On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 01:45:48 +0100, Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.ar
wrote:
Walter Bright, el 9 de October a las 17:28 me escribiste:
On 10/9/2014 7:25 AM, Dicebot wrote:
At the same time I don't see what real benefit such runtime options
brings to
the table. This is why in my PR
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 04:46:19 UTC, Sergey wrote:
I try to do in this:
D version: http://pastebin.com/7tGyytDh
Tds file: http://pastebin.com/JCA8XQH0
C version: http://pastebin.com/FWJM4B6X
First I checked the C version.
When I did this:
$ gcc -o connect_mssql connect_mssql.c
I got
On 14/10/14 03:55, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The concept is in D1 for arrays since as long as I've ever used D.
As far as I recall, it was an accidental feature of arrays and perhaps
associative arrays. Might be a bit hard to track down that.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 14/10/14 08:11, Sergey wrote:
Wrong, I need to have:
$ dmd test_tds_connect.d tds.d
You can use rdmd to compile and run an application:
$ rdmd test_tds_connect.d
It will automatically find all (D) dependencies for test_tds_connect
and compile those as well. But you still need to link
On 10/08/2014 11:37 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
Lately, I find myself wondering, if I should add parameterized unit
tests to std.string, because the last few bugs I fixed where not caught
by tests, as the test-data was not good enough. I know random data is
not perfect either, but it would
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 01:36:08 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Templates are absolutely critical for any new system level
programming language for me to even consider it. I had my share
of pain emulating those in plain C and don't want to ever do it
again.
But maybe you don't really do low
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 07:25:59 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
But maybe you don't really do low level programming then? In
which areas of low level programming are templates critical? I
have trouble finding examples where I have used it or seen it
used for anything non-trivial in
On 10/14/2014 1:00 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Templates are not about low level or high level of domain. It is a tool to
reduce code redundancy and simplify maintenance of large code base. I am not
even speaking about algorithms in STL or std.algorithm sense but much more
routine things - common small
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 06:54:42 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 10/08/2014 11:37 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
Lately, I find myself wondering, if I should add parameterized
unit
tests to std.string, because the last few bugs I fixed where
not caught
by tests, as the test-data was not
eles eles...@gzk.dot writes:
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 23:28:05 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 21:50:20 UTC, eles wrote:
Short answer is: yes, you cand write, but you cannot compile.
Wait, what? Do you mean link or maybe load? I don't write Linux
kernel modules, but
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 08:00:21 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
large code base. I am not even speaking about algorithms in STL
or std.algorithm sense but much more routine things - common
small snippets that either get copy-pasted or hidden behind C
macros.
C has macros to compensate for
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:25:56 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
But maybe you don't really do low level programming then? In
which areas of low level programming are templates critical?
in the same areas as other things, like conditional branches, for
example.
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:34:36 +0200
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 14/10/14 08:11, Sergey wrote:
Wrong, I need to have:
$ dmd test_tds_connect.d tds.d
You can use rdmd to compile and run an application:
$ rdmd test_tds_connect.d
It will
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:36:33 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
C has macros
KILL! KILL! KILL! HULK SMASH!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello.
i really really wonder if the following program should ouput what it
outputs:
version = wtf;
string listit(alias mod) () {
foreach (m; __traits(allMembers, mod)) {
pragma(msg, m);
}
return ;
}
enum s = listit!(mixin(__MODULE__));
i see this:
object
wtf
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 06:29:01 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 14/10/14 03:55, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The concept is in D1 for arrays since as long as I've ever
used D.
As far as I recall, it was an accidental feature of arrays and
perhaps associative arrays. Might be a bit hard
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 01:47:10 UTC, Brad Roberts via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 10/13/2014 1:28 PM, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 17:16:40 UTC, Brad Roberts via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 10/13/2014 7:47 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:10:23 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
mkay, mkay, we have an easy solution to sort out non-module symbols:
enum isModuleMember(alias mod, alias id) =
is(typeof(__traits(getMember, mod, id)));
string listit(alias mod) () {
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 09:36:34 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 08:00:21 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
large code base. I am not even speaking about algorithms in
STL or std.algorithm sense but much more routine things -
common small snippets that either get
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 01:48:12 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
fixed some bugs, made default function args to work again and...
GDC is in game again!
sorry, Iain, i'm not ready to make a bugreport. neither i'm sure it
worth the efforts, as GDC will be 2.066
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:04:01 +
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
This is what made me move away from Turbo Pascal back in the day.
