On Monday, 3 June 2024 at 13:26:54 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
## The DConf '24 Schedule
The DConf '24 schedule is now live:
https://dconf.org/2024/index.html#schedule
You'll notice that we've departed from the norm in a few
places. That's because of the number of submissions we
received.
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 at 11:04:04 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 at 09:08:45 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is there a reason why
```d
class Base {}
class Derived : Base {}
@safe pure nothrow unittest {
Base b;
Derived d;
b = d; // pass
On Tuesday, 20 February 2024 at 10:51:27 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
I'm gonna see if I can put together enough content for a talk
about effective dustmiting. Might have to be a lightning talk
though. 30 minutes is gonna be a challenge to hit with that.
Nevermind, I just went through the
On Tuesday, 20 February 2024 at 03:27:31 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's time to start thinking more seriously about that DConf
talk you've been thinking about submitting: DConf '24 is
tentatively scheduled for September 17 - 20. Symmetry
Investments is again our host and primary sponsor. We'll
On Monday, 22 January 2024 at 08:54:54 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Monday, 22 January 2024 at 08:27:36 UTC, Joel wrote:
```d
import std;
struct Person {
string name, email;
ulong age;
auto withName(string name) { this.name=name; return this; }
auto withEmail(string email) {
On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 15:59:59 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
I remember reading this was an issue and now I ran into it
myself.
```d
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
auto names = [ "foo", "bar", "baz" ];
void delegate()[] dgs;
foreach (name; names)
{
dgs ~= () =>
On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 15:39:07 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
If I make a `scope` variable of the delegate and pass *it* to
`receiveTimeout`, there no longer seems to be any mention of
the closure in the error (given 2.092 or later).
```d
void foo(Thing thing) @nogc
{
void
On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 10:56:58 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
I'm increasingly using nested delegates to partition code.
```d
void foo(Thing thing)
{
void sendThing(const string where, int i)
{
send(thing, where, i);
}
sendThing("bar", 42);
}
```
...
3. Those
On Saturday, 6 January 2024 at 17:57:06 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Friday, 5 January 2024 at 20:41:53 UTC, Noé Falzon wrote:
In fact, how can the template be instantiated at all in the
following example, where no functions can possibly be known at
compile time:
```
auto do_random_map(int
On Saturday, 18 November 2023 at 18:52:07 UTC, JN wrote:
Latest DMD for Windows downloaded from here:
https://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.105.3/dmd-2.105.3.exe reports version as dirty:
DMD64 D Compiler v2.105.3-dirty
Copyright (C) 1999-2023 by The D Language Foundation, All
Rights
On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 00:18:35 UTC, Richard (Rikki)
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
Part of the problem with shared is that it is completely
inverse of what it should be.
It fundamentally does not annotate memory with anything extra
that is useful.
At the CPU level there are no guarantees
On Friday, 22 September 2023 at 17:52:51 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
"Integer representation" here refers to the ANSI index or
Unicode codepoint, ie. the filename must not contain `\x00` to
`\x31`.
Er oops, make that `\x00` to `\x1f`.
On Friday, 22 September 2023 at 17:44:50 UTC, Vino wrote:
Hi All,
Request you help in understanding why the below code is
always returning true when it should return false as per the
documentation.
Documentation
```
filename must not contain any characters whose integer
representation is
On Sunday, 17 September 2023 at 15:55:37 UTC, Vitaliy Fadeev
wrote:
Is it possible to write like this in D?
```d
struct Message
{
ulong timestamp;
}
Message LongMessage
{
ubyte[255] s;
}
//
// it mean
//
// struct LongMessage
// {
// Message _super;
// alias _super this;
//
On Sunday, 17 September 2023 at 15:35:04 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I've begun editing, rendering, and publishing the standalone
videos of the DConf '23 talks. The venue gave us access to all
of their footage this year rather than just a subset of it, and
I'm happy to make use of it.
I've also
On Sunday, 3 September 2023 at 10:11:22 UTC, Vino wrote:
Hi All,
Any update as to when the function described in the below
ticked would be action-ed, I am more interested in isBinary
(check a file whether is is binary file or not)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9455
From,
On Sunday, 3 September 2023 at 07:04:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Saturday, 2 September 2023 at 20:41:33 UTC, Dukc wrote:
Just a while ago I was hit by some sort of a violent ailment.
I first noticed it like an hour ago, and I'm shivering as I
stand in a well-heated house, despite
On Saturday, 2 September 2023 at 20:27:04 UTC, Bonarc wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 August 2023 at 14:19:03 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
When you want to react to ~every keypress in a language server
impl with updated coloring, it starts to be problematic. Think
in terms of "UI feedback" rather than
On Thursday, 31 August 2023 at 05:16:02 UTC, Vino wrote:
Hi All,
Request your help on the below error
Program
```
void main()
{
import std.stdio:writeln;
import std.algorithm.iteration : splitter;
auto splitter_ptr = !((a, b) => a.splitter(b).array);
On Friday, 25 August 2023 at 02:10:25 UTC, harakim wrote:
I'm also curious why a 500ms compile time would be generally
recognized as way too long. Is it because it has potential to
be faster or does it cause some legitimate problem? That's a
question at large, not for Matheus.
When you want
On Tuesday, 22 August 2023 at 16:22:52 UTC, harakim wrote:
On Monday, 21 August 2023 at 11:05:36 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
Can you print some of the wrong sizes? D's DirEntry iteration
code just calls `FindFirstFileW`/`FindNextFileW`, so this
*shouldn't* be a D-specific issue, and it should
On Monday, 21 August 2023 at 07:52:28 UTC, harakim wrote:
I have been doing some backups and I wrote a utility that
determines if files are an exact match. As a shortcut, I check
the file size. So far so good on this with millions of files
until I found something odd: getSize() and DirEntry's
On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 17:59:27 UTC, vino wrote:
Hi All,
Request your help in finding duplicate element without sorting
as per the below example
```
Example:
string[] args = [" test3", "test2 ", " test1 ", " test1 ", " "];
Output Required:
If duplicate element found then print
On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 20:09:28 UTC, Joel wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 16:54:49 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
But does *not* import `std.ascii`! So there's no ambiguity
inside the `sort` string expression between the two `toLower`
functions..
How do I get it to work?
I tried
On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 16:47:36 UTC, Joel wrote:
How come toLower works in the sort quotes, but not in the map?
```d
void main() {
import std;
"EzraTezla"
.to!(char[])
.byCodeUnit
.sort!"a.toLower c.toLower)
.writeln;
}
```
When you pass a string
On Thursday, 13 July 2023 at 11:55:17 UTC, Ki Rill wrote:
Why does the first example `class A` work, but the second one
with `class B` does not?
```D
class A {
immutable int a;
this(in int a) {
this.a = a;
}
}
class B {
immutable int[] b;
this(in int[] b) {
On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 17:15:26 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have a dynamic array of dstrings and I’m spending dstrings to
it. At one point I need to append a zero-length string just to
increase the length of the array by one but I can’t have a slot
containing garbage. I thought about
On Monday, 3 July 2023 at 09:50:20 UTC, Arafel wrote:
Hi!
I am a D user coming from java, rather than from C/C++
(although obviously also have some exposure to them), and thus
apparently one of the few people here who likes OO (within
reason, of course).
So while I appreciate the fact that
On Monday, 3 July 2023 at 09:50:20 UTC, Arafel wrote:
Hi!
I am a D user coming from java, rather than from C/C++
(although obviously also have some exposure to them), and thus
apparently one of the few people here who likes OO (within
reason, of course).
So while I appreciate the fact that
On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 19:05:23 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have code roughly like the following:
dstring str = "name"d;
uint ordinal = (( str in Decls.ordinals ) !is null) ?
Decls.ordinals[ str ] : -1;
struct Decls
{
uint[ dstring] ordinals;
}
//and
On Friday, 23 June 2023 at 18:43:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
It should be a spec change. Change POD to say "type" instead of
"struct".
The goal of `isPOD` is to determine how careful generic code
needs to be to pass the type around, or copy it. Changing it to
false implies that it is
On Friday, 23 June 2023 at 14:22:24 UTC, DLearner wrote:
Hi
Was looking for compile-time detection of a struct variable.
However, the following test code gave the two 'FAILS' shown
below.
Comments?
