Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 17:44:15 UTC, Guillaume Boucher wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 16:52:22 UTC, Sebastien Alaiwan wrote: Checked exceptions allow a lot more precision about what types of exceptions a function can throw. I totally agree that this is a problem with D right now. This

[Issue 17560] Enhancement: view and copy full code example for offline compile/play

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17560 greensunn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC|

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 02:19:56 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote: I think I'll write a DIP for this after my honours thesis. Initial draft https://github.com/thewilsonator/DIPs/blob/Attributes/DIPs/DIP_attributes.md Don't expect much from me until 4th of July.

Re: Go 1.9

On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 02:38:31 UTC, bachmeier wrote: I'll post here after updating and testing the embedr package. Great. I'll give it a go again when it's ready.

Re: Go 1.9

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:20:02 UTC, jmh530 wrote: [...] I might make another effort on this after work if I have time. I think this will be fairly easily handled within the embedr R package. I should be able to put R.lib inside the package. R knows where to find R.dll. The only thing

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 18:47:18 UTC, Random D user wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:17:26 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: 1) Add the opposite attributes: `impure`, `throws`, `@gc`, etc. 2) Add the module version thing that changes defaults on request 3) imagine more potential going forward

Re: dlang website design

On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 19:19:20 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote: class TOTO ...I think that trying to make the website very appealing to inexperienced programmers as well could significantly broaden its user base. Although I am admittedly an LOB kind of person who cares little for games or

Re: Phobos PR in need of review/merge

Another PR that somebody in IRC mentioned: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5004 This one hasn't had any response for awhile either.

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:17:26 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: // next gen D module version(3.0) foo.bar; // opt in here void whatever() {} // now @safe by default That's a really good idea.

Phobos PR in need of review/merge

Recently, a pull request was closed out of frustration by the submitter: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5309 I have asked them to re-submit the PR[1] in question so we can try to get it through. It's a mostly trivial change that could do with some eyes, comments, and most importantly,

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 00:29:53 UTC, crimaniak wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 19:31:53 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: And the good *way* to achieve this result would be the following: - When visiting `startFoo`, the compiler automatically aggregates all different exceptions it may throw

Re: isImplictlyConvertible for Variadic Templates

On 06/27/2017 02:59 AM, rpeio wrote: struct Foo(V) { this(Vs...)(Vs values) if (eachIsImplictlyConvertible!(T, Vs)) { // do stuff } } This can be accomplished off the top of my head by taking the code from std.traits for "isImplicitlyConvertible" and making the following

Re: DIY checking exceptions

On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 00:10:32 UTC, jag wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 21:53:57 UTC, John Colvin wrote: I wonder what could be done with something like this: void foo(int a) { if (a > 0) throw new BlahException("blah"); throw new BloopException("bloop"); } unittest {

isImplictlyConvertible for Variadic Templates

I was wondering whether there was a method built into phobos for expanding the "isImplictlyConvertible" template to work for variadic templates. To explain what I mean by this, normally "isImplicitlyConvertible(To, From)" checks whether or not a type "From" may implicitly be converted to a

Re: Allocation trace

On Saturday, 24 June 2017 at 22:15:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Hello, does anyone have traces of allocations from real applications? Looking for the sequence of calls to malloc, realloc, and free, e.g.: 0 malloc 128 1 malloc 8192 2 malloc 32 3 free 1 ... Thanks, Andrei On *nix

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 19:31:53 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: And the good *way* to achieve this result would be the following: - When visiting `startFoo`, the compiler automatically aggregates all different exceptions it may throw and stores the resulting set - If `startFoo` is going to

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Sunday, 25 June 2017 at 17:38:14 UTC, mckoder wrote: I am disappointed that D doesn't have checked exceptions. Warning, Google translate is used! (sorry) I fully support mckoder with regard to exceptions. This is a great advantage of Java. I think, the problem with the introduction of

Re: DIY checking exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 21:53:57 UTC, John Colvin wrote: I wonder what could be done with something like this: void foo(int a) { if (a > 0) throw new BlahException("blah"); throw new BloopException("bloop"); } unittest { // NEW FEATURE HERE alias Exceptions =

[Issue 17560] New: Enhancement: view and copy full code example for offline compile/play

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17560 Issue ID: 17560 Summary: Enhancement: view and copy full code example for offline compile/play Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status:

[Issue 12866] Append to std.container.Array of fixed size arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12866 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/7c217521979df28deb23517a90c7a3c9aba970b6 Fix Issue 12866 - concatenating to std.container.array

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 18:47:18 UTC, Random D user wrote: Anyway, I think we could just have a compile time switch for defaults. Imagine having n libraries with pairwise different required defaults used in your application. Say goodbye to combined compilation, hello n separate required

