On 04/24/2018 02:43 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
This reminds me of Nick Sabalausky's rant once that back in the 80's we
used to run programs on 64KB RAM and 8kHz CPUs, and lived with the slow
performance, and nowadays we have GB's of RAM and multicore GHz CPUs,
and we are finally able to write web app
On 04/24/2018 10:30 AM, Thomas Brix Larsen wrote:
I'd recommend dqml[1] or full Qt using Calypso[2] instead of QtE5. I'm
currently using dqml in a project and it is working out great.
Why not QtE5? I've been meaning to give it a try.
On 04/24/2018 08:29 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
like I did a wysiwyg editor for work that is a redistributable
server exe they run locally, but the ui is in a browser. You get better
results on firefox than chrome due to a bunch of little things.)
Yea, Chrome is kind of notorious for random break
On 04/23/2018 11:46 PM, Nerve wrote:
The user DOES NOT CARE how easy it is
for you to maintain your codebase.
That needs to be painted on every wall, and etched into every computer,
and tattooed onto every forehead, at every developer workspace in the world.
On 04/24/2018 08:44 AM, Uknown wrote:
Even on linux, back in the day, GTK apps looked out of place on
QT systems and vice versa.
That's still true even now, albeit maybe not to the same extent (that
is, until you try to save/open a file...).
We REALLY need a lib that provides the GTK API/ABI
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18795
Stomping the stack is important for detecting certain kinds of dangling
reference bugs (shouldn't be possible in @safe code), but also for cryptographic
code that aims to prevent a function from leaking any information to its caller:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/whatyouc.pdf
This sh
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 20:44:12 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:18:55PM +, Basile B. via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 18:53:02 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Yesterday afternoon I ran into a performance issue in one of
> my D projects, and thought, "we
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 20:18:55 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
[snip]
In the report you forgot to mention that the bug is only
visible with -O -profile.
With just -O the provided test case works fine.
I ran the test case on run.dlang.org with -O and it happens.
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 18:43:54 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
This reminds me of Nick Sabalausky's rant once that back in the
80's we used to run programs on 64KB RAM and 8kHz CPUs, and
lived with the slow performance, and nowadays we have GB's of
RAM and multicore GHz CPUs, and we are finally
On 04/24/2018 08:53 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Yesterday afternoon I ran into a performance issue in one of my D
projects, and thought, "well, it's simple, just compile with -profile,
identify the hotspot, optimize". Unfortunately, doing that triggered a
latent codegen bug in -O that randomly causes
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:18:55PM +, Basile B. via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 18:53:02 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Yesterday afternoon I ran into a performance issue in one of my D
> > projects, and thought, "well, it's simple, just compile with
> > -profile, identify t
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 18:53:02 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Yesterday afternoon I ran into a performance issue in one of my
D projects, and thought, "well, it's simple, just compile with
-profile, identify the hotspot, optimize". Unfortunately,
doing that triggered a latent codegen bug in -O
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 18:53:02 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[snip]
That's definitely weird. Problem seems to go away with a static
array. Seems somehow related to impl[0]. Re-writing that as
*impl.ptr and breaking apart some of the logic might help narrow
down the issue.
bool method(int
Yesterday afternoon I ran into a performance issue in one of my D
projects, and thought, "well, it's simple, just compile with -profile,
identify the hotspot, optimize". Unfortunately, doing that triggered a
latent codegen bug in -O that randomly causes runtime segfaults,
basically halting all pro
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:13:46PM +, TheGag96 via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> Uknown's point about Moore's Law, I think, is the one we should be
> paying attention to. A while back, I saw a talk by Jonathan Blow
> called "Making Game Programming Less Terrible"[1], and lately it's
> been on my
On Monday, 23 April 2018 at 06:12:33 UTC, TheGag96 wrote:
Heya guys. For my projects that use a GUI library, I've tried
both tkd and DlangUI. Both I feel have their drawbacks, and I'd
like to know if any of you are using anything you find better.
