Re: Possible bug in std.path?

On Thursday, 19 May 2016 at 03:49:36 UTC, Hugo wrote: mytest "my dir\" Here, your backslash is used to escape the second " character. Error: 'my test"' is not a valid directory path. Here you can see the final string value of the program argument in your program. The correct invocation

Possible bug in std.path?

I am having a problem on Windows with the following code: module mytest; import std.stdio, std.file, std.path; enum EXIT_SUCCESS = 0; enum EXIT_FAILURE = -1; int main(string[] args) { string appdir; switch(args.length-1) { case 0: writeln("You must provide an argument with a

Re: D's Auto Decoding and You

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 22:23:45 UTC, jmh530 wrote: Is this true of all @property functions? No, this is purely a range thing where it's legal to have your front be a public member variable rather than a getter function. Should this be noted in the spec? While somewhat supported in

Re: D's Auto Decoding and You

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 20:10:09 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: At this point, if anyone ever calls front with parens, they're doing it wrong. $ cd ~/dlang/phobos && grep -r "\.front()" * | wc -l 3 Not bad. One is commented out and the other two look intentional.

Re: Why doesn't dlang-bot use the GitHub conventions?

On 19/05/2016 3:06 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2016-05-18 17:05, Daniel Murphy wrote: No, because #99 is a github pull request reference. GitHub uses the same syntax to refer to issues and pull requests. If the syntax works for GitHub I don't see why it can't work for us. No point in

Re: Discuss vulkan erupted, the other auto-generated vulkan binding

On Monday, 16 May 2016 at 12:10:58 UTC, ParticlePeter wrote: This is in respect to announce thread: https://forum.dlang.org/post/mdpjqdkenrnuxvruw...@forum.dlang.org Please let me know if you had the chance to test the functionality as requested in the announce thread. All other question are

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:28:13PM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 5/18/2016 4:17 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > > On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 23:09:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: > > > Now try the square root of 2. Or pi, e, etc. The irrational > > > numbers are, by

Re: Single-Allocation Variable-Sized Array

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 21:28:56 UTC, Nordlöw wrote: What's the preferred way in D to implement single-allocation variable-sized arrays such as /** Single-Allocation Array. */ struct ArrayN { ubyte length; // <= maxLength size room; // allocated length ubyte[0] data; //

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:09:28PM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] > Now try the square root of 2. Or pi, e, etc. The irrational numbers > are, by definition, not representable as a ratio. This is somewhat tangential, but in certain applications it is perfectly possible to

Re: Always false float comparisons

On 5/18/2016 4:17 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 23:09:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Now try the square root of 2. Or pi, e, etc. The irrational numbers are, by definition, not representable as a ratio. Continued fraction? :-) Somehow I don't think gcc is

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 23:09:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Now try the square root of 2. Or pi, e, etc. The irrational numbers are, by definition, not representable as a ratio. Continued fraction? :-)

Re: Always false float comparisons

On 5/18/2016 1:22 PM, deadalnix wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 20:14:22 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 5/18/2016 4:48 AM, deadalnix wrote: Typo: arbitrary precision FP. Meaning some soft float that grows as big as necessary to not lose precision à la BitInt but for floats. 0.10 is not

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 22:06:43 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 21:02:03 UTC, tsbockman wrote: Can you give me a source for this, or at least the name of the relevant op code? (I'm new to x86 assembly.) http://www.mathemainzel.info/files/x86asmref.html#mul

Re: Beta D 2.071.1-b1

On Monday, 16 May 2016 at 20:59:41 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote: On Sunday, 15 May 2016 at 04:40:21 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: First beta for the 2.071.1 point release. A few issues remain to be fixed before the next beta. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta

Re: D's Auto Decoding and You

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 20:10:09 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: At this point, if anyone ever calls front with parens, they're doing it wrong. Is this true of all @property functions? Should this be noted in the spec? Should it be an error? If it shouldn't be an error, is it really such

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 21:49:34 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 20:29:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: I do not understand the tolerance for bad results in scientific, engineering, medical, or finance applications. I don't think anyone has suggested

