> I'm pretty sure Timothee based his patch onto LLDB/LLVM trunk.
indeed, see instructions here:
https://github.com/timotheecour/dtools/blob/master/dtools/lldbdplugin.d
> Seems like they prefer a shared library and not rewriting it in C++ [1].
indeed, I would not support something that requires
On 2018-03-08 16:03:57 +, Adam D. Ruppe said:
How are you accessing it? If it is by pointer only passing it to
methods, you can simply:
struct my_cpp_struct;
and define functions:
extern(C)
void foo(my_cpp_struct* arg);
Hi, :-/ seems I was a bit confused by all the backs and forth on
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 05:56:50 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
And given how many embedded toolchains are out there, I doubt
we can ever cover many of them beforehand. We could probably
put out a tutorial for some popular toolchain, but first we
need to get it completely working, which AFAIK
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 06:13:01 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 03:09:16 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
[...]
I have a tutorial for raspberry py cross compilation from
windows. It is on german but Google translator does give you a
good English translation.
An all-D MySQL/MariaDB client library:
https://github.com/mysql-d/mysql-native
==
Tagged bugfix release, 'v2.2.1'.
Full changelog:
https://github.com/mysql-d/mysql-native/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
This fixes a pretty big regression (for vibe.d users) from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18575
--- Comment #1 from Walter Bright ---
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7989
--
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 03:09:16 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
hi all,
I think the D community should make more effort to make Dlang
more easier to use on embedded Linux(mostly are arm and mips,
powerpc).
currently, LDC seems to be more complete, but we can only see a
hundred words on the
On Friday, March 09, 2018 03:16:03 Taylor Hillegeist via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> I wasn't so much asking about auto-decoding in particular more
> about the mentality and methods of breaking changes.
>
> In a way any change to the compiler is a breaking change when it
> comes to the configuration.
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 03:09:16 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
hi all,
I think the D community should make more effort to make Dlang
more easier to use on embedded Linux(mostly are arm and mips,
powerpc).
currently, LDC seems to be more complete, but we can only see a
hundred words on the
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 05:34:31 UTC, bauss wrote:
Lmao I love Reddit.
The D hate has moved onto a new level.
Instead of hating on D, it's now geared towards the amount of
upvotes a D post on reddit gets.
What an amusement.
To be fair, some things get posted to /r/programming that
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 16:24:22 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/8/18 11:14 AM, bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 15:09:07 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
The point of a pool is to avoid some costly setup. In my
case, I'm not even closing the connection because I feel the
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 21:19:25 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Reposting here from the main newsgroup:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/82xyu6/advent_of_d_learning_d_with_advent_of_code/
Ali
Lmao I love Reddit.
The D hate has moved onto a new level.
Instead of hating on D,
On 09/03/2018 4:09 PM, dangbinghoo wrote:
hi all,
I think the D community should make more effort to make Dlang more
easier to use on embedded Linux(mostly are arm and mips, powerpc).
currently, LDC seems to be more complete, but we can only see a hundred
words on the wiki about the
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 22:56:27 UTC, Henrik wrote:
why do I have to put the @nogc on the constructor and
destructor separately?
You can make things slightly better by putting @nogc in the
struct itself:
struct S
{
@nogc:
void member1()
{
}
void member2()
{
}
}
But,
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 17:14:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2018 16:34:11 Guillaume Piolat via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 13:24:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 07, 2018 12:53:16 Guillaume Piolat via
>
> Digitalmars-d
hi all,
I think the D community should make more effort to make Dlang
more easier to use on embedded Linux(mostly are arm and mips,
powerpc).
currently, LDC seems to be more complete, but we can only see a
hundred words on the wiki about the cross-compiling for arm.
I'm working in a
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 01:22:15 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I would like to know if this can be improved to support the
following:
* binary assignment operators (e.g. +=)
* unary assignment operators (e.g. ++)
* @safe, @nogc, and -betterC compatible
* at least as good code generation as
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 14:34:53 UTC, bauss wrote:
Would there be a reason why this wouldn't be a good
implementation?
If so what and how could it be improved?
Are there flaws in an implementation like this?
[... snip ...]