Re: DIY checking exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 21:53:57 UTC, John Colvin wrote: On Sunday, 25 June 2017 at 17:38:14 UTC, mckoder wrote: I am disappointed that D doesn't have checked exceptions. I wonder what could be done with something like this: void foo(int a) { if (a > 0) throw new

DIY checking exceptions

On Sunday, 25 June 2017 at 17:38:14 UTC, mckoder wrote: I am disappointed that D doesn't have checked exceptions. I wonder what could be done with something like this: void foo(int a) { if (a > 0) throw new BlahException("blah"); throw new BloopException("bloop"); } unittest

[Issue 17559] [REG2.073.0] Wrong line number in stack trace

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17559 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Schuetze --- Ok, I can reproduce it with Win64 if I remove the (bad) condition that disallows decreasing line numbers. --

[Issue 17521] -betterC programs should not link in Phobos runtime library by default

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17521 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 17521] -betterC programs should not link in Phobos runtime library by default

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17521 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/85873d9978028a7978121b25a00f6eed66f4f647 -betterC programs should not link in Phobos by default -

[Issue 11881] -betterC switch suffers from bit rot

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11881 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 11881] -betterC switch suffers from bit rot

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11881 --- Comment #20 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/85873d9978028a7978121b25a00f6eed66f4f647 -betterC programs should not link in Phobos by default -

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On 20.06.2017 13:57, Mike Parker wrote: DIP 1009 is titled "Improve Contract Usability". https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1009.md All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should occur in this thread. The review period will end at 11:59 PM ET on July 3 (3:59

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 18:42:24 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 17:44:15 UTC, Guillaume Boucher wrote: Java uses A, Rust/Go use B. C++ uses B to some extend (e.g. in std::experimental::filesystem). The C++17 filesystem api provides two alternatives, the

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 17:50:47 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: I have tried using such Monads in D, but in the end it always ended up being too verbose or too hard to read compared to using exceptions or even simple error codes (with 0 == no error). I haven't tried that yet, tbh. visit is

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 18:31:50 UTC, jag wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 17:43:08 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: Here's the point: with checked exceptions good programmers can write good code. With checked exceptions any programmer is forced to a) annotate every single function with the

[Issue 16992] fromISOString, fromISOExtString, and fromSimpleString do not have examples

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16992 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 15950] Wish: __compressed_import("file.ext");

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 17468] Internal assertion fails during CTFE

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17468 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/e7a0c6bfc97bb8d9634db8def7e9f9904ffb864f fix Issue 17468 - Internal Assertion fails during CTFE

[Issue 17296] EINTR awareness - posix system calls can be interrupted by posix signal

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17296 greensunn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||greensunn...@gmail.com --- Comment

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:17:26 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: 1) Add the opposite attributes: `impure`, `throws`, `@gc`, etc. 2) Add the module version thing that changes defaults on request 3) imagine more potential going forward I dislike doubling the keywords by having a 'not' case for

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 17:44:15 UTC, Guillaume Boucher wrote: Java uses A, Rust/Go use B. C++ uses B to some extend (e.g. in std::experimental::filesystem). The C++17 filesystem api provides two alternatives, the standard filesystem_error exception and an output-paramater for capturing

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 17:43:08 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: Here's the point: with checked exceptions good programmers can write good code. With checked exceptions any programmer is forced to a) annotate every single function with the complete aggregate of the exceptions that may be

Re: D Milestones

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:58:00 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 10:14:08 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote: I think it would be good for all which want to invest their time in learning D to know more about the history and probably the future of D. D frontend written in

[Issue 17559] [REG2.073.0] Wrong line number in stack trace

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17559 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Panteleev --- (In reply to Rainer Schuetze from comment #1) > Works alright on Windows. Linux x64 here. > Anything special in mod.d or can it be omitted? If fun is in the same file

[Issue 17559] [REG2.073.0] Wrong line number in stack trace

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17559 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 17:44:15 UTC, Guillaume Boucher wrote: It is very well possible to use option B in D. The most convenient one is making functions nothrow and use Algebraic!(T, ErrorCode), or, for void functions, have a parameter "ref ErrorCode". If all functions in Phobos would

Re: Zero-cost version-dependent function call at -O0.

On Sunday, 25 June 2017 at 23:02:28 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Sunday, 25 June 2017 at 22:53:07 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote: I meant semantically no call. In the existing language, I think version (or static if) at the usage and definition points both is as good as you're going to get. At

[Issue 11881] -betterC switch suffers from bit rot

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11881 Gary Willoughby changed: What|Removed |Added CC|d...@nomad.so| --

[Issue 8378] /entry:_function is implemented, but undocumented.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8378 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

Re: Zero-cost version-dependent function call at -O0.