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 21:02:03 UTC, tsbockman wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 19:53:10 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 19:36:59 UTC, tsbockman wrote: I agree that intrinsics for this would be nice. I doubt that any current D platform is actually computing the

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 20:29:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: I do not understand the tolerance for bad results in scientific, engineering, medical, or finance applications. I don't think anyone has suggested tolerance for bad results in any of those applications. What _has_ been argued

Re: D mentioned and criticized

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 12:02:02 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote: On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 12:00:53 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote: Nim is much more interesting as a D alternative, in the sense that it is a. I give up, kept pressing ENTER while typing a message. Please finish, I have to know

[Issue 15991] std.datetime.StopWatch is not @nogc

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15991 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/41de4f17b71edfe8101a16b696c23ed0ab89fb4c fix issue 15991 - std.datetime.StopWatch is not @nogc

[Issue 15991] std.datetime.StopWatch is not @nogc

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15991 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

Single-Allocation Variable-Sized Array

What's the preferred way in D to implement single-allocation variable-sized arrays such as /** Single-Allocation Array. */ struct ArrayN { ubyte length; // <= maxLength size room; // allocated length ubyte[0] data; // `room` number of bytes follows } where insertion/deletion

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 19:53:10 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 19:36:59 UTC, tsbockman wrote: I agree that intrinsics for this would be nice. I doubt that any current D platform is actually computing the full 128 bit result for every 64 bit multiply though - that

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 19:49:04 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen wrote: That does mention Windows as supported. It is quite old though, the latest github activity is from a year ago. Got it working, thanks a lot!

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 20:41:13 UTC, TheDGuy wrote: C:\Users\Standardbenutzer\Downloads\DUB>dub build Fetching serial-port 1.1.0 (getting selected version)... Placing serial-port 1.1.0 to C:\Users\Standardbenutzer\AppData\Roaming\dub\packages\... Performing "debug" build using dmd for

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 19:49:04 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen wrote: The onyx README seems to suggest it only works for POSIX. Did you try serial-port by any chance: http://code.dlang.org/packages/serial-port That does mention Windows as supported. It is quite old though, the latest github

Re: Always false float comparisons

On 5/18/2016 4:27 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote: The comparison was a 24bit fpu doing runtime work but where some constant input data was calculated with a separate 32bit fpu. The particulars were not ever intended to be relevant to the conversation, except the fact that 2 differently

Re: Discuss vulkan erupted, the other auto-generated vulkan binding

Am Wed, 18 May 2016 18:57:48 + schrieb ParticlePeter : > On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 15:09:50 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: > > On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 13:26:14 UTC, Manuel König wrote: > > > >> I think I will use glfw3 later. I don't know if the original > >> problem

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 19:30:12 UTC, deadalnix wrote: I'm confused as to why the compiler would be using soft floats instead of hard floats. Cross compilation. Ah, looking back on the discussion, I see the comments about cross compilation and soft floats. Making more sense now...

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 20:14:22 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 5/18/2016 4:48 AM, deadalnix wrote: Typo: arbitrary precision FP. Meaning some soft float that grows as big as necessary to not lose precision à la BitInt but for floats. 0.10 is not representable in a binary format

Re: Always false float comparisons

On 5/18/2016 4:48 AM, deadalnix wrote: Typo: arbitrary precision FP. Meaning some soft float that grows as big as necessary to not lose precision à la BitInt but for floats. 0.10 is not representable in a binary format regardless of precision.

Re: D's Auto Decoding and You

On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 17:36:44 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:19:48PM +, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 17:26:59 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > > >However, it's perfectly legal for a front

Re: Suffix tree benchmark

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 19:55:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 5/18/16 3:14 PM, Basile B. wrote: Hey, los douchbagos... I've recently worked on a suffix array (https://github.com/BBasile/iz/blob/master/import/iz/strings.d#L1555) Test for presence are excelent (O1) canFind% of

Re: Small-Size-Optimized Array

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 00:50:53 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: Have a look at tempCString, but it's for internal use only at the moment. Thanks, Vladimir.

Re: Suffix tree benchmark

On 5/18/16 3:14 PM, Basile B. wrote: Hey, los douchbagos... I've recently worked on a suffix array (https://github.com/BBasile/iz/blob/master/import/iz/strings.d#L1555) Test for presence are excelent (O1) canFind% of canFind : 100 SuffixArr1 % of canFind : 2.78019 SuffixArr2 % of

Re: Project: better partition

On 5/18/16 2:48 PM, Xinok wrote: On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 19:27:22 UTC, Xinok wrote: On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 17:31:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: We should take advantage of the improved partition code I discussed at ACCU. Also there's a person on

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 19:36:59 UTC, tsbockman wrote: I agree that intrinsics for this would be nice. I doubt that any current D platform is actually computing the full 128 bit result for every 64 bit multiply though - that would waste both power and performance, for most programs.

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 16:37:48 UTC, TheDGuy wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 16:13:35 UTC, Seb wrote: May I ask why you need to get tango working? It has been deprecated a long time ago and phobos (the standard library) or alternatively other packages on dub have a look of features

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 11:46:37 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 10:25:10 UTC, tsbockman wrote: https://code.dlang.org/packages/checkedint https://dlang.org/phobos/core_checkedint.html Glancing at the checkedInt I really don't see it as being the same as what I'm

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 19:20:20 UTC, jmh530 wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:39:21 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: Do you have a link explaining GCC actually uses such a soft float? I'm confused as to why the compiler would be using soft floats instead of hard floats. Cross

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:39:21 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: Do you have a link explaining GCC actually uses such a soft float? I'm confused as to why the compiler would be using soft floats instead of hard floats.

Suffix tree benchmark

Hey, los douchbagos... I've recently worked on a suffix array (https://github.com/BBasile/iz/blob/master/import/iz/strings.d#L1555) Test for presence are excelent (O1) canFind% of canFind : 100 SuffixArr1 % of canFind : 2.78019 SuffixArr2 % of canFind : 3.15439 runtime AA % of

Re: D performance in Julia microbenchmarks

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 19:00:06 UTC, Carl Vogel wrote: Please let me know if you're interested in this and have any questions or issues. Cool.

D performance in Julia microbenchmarks

Hi -- first-time poster, long-time lurker... On its homepage, the Julia langauge (http://julialang.org) advertises some microbenchmark results to show how competitive it is with C, along with a number of other languages (go, python, JS, R, etc.). These should of course be taken with a big

Re: Discuss vulkan erupted, the other auto-generated vulkan binding

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 15:09:50 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 13:26:14 UTC, Manuel König wrote: I think I will use glfw3 later. I don't know if the original problem of using multiple configurations (xcb, xlib, glfw3, ...) is possible with only dub's internal

Re: Project: better partition

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 19:27:22 UTC, Xinok wrote: On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 17:31:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: We should take advantage of the improved partition code I discussed at ACCU. Also there's a person on

Re: Github names & avatars

On Friday, 13 May 2016 at 17:19:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Actually, given the blatant misogyny frequently on display on this forum, ???

Re: mago-mi: GDB/MI compatible frontend for Mago debugger

On 17/05/2016 17:56, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 13:04:23 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote: Interesting. I was about to ask what was the main advantage over GDB? I reckon it is that Mago can debug executables with the COFF and/or OMF formats, right? (as opposed to GDB's DWARF

Re: DDT 1.0.0 released.