```
void main() {
import std.stdio : writeln;
import std.traits;
string mxnTst(string
On Sunday, 18 June 2023 at 10:21:16 UTC, IchorDev wrote:
On Sunday, 18 June 2023 at 10:04:14 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
On Sunday, 18 June 2023 at 09:48:40 UTC, IchorDev wrote:
Does anyone understand why this happens?
Is there any way to subvert this behaviour, or is it actually
a bug?
On Sunday, 18 June 2023 at 09:48:40 UTC, IchorDev wrote:
Does anyone understand why this happens?
Is there any way to subvert this behaviour, or is it actually a
bug?
Yes, see also my bug report,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20008
"__traits(allMembers) of packages is complete
On Tuesday, 6 June 2023 at 13:33:00 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Thanks again to everyone who submitted talks for DConf '23, and
congratulations to those who were accepted. We've got what
looks to be another solid lineup this year. Check it out:
https://dconf.org/2023/index.html
And remember,
On Tuesday, 2 May 2023 at 00:34:45 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
This release comes with 11 major changes, including:
- In the standard library, `std.typecons.Rebindable` now
supports all types
Tiny note of warning: `Rebindable` supports all types that it did
not previously support, including
On Sunday, 7 May 2023 at 02:15:02 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 11:13:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
IVY, their organizational development program
Your solution to hearing luas dev saying "I dont manage
anything" and whatever feedback from your survey, is you got
corporate
On Wednesday, 5 April 2023 at 09:19:17 UTC, Alexander Zhirov
wrote:
How to compile the example given in the book correctly? When
compiling, an error occurs that the main function is missing.
If I replace `shared static this()` with `void main()', then
everything starts. What does the
On Wednesday, 8 March 2023 at 10:49:32 UTC, Markus wrote:
So, having no clue about D (just bought some books), I wanted
to ask if nice looking code can become slow, in general. In the
mentioned case it's just that I like the packaging of functions
into some sort of scope (OOP) versus the flat
On Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 09:37:48 UTC, rempas wrote:
Thank you! You are amazing for explaining it! I was so focused
on thinking that I'm doing something wrong with the type that I
didn't noticed that the pointers, points to nowhere so the
function obviously has nowhere to write to.
On Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 09:37:48 UTC, rempas wrote:
Thank you! You are amazing for explaining it! I was so focused
on thinking that I'm doing something wrong with the type that I
didn't noticed that the pointers, points to nowhere so the
function obviously has nowhere to write to.
On Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 08:26:07 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
```d
uint32_t[1] value;
value[0] = screen.black_pixel;
xcb_create_gc(connection, black, win, mask, value.ptr);
```
To expand on this:
```d
uint32_t[2] value;
uint32_t* value_ptr = value.ptr;
// We are allowed to access the
On Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 08:12:05 UTC, rempas wrote:
I'm looking into
[this](https://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.7/doc/libxcb/tutorial/index.html) tutorial to learn XCB and I'm trying to write the code in D with betterC. In the section 9.1 (sorry, I cannot give a section link, the article does
On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 07:11:49 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 06:26:34 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
There have now been three pages produced by three people all
agreeing with each other.
At what point does it start being spam?
Yes, it's all just noise
On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 05:21:44 UTC, forky wrote:
On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 07:04:31 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
...
Having class-private doesn't preclude module-private. Dennis
even submitted a PR implementing class-private, but it stalled
because people couldn't agree on whether
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 02:27:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 02:26:44 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
Wrong. I'm arguing things:
Geez. "I'm arguing 2 things:"
Springboarding off this post:
This thread is vastly dominated by some people who care very much
On Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 21:45:29 UTC, []() {}() wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 21:00:58 UTC, []() {}() wrote:
"Being able to declare a “friend” that is somewhere in some
other file runs against notions of encapsulation." (This is the
motivation for that article it seems).
On Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 04:39:35 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
I am creating a TUI library and I have a class with the
following constant fields:
```
class Label : Renderable {
const string text;
const TextAlignment textAlignment;
const Color color;
this(Dimensions
On Saturday, 29 October 2022 at 10:14:31 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
And now for some good news!
Its almost Halloween, so grab your candy and any spooky brews
you may have, and join us for a ghostly chat!
https://meet.jit.si/Dlang2022OctoberBeerConf
I wish you'd announce the time a bit in
On Sunday, 7 August 2022 at 01:22:18 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
Why we use "chain" while we have "~":
'''D
int[] x=[1,2,3];
int[] y=[4,5,6];
auto z=chain(x,y);
auto j=x~y;
'''
Chain doesn't allocate any memory. This can be useful
occasionally.
