Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 1) by ponce: Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png Variant 2:

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On 2015-11-04 03:30, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 3

Re: Release D 2.069.0

V Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:44:40 + Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce napsáno: > On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 01:50:38 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: > > Glad to announce D 2.069.0. > > > > http://dlang.org/download.html > >

[Issue 13244] Wrong code with -inline and foreach/map/all

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13244 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Panteleev --- (In reply to Ola Østtveit from comment #9) > I'm getting this again with dmd 2.069. How do you know it's the same bug? None of the examples that I posted still reproduced. The

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 1) by ponce: Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png Variant 2:

Re: Deprecating Allocating Functions In std.string

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 16:17:29 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote: Looking through the source code of std.string, a lot of the functions that allocate have range based non-allocating alternatives that accomplish the same task. I'm wondering if there is any specific reason to keep the

Re: Preventing implicit conversion

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 19:09:42 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote: On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 14:27:49 UTC, ixid wrote: Is there an elegant way of avoiding implicit conversion to int when you're using shorter types? Only with library solution. Implicit conversions are built into

Re: D 2.068.2 test runner for Android ARM, please test and report results from your Android device

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 17:34:58 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Sunday, 1 November 2015 at 09:50:16 UTC, Joakim wrote: You can build ldc from source yourself using the patches linked. I will soon make available a cross-compiler build of ldc on linux/x86 and write up the process of building

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 01:50:38 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Glad to announce D 2.069.0. This is the first release with a self-hosted dmd compiler and comes with even more rangified phobos functions, std.experimental.allocator, and many other improvements. Thanks and congratulations

[Issue 13244] Wrong code with -inline and foreach/map/all

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13244 Ola Østtveit changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

Re: I have this game engine...

Am Wed, 4 Nov 2015 09:37:46 +1000 schrieb Manu via Digitalmars-d : > On 3 November 2015 at 17:30, Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d > wrote: > > Am Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:16:47 +1000 > > schrieb Manu via Digitalmars-d

Re: Partially instantiated template as argument to alias parameter.

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 23:07:42 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: I think this is a reasonable use case: auto A(R, S)(R a,S b) {return a+b;} auto B(alias f)(){return f(1, 1.0);} void main{writeln(B!(A!int)());} Currently this is doable by moving the parameters that are to be explicitly

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On 2015-11-04 1:30 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 1) by ponce: Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png 1.1

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 17:52:23 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: If host machine is x64 bit windows try setting large address aware bit on the executable (there are tools to do that IRC), would allow it to eat up to ~4 gigs. We're already doing that since quite a while.

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

3

Partially instantiated template as argument to alias parameter.

I think this is a reasonable use case: auto A(R, S)(R a,S b) {return a+b;} auto B(alias f)(){return f(1, 1.0);} void main{writeln(B!(A!int)());}

Re: ARC on Objects not Class Definitions

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 19:33:07 UTC, IbanezDavy wrote: Usually how you allocate the object has very little to do with implementation of the object itself. The question isn't really allocation, but instead when to deallocate. The object itself needs to know it because the object may

Re: Partially instantiated template as argument to alias parameter.

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 23:10:09 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 23:07:42 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: I think this is a reasonable use case: auto A(R, S)(R a,S b) {return a+b;} auto B(alias f)(){return f(1, 1.0);} void main{writeln(B!(A!int)());}

Re: Deprecating Allocating Functions In std.string

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 22:42:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: And why break the code that uses them? They work just fine, and for many programs, the allocation is a non-issue and simply getting a string back rather than a range is more user-friendly. Because there are two functions

Can't call nested template function unless it's anonymous?

/ test.d / // Call alias with a parameter. void callAlias(alias f)() { f(42); } alias Identity(alias X) = X; void main() { int local; // Declare an anonymous function template // which writes to a local. alias a =

Re: Partially instantiated template as argument to alias parameter.

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 23:07:42 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: I think this is a reasonable use case: auto A(R, S)(R a,S b) {return a+b;} auto B(alias f)(){return f(1, 1.0);} void main{writeln(B!(A!int)());} For now I have to explicitly write A like this: template A(R){auto A(S)(R a, S

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On 5 November 2015 at 09:20, Anonymous via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> >> Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: >> >> 1) by ponce: >> >> Variant 1: >>

OS X libphobos2.so

Hi Anyone know when a version of libphobos2.so will be available on OS X? I understand there are issues preventing us having one. -k

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: 3) by anonymous: PNG: http://imgur.com/GX0HUFI SVG: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/4ef7282dfec9ab327084 3 with font tweaks.