If UNIX variants had a Turbo Pascal 7 or Modula-2 compatible
compilers,
I would have stayed in that world for a lot longer.
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 01:48:12 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
next task in the list: make AA variables work.
possible task: make array variables work, supporting all kinds of array
element types.
ask your questions, make your suggestions! i will answer the
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:10:09 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
this was a hard move, as i had to drop all my fpc libraries and start
writing new ones for C.
p.s. transition to D is much easier, as i can use all my C libraries in
D. thanks gods that i didn't
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 11:16:09 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:10:09 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
this was a hard move, as i had to drop all my fpc libraries
and start
writing new ones for C.
p.s. transition to D is
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:24:44 +
Sag Academy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
here c means language or drive?
i never used CP/M for work.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 11:04:03 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Why drop down to C/C++?
It would be like saying you need to drop down to them from D.
Not sure what you meant here. Cocoa+tooling provides a fairly
high level environment. You drop down to C when you need speed or
low level
On 10/14/2014 10:38 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
well quite a nice and big library. You add the benchmark feature, get a
merged into phobos and I will gladly use it to test std.string.
Not sure whether a random testing library belongs into phobos.
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 15:21:32 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On 10/11/2014 7:23 AM, IgorStepanov wrote:
class A
{
int i;
alias i this;
}
class B
{
int i;
alias i this;
}
class C
{
A a;
B b;
alias a this;
alias b this;
}
My preferred solution would be to reject the 2nd alias
declaration
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 11:57:44 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 11:04:03 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Why drop down to C/C++?
It would be like saying you need to drop down to them from D.
Not sure what you meant here. Cocoa+tooling provides a fairly
high
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 11:29:02 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:24:44 +
Sag Academy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
here c means language or drive?
i never used CP/M for work.
Wow. I did use it, but only at school. :)
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 12:17:05 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 10/14/2014 10:38 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
well quite a nice and big library. You add the benchmark
feature, get a
merged into phobos and I will gladly use it to test std.string.
Not sure whether a random testing
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 12:39:37 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Objective-C is a C superset and Swift offers the required
unsafe constructs for the ultimate performance if I really want
to.
My remark was that what should be emphasized is coding in a
more performance aware style, no need to
On Wednesday, 8 October 2014 at 07:52:37 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 October 2014 at 21:59:08 UTC, Peter Alexander
Okay, I think I should go a bit futher with the second version
of the tool.
Things on todo list:
- make tool general enough to work for any GitHub based
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 13:02:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 12:39:37 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Objective-C is a C superset and Swift offers the required
unsafe constructs for the ultimate performance if I really
want to.
My remark was that what
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 23:28:05 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 21:50:20 UTC, eles wrote:
Check out the betterC switch to get away with runtime
A hand here?:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/spgdillzvmnvskyzq...@forum.dlang.org
Just a bunch of links:
http://www.horstpeterhermann.de/ada_related/gems.html
This one reminded me D, with some hints about what could still be
offered:
http://www.adacore.com/adaanswers/gems/ada-gem-7/
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 13:52:24 UTC, eles wrote:
Just a bunch of links:
http://www.horstpeterhermann.de/ada_related/gems.html
This one reminded me D, with some hints about what could still
be offered:
http://www.adacore.com/adaanswers/gems/ada-gem-7/
Hijack, also OT: using C++
eles:
Just a bunch of links:
http://www.horstpeterhermann.de/ada_related/gems.html
This one reminded me D, with some hints about what could still
be offered:
http://www.adacore.com/adaanswers/gems/ada-gem-7/
Two nice ones:
http://www.adacore.com/adaanswers/gems/ada-gem-24/
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 14:56:53 UTC, eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 13:52:24 UTC, eles wrote:
http://ask-beta.slashdot.org/story/14/04/30/1344224/c-and-the-stl-12-years-later-what-do-you-think-now
I've been using it professionally for 15 years now, and if I
observe
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 18:50:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/13/2014 1:53 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
On Saturday, 4 October 2014 at 05:26:52 UTC, eles wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 20:31:42 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 18:00:58 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 15:43:59 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
For the curious, the flight analysis here:
Chris wend...@tcd.ie writes:
iOS/ARM are very important. What's the latest state of affairs? I know
some progress has been made but it has been off my radar for a month
or two now.