On Sunday, 31 July 2022 at 07:43:06 UTC, Salih Dincer wrote:
Why are you using const for strings? After all, they are
protected by immutable. Moreover, since you do not use refs,
copies are taken in every function and also you have created
extra copy for results.
Note sure if I'm
On Wednesday, 4 May 2022 at 16:21:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Mario also mentioned that Mathis Beer is having "the usual
problems" in his work because he is always "in the dark areas
of the D compiler", but they have nothing causing them any
major issues that need immediate attention.
I
On Monday, 4 October 2021 at 22:40:19 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
What is really discourages me that persons like Walter instead
of making D great just do nothing helpful.
This is just uncalled for. I'm sure you can express what you mean
without pointlessly and wrongly insulting the *reason we have
On Wednesday, 29 September 2021 at 10:22:40 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
Or: Turducken 2.0 The Reckoning
https://code.dlang.org/packages/rebindable
https://github.com/FeepingCreature/rebindable
Rebindable offers a proxy type, `rebindable.DeepUnqual`
(`DeepUnqual!T`) that can "stand in" for
Or: Turducken 2.0 The Reckoning
https://code.dlang.org/packages/rebindable
https://github.com/FeepingCreature/rebindable
Rebindable offers a proxy type, `rebindable.DeepUnqual`
(`DeepUnqual!T`) that can "stand in" for `T` in layout, but does
not share `T`'s constructor, destructor, copy
On Wednesday, 25 August 2021 at 12:11:01 UTC, Johann Lermer wrote:
Hi all,
I have a little problem understanding alias this. I always
thought, that alias this only makes implicit conversions from
the aliased object to this. Then, why do lines 18 and 22
compile in the code below? And, btw,
On Saturday, 14 August 2021 at 21:19:25 UTC, kinke wrote:
A new minor version was just released:
* Based on D 2.097.2 (very few fixes over v1.27.0).
* Improved `-ftime-trace` implementation for compiler
profiling/tracing, now excluding LLVM-internal traces, adding
frontend memory tracing,
On Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 15:34:48 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 14:14:27 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
I can just wait for 2.098.1 otherwise though, it's not a big
deal.
Since Nullable is a template type, maybe you can just apply the
patch on your LDC installation's
On Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 13:57:28 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 08:43:59 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 17:21:40 UTC, kinke wrote:
I don't plan to release any LDC v1.27.1 for the very few
minor fixes that made it into v2.097.2 compared to
On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 17:21:40 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 13:06:24 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
Seems to work here too :) Just waiting for ldc now.
I don't plan to release any LDC v1.27.1 for the very few minor
fixes that made it into v2.097.2 compared to
On Saturday, 7 August 2021 at 00:31:34 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 17:34:32 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.097.2 point release,
Thanks Martin, much appreciated. Test results at Symmetry are
looking good.
Seems to work here too :)
On Sunday, 8 August 2021 at 11:30:41 UTC, james.p.leblanc wrote:
Hello,
With structs, I understand that "invariant checking" is called
(from dlang tour):
It's called after the constructor has run and before the
destructor is called.
It's called before entering a member function
Since the GC can sometimes cause delays that can make problems
for latency-sensitive programs, it may be useful to notice when
it has run.
To that end, I've adapted Brendan Gregg's killsnoop (
https://github.com/brendangregg/perf-tools/blob/master/killsnoop
) to `gcsnoop`, a tool to
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 10:19:47 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.097.0, ♥ to the 54 contributors.
This release comes with a new `std.sumtype` packcage, support
for `while (auto n = expression)`, an overhauled formatting
package, and many more changes.
On Tuesday, 18 May 2021 at 16:27:13 UTC, Alain De Vos wrote:
After each } i write a ;
And let the compiler tell me it is an empty instruction.
What are the general rules where ; is not needed after a }
Is `;` ever needed after a `}`?