[Issue 8693] inconsistent behavior with "is a nested function and cannot be accessed from"

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8693 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: Second CT-Parameter of isRange Predicates

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 10:37:54 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 10:08:04 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 08:37:22 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: Am I the only one who ever writes `int[]` or `Struct[]` in a function signature? Probably

Re: Deprecating Allocating Functions In std.string

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 23:28:09 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote: On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 22:42:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: And why break the code that uses them? They work just fine, and for many programs, the allocation is a non-issue and simply getting a string back rather

Re: Chrome OS folding into Android, Android coming to laptops

On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 13:40:52 UTC, Kagamin wrote: On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 09:06:57 UTC, Joakim wrote: Android and iOS are gunning for laptops next Reincarnation of eeePC? Without the user control. I wouldn't buy such a machine...

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 1) by ponce: Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png Variant 2:

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

3 But can be better :)

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 3

Re: Is dlangui dead?

On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 20:56:22 UTC, thedeemon wrote: On Tuesday, 20 October 2015 at 17:01:19 UTC, karabuta wrote: I hope I am wrong, but dlangui seems to be abandoned for some time after all the hard work that went into it. I really like it since it was easy to setup and get things

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 17:52:23 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: If host machine is x64 bit windows try setting large address aware bit on the executable (there are tools to do that IRC), would allow it to eat up to ~4 gigs. What can we do when it eats up all 4 gigs? (Windows)

Re: Align a variable on the stack.

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 01:14:31 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote: Note that there are two different alignments: to control padding between instances on the stack (arrays) to control padding between members of a struct align(64) //arrays struct foo { align(16) short

Re: Preventing implicit conversion

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 21:22:04 UTC, ixid wrote: On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 19:09:42 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote: On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 14:27:49 UTC, ixid wrote: Is there an elegant way of avoiding implicit conversion to int when you're using shorter types? Only with

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3 2

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, November 04, 2015 10:30:35 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: > > 1) by ponce: > > Variant 1: > https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png > Variant 2: >

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Wednesday, 04 November, 2015 09:49 AM, Martin Nowak wrote: Glad to announce D 2.069.0. http://dlang.org/download.html http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.069.0/ This is the first release with a self-hosted dmd compiler and comes with even more rangified phobos functions,

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On 04/11/15 17:30, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 1) by ponce: Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png Variant 2:

Re: Preventing implicit conversion

On Wednesday, November 04, 2015 21:22:02 ixid via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 19:09:42 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote: > > On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 14:27:49 UTC, ixid wrote: > >> Is there an elegant way of avoiding implicit conversion to int > >> when you're using

Re: OS X libphobos2.so

On 2015-11-05 01:18, Kingsley wrote: Hi Anyone know when a version of libphobos2.so will be available on OS X? No. I understand there are issues preventing us having one. Nothing will happen unless someone fixes those issues. -- /Jacob Carlborg

[Issue 15287] New: Th

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15287 Issue ID: 15287 Summary: Th Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component:

Re: Chrome OS folding into Android, Android coming to laptops

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 23:15:32 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 13:40:52 UTC, Kagamin wrote: On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 09:06:57 UTC, Joakim wrote: Android and iOS are gunning for laptops next Reincarnation of eeePC? Without the user control. I wouldn't

[Issue 12021] VS2012-2013 .vcxproj files don't show in the solution explorer

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12021 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Schuetze --- Turned out that this is caused by an unimplemented method in the automation model, that stops asynchronous loading of the C++ project in some intemediate state. --

looking for sdl2 based application skeleton

It seems to me I saw somewhere the project like this. I don't want to make another one if there is something like that.

iOS LDC 0.16.1 (2.067.1) binaries available

This is another set of binaries and universal libs for the experimental LDC iOS cross-compiler. It is now based on LDC 0.16.1 (2.067.1) and LLVM 3.6.2. https://github.com/smolt/ldc-iphone-dev/releases/tag/ios-0.16.1-151104 Feedback appreciated, especially since iOS support may get into official

Re: Release vibe.d 0.7.26

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 07:41:34 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: http://vibed.org/blog/posts/vibe-release-0.7.26 congrats and thanks! its exciting to see vibe moving so fast

Re: Preventing implicit conversion

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 14:27:49 UTC, ixid wrote: Is there an elegant way of avoiding implicit conversion to int when you're using shorter types? Only with library solution. Implicit conversions are built into language.

Re: Release vibe.d 0.7.26

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:15:31 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote: On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 07:41:34 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: This release compiles on the 2.069.0 (D)DMD frontend. Major changes ... Awesome, thank you ! Absolutely awesome! Thank you all for your hard work on this

ARC on Objects not Class Definitions

I actually asked this on reddit but I figured I'd pose the question here because it seems like a more fitting place for the discussion. I'd actually very much like to see ARC as an alternative to GC in D. I'd literally have no more excuses to use C++ anymore if that was the case. But after

Re: good reasons not to use D?

On Friday, 30 October 2015 at 10:35:03 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: I'm writing a talk for codemesh on the use of D in finance. Sorry - I wrote this in a hurry, and I should have said on my experience of using D in finance (not the whole sector, which is absolutely enormous and very diverse),

Re: should fixedpoint be in phobos? project registry ?

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 12:30:24 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: More generally, does it make sense to have a suggested project registry for those who would like to contribute to Phobos and have the skill to do so but aren't sure what to work on ? Projects could be added after discussion

[Issue 14504] Regex Optimizer doesn't merge equivalent threads.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14504 --- Comment #1 from Guillaume Couture-Levesque --- Any word on getting this fixed? --

[Issue 15285] New: Range-ified functions for std.string

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15285 Issue ID: 15285 Summary: Range-ified functions for std.string Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

Re: Preventing implicit conversion

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 14:27:49 UTC, ixid wrote: Is there an elegant way of avoiding implicit conversion to int when you're using shorter types? Also does this not seem inconsistent: ushort a = ushort.max, b = ushort.max; a += b; // Compiles fine a = a + b; // Error:

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

1.1

Re: d on heise

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 14:20:56 UTC, tester wrote: no killer feature and as interesting as brainfuck Next time, instead of pointing to the changelog, I have to write the article for them. Anyway, better than nothing.

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

None! Sorry to be the negative punt. The current one (on dlang.org) is better. Maybe a play on a flattened version of that would suffice. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:21 PM, yawniek via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 1) by ponce: Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png Variant 2:

[Issue 15285] Range-ified functions for std.string

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15285 --- Comment #1 from Jack Stouffer --- soundexer/soundex being on there is a mistake, sorry. --

d on heise

http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Programmiersprache-D-Compiler-ist-jetzt-selbst-in-D-geschrieben-2869589.html in essence: no killer feature and as interesting as brainfuck -> and they didn't know about the problems with windows after installation

Re: d on heise

On 05/11/15 3:20 AM, tester wrote: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Programmiersprache-D-Compiler-ist-jetzt-selbst-in-D-geschrieben-2869589.html in essence: no killer feature and as interesting as brainfuck -> and they didn't know about the problems with windows after installation

Preventing implicit conversion

Is there an elegant way of avoiding implicit conversion to int when you're using shorter types?

Re: Under 1000 opened bugs for Phobos

On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 23:06:58 UTC, Chris wrote: On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 19:42:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I wrote this: http://wiki.dlang.org/Starting_as_a_Contributor, is it what you need it to be? -- Andrei "Then, github detects the new code and offers assistance

Re: foreach loop

On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:06:00 UTC, Namal wrote: Can you help me out please. Thx. reduce!((x, y) => x + !y)(0, arr).writeln; This would probably be the preferred way, that uses a lambda function (x, y) => x + !y which adds the inverse of the next array value (y) to the total so far

Re: DIP 57: static foreach

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 11:41:59 UTC, Idan Arye wrote: On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 20:28:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/03/2015 03:12 PM, Shammah Chancellor wrote: Ditto. This needs `static continue` and `static break`. Without this functionality, the control flow

Re: Out for the week

On 11/4/15 2:28 AM, rsw0x wrote: On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 00:31:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I'm leaving for http://codedive.pl/en/agenda/ to destroy. Will be out for the week. -- Andrei Is this a conference? Do you know if this will be recorded? Some of these talks looks

Re: DIP 57: static foreach

On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 20:28:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/03/2015 03:12 PM, Shammah Chancellor wrote: Ditto. This needs `static continue` and `static break`. Without this functionality, the control flow in `static foreach` becomes very unwieldy. "continue" and

Re: good reasons not to use D?

On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 23:37:36 UTC, Chris wrote: On Friday, 30 October 2015 at 10:35:03 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: Interesting. Two points suggest that you should use D only for serious programming: "cases where you want to write quick one-off scripts that need to use a bunch of

Re: Help with Concurrency

On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 23:16:59 UTC, bertg wrote: while (true) { writeln("receiving..."); std.concurrency.receive( (string msg) { writeln("conn: received ws message: " ~ msg); } );

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

3, but 2 is a nice concept, too

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:45:08 UTC, ponce wrote: 3 but not with this font! On second thought, I had looked at the SVG not PNG. The font is OK. Don't look at the SVG if you don't have the same font installed.

[Issue 15283] `protected` doesn't work for static members

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15283 --- Comment #1 from Dicebot --- oops, it should be `class A : B` of course --

[Issue 15284] dmd installer hangs when updating installed windows version

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15284 Ivan Kazmenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ga...@mail.ru --- Comment #2

should fixedpoint be in phobos? project registry ?

Point came up in a discussion in the learn group that fixedpoint arithmetic would be quite useful, especially in the financial domain. There does exist a github library for this - it looked reasonably thought-through, but I haven't used it as when I tried it didn't compile with the version of

Re: good reasons not to use D?