The iOS project with LDC has been idle during the windsurfing season
:-). Days are geting shorter so I plan to
Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.768.1413233509.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
I don't know that we need to wait for dfix, but we never remove deprecated
stuff from the language very quickly anyway. So, I expect that it'll be
around
for at least a year
John Colvin wrote in message news:ljjtmnnckwzenvhaw...@forum.dlang.org...
[2] By easily managed I don't mean sed-able, or even tooling-fixable. For
me it pivots on being able to maintain one code-base that will compile
with multiple compiler versions. An example where this fails: @nogc, being
On 10/14/14 11:34 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 18:50:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/13/2014 1:53 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
Am Sun, 12 Oct 2014 12:07:55 +
schrieb Robert burner Schadek rburn...@gmail.com:
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 23:37:42 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I had the same feeling as Jakob about an `Appender` already
in the base class and would have expected a bare bones
abstract class + a
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 16:11:34 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
John Colvin wrote in message
news:ljjtmnnckwzenvhaw...@forum.dlang.org...
[2] By easily managed I don't mean sed-able, or even
tooling-fixable. For me it pivots on being able to maintain
one code-base that will compile with
On 10/14/2014 3:49 AM, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d wrote:
You say I'm focused on impl, but @safe *is* an implementation
certification.
I'm not derailing the thread or talking about process. If Array can't be
certified memory safe, then it can't be marked as @safe. That's really
all there
Am 14.10.2014 um 16:56 schrieb eles:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 13:52:24 UTC, eles wrote:
Just a bunch of links:
http://www.horstpeterhermann.de/ada_related/gems.html
This one reminded me D, with some hints about what could still be
offered:
Am 14.10.2014 um 17:30 schrieb eles:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 14:56:53 UTC, eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 13:52:24 UTC, eles wrote:
http://ask-beta.slashdot.org/story/14/04/30/1344224/c-and-the-stl-12-years-later-what-do-you-think-now
I've been using it professionally for
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 17:59:43 UTC, Brad Roberts via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 10/14/2014 3:49 AM, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d wrote:
You say I'm focused on impl, but @safe *is* an implementation
certification.
I'm not derailing the thread or talking about process. If
Array can't
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 19:49:08 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 14.10.2014 um 17:30 schrieb eles:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 14:56:53 UTC, eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 13:52:24 UTC, eles wrote:
On 09/30/2014 04:48 AM, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Monday, 29 September 2014 at 20:15:06 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Monday, 29 September 2014 at 10:00:27 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Is that all it would take? Do you also need a GC-free standard
library, which seems to be the need of all the others
Am 14.10.2014 um 22:08 schrieb Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 19:49:08 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 14.10.2014 um 17:30 schrieb eles:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 14:56:53 UTC, eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 20:41:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 09/30/2014 04:48 AM, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Monday, 29 September 2014 at 20:15:06 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Monday, 29 September 2014 at 10:00:27 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
Is that all it would take? Do you also need a
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 16:09:31 UTC, Dan Olson wrote:
Chris wend...@tcd.ie writes:
iOS/ARM are very important. What's the latest state of
affairs? I know
some progress has been made but it has been off my radar for a
month
or two now.
The iOS project with LDC has been idle during
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 03:34:06 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
One simple thing we did in Crystal is to allow invoking a
function with named arguments only for arguments that have a
default value. For example:
void foo(int x, int y = 2, int z = 3) { ... }
foo(x, y: 10);
foo(x, y: 10, z:
if code like this worked: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/7ea4eb03f02e
A few reasons why it doesn't:
You have to duplicate the case keyword when declaring case
ranges. Why?
Case ranges are inclusive at both ends of the range, unlike in
foreach. Again, why?
exponential notation (e.g. `2e9`) returns
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 21:29:59 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
You have to duplicate the case keyword when declaring case
ranges. Why?
Case ranges are inclusive at both ends of the range, unlike in
foreach. Again, why?
It comes from writing:
switch(foo) {
case 1:
case 2:
case 3:
On 10/14/14, 2:29 PM, John Colvin wrote:
if code like this worked: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/7ea4eb03f02e
A few reasons why it doesn't:
You have to duplicate the case keyword when declaring case ranges. Why?
Case ranges are inclusive at both ends of the range, unlike in foreach.
Again, why?
On 10/14/2014 3:38 AM, Don wrote:
and then Walter confessed to having done it.