I am very interested in this as a potential alternative to
On 03/08/2018 05:31 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/8/18 1:00 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
But are we CERTAIN that's all there is to it? I have a non-reduced
situation right now where outputting the address of a class reveals a
non-null address, and yet
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 17:35:11 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:14:16AM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
Yeah, the only reason autodecoding survived in the beginning
was because Andrei (wrongly) thought that a Unicode code
I read where shared classes have not been implemented yet. So I'm
using
just a struct e below: But the output below is showing that
sharing is
not happening between Struct in main() and the various spawned
threads.
I'm I doing something wrong?
creating queue in EventBuffer constructor
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 22:02:17 UTC, sarn wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 12:49:40 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
If you know enough D maybe you can implement your own virtual
functions on top of D structs. It seems no one has made it yet.
When I wrote Xanthe a year ago, I rolled my
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 09:35:08 UTC, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 07:54:29 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 07:20:53 UTC, Radu wrote:
This guys says that vide.d works
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/gikoeutmdyvolfshp...@forum.dlang.org
Yes,
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 22:16:50 UTC, aberba wrote:
Why is there NVG* everything? That's code noise.
It is a fork and port from a C codebase.
Fairly little of that is used in the public api though.
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 03:55:35 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/arsd
nanovega.d
[...]
Why is there NVG* everything? That's code noise.
Anyways, its well documented.
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 04:37:08 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
Nice! I was thinking about something almost exactly like this
recently since 2.079.0 has features to further decouple the
language from the runtime. It would be nice to read a blog
post about this technique.
Mike
I didn't
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 19:24:43 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 03:55:35 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/arsd
nanovega.d
[...]
AMAZING! I think this will revolutionize how we do GUI and
rendering in D, especially nogc. You can make really
On 2018-03-08 17:24:32 +, kinke said:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 17:03:18 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Using Dub and pretty simple setup, that links in 3 C/C++ static
libraries, I get these linker errors:
libyogacore.lib(Yoga.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
__imp_fmodf
Reposting here from the main newsgroup:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/82xyu6/advent_of_d_learning_d_with_advent_of_code/
Ali
On 3/8/18 2:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/8/18 1:56 PM, Markus wrote:
I tested dmd (2.079.0), gdc and ldc2. All got the same result. Which
makes me think, that it's not a bug, but a "feature" :)
This is DEFINITELY a bug.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18582
-Steve
On 03/07/2018 09:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> The post does not appear on the /r/programming page, so it has been
> flagged as spam.
On the first page right now.
Ali
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18582
Issue ID: 18582
Summary: C++ namespace mangling from multiple modules doesn't
use sequence ids
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 21:35:06 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 18:09 +, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I wrote a blog post about working on Advent of Code in D. You
can read it here:
http://jordi.inversethought.com/blog/advent-of-d/
Another blog
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18581
Issue ID: 18581
Summary: Segmentation fault with dmd -X if static foreach
inside template
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Mac OS X
Status:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18581
Ali Ak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
--
Am 08.03.2018 um 10:15 schrieb Sueko:
On Monday, 15 January 2018 at 11:15:41 UTC, Brian wrote:
zoujiaqing@Brian-XPS MINGW64 /d/Projects
$ dub init serializable -v
Using dub registry url 'https://code.dlang.org/'
Refreshing local packages (refresh existing: true)...
Looking for local package map
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 03:55:35 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/arsd
nanovega.d
[...]
AMAZING! I think this will revolutionize how we do GUI and
rendering in D, especially nogc. You can make really cool effects
and renders very quickly.
Got some cool project
On 3/8/18 1:56 PM, Markus wrote:
You are right.
$ dmd -c main.d
$ nm main.o | grep some
U _ZN4ns_a13some_functionEPN4ns_a7class_aE
$ nm lib.o | grep some
T _ZN4ns_a13some_functionEPNS_7class_aE
But when i merge the main.d and other.d I get
$ nm main.o | grep
On 3/8/18 1:56 PM, Markus wrote:
I tested dmd (2.079.0), gdc and ldc2. All got the same result. Which
makes me think, that it's not a bug, but a "feature" :)
This is DEFINITELY a bug.
-Steve
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 18:56:04 UTC, Markus wrote:
I tested dmd (2.079.0), gdc and ldc2. All got the same result.