I guess in `void delegate() dg = { writeln!"Hello World";
On Monday, 26 April 2021 at 14:01:37 UTC, sighoya wrote:
On Monday, 26 April 2021 at 13:17:49 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 21:27:55 UTC, sighoya wrote:
On Monday, 19 April 2021 at 06:37:03 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
Native CTFE and macros are a beautiful thing
On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 21:27:55 UTC, sighoya wrote:
On Monday, 19 April 2021 at 06:37:03 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
Native CTFE and macros are a beautiful thing though.
What did you mean with native?
When cx needs to execute a function at compiletime, it links it
into a shared object
On Monday, 19 April 2021 at 08:46:05 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I think the downsides are conceptual and technical, not social.
If you can implement a version counter then you get all kinds
of problems, like first compilation succeeding, then the second
compilation failing with no code
On Sunday, 18 April 2021 at 04:41:44 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grostad
wrote:
On Sunday, 18 April 2021 at 00:38:13 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I heard about safety issues around allowing full I/O during
compilation but then the following points kind of convinced me:
- If I am compiling a program, my goal
On Sunday, 18 April 2021 at 23:04:26 UTC, ShadoLight wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 April 2021 at 14:06:18 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 April 2021 at 13:43:20 UTC, Berni44 wrote:
[..]
Covariance is related ...
[..]
The opposite (contravariance) happens ...
[..]
Nice answer
On Wednesday, 14 April 2021 at 13:43:20 UTC, Berni44 wrote:
I'm trying to understand, what virtual functions are. I found
the
[specs](https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#virtual-functions), but I can't make head or tail of it.
- What is a `vtbl[]`? Obviously a function pointer table. But
On Monday, 1 March 2021 at 14:12:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/1/21 2:02 AM, FeepingCreature wrote:
On Sunday, 28 February 2021 at 11:56:28 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.096.0 release, ♥ to
the 53 contributors.
On Sunday, 28 February 2021 at 11:56:28 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.096.0 release, ♥ to
the 53 contributors.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.096.0.html
As usual please report any bugs at
https://issues.dlang.org
On Thursday, 25 February 2021 at 06:47:11 UTC, Mike wrote:
hi all,
If i have an array:
byte[3] = [1,2,3];
How to get string "123" from it?
Thanks in advance.
string str = format!"%(%s)"(array);
On Thursday, 25 February 2021 at 06:57:57 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
On Thursday, 25 February 2021 at 06:47:11 UTC, Mike wrote:
hi all,
If i have an array:
byte[3] = [1,2,3];
How to get string "123" from it?
Thanks in advance.
string str = format!"%(%s)"(array);
Er sorry, typo, that
On Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 18:07:49 UTC, JN wrote:
class Foo
{
}
void main()
{
Foo Foo = new Foo();
}
this kind of code compiles. Is this expected to compile?
Yes, why wouldn't it? main is a different scope than global; you
can override identifiers from global in main. And "Foo"
On Wednesday, 27 January 2021 at 02:14:39 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Yes, definitely try this. This will completely eliminate the
overhead of using an AA, which has to allocate memory (at
least) once per entry added. Especially since the data has to
be sorted eventually anyway, you might as well
On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 11:15:28 UTC, frame wrote:
After a while my program crashes.
I'm inspecting in the debugger that some strings are
overwritten after a struct is assigned to an associative array.
- I have disabled the GC.
- All happens in the same thread.
- The strings belong to
On Monday, 30 November 2020 at 14:33:22 UTC, realhet wrote:
Hi,
class A{
A parent;
A[] items;
void myDestroy(){
items.each!(i => i.myDestroy);
parent = null;
// after this point I think the GC will release it
automatically, and it will call ~this() too. Am I right?
}
}
I
yaaay
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 at 09:17:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I was on the verge to cutting the schedule down to one day, but
thanks to some last-minute submissions, looks like we'll have
enough content now to stretch across two days!
Thanks to everyone who submitted a proposal. I'll be in
On Sunday, 13 September 2020 at 19:16:24 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Yeah, I don't know the intention originally. But I have
definitely done exactly what the thread author stated (used
__traits(getMember) on all the module to look for certain
symbols). So my code would be broken too.
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 at 09:17:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I was on the verge to cutting the schedule down to one day, but
thanks to some last-minute submissions, looks like we'll have
enough content now to stretch across two days!
Yay! How close was it? Half the submissions in the
On Saturday, 5 September 2020 at 04:01:43 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 31 August 2020 at 08:36:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I've received exactly one submission for DConf Online. Two
keynotes + one talk does not make a conference.
So this is the last call. The deadline has been extended
On Wednesday, 19 August 2020 at 14:43:22 UTC, Victor Porton wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2020 at 14:06:16 UTC, Victor Porton
wrote:
This declaration does compile:
enum x;
But what is it? Is it an equivalent of
enum x { }
?
What in the specification allows this looking a nonsense
enum x;
On Wednesday, 19 August 2020 at 14:06:16 UTC, Victor Porton wrote:
This declaration does compile:
enum x;
But what is it? Is it an equivalent of
enum x { }
?
What in the specification allows this looking a nonsense
enum x;
?
It's an enum type whose members we don't know.
So we can't
On Tuesday, 4 August 2020 at 17:36:53 UTC, Michael Reese wrote:
Thanks for suggesting! I tried, and the union works as well,
i.e. the function args are registered. But I noticed another
thing about all workarounds so far:
Even if calls are inlined and arguments end up on the stack,
the linker
On Thursday, 25 June 2020 at 11:55:14 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Simen Kjærås outlines an approach to supporting head-mutable
types in D without the need for compiler or language changes.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/06/25/a-pattern-for-head-mutable-structures/
Reddit:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2020 at 12:39:11 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2020 at 12:30:24 UTC, Quantium wrote:
Hi all! I have a programm in D (The simplest OS), which should
be compiled into .bin or .iso format to be possible to run it
on VirtualBox. How can I compile it to
On Wednesday, 17 June 2020 at 12:30:24 UTC, Quantium wrote:
Hi all! I have a programm in D (The simplest OS), which should
be compiled into .bin or .iso format to be possible to run it
on VirtualBox. How can I compile it to .bin / .iso format and
which compiler should I use?
Try this page?
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 13:58:13 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
Because of the problems with checked exceptions they were
deliberately left out in C#. Here is an interview with Anders
Hejlsberg, the creator of C# at MS, where he explains the
reasons for this decision:
On Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 03:50:35 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/26/2020 4:46 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
But DIP1027 had a fatal flaw: it made type safety impossible.
I don't see how that is true.
Because it turned a format string into a list of built-in types
indistinguishable from
On Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 11:13:12 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 09:45:55 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
It is lowered to:
f("hello %s", a);
as designed. I don't know what's unwanted about it.
In all other languages with string interpolation
On Monday, 24 February 2020 at 22:11:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The semantics of an interpolated string must be defined by the
DIP, not deferred to some template. If the implementation of
those defined language features is done by a template, that is
an implementation choice, not part of the
On Monday, 17 February 2020 at 11:07:33 UTC, foozzer wrote:
Hi all,
There's something in Phobos for that?
Thank you
Here you go:
import std;
// extract the types that make up the tuple
auto transposeTuple(T : Tuple!Types[], Types...)(T tuples)
{
// templated function that extracts the
On Monday, 20 January 2020 at 06:48:08 UTC, DanielG wrote:
I can't seem to figure out what dub's dustmite command is
looking for with its regexes. No matter what I try - no matter
how simple - the initial test fails.
I am able to run dustmite standalone just fine with the
following test
On Monday, 11 November 2019 at 13:44:28 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
Now that dud can parse dub files, the next step will be a
semantic phase,
checking the input for errors.
After that, path expansion and dependency resolution.
PR's are always welcome.
Destroy!
[1]
On Tuesday, 29 October 2019 at 06:06:56 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 16:50:00 UTC, baz wrote:
What does the author of the deprecation think about this case
("feep" IIRC ) ?
Yeah that's a non-fix. It's a blind replacement of "a" with
"a.get" that ignores the fact
On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 16:50:00 UTC, baz wrote:
On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 16:38:30 UTC, baz wrote:
On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 15:04:34 UTC, drug wrote:
27.10.2019 17:20, baz пишет:
On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 12:59:52 UTC, baz wrote:
On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 06:02:33
On Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 18:02:28 UTC, Mario Kröplin wrote:
https://github.com/linkrope/oberon2d
is a simple tool that translates source code from Oberon to D.
It was intended to be thrown away after the resurrection of a
single Oberon project.
(So, don't expect too much.)
But then,
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