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 12:08:19 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: this hardly matters for Java, C++, Python etc because mostly you won't need to use a bunch of different libraries. I meant mostly you won't need to go outside that ecosystem to use a bunch of different libraries whereas with

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On 2015-11-04 11:07, Walter Bright wrote: There's much discussion on that feature on reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3rg17h/d_2069_has_been_released_basic_support_for/ Cool :) -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: d on heise

On 11/4/15 3:20 PM, tester wrote: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Programmiersprache-D-Compiler-ist-jetzt-selbst-in-D-geschrieben-2869589.html in essence: no killer feature and as interesting as brainfuck Was this a comment in the article? I didn't see it. -- Andrei

Deprecating Allocating Functions In std.string

Looking through the source code of std.string, a lot of the functions that allocate have range based non-allocating alternatives that accomplish the same task. I'm wondering if there is any specific reason to keep the allocating versions around? If there are two functions in the same module

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 1) by ponce: Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png Variant 2:

Re: should fixedpoint be in phobos? project registry ?

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 12:30:24 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: Point came up in a discussion in the learn group that fixedpoint arithmetic would be quite useful, especially in the financial domain. There does exist a github library for this - it looked reasonably thought-through, but I

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 15:22:41 UTC, Wyatt wrote: On that note, I like how 1.2 incorporates the colours of the German flag and evokes the moons at the same time, but it ends up being too busy and doesn't draw the eye well, IMO. Hard edges are fine, but the angles don't give me a

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On 11/4/15 2:30 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 3

[Issue 14504] Regex Optimizer doesn't merge equivalent threads.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14504 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Olshansky --- (In reply to Guillaume Couture-Levesque from comment #1) > Any word on getting this fixed? Been exceedingly busy, forgot about this issue. All in all I wanted to complete a big chunk

Re: good reasons not to use D?

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 12:25:31 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: On Friday, 30 October 2015 at 10:35:03 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: I'm writing a talk for codemesh on the use of D in finance. Sorry - I wrote this in a hurry, and I should have said on my experience of using D in finance (not

Re: d on heise

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 16:12:45 UTC, Robert burner Schadek wrote: On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 16:07:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/4/15 3:20 PM, tester wrote: in essence: no killer feature and as interesting as brainfuck Was this a comment in the article? I didn't

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 1) by ponce: Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png Variant 2:

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

3 (PNG)

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: At some level, none of them? 3 gives me the best feeling so far, but I think it could be refined. It's neat how the "D" has heavier weight, but then the "Conf" looks like a

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 01:50:38 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Glad to announce D 2.069.0. http://dlang.org/download.html http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.069.0/ This is the first release with a self-hosted dmd compiler and comes with even more rangified phobos functions,

DConf 2014 T-shirt design

The folks at Sociomantic wanted to take a look at the 2014 T-shirt design. Unfortunately that went with my corporate email archive. Does anyone here have it? Some photos of the actual T-shirt would help as well! -- Andrei

Re: d on heise

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 16:07:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/4/15 3:20 PM, tester wrote: in essence: no killer feature and as interesting as brainfuck Was this a comment in the article? I didn't see it. -- Andrei no, it is the summary of the article by tester

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On 11/4/15 4:07 PM, Adil Baig via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: None! Sorry to be the negative punt. The current one (on dlang.org ) is better. Maybe a play on a flattened version of that would suffice. You meant the D language logo? -- Andrei

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 15:25:04 UTC, Márcio Martins wrote: Are there any plans to release a dmd64.exe? I don't think we can even build one any more. Rainer/Martin?

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 1) by ponce: Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png Variant 2:

Re: should fixedpoint be in phobos? project registry ?

On 11/4/2015 7:35 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote: On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 12:30:24 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: Point came up in a discussion in the learn group that fixedpoint arithmetic would be quite useful, especially in the financial domain. There does exist a github library for this -

Re: DConf 2014 T-shirt design

On 11/4/2015 7:50 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: The folks at Sociomantic wanted to take a look at the 2014 T-shirt design. Unfortunately that went with my corporate email archive. Does anyone here have it? Some photos of the actual T-shirt would help as well! -- Andrei I'd post a picture of

Re: DConf 2014 T-shirt design

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 15:50:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: The folks at Sociomantic wanted to take a look at the 2014 T-shirt design. Unfortunately that went with my corporate email archive. Does anyone here have it? Some photos of the actual T-shirt would help as well! --

Re: Please vote for the DConf logo

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3: 1) by ponce: Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png Variant 2:

Re: Help with Concurrency

On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 23:16:59 UTC, bertg wrote: Running the following code I get 3 different tid's, multiple "sock in" messages printed, but no receives. I am supposed to get a "received!" for each "sock in", but I am getting hung up on "receiving...". [...] while (true)

  1   2   >