On 18/05/2016 16:54, E.S. Quinn wrote: On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 14:04:04 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote: New DDT release out: dfmt support, performance improvements to semantic operations, more build command customization, fixes. Please see changelog for full list:

Re: Always false float comparisons

On 17.05.2016 21:31, deadalnix wrote: On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 18:08:47 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: Right. Hence, the 80-bit CTFE results have to be converted to the final precision at some point in order to commence the runtime computation. This means that additional rounding happens, which was

Re: Always false float comparisons

I had written and sent this message three days ago, but it seemingly never showed up on the newsgroup. I'm sorry if it seemed that I didn't explain myself, I was operating under the assumption that this message had been made available to you. On 14.05.2016 03:26, Walter Bright wrote: > On

[Issue 16036] std.net.isemail - isEmail reurns "valid: false" for any email with EmailStatusCode.none (default)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16036 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 16036] std.net.isemail - isEmail reurns "valid: false" for any email with EmailStatusCode.none (default)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16036 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/9fd3646ae698b925849ce60d1cbd26fbf2e1fd9f Fix issue 16036 - isEmail returns invalid for any email

Re: Always false float comparisons

On 17.05.2016 23:07, Walter Bright wrote: On 5/17/2016 11:08 AM, Timon Gehr wrote: Right. Hence, the 80-bit CTFE results have to be converted to the final precision at some point in order to commence the runtime computation. This means that additional rounding happens, which was not present in

Re: dxorshift: random number generators from the extended Xorshift family

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 16:12:35 UTC, jmh530 wrote: On Sunday, 15 May 2016 at 23:34:46 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: Wrapper implemented here, together with documentation and tests: https://github.com/WebDrake/dxorshift/pull/1 N.B. I'm sticking with the explicit wrapper, because

Re: Why doesn't dlang-bot use the GitHub conventions?

On 2016-05-18 17:05, Daniel Murphy wrote: No, because #99 is a github pull request reference. GitHub uses the same syntax to refer to issues and pull requests. If the syntax works for GitHub I don't see why it can't work for us. No point in inventing a new syntax when a lot of developers

Re: DDT 1.0.0 released.

Congratulations on the milestone! I've been an admirer (and regular user!) of your work. +1 I hope we get to version 2. A On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > New DDT release out: dfmt support, performance

Re: Why doesn't dlang-bot use the GitHub conventions?

On 2016-05-18 17:32, David Nadlinger wrote: dlang-bot is not related to the Bugzilla integration proper. Martin wrote it to have links back to the respective issues automatically available somewhere on the PR page, but it's a separate tool. I suspected that, not sure how is relevant though.

Re: dxorshift: random number generators from the extended Xorshift family

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 16:12:35 UTC, jmh530 wrote: Thought you might find this interesting: http://news.utexas.edu/2016/05/16/computer-science-advance-could-improve-cybersecurity and reddit discussion:

[Issue 16044] New: __traits(allMembers) returns empty tuple for subpackages

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16044 Issue ID: 16044 Summary: __traits(allMembers) returns empty tuple for subpackages Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 16:13:35 UTC, Seb wrote: May I ask why you need to get tango working? It has been deprecated a long time ago and phobos (the standard library) or alternatively other packages on dub have a look of features :) Okay, it looks like 'onyx' is a library which handles

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 15:42:56 UTC, Joakim wrote: I see, so the fact that both the C++ and D specs say the same thing doesn't matter, and the fact that D also has the const float in your example as single-precision at runtime, contrary to your claims, none of that matters. D doesn't

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 16:13:35 UTC, Seb wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 14:59:52 UTC, TheDGuy wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 14:19:48 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: [1] https://github.com/SiegeLord/Tango-D2/blob/d2port/dub.json#L32 How can i get that line working? May I ask why

[Issue 16043] Wrong line number for closure in -vgc

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16043 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara --- The shown line number is not wrong. The closure environment that is closing variable foo, is allocated at the start of function test() == line 1. The delegate literal at line 4 just refers it.

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 14:59:52 UTC, TheDGuy wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 14:19:48 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: [1] https://github.com/SiegeLord/Tango-D2/blob/d2port/dub.json#L32 How can i get that line working? May I ask why you need to get tango working? It has been deprecated

Re: dxorshift: random number generators from the extended Xorshift family

On Sunday, 15 May 2016 at 23:34:46 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: Wrapper implemented here, together with documentation and tests: https://github.com/WebDrake/dxorshift/pull/1 N.B. I'm sticking with the explicit wrapper, because I want to be really, really certain that what comes out is

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 15:30:42 UTC, Matthias Bentrup wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 14:29:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:27:38 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: And yes, half-precision is only 10 bits. Actually, it turns out that the mantissa is

Re: DDT 1.0.0 released.

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 14:04:04 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote: New DDT release out: dfmt support, performance improvements to semantic operations, more build command customization, fixes. Please see changelog for full list: https://github.com/DDT-IDE/DDT/releases/tag/v1.0.0 Since DDT has

Re: Github names & avatars

On Friday, 13 May 2016 at 21:10:09 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Friday, May 13, 2016 19:53:18 bitwise via Digitalmars-d wrote: May be worth mentioning archiving sites like gmane that seem to love making your stupid questions/statements your #1 google search result. Excellent way to make an

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:27:38 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 11:16:44 UTC, Joakim wrote: Welcome to the wonderful world of C++! :D More seriously, it is well-defined for that implementation, you did not raise the issue of the spec till now. In fact, you

Re: Why doesn't dlang-bot use the GitHub conventions?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 14:27:22 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: Apparently dlang-bot doesn't recognize the GitHub syntax/conventions [1] to link and close issues from pull requests. Instead one have to use "Fix issue ...". I don't see a point in inventing new conventions for this. Can we

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 14:29:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:27:38 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: And yes, half-precision is only 10 bits. Actually, it turns out that the mantissa is 11 bits. So it clearly plays louder than other floats. ;-) The

Re: Discuss vulkan erupted, the other auto-generated vulkan binding

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 13:26:14 UTC, Manuel König wrote: I think I will use glfw3 later. I don't know if the original problem of using multiple configurations (xcb, xlib, glfw3, ...) is possible with only dub's internal logic. I tried putting this in my "vulkantest" packages' dub.json

Interest in Paris area D meetups?

I got inspired by Steven's thread :) Anyone in Paris interested in D meetups? Feel free to add yourself to the map: https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1euIpoA6stFHlmIk1m9qbVHwP_64

Re: Why doesn't dlang-bot use the GitHub conventions?

On 19/05/2016 12:27 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: Apparently dlang-bot doesn't recognize the GitHub syntax/conventions [1] to link and close issues from pull requests. Instead one have to use "Fix issue ...". I don't see a point in inventing new conventions for this. Can we please have dlang-bot

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 18/05/2016 9:01 AM, Martin Nowak wrote: Yes, this https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/7d00095301c4780b41addcfeb50f4743a9a6c5d4/src/dinterpret.d#L3418 is really ugly and complex, but you won't get rid of this inherent complexity. The e2ir code for AssingExp looks almost the same

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 14:19:48 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: [1] https://github.com/SiegeLord/Tango-D2/blob/d2port/dub.json#L32 How can i get that line working?

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 14:19:48 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: Everything in tango/stdc/posix should be ignored when compiling on Windows. Seems like this line isn't working [1], fore some reason. So what should i do? Delete the file?

Re: Command line parsing

On 2016-05-18 03:15, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: I'm not sure what you mean, but if you mean what I think you mean, then just write the parameter list with one parameter per line, and it's no different from a struct. I always end up with a struct or class any way to store the arguments,

[Issue 16043] New: Wrong line number for closure in -vgc

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16043 Issue ID: 16043 Summary: Wrong line number for closure in -vgc Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:27:38 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: And yes, half-precision is only 10 bits. Actually, it turns out that the mantissa is 11 bits. So it clearly plays louder than other floats. ;-)

Why doesn't dlang-bot use the GitHub conventions?

Apparently dlang-bot doesn't recognize the GitHub syntax/conventions [1] to link and close issues from pull requests. Instead one have to use "Fix issue ...". I don't see a point in inventing new conventions for this. Can we please have dlang-bot recognize the GitHub syntax as well? [1]

Re: Beta D 2.071.1-b1

On Sunday, 15 May 2016 at 04:40:21 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: First beta for the 2.071.1 point release. A few issues remain to be fixed before the next beta. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.071.1.html Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On 2016-05-18 14:32, TheDGuy wrote: Okay, now i get this: Performing "debug" build using dmd for x86. tango ~master: building configuration "static"... tango\sys\win32\WsaSock.d(31,14): Warning: instead of C-style syntax, use D-style syntax 'char[WSADESCRIPTION_LEN + 1] szDescription'