Which makes me think, that it's not a bug, but a "feature" :)
C++ mangling is part of the DMD front-end shared by all 3
compilers, so no surprises there:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 17:04:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/8/18 11:35 AM, Markus wrote:
When I do this locally on my mac, I get a similar error. When I
nm the main.o file vs. the lib.o file, I see different mangled
names.
It appears that the D mangled name is not doing back
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 15:16:14 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Is is just me or did this release just break the latest
non-beta vibe.d? Is the Jenkins build testing the dub packages
on master instead of the latest tag?
Also this offer still stands
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 18:11:47 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
Only glib (http://gtk-d.dpldocs.info/glib.html) seems to be
broken / missing.
Yeah, the index broke for some reason. But the files are there:
http://gtk-d.dpldocs.info/glib.ArrayG.ArrayG.html
and once you get inside you can navigate
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 22:37:21 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.8. The
highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.078.3.
Thanks for the efforts.
On 08-03-18 02:27, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
GtkD is a D wrapper to the GTK library. It has plenty of doc comments
attached... but they are in a special GTK syntax and all the cross
references refer to C structs and functions instead of to D classes and
methods.
Well, adrdox got some special-case
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 21:12:30 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
D just doesn't follow semver. If it did, we would have D79 now,
nothing else even comes close to this. And I suspect it won't
adopt semver because major number would be so ridiculously high
and will advertize something else.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18580
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18580
--- Comment #3 from Jack Stouffer ---
(In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #2)
> Ah, the title gave what you were trying to do. I missed that. I'm not sure
> that I agree that it should work though, since it's unsafe and
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 17:06:05 UTC, Marc wrote:
How do I define the callback so that it can be used in
RegisterWaitForSingleObject()?
I've tried pass as argument:
myFunc
myFunc.ptr
none worked. Here's my code:
[...]
Function call:
[...]
Error:
[...]
Solved! I shall rather
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18580
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis ---
Ah, the title gave what you were trying to do. I missed that. I'm not sure that
I agree that it should work though, since it's unsafe and arguably should look
that way, which is
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18580
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:14:16AM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Thursday, March 08, 2018 16:34:11 Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
[...]
> > I'd agree with you, hate the special casing. However it seems to
> > me this has been debated to death already, and
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 17:03:18 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Using Dub and pretty simple setup, that links in 3 C/C++ static
libraries, I get these linker errors:
libyogacore.lib(Yoga.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external
symbol __imp_fmodf referenced in function "void __cdecl
On Thursday, March 08, 2018 16:34:11 Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 13:24:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 07, 2018 12:53:16 Guillaume Piolat via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 06:00:30 UTC,
On 2018-03-08 14:51, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
You need to go all to the way to the top level by clicking the topmost
link on the left nav:
http://dwt.dpldocs.info/org.html
http://dwt.dpldocs.info/java.html
Aha, I see.
* No inheritance chain
* No implemented interfaces
They are in the
How do I define the callback so that it can be used in
RegisterWaitForSingleObject()?
