13 10:27, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
With Object.factory that's taken care of already.
No, you need to register the subclasses as well. The static type
information is lost for the subclasses.
We are definitely talking about different
On 11/13/13 4:05 AM, logicchains wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 11:30:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 10:19:34 UTC, logicchains wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 09:12:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
struct, then I have to write (*pt).X to access field
On 11/13/13 2:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Here is an excerpt of my serialization library, with the relevant code
for this discussion:
[snip]
To drive the point home: I looked once more over the code and I think
it's too complicated for what it does. It could be improved as follows.
The key
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 08:26:52 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
I'm using a pluign to Ruby on Rails that does something similar
but by overloading operators. The problem with this approach,
in Ruby, is that you cannot overload operators like || and ,
so instead they overload | and
There is one thing that seems really inconvenient to me but I'd
like to see community opinion before writing a DIP :) It is all
about current semantics of deprecated attribute.
Right now using deprecated symbols is a warning. And if you use
-w switch (like most pedantic projects do) it is an
13-Nov-2013 04:33, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
Hello,
[snip]
Here's what I'm thinking. First, obliterate calls the destructor if
present and then writes the fields as follows:
* unsigned integers: t.max / 2
* signed integers: t.min / 2
* characters: ?
As Vladimir said:
0xFF for char
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 12:05:51 UTC, logicchains wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 11:30:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 10:19:34 UTC, logicchains
wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 09:12:40 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis wrote:
struct, then I have to
On 11/13/13 10:18 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
As Vladimir said:
0xFF for char
0x for wchar
0x10_ for dchar
Alternatives for w/dchar :
all in range of 0xFDD0-0xFDEF
0xFFFE and 0x
0x1FFFE and 0x1
0x2FFFE and 0x2
and so on, up to
0x10FFFE and 0x10
Relevant passage from the
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 14:45:52 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 14:36:22 UTC, Vincent wrote:
import std.stdio,std.cstream;
void main(string[] args)
{
int first;
int second;
write (First Number : );
readf ( %s,
13-Nov-2013 13:27, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 11/13/13 12:55 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-13 05:07, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Then how do you figure doing this:
class Streamable { ... }
class Foo : Streamable { ... }
class Bar : Streamable { ... }
string className =
On 11/13/13 10:41 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
13-Nov-2013 13:27, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 11/13/13 12:55 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-13 05:07, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Then how do you figure doing this:
class Streamable { ... }
class Foo : Streamable { ... }
class Bar :
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 18:39:59 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
This wouldn't happen so often if digitalmars.D.learn appeared
at the top of the page.
amen, it is so far down that sometimes i forget about it!
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