On Sunday, 25 June 2017 at 23:02:28 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: That'd be kinda tricky because the arguments would still be liable to be evaluated... Well.. I guess someone might argue that's a mis-feature of my preprocessor example: "foo(i++)" may not do what you want. (So the C code

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 16:52:22 UTC, Sebastien Alaiwan wrote: Checked exceptions allow a lot more precision about what types of exceptions a function can throw. I totally agree that this is a problem with D right now. If you want to catch all errors, how are you supposed to remember what

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 15:40:19 UTC, mckoder wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 15:15:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: No, checked exceptions leads to this (maybe not for you, but for 90% of developers out there): void foo() { functionWithException(); } compiler: foo throws, and

[Issue 11881] -betterC switch suffers from bit rot

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11881 --- Comment #19 from Walter Bright --- (In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #18) > Use `extern(C) int main` to avoid the _d_run_main dependency of the > generated C main wrapper. That's right. If you're writing C code,

[Issue 7841] Better error message for wrong template argument with ref

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7841 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 16:35:51 UTC, jmh530 wrote: Just curious: how are checked exceptions different from setting nothrow as the default? Like you would have to write: void foo() @maythrow { functionWithException(); } So for instance, you could still use your "//shut up compiler"

[Issue 11881] -betterC switch suffers from bit rot

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11881 --- Comment #18 from Martin Nowak --- Use `extern(C) int main` to avoid the _d_run_main dependency of the generated C main wrapper. --

[Issue 17361] latest windows 10 insider preview and dmd no longer runs.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17361 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 16:51:06 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 16:10:01 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: Yes, please do! If we can push this through, D could be in a much, much better place in a few years' time! As long as you don't introduce immutable by default,

Re: dlang website design

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 17:15:50 UTC, bachmeier wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 16:14:32 UTC, Seb wrote: They publish a high-level vision every six months (e.g. https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2017H1) -maybe we should shoot out a short blog post about it in the future, so that it receives

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 16:51:06 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: As long as you don't introduce immutable by default, resulting in datastructures being littered with `mutable`. Yeah, I'm against immutable by default. Also, my nogc, safe, etc by default idea does NOT apply to main() or virtual

Re: dlang website design

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 16:14:32 UTC, Seb wrote: They publish a high-level vision every six months (e.g. https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2017H1) -maybe we should shoot out a short blog post about it in the future, so that it receives more publicity? As I recall, the hope was for

[Issue 17559] New: [REG2.073.0] Wrong line number in stack trace

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17559 Issue ID: 17559 Summary: [REG2.073.0] Wrong line number in stack trace Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: regression

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 16:35:51 UTC, jmh530 wrote: Just curious: how are checked exceptions different from setting nothrow as the default? Like you would have to write: void foo() @maythrow { functionWithException(); } So for instance, you could still use your "//shut up compiler"

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 16:10:01 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:39:30PM +, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:17:26 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > > So here's how I'd do it: > > 1) Add the opposite attributes: `impure`, `throws`, `@gc`,

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 16:10:01 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:39:30PM +, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:17:26 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > > So here's how I'd do it: > > 1) Add the opposite attributes: `impure`, `throws`, `@gc`,

[Issue 17546] Cannot call .stringof on a function symbol if it does not have a no-args overload

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17546 --- Comment #3 from monkeywork...@hotmail.com --- Ah, I forgot all about __traits(identifier). I wonder what the difference is between this and .stringof... Anyway, this should be a good enough workaround for the time being. --

Re: Go 1.9

On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 16:30 +, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d wrote: > […] > I don't know how well dub will handle it as my dub projects never  > get this complicated. I haven't used SCons, but might make sense.  > Reggae is another choice (though I haven't used that either). Although I have been

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 15:15:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: No, checked exceptions leads to this (maybe not for you, but for 90% of developers out there): void foo() { functionWithException(); } compiler: foo throws, and you need to handle or declare the exceptions it throws

Re: Go 1.9

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 13:10:17 UTC, bachmeier wrote: Thanks for giving it a try. I have a feeling that this is a job for Dub, SCons, or more likely, an R package that figures out this stuff. Windows development seems to have more moving parts. An R package on Linux requires adding a

[Issue 13993] visual studio 2010: can't build with vcbuild/builddmd.bat

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13993 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 16993] Documentation for toSimpleString and toString does not explain how they differ

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16993 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Component|dlang.org

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:39:30PM +, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:17:26 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > > > > > So here's how I'd do it: > > > > 1) Add the opposite attributes: `impure`, `throws`, `@gc`, etc. > > 2) Add the module version thing that

[Issue 15646] Unresolved symbols when using m32mscoff with Windows subsystem

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15646 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: dlang website design

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:59:56 UTC, bachmeier wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 11:09:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 10:13:13 UTC, bachmeier wrote: Now we have one, and by my count, the number of posts from Walter and Andrei are zero. Actually, they have one

[Issue 16162] not reachable sites

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16162 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 13598] enum isPublic(alias e) = __traits(getProtection, e) == "public";

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13598 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Issue 13226] Symbol is not accessible when using traits or mixin

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13226 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Panteleev --- *** Issue 13598 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --

[Issue 17546] Cannot call .stringof on a function symbol if it does not have a no-args overload

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17546 --- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer --- (In reply to monkeyworks12 from comment #0) > Currently I am resorting to a hacky workaround by doing > `().stringof[2..$]`. I've found another possible workaround:

[Issue 17546] Cannot call .stringof on a function symbol if it does not have a no-args overload

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17546 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Issue 12327] [IMPLEMENTATION] Target fields in frontend should be private to target.c

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12327 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #0) > There are a number of isXXX fields in mars.h (struct Params). N.B. Today these are in src/ddmd/globals.h. --

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 15:15:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: void foo() { try { functionWithException(); } catch(Exception e) {} // shut up compiler } So it ends up defeating the purpose. The exception is not properly handled, either inside or outside the function. That's

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 15:15:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: No, checked exceptions leads to this (maybe not for you, but for 90% of developers out there): void foo() { functionWithException(); } compiler: foo throws, and you need to handle or declare the exceptions it throws

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On 6/25/17 1:38 PM, mckoder wrote: I am disappointed that D doesn't have checked exceptions. C++ and C# also don't have checked exceptions. Java has checked exceptions. Having programmed extensively in all these languages I can say with confidence that checked exceptions is the most important

Re: Project Highlight: Derelict

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:55:25 UTC, arturg wrote: s/you don't tend find/you don't tend to find/ s/As the D has evolved/As D has evolved/ Thanks!

Re: Checked vs unchecked exceptions

On Sunday, 25 June 2017 at 18:00:46 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote: http://forum.dlang.org/post/ullvxbfqeuztwecxc...@forum.dlang.org As suggested by the post in above link I searched for "Walter checked exceptions". I found a few posts where Walter points to an article written by Bruce Eckel.

[Issue 17519] RedBlackTree doesn't like const/immutable elements

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17519 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/29c7f36df591e3137233460940cdd824a745786c fix issue 17519 - RedBlackTree doesn't like

Re: Project Highlight: Derelict

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:30:13 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: I've just published a wall of text about Derelict. I don't think I've ever written so much about it in one sitting, so it was a fun post to write. As well as (the reminder of how fast time is slipping away aside) a nice walk down

Re: D Milestones

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:58:00 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 10:14:08 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote: I think it would be good for all which want to invest their time in learning D to know more about the history and probably the future of D. D frontend written in

[Issue 7182] Call const or immutable member functions from class invariant

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7182 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Issue 13627] Error: core.stdc.string.memcpy conflicts with core.thread.memcpy

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13627 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:17:26 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: So here's how I'd do it: 1) Add the opposite attributes: `impure`, `throws`, `@gc`, etc. 2) Add the module version thing that changes defaults on request 3) imagine more potential going forward It isn't even hard. And along

Project Highlight: Derelict

I've just published a wall of text about Derelict. I don't think I've ever written so much about it in one sitting, so it was a fun post to write. As well as (the reminder of how fast time is slipping away aside) a nice walk down memory lane. The Blog:

[Issue 16462] mixin template ddoc doesn't appear in docs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16462 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

Re: range of ranges into one range?

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 06:19:07 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: Perhaps? http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm_iteration.html#.joiner Thank you.

Re: What are the unused but useful feature you know in D?

On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 04:31:33 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: Yes, the wrong defaults were a historical accident. One that we could fix, even without breaking any code. Of course, breaking some code to change it would be fairly straightforward to fix for authors, and could even be done

[Issue 13335] Add rotateTail to std.algorithm and formally define sameHead

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13335 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3

[Issue 15504] core.demangle uses exception handling for normal control flow

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15504 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 17202] std.functional: partialRight

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17202 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P5

[Issue 10728] A combination of implicit conversion and lambda call cannot be compiled

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10728 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Issue 13153] dlang.org: provide version-specific documentation of the language and stdlib

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13153 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 15810] Store historical docs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15810 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

Re: past.code123.org new service for sharing D code.

On Saturday, 24 June 2017 at 12:59:50 UTC, Suliman wrote: Sorry! Domain should be not `past` `but` `paste` http://paste.code123.org/ version 0.2 split-view support: http://paste.code123.org/86fc5ded-90e1 P.S. WIP

[Issue 9567] "Symbol Undefined" linker error after separating project part into library

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9567 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

  1   2   >