I've tried pass as argument:
myFunc
myFunc.ptr
none worked. Here's my code:
extern (C) void OnExited(void* context, BOOLEAN isTimeOut);
extern(Windows):
BOOL RegisterWaitForSingleObject(
On 3/8/18 11:35 AM, Markus wrote:
error:
main.o: In function `_Dmain':
main.d:(.text._Dmain[_Dmain]+0xa): undefined reference to
`ns_a::some_function(ns_a::class_a*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Error: linker exited with status 1
symbols:
nm --demangle libissue.so |
Using Dub and pretty simple setup, that links in 3 C/C++ static
libraries, I get these linker errors:
libyogacore.lib(Yoga.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
__imp_fmodf referenced in function "void __cdecl
YGRoundToPixelGrid(struct YGNode * const,float,float,float)"
On 3/8/18 11:23 AM, Markus wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 15:27:31 UTC, Markus wrote:
Hi
I got the following c++ code [lib.cpp]:
namespace ns_a
{
class class_a {
};
void some_function(class_a*) {;}
}
and the following d code [main.d]:
extern (C++, namespace_a) {
class class_a
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 16:19:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/8/18 10:27 AM, Markus wrote:
Hi
I got the following c++ code [lib.cpp]:
namespace ns_a
{
class class_a {
};
void some_function(class_a*) {;}
}
and the following d code [main.d]:
extern (C++, namespace_a) {
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 13:24:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, March 07, 2018 12:53:16 Guillaume Piolat via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 06:00:30 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
> That way the breaking change was easily fixable, and the
> mistakes of the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18580
Issue ID: 18580
Summary: std.conv.to!(ubyte[])(void[]) should work
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 15:27:31 UTC, Markus wrote:
Hi
I got the following c++ code [lib.cpp]:
namespace ns_a
{
class class_a {
};
void some_function(class_a*) {;}
}
and the following d code [main.d]:
extern (C++, namespace_a) {
class class_a {}
void some_function(class_a);
On 3/8/18 11:14 AM, bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 15:09:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The point of a pool is to avoid some costly setup. In my case, I'm not
even closing the connection because I feel the "cost" of allocating a
connection from the heap isn't worth worrying
On 3/8/18 10:27 AM, Markus wrote:
Hi
I got the following c++ code [lib.cpp]:
namespace ns_a
{
class class_a {
};
void some_function(class_a*) {;}
}
and the following d code [main.d]:
extern (C++, namespace_a) {
did you mean ns_a?
-Steve
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 15:09:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The point of a pool is to avoid some costly setup. In my case,
I'm not even closing the connection because I feel the "cost"
of allocating a connection from the heap isn't worth worrying
about. But I also limit the pool so
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 15:51:53 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
I have a pretty complex struct with C++ typed private members
etc. in it which I want to use from D.
How are you accessing it? If it is by pointer only passing it to
methods, you can simply:
struct my_cpp_struct;
and define
Just sharing this resource here
https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01724997
might be of interest to some
this is just a proposal clearly
I have a pretty complex struct with C++ typed private members etc. in
it which I want to use from D.
Obviously I don't want to/can't rebuild the struct definiton in D and I
don't need access to all the members just some simple C API ones are
enough.
How can I get access to this struct from
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 16:29:33 UTC, Seb wrote:
Well, I tried that already:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5513
In short: very easy to do, but not much interest at the time.
No. The main problem with that (and the idea of using a compiler
flag in general) is that it affects the
Hi
I got the following c++ code [lib.cpp]:
namespace ns_a
{
class class_a {
};
void some_function(class_a*) {;}
}
and the following d code [main.d]:
extern (C++, namespace_a) {
class class_a {}
void some_function(class_a);
}
void main() {
namespace_a.class_a instance_a;
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 09:01:55 UTC, Vino wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 13:50:28 UTC, Vino wrote:
[...]
Hi All,
On further analysis, as to why the function deleteAgedDir is
not getting executed, found that if this function finds a
folder to be deleted then it should delete the
On 3/8/18 9:58 AM, joe wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 10:57:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Here's something I wrote up on const:
/snip
May be not entirely related, but a little gotcha.
given:
interface XY {}
class Foo: XY {}
class Bar: XY {}
void doSomething(in XY sth)
{
auto foo =
On 3/8/18 6:57 AM, bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 06:49:52 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)
wrote:
On 03/07/2018 02:32 PM, bauss wrote:
Wait why has it been updated to array() ? So it's not a real range
anymore? Or was it always represented as an array behind the scenes?
I just
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 10:57:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Here's something I wrote up on const:
/snip
May be not entirely related, but a little gotcha.
given:
interface XY {}
class Foo: XY {}
class Bar: XY {}
void doSomething(in XY sth)
{
auto foo = cast(Foo)sth; // error in @safe
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 21:39:09 UTC, Apocalypto wrote:
Are there any tutorials about D in vscode?
Which are the minimal plugins to install to have code
completion, syntax highlighting and code formatting?
Are there any app templates that i can invoke to not start
every project from
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 13:33:32 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
Sonke figured out just a few hours ago, and I confirmed, that
#170 is caused by a bug in MySQLPool.lockConnection introduced
in v2.1.0. I plan to have that fixed with a new release today.
That bug turned out to be
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 20:19:33 UTC, Dennis wrote:
I'd still like to find a nice way to generate the boilerplate
code for dynamic loading, if I come up with something I'll post
it here.
