Re: If you had money to place for a bounty, what would you choose?

2013-12-01 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-11-29 20:33, Michel Fortin wrote: If I were Walter, I wouldn't accept it in the state it is currently in. The missing support for the modern runtime makes it look like a gimmick, as the legacy runtime is dead end (Apple is already dropping 32-bit support with new OS X frameworks). And no

Re: GUI libraries

2013-12-01 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-11-30 22:38, Xavier Bigand wrote: Lua script have to be accessible as resources, for the moment we don't know if it will be possible to do the same thing completely in D. The main difficulty is to make the property binding works, it seams feasible but it's not on top on our priorities.

Re: GUI libraries

2013-12-01 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-11-28 21:54, Xavier Bigand wrote: Yep, that the goal, having applications with a real personality. I don't think it's an issue especially when application is full screen and respect pictographs (icons and texts) standards,... Having custom UI can help applications to improve ergonomic w

Re: DIP 45 - approval discussion

2013-12-01 Thread Manu
On 2 December 2013 06:05, Martin Nowak wrote: > On 11/18/2013 06:12 AM, Walter Bright wrote: > >> >> I'm very much against the suggested rewriting of obj files to strip the >> export records :-) >> > > That is only one particular aspect of the DIP. It's not essential and > maybe we'll find a diff

Re: Ehem, ARM

2013-12-01 Thread Joakim
Alright, submitted my first pull request for Android support in druntime: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/681 I'll push all further changes to druntime in my android branch: https://github.com/joakim-noah/druntime/tree/android Hopefully, I can get some subset of D work

Re: DIP 45 - approval discussion

2013-12-01 Thread Martin Nowak
On 11/18/2013 06:12 AM, Walter Bright wrote: I'm very much against the suggested rewriting of obj files to strip the export records :-) Changed http://wiki.dlang.org/?title=DIP45&diff=3201&oldid=3094

Re: DIP 45 - approval discussion

2013-12-01 Thread Martin Nowak
On 11/18/2013 06:12 AM, Walter Bright wrote: I'm very much against the suggested rewriting of obj files to strip the export records :-) That is only one particular aspect of the DIP. It's not essential and maybe we'll find a different solution during implementation. The need to statically lin

Re: DIP 45 - approval discussion

2013-12-01 Thread Martin Nowak
On 11/18/2013 06:13 AM, Walter Bright wrote: Why? dmd is very fast at compiling. I'm not sure what is being saved here. It's not the time argument, but correctly listing all modules that go into the same DLL as additional compilation argument. You can see an earlier proposals of the DIP. h

Re: Need help making minimal bare metal ARM Cortex-M D program

2013-12-01 Thread David Nadlinger
On Saturday, 30 November 2013 at 11:37:25 UTC, Mike wrote: I finally succeeded in doing what I set out to do: Write a simple hello world program for an ARM Cortex-M processor using ONLY D. That's some nice progress indeed! Would you mind transferring your excellent description of the proces

Re: Need help making minimal bare metal ARM Cortex-M D program

2013-12-01 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:35:57 -0800 schrieb Ellery Newcomer : > On 11/24/2013 06:21 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote: > > Am Sun, 24 Nov 2013 14:19:43 +0100 > > schrieb "Mike" : > > > >> On Sunday, 24 November 2013 at 12:53:42 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >>> On Sunday, 24 November 2013 at 12:43:01 UTC, Mike w

Re: Ehem, ARM

2013-12-01 Thread Joakim
On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 at 13:52:17 UTC, Chris wrote: On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 at 11:22:59 UTC, Joakim wrote: What JNI-D stuff have you tried and on what platform, linux/x86? I'll try the shared library approach on Android at some point and report back. If I remember correctly,

Re: Need help making minimal bare metal ARM Cortex-M D program

2013-12-01 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Sun, 01 Dec 2013 09:58:01 +0100 schrieb "Mike" : > I was finally able to build a GDC cross compiler using GCC 4.8.2, > the GDC 4.8 branch, and crosstools-ng 1.19.0. However, I found > the following errors in the instructions located here > (http://gdcproject.org/wiki/Cross%20Compiler/crosst

Re: If you had money to place for a bounty, what would you choose?

2013-12-01 Thread Iain Buclaw
On Dec 1, 2013 8:10 AM, "sclytrack" wrote: > > > Re: If you had money to place for a bounty, what would you choose? > > Official debian packages for gdc, derelict, gtkd, vibed. The gdc packages in Debian are official. :) Regards -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';

Re: Need help making minimal bare metal ARM Cortex-M D program

2013-12-01 Thread Mike
On Sunday, 1 December 2013 at 06:00:08 UTC, Mike wrote: On Sunday, 1 December 2013 at 05:23:19 UTC, Mike wrote: On Sunday, 24 November 2013 at 18:38:19 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: Am Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:18:22 +0100 schrieb "jerro" : It seems languages other than C are disabled for bare metal bu

Re: If you had money to place for a bounty, what would you choose?

2013-12-01 Thread sclytrack
Re: If you had money to place for a bounty, what would you choose? Official debian packages for gdc, derelict, gtkd, vibed.