In my case, my ideal choice would be:
- Nice b
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 14:30:07 UTC, Thomas Brix Larsen
wrote:
I'd recommend dqml[1] or full Qt using Calypso[2] instead of
QtE5. I'm currently using dqml in a project and it is working
out great.
Awesome, thank you! I'll keep that in mind!
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 13:08:24 UTC, Chr
On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 16:39:27 Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 April 2018 at 12:40:44 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > 2. Somewhere, it should state that the goal is for the typical
> > deprecation cycle for a symbol to last approximately two years
> > and that the
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 07:05:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1013 is titled "The Deprecation Process".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/d8f6bfa1810c9774bd7d3b3dc6a7a6776ed5e17e/DIPs/DIP1013.md
It's good to have this formalized as relying on authoritative
review on a per-case basis doesn'
On Wednesday, 18 April 2018 at 12:40:44 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
2. Somewhere, it should state that the goal is for the typical
deprecation cycle for a symbol to last approximately two years
and that the number of releases was picked on the assumption
that we would have approximately 5 - 6
On Monday, 23 April 2018 at 06:12:33 UTC, TheGag96 wrote:
Heya guys. For my projects that use a GUI library, I've tried
both tkd and DlangUI. Both I feel have their drawbacks, and I'd
like to know if any of you are using anything you find better.
In my case, my ideal choice would be:
- Nice b
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 12:29:04 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 10:30:21 UTC, Chris wrote:
- cross platform: no need to deploy libs (e.g. Gtk on Mac and
Windows)
Well... that depends. If you can just use the browser already
installed, yeah, but then you have to de
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 12:44:59 UTC, Uknown wrote:
I forgot to mention consistency. This is the biggest reason I
don't use non native apps. I'm not talking about your app being
consistent across operating systems. I'm referring to being
consistent with programs on the current system. E
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 11:15:43 UTC, Uknown wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 10:30:21 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Monday, 23 April 2018 at 14:38:44 UTC, TheGag96 wrote:
That's definitely what I'm trying to avoid... I feel those
kinds of interfaces are 99% of the time mega bloated for what
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 10:30:21 UTC, Chris wrote:
- cross platform: no need to deploy libs (e.g. Gtk on Mac and
Windows)
Well... that depends. If you can just use the browser already
installed, yeah, but then you have to deal with cross-browser
(which is still a thing, like I did a wysi
Am Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:02:18 +
schrieb Seb :
> I agree that the current Bugzilla instance is suboptimal for
> collaboration.
>
> FYI: there's already a DLang Trello board, but it wasn't actively
> used:
>
> https://trello.com/b/XoFjxiqG/active
> https://trello.com/b/jGdlx9vZ/backlog
>
> G
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 10:30:21 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Monday, 23 April 2018 at 14:38:44 UTC, TheGag96 wrote:
That's definitely what I'm trying to avoid... I feel those
kinds of interfaces are 99% of the time mega bloated for what
they are. Discord is the only one that seemed big enough
On Monday, 23 April 2018 at 14:38:44 UTC, TheGag96 wrote:
That's definitely what I'm trying to avoid... I feel those
kinds of interfaces are 99% of the time mega bloated for what
they are. Discord is the only one that seemed big enough for
the britches of an entire browser instance. Absolute
On Sunday, 15 April 2018 at 22:52:47 UTC, Giles Bathgate wrote:
Hi,
I wanted a way to lazily insert a value into an associative
array, and I am proposing a new function called getOrAdd in
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/2162
Yes please :)
Just one question: does this work for value-
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 07:15:38 UTC, Dave wrote:
On Sunday, 28 January 2018 at 16:02:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> The problem is Teoh that learning a language in Vim or a
> IDE are two totally different things.
vim is a fantastic tool but it can be time consuming to
configure. So I
On Sunday, 28 January 2018 at 16:02:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> The problem is Teoh that learning a language in Vim or a IDE
> are two totally different things.
vim is a fantastic tool but it can be time consuming to
configure. So I am wondering if some vim-D users would kindly
share th
32 matches
Mail list logo