I was threatened with the Comfy Chair. What else could I do?
On 9/29/2014 3:00 AM, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Hi,
recently there is much talk about extending C++ interop in D but it is unclear
to me what that means. Functions and virtual class methods are already callable.
What else is planned in the near future? Exceptions? Support for C++ templates?
(that
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 22:27:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Currently, D supports C++:
* function calling
* name mangling
* namespaces
* templates
* member functions
* single inheritance
* basic types that exist in C++ but not D (like 'long')
Note that there are no plans to support C++
On 10/14/14, 3:53 PM, Meta wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 22:27:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Currently, D supports C++:
* function calling
* name mangling
* namespaces
* templates
* member functions
* single inheritance
* basic types that exist in C++ but not D (like 'long')
Note that
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 23:01:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/14/14, 3:53 PM, Meta wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 22:27:35 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Currently, D supports C++:
* function calling
* name mangling
* namespaces
* templates
* member functions
* single
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 22:27:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 9/29/2014 3:00 AM, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Hi,
recently there is much talk about extending C++ interop in D
but it is unclear
to me what that means. Functions and virtual class methods are
already callable.
What else is
On 10/11/2014 1:34 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Having previously played around with PRNG's (using them, not actually creating
them), I had noticed that you do tend to get surprisingly long runs of one value
missing, or the occasional clustering. I carefully used that knowledge to help
me cheat.
On 10/14/2014 5:40 PM, Szymon Gatner wrote:
I do understand current situation tho I admit I am not aware of the single
inheritance. Does it mean that one can derive in D from a C++ class (don't see
it in the docs)?
It's part of D's COM support.
Yes, it works now:
$ rdmd -L-lsybdb test_tds_connect.d
(If somehow get rid of -L-lsybdb. Maybe add it somewhere in the
code ...?)
I got some data from the server, and it is certainly:
005��... etc.
I've written before transcoding function, and I
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 01:48:58 +
Sergey via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Now it's like:
DBCHAR[255] table_field;
dbbind(dbconn, 1, NTBSTRINGBIND, 0, cast(BYTE*)table_field);
But I need to may be:
ubyte[] ubyte_value = [];
dbbind(dbconn, 1, NTBSTRINGBIND, 0,
Do you mean:
ubyte[] ubyte_value = [];
dbbind(dbconn, 1, NTBSTRINGBIND, 0, cast(ubyte[])ubyte_value);
This error is:
test_tds_connect.d(84): Error: function tds.dbbind
(tds_dblib_dbprocess* dbproc, int column, int vartype, int
varlen, ubyte* varaddr) is not callable using argument types
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 02:37:23 +
Sergey via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Do you mean:
ubyte[] ubyte_value = [];
dbbind(dbconn, 1, NTBSTRINGBIND, 0, cast(ubyte[])ubyte_value);
of course not. cast your DBCHAR array from the first example *after*
you called 'dbbind'.
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 12:33:50 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
This code tell that C is subtype of A and C is subtype of B.
User can use this fact in his code:
void foo(B);
C c = new C;
foo(c); //Ok.
Of course, we shouldn't allow user to cast c to int:
int i = c; //wrong
However, user can
As there was quite some last moment feedback I am giving some
more time for me to research issues a bit and Robert to address
them :)
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 17:59:43 UTC, Brad Roberts via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 10/14/2014 3:49 AM, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d wrote:
You say I'm focused on impl, but @safe *is* an implementation
certification.
I'm not derailing the thread or talking about process. If
Array can't
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 22:06:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
All assert actually does is call a function in druntime. You
can override and insert your own assert handling function, and
have it do as you need. It was deliberately designed that way.
A while ago I have been a looking for a
On 10/14/2014 8:03 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 22:06:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
All assert actually does is call a function in druntime. You can override and
insert your own assert handling function, and have it do as you need. It was
deliberately designed that way.
A
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 01:47:10 UTC, Brad Roberts via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
That's why I asked the question I did. The core question isn't
about what the current implementation is or does but about
where it should end up. Should Array be usable in @safe code.
Well, I think it goes
On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 03:18:31 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
However, the compiler is still going to regard the assert() as
nothrow, so the unwinding from an Exception won't happen until
up stack a throwing function is encountered.