Re: My ACCU 2016 keynote video available online

On 18 May 2016 1:25 PM, "Bill Hicks via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 09:34:53 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: >> >> >> As a South African, I can only say that you are talking nonsense regarding the horse/zebra joke. If you've been

Re: Potential issue with DMD where the template constrains are not evaluated early enough to prevent type recursion

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:02:13 UTC, Hara Kenji wrote: On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 21:48:55 UTC, Georgi D wrote: On Friday, 13 May 2016 at 23:31:00 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: On 13.05.2016 23:21, Georgi D wrote: [...] It's tricky. The reason it fails to compile is that the template

Re: Github names & avatars

On 05/13/2016 01:19 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Actually, given the blatant misogyny frequently on display on this forum, Don't claim things that inflammatory when they obviously aren't true.

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:39:21 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: Do you have a link explaining GCC actually uses such a soft float? For example https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/fold-const.c#L20 still says "This file should be rewritten to use an arbitrary precision..."

Re: Discuss vulkan erupted, the other auto-generated vulkan binding

On, 18 May 2016 04:51:10 +, ParticlePeter wrote: > > > > Sounds reasonable, picking a subconfig is definitely easier to > > use and implement. I was looking into that too, the only > > nitpicking I have is that it sounded like you can't select > > multiple

Re: Always false float comparisons

Am Wed, 18 May 2016 11:48:49 + schrieb deadalnix : > On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 11:11:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: > > On 5/18/2016 3:15 AM, deadalnix wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 08:21:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: > >>> Trying to make D behave exactly

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:25:47 UTC, John Colvin wrote: http://code.dlang.org/download Okay, now i get this: Performing "debug" build using dmd for x86. tango ~master: building configuration "static"... tango\sys\win32\WsaSock.d(31,14): Warning: instead of C-style syntax, use D-style

Re: import("dir/file") does not work

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:20:14 UTC, Andrew Chamberlain wrote: Thank you! It looks like it's not yet included into recent DMD beta available for download. in nightly perhaps ? https://dlang.org/download.html#dmd-nightly the latest beta is always for a "point" release so it only

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

Oh it looks like Dub is a program i have to install ^^

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:24:06 UTC, TheDGuy wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 03:15:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: That should get your library. Thanks for your answer. I tried that on my windows console and i got the error that the command 'dub' can't be found.

Re: Always false float comparisons

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 11:16:44 UTC, Joakim wrote: Welcome to the wonderful world of C++! :D More seriously, it is well-defined for that implementation, you did not raise the issue of the spec till now. In fact, you seemed not to care what the specs say. Eh? All C/C++ compilers I

Re: Compile Tango for DMD2 - Any instructions how to do it?

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 03:15:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: That should get your library. Thanks for your answer. I tried that on my windows console and i got the error that the command 'dub' can't be found. If i try: 'dub.json build' it just opens the dub.json file in my default .json

Re: import("dir/file") does not work

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 12:16:47 UTC, Andrew Chamberlain wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 11:58:46 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 06:47:08 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 05:11:51 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: [...] That was a bug that

Re: import("dir/file") does not work

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 11:58:46 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 06:47:08 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 05:11:51 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: [...] That was a bug that was recently fixed. Atila Thank you! It looks like it's not yet

[Issue 15959] core.sys.windows modules should be modified for x64

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15959 --- Comment #6 from j...@red.email.ne.jp --- Aand MORE: https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1575 About SIZE_T's, I did the same routine (detect and replace). They are much less than above. --

Re: Potential issue with DMD where the template constrains are not evaluated early enough to prevent type recursion

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 21:48:55 UTC, Georgi D wrote: On Friday, 13 May 2016 at 23:31:00 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: On 13.05.2016 23:21, Georgi D wrote: [...] It's tricky. The reason it fails to compile is that the template argument you are passing does not actually refer to the overload

  1   2   >