So I ended up using an import library for a while, but I then
wanted to get the handle of the DLL,
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 08:25:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
* It doesn't seem to be possible to navigate between the top
level packages, i.e. "java" and "org"
You need to go all to the way to the top level by clicking the
topmost link on the left nav:
http://dwt.dpldocs.info/org.html
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18579
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/de376769790ddd5cd7c2bc38dcfa4a765685ef67
Fix Issue 18579 - Fix digits grouping in formatValue()
On 03/08/2018 06:57 AM, bauss wrote:
But if you can't store the pools anywhere, how are you supposed to use
them with vibe.d?
You can store the pools wherever you need to, just don't hold onto a
Connection past the end of a vibe task.
Creating a new pool for every thread seems expensive
On Monday, 29 January 2018 at 11:04:19 UTC, Seb wrote:
Just giving this a different title as I'm having troubles finding
this topic.
https://github.com/wilzbach/d-bootstrap
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 22:02:17 UTC, sarn wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 12:49:40 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
If you know enough D maybe you can implement your own virtual
functions on top of D structs. It seems no one has made it yet.
When I wrote Xanthe a year ago, I rolled my
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 13:26:06 UTC, Alex wrote:
From this point of view, size_t is not fixed, but capable to
point to any place in memory.
Therefore, pointer of any type have by definition exactly the
defined size of size_t.
Thank you,I thougth that pointer aliasing wasn't allowed.
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 06:49:52 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/07/2018 02:32 PM, bauss wrote:
Wait why has it been updated to array() ? So it's not a real
range anymore? Or was it always represented as an array behind
the scenes?
I just feel like allocating it into an
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 22:51:10 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
And api documentation for the new version!
http://diamond.dpldocs.info/v2.7.0/index.html
Thanks for updating it!
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 01:38:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 22:37:36 UTC, bauss
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 01:46:26 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 19:40:12 UTC, Stephan wrote:
Hello fellow Dlers,
thanks to last years DConf some German D developers agreed to
meet for drinks in Hamburg.
What time?
TL;DR
6 pm!
Sorry for the late reply. Since I will
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16037
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16037
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/4b93ddef41508453c6e83b11e62f97ae870c8c98
fix Issue 16037 - assigning delegate to a scope variable
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18571
Seb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greensunn...@gmail.com
---
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 09:28:02 UTC, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 08:07:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
I built out LDC on Alpine using the v1.8.0 LDC release. It's
available now through Docker Hub and Github.
Docker:
On 3/8/18 1:00 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/08/2018 12:05 AM, ketmar wrote:
Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
I'm having trouble finding the documentation for what exactly the
unary "not" operator does when applied to a class/interface object.
Does this documentation exist
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18571
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
The DIP process is on again. I'll be publishing a blog post soon
describing the changes and their motivation. In the meantime, the
primary candidate to become DIP 1013 [1] needs a good going over
for the Draft Review to shake out any structural or technical
issues. Please see the new Procedure
On 3/8/18 3:29 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 07/03/18 17:11, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Well, you could do it with templates, but obviously that is less
desirable:
void func2(Args...)(Args args) if(is(typeof(func(args { return
func(args); }
I never understood why anyone would use "is"
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 08:04:54 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
Interesting. I was using vibe.d 'v0.8.3-rc.1' (which doesn't
appear to work on run.dlang.io). But it does seem to work for
me if I use 'v0.8.3-alpha.1'.
I wonder what could have changed to result in this?
It's a
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 09:17:53 UTC, IM wrote:
This is great, thanks!
Any plans to make it link with gtk3 instead of 2? I remember
gtk2 had issues with HiDPI support.
DWT is a port of the Java library SWT. This particular version,
3.4, of SWT only supports GTK2. Later versions of SWT
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 07:54:29 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 07:20:53 UTC, Radu wrote:
This guys says that vide.d works
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/gikoeutmdyvolfshp...@forum.dlang.org
Yes, it's pretty straightforward:
1. Build on Ubuntu, or some other
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18577
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 08:07:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 06:49:07 UTC, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 17:58:25 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[snip]
What is the exact error? Maybe report it here:
https://github.com/lindt/docker-dmd/issues/1
I built out LDC
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo