On 3/23/17 4:21 PM, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 23 March 2017 at 16:14:03 UTC, xtreak wrote:
On Thursday, 23 March 2017 at 12:34:13 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 March 2017 at 15:20:03 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 March 2017 at 16:12:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Fresh from
On 3/19/17 5:16 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
Every few years I do a little test to see how much effort it takes to
get the ioquake3 [1] codebase set up in a way that I can replace bits of
it with D implementations and compile it all together. Not because I
plan to port the whole thing, but I'm
On 2/24/17 11:02 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://dconf.org/2017/registration.html
Don't forget, it goes up to $400 after Monday.
What do we do if we purchased three pass via EventBrite? I didn't see
anywhere to set name/company info...
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
import
Somebody did some analytics on what languages get used on the weekends
and D made the list.
https://medium.com/@hoffa/the-top-weekend-languages-according-to-githubs-code-6022ea2e33e8#.2jmihhgb2
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
import quiet.dlang.dev;
On 1/25/17 5:22 PM, Lucas wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 January 2017 at 23:00:05 UTC, James Buren wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 January 2017 at 22:37:30 UTC, Lucas wrote:
[...]
Most likely, you are dealing with this issue:
https://github.com/aBothe/Mono-D/issues/648
MonoDevelop 5.x is the latest
On 1/6/17 4:46 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
It's 2017 already - sharpen your pencils and start on a proposal for a
presentation! Time is moving fast!
Just sent mine in!
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
import quiet.dlang.dev;
On 1/3/17 11:55 PM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 07:32:34 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Has anything graduated yet?
No
So at what point well we? I mean that is the point after all...
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
import quiet.dlang.dev;
What are the exit conditions for graduating from std.experimental.* to
std.*?
Has anything graduated yet?
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
import quiet.dlang.dev;
On 1/2/17 12:09 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-01-02 02:34, Adam Wilson wrote:
That was my intention, the knee-jerk reaction that class and interfaces
get here sometimes strikes me as a bit histrionic sometimes. They are a
tool with a use case. :)
I think that the design should try to
On 1/2/17 12:05 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-01-01 17:50, Chris Wright wrote:
Those both limit your ability to use the underlying database to its full
potential. They offer a chance for queries that seem simple and efficient
to become horribly inefficient.
I'm perfectly aware of the
On 1/2/17 8:33 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 17:55:01 -0800, Adam Wilson wrote:
On that I beg to differ. The C libraries are not @safe, they have wildly
different API's, and they have high-complexity, which is a large
risk-factor for bugs and/or security flaws.
If we have the
rikki cattermole wrote:
On 02/01/2017 3:03 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
rikki cattermole wrote:
On 01/01/2017 5:19 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 1 January 2017 at 03:51:52 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Which is fine if all you use is c's sockets or only that database
connection for a thread.
rikki cattermole wrote:
On 01/01/2017 5:19 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 1 January 2017 at 03:51:52 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Which is fine if all you use is c's sockets or only that database
connection for a thread.
The C drivers typically offer handles of some sort (Windows
Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 1 January 2017 at 03:24:31 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
interface(s) to a data-store an essential component of the D Standard
Library.
Eh, I count it as would-be-nice just because it isn't that hard to just
use the C ones, or another third party lib; it doesn't have
Chris Wright wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 19:24:31 -0800, Adam Wilson wrote:
My idea: Split the data storage systems out by category of data-store.
For example:
- SQL: std.database.sql (PostgreSQL, MySQL, MSSQL, etc.)
This is doable; SQL is an ANSI and ISO standard, and it strongly
Chris Wright wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 10:29:28 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-01-01 04:24, Adam Wilson wrote:
My idea: Each data store has it's own implementation with it's own
naming convention. For example (ADO.NET):
- SqlConnection (MSSQL)
- NpgsqlConnection (Npgsql)
Chris Wright wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 19:24:31 -0800, Adam Wilson wrote:
My idea: Each data store has it's own implementation with it's own
naming convention. For example (ADO.NET):
- SqlConnection (MSSQL)
- NpgsqlConnection (Npgsql)
Yes, this means that you have to change
Mark wrote:
On Sunday, 1 January 2017 at 03:24:31 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
2. There are so many different types of data storage systems, how do
you design a system generic enough for all of them?
My answer: You don't. Nobody else has bothered trying, and I believe
that our worry over that
On 12/31/16 7:31 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
We do indeed need a good database abstraction.
But a core requirement for any implementation has yet to be met.
There has to be a standard way for asynchronous sockets. To implement
this we need to take into consideration the event loop that it uses
Hi Everyone,
I've seen a lot of talk on the forums over the past year about the need
for database support in the D Standard Library and I completely agree.
At the end of the day the purpose of any programming language and its
attendant libraries is to allow the developer to solve their
On 12/23/16 8:39 PM, Suliman wrote:
On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 01:15:43 UTC, jkpl wrote:
On Friday, 23 December 2016 at 06:18:02 UTC, Suliman wrote:
I would like to visualize how GC works and display free/not free
memory segments.
How I can understand which of them are used and which
Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/15/2016 12:20 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
https://www.meetup.com/D-Lang-Silicon-Valley/events/236253882/
The slides:
http://files.meetup.com/18234529/The%20Curse%20of%20Knowledge.pptx
The video: http://youtu.be/XjnBMfVTI0k
(There is no audio on the recording until
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-12-12 08:07, Adam Wilson wrote:
On OSX you need to use LDC or the linker will fail.
What linker errors do you get using DMD?
ld: in
Adam Wilson wrote:
Adam Wilson wrote:
rikki cattermole wrote:
On 14/11/2016 9:31 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote:
I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted,
and it
is available everywhere. I despise the license and
Dsby wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 November 2016 at 11:20:10 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
We look forward to sane GC over the years. How do we accelerate the
development of precise GC, RC and so on?
Maybe we should organize a fundraiser on Kickstarter or somewhere else?
I'm not ready to write precise GC,
eugene wrote:
hello everyone,
could you, please, tell do any jobs(full-time or freelance) exist for
junior D developers?
This page might be off assistance. These are all the known corps using
D. Some have hiring links. https://dlang.org/orgs-using-d.html
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Adam Wilson wrote:
rikki cattermole wrote:
On 14/11/2016 9:31 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote:
I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it
is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly,
those
rikki cattermole wrote:
On 14/11/2016 9:31 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote:
I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it
is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly,
those
are not primary
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/12/16 8:15 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Hello DLang,
I wanted to announce that I have completed the bulk of the work on my
Cryptography library for D, SecureD. I was inspired to do this project
by Stan Drapkin and his Inferno.NET project, however, the two projects
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote:
I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it
is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly, those
are not primary concerns when dealing with Cryptograpy libraries.
Well, Apple
Suliman wrote:
It would take some research, but the native Botan library makes heavy
use of C++ templates
There is native lib https://github.com/etcimon/botan
Some people with whom I talked said that botan is too low level for them
and it's hard for them to use it. So your lib maybe very good
Suliman wrote:
Is its possible to make its wrap on botan instead of openssl? Some of
developers have problems with openssl because it's require openssl lib.
But botan is more native but much more lowlevel. So its hard to use.
It might be possible. But it would not be without difficulties. It
Hello DLang,
I wanted to announce that I have completed the bulk of the work on my
Cryptography library for D, SecureD. I was inspired to do this project
by Stan Drapkin and his Inferno.NET project, however, the two projects
NOT compatible.
GitHub: https://github.com/LightBender/SecureD
ketmar wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:13:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 12:04:34 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 06:19:08 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
I've yet to see a large desktop app relying on GC that does not feel
sluggish.
i've yet to
Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 13:39:19 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I just read elsewhere that a GSoC student is working to achieve the
goal of making the GC swappable and adding Reiner's precise scanning
GC. I consider this to be essential work, I hope we can get this
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei posted this on another thread. I felt it deserved its own thread.
It's very important.
-
I go to conferences. Train and consult at large companies. Dozens every
year, cumulatively thousands
On 3/24/2016 23:06, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 18:58:56 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
[snip]
Interestingly enough, there is a GSoC candidate this year that is
proposing a project that would make the D GC precise.
There was already a GSOC project to make the GC precise by
On 3/24/2016 11:25, Temtaime wrote:
Hi !
I have an app with large amount of math, so there's lot of arrays with
floats.
I found that sometimes my app starts to eat memory and then it crash.
The problem i think is false pointers. For example i have a struct with
pointers and static array of
Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 18.03.2016 22:04, Jeremy deHaan wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 16:41:21 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 15.03.2016 02:34, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
[...]
Being always way behind reading the forum these days, I'm a little
late and have not read all the messages in
Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
I haven't had power for a couple of days, but it looks like the
discussion has gone along pretty ok. After reading everything, I think
I'm inclined to agree with Adam and the main focus of my proposal will
be a precise GC (or as precise as we can get). I'll definitely need
thedeemon wrote:
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 01:38:50 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Lastly, Rainer seemed to think a precise GC could be done, and he then
went and did it ... so "can't reasonably have a precise collector" is
a factually incorrect assertion.
IIRC, Rainer called it "mostly precise",
deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 13 March 2016 at 23:34:44 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Is there an implementation of a conservative moving (compacting) GC
out there? I'm not aware of one, but there are a lot of GC's out
there. Boehm isn't.
That is impossible, you need to know what is and isn't a
Chris Wright wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:34:44 -0700, Adam Wilson wrote:
Is this a debate about precise vs. non-precise GC or are we just
bikeshedding about terminology and technical details?
You made a large number of assertions about garbage collection and they
were almost all wrong.
Chris Wright wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:43:37 -0700, Adam Wilson wrote:
A "partially moving" GC does not exist, as far as I know.
Yep, it's a Bad Idea.
It's not a standard term. Google's only seeing about four references to
the term, none of them authoritative or definitive. Since it's
Chris Wright wrote:
On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:23:35 -0800, Adam Wilson wrote:
To start off, let's talk terminology. You seem to be using nonstandard
terminology and possibly misunderstanding standard terminology.
A GC scan is the mark phase of a mark/sweep collector (and specifically
the part
Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
On Saturday, 12 March 2016 at 08:50:06 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
If I may make a suggestion. The lock free work is unlikely to require
the entirety of GSoC. And the precise GC is the next most important
thing on your list and will have the biggest impact on GC performance.
Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Thank you all for the feedback.
I think I might still need a little more feedback as to what the project
should actually entail, but here's what it's looking like so far:
Implement lock free allocation using std.experimental.allocator's
freelists (SharedFreeList? It was
Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Hey all,
I'm trying to think of good project ideas for this years GSoC, and one
in particular I thought would be a great was working on and improving
the GC. I'm not sure what the scope of this project would be like, but
at the moment I am thinking writing a generational
PLEASE! For the sake of everything that is good and right in this world,
let this be a thing!
I don't even care about the drop-downs. This is categorically superior
to the current site in every relevant way.
Clean, modern, user-friendly, and mobile-friendly design. Easily
accessible to both
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:13:31 -0700, Etienne etci...@gmail.com wrote:
It's finally here: https://github.com/etcimon/libasync
We all know how event loops are the foundation of more popular libraries
Qt and Nodejs.. we now have a natively compiling async library entirely
written in D.
This
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:12:01 -0700, Kapps opantm2+s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 05:40:29 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Yes, performance is not a goal, because we are intentionally not
targeting scenarios where that is the first concern. I understand that
a lot of people want
On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 09:03:37 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (please find and vote quickly)
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/486540487080554496
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/881134858566863
Hi Walter and Andrei,
I just wanted to let you know that I have found new employment. As my new
employer has no current or planned work in anything related to my
open-source work with D, I will be able to legally continue development on
Aurora and my other projects in D without any change
On Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:57:34 -0700, Adam Wilson flybo...@gmail.com wrote:
And now I look like a complete idiot for hitting the wrong button!
*embarrassed*
--
Adam Wilson
GitHub/IRC: LightBender
Aurora Project Coordinator
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 15:01:22 -0700, Robert Schadek via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 06/30/2014 07:29 AM, Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:57:22 -0700, Suliman everm...@live.ru wrote:
Post screenshots please...
Sadly I don't have anything
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 23:08:51 -0700, Charles charles.hoskin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there a native D crypto library like Crypto++?
No. And for good reason. Building a cryptography library is an extremely
dificult proposition. Even after you've completed the build, you still
face a trust
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 05:33:06 -0700, Etienne etci...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2014-06-29 3:19 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Botan isn't as battle-tested as OpenSSL or Crypto++ but it was designed
from the ground up to mitigate or prevent the kind of problems that
OpenSSL is currently experiencing, and was
I just wanted to post a quick update on Aurora. This weekend I got
keyboard input working on Windows and I also fixed a flaw in window
message dispatching that was so heinous I am shocked that the DConf demo
worked at all. That said it should work correctly on all machines now. As
an
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:57:22 -0700, Suliman everm...@live.ru wrote:
Post screenshots please...
Sadly I don't have anything that is visually beyond what I demoed at DConf
so it's still just a blank window. I'm still down in the bowels of
interacting with the operating system and time has
Please consider the following code:
module aurora.immediate.input;
public enum Key : int { //... }
public immutable struct KeyData
{
private Key _key;
@property public Key KeyCode() { return _key; }
private bool _isDown;
@property public bool IsDown() { return
On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:42:07 -0700, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:13:32 -0700
Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Please consider the following code:
module aurora.immediate.input;
public enum Key
On Tue, 27 May 2014 02:24:01 -0700, evilrat evilrat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:27:24 UTC, evilrat wrote:
https://github.com/evilrat666/directx-d
this is it. i think i can't continue on this one anymore, nor do i have
time, nor passion. i've made a lot of work and
Hi everyone,
I have a small procedural question regarding pull requests against
druntime's operating system interfaces. Specifically I may find it quite
useful to add Windows API function calls and types to the
core.sys.windows.windows file.
Should I pull them as needed or bunch them up
On Mon, 26 May 2014 21:20:09 -0700, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 5/26/2014 8:14 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
As needed, as small as possible.
Right. The smaller they are, the easier they are to review.
Done. I look forward to some easy stats karma then. ;-)
--
Adam
Hi Kenji,
My name is Adam Wilson. I am working on the Aurora Project for D and I was
wondering if I could interest you in a bug that is giving me quite a lot
of trouble. The problem is around how static if is parsed. Specifically,
if you have two static if blocks that both evaluate to
On Mon, 05 May 2014 19:20:45 -0700, Lionello Lunesu
lione...@lunesu.remove.com wrote:
Hi all,
After last year's incident with my tires getting slashed, I'm really
hoping I can do without a car during this year's DConf. How feasible is
this?
I'll be staying at Aloft. Would be great if
Hi guys,
I have been beating my head against this wall for a few days and I am
having difficult understanding what's going on here. I am building the
DirectX COM bindings for Aurora and DMD is popping out an Undefined
Identifier error when I use an interface as a member of a struct.
Addendum:
In the module Structs and Interfaces are wrapped with static if blocks in
the following manner:
static if(DX110)
{
//Enumerations
}
static if(DX111) { //...}
static if(DX112) { //...}
static if(DX110)
{
//Structs
}
static if(DX111) { //...}
static if(DX112) {
On Sun, 18 May 2014 17:48:45 -0700, Adam Wilson flybo...@gmail.com wrote:
Addendum:
In the module Structs and Interfaces are wrapped with static if blocks
in the following manner:
static if(DX110)
{
//Enumerations
}
static if(DX111) { //...}
static if(DX112) { //...}
static
On Sun, 18 May 2014 17:48:45 -0700, Adam Wilson flybo...@gmail.com wrote:
Addendum:
In the module Structs and Interfaces are wrapped with static if blocks
in the following manner:
static if(DX110)
{
//Enumerations
}
static if(DX111) { //...}
static if(DX112) { //...}
static
On Sun, 04 May 2014 23:22:27 -0700, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 04/05/14 20:26, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Just had a quick look at the source code.
If this is to be something like the official gfx library wouldn't it
make sense to follow the phobos coding style?
For example struct Size
On Sun, 04 May 2014 23:22:27 -0700, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 04/05/14 20:26, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Just had a quick look at the source code.
If this is to be something like the official gfx library wouldn't it
make sense to follow the phobos coding style?
For example struct Size
On Sun, 04 May 2014 23:22:27 -0700, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 04/05/14 20:26, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Just had a quick look at the source code.
If this is to be something like the official gfx library wouldn't it
make sense to follow the phobos coding style?
For example struct Size
On Sat, 03 May 2014 02:56:37 -0700, Nordlöw per.nord...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any progress on the graphics API Adam Wilson is working on?
Yes. There has been progress. I am currently finishing up the DirectX 11
bindings. For now it will include everything but 3D. I am focusing on
On Thu, 01 May 2014 14:55:05 -0700, brad clawsie b...@b7j0c.org wrote:
Adam, this is very cool!
do you have any examples showing its use? In particular, examples
highlighting D code using AES and SHA libs
thanks!
brad
You're welcome. There are no example yet. And the build script only
Hello Fellow D'ers,
I'd like to announce TitaniumD, a binding for D to the Botan Cryptography
Library. Botan is an open-source cryptography library written in C++11 and
makes extensive use of the C++ Standard Library in it's API. Titanium is a
PIMPL around the Botan API designed to make
I know we don't place much value in TIOBE and it's brethren. However, I
thought that this was a milestone worthy of a note anyways.
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
--
Adam Wilson
GitHub/IRC: LightBender
Aurora Project Coordinator
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:48:43 -0700, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 4/18/2014 3:02 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
Objective-C enables ARC by default for all pointers to Objective-C
objects.
Since virtually all Objective-C APIs deal with Objective-C objects (or
integral
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:56:32 -0700, Adam Wilson flybo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:15:21 -0700, Kapps opantm2+s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 22:45:45 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:35:18 -0700, Alexander Bothe
i...@alexanderbothe.com
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 04:50:51 -0700, Manu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I am convinced that ARC would be acceptable, and I've never heard anyone
suggest any proposal/fantasy/imaginary GC implementation that would be
acceptable...
In complete absence of a path towards an
101 - 180 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