This makes impossible to have non-fatal unittests and
On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 02:54:27 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
As there was quite some last moment feedback I am giving some
more time for me to research issues a bit and Robert to address
them :)
The Pareto Principle could be worth mentioning here. We were 80%
of the way to a quality
On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 02:46:05 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 12:33:50 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
This code tell that C is subtype of A and C is subtype of B.
User can use this fact in his code:
void foo(B);
C c = new C;
foo(c); //Ok.
Of course, we shouldn't allow
Is it possible to write a wrapper for file handles, that is
immutable if we don't plan to swap out the handle and the ref
count is in some external data structure and only accessed
in ctors/dtors of the struct ?
It would look quite a bit like some sort of head immutable,
but with no access to the
Exactly, it's just, sorry... :)
Well, now everything works, thanks!
Now I will test and then will create a convenient wrapper.
On 10/14/2014 5:21 AM, WhatMeWorry wrote:
I have a simple GLFW3 program running in Visual D integrated shell, that
kept aborting at DerelictFLFW3.load() with a failed to load the shared
libraries: glfw3.dll.'
So I found a glfw3.dll somewhere and moved it into the project folder (I
know this is
Which project are you looking at?
Bindings for the Windows API:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings/wiki/WindowsApi
This is a pretty important project, especially for getting more
Windows programmers on board..
thanks for your help
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 13:46:56 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
other than that I'm not sure how to go about this.
I tried replace inout with a C++-style member duplication at
https://github.com/nordlow/phobos/commit/b2a4ca28bf25bf7c6149566d066cbb54118b36b4
Now it instead errors as
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 13:46:56 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
A blunt force solution would be to create a range as
Range!(ReturnType!Array...)(cast(Array!T)this, low, high);
and then do the correct casts in Range.
The ReturnType would be the ReturnType of opIndex of the Range
type
On 10/14/14 5:03 AM, dcrepid wrote:
Which project are you looking at?
Bindings for the Windows API:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings/wiki/WindowsApi
This is a pretty important project, especially for getting more Windows
programmers on board..
thanks for your help
Looks like they
Hello,
According to this:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/lddug4$jgv$1...@digitalmars.com
-betterC should disable support for exception handling. So I
expected dmd to reject the following code:
===
import std.stdio;
int readDieFromFile()
{
auto
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 13:20:50 UTC, eles wrote:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/lddug4$jgv$1...@digitalmars.com
That was just a speculative thread, that stuff isn't implemented.
(And I think that went way too far, IMO betterC should just
remove the mandatory stuff like ModuleInfo and
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:20:49 +
eles via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
What code would fail under -betterC and how?
currently betterC disables module info generation and some module
helper functions generation. that's all. just grep DMD sources for
betterC and
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 13:31:47 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 13:20:50 UTC, eles wrote:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/lddug4$jgv$1...@digitalmars.com
-betterC right now is still an undocumented hack that doesn't
do much.
Thank you.
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 13:06:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
dsource is no longer actively maintained. I don't think anyone
knows how to contact the admin.
I've contacted Brad on a few occasions.
Looks like they are still using dsource for that project,
latest update is 9/7/14.
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 12:51:29 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Could you please give me a code example? I'm not skilled enough
in D to follow this description.
struct Range(T) {
Array!S array;
T opIndex(size_t i) {
return cast(T)array[i];
}
}
struct Array(T) {
Range!(const(T))
the long-term solution is to include the [win32] headers in
druntime
™
Vladimir, thanks for looking at the pull request. It'd be great
if the whole project was moved to GitHub to allow more people to
contribute.
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 19:47:00 UTC, jicman wrote:
Greetings.
Imagine this code,
char[] s = ABCabc;
foreach (char c; s)
{
// how do I convert c to something an Unicode code? ie.
\u.
}
I'd look at the JSON string encoder.
Greetings.
Imagine this code,
char[] s = ABCabc;
foreach (char c; s)
{
// how do I convert c to something an Unicode code? ie. \u.
}
thanks.
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:46:57 +
jicman via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com
wrote:
char[] s = ABCabc;
foreach (char c; s)
{
// how do I convert c to something an Unicode code? ie. \u.
}
string res;
foreach (dchar ch; s) res ~= \\u%04X.format(ch);
//
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 19:49:16 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 19:47:00 UTC, jicman wrote:
Greetings.
Imagine this code,
char[] s = ABCabc;
foreach (char c; s)
{
// how do I convert c to something an Unicode code? ie.
\u.
}
I'd look at the JSON